summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt395
1 files changed, 395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..011056f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1091.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. VanBokkelen
+Request for Comments: 1091 FTP Software, Inc.
+Obsoletes: RFC 930 February 1989
+
+
+ Telnet Terminal-Type Option
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This RFC specifies a standard for the Internet community. Hosts on
+ the Internet that exchange terminal type information within the
+ Telnet protocol are expected to adopt and implement this standard.
+
+ This standard supersedes RFC 930. A change is made to permit cycling
+ through a list of possible terminal types and selecting the most
+ appropriate.
+
+ Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+1. Command Name and Code
+
+ TERMINAL-TYPE 24
+
+2. Command Meanings
+
+ IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Sender is willing to send terminal type information in a
+ subsequent sub-negotiation.
+
+ IAC WON'T TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Sender refuses to send terminal type information.
+
+ IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Sender is willing to receive terminal type information in a
+ subsequent sub-negotiation.
+
+ IAC DON'T TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Sender refuses to accept terminal type information.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 1]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+ IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Server requests client to transmit his (the client's) next
+ terminal type, and switch emulation modes (if more than one
+ terminal type is supported). The code for SEND is 1. (See
+ below.)
+
+ IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ... IAC SE
+
+ Client is stating the name of his current (or only) terminal
+ type. The code for IS is 0. (See below.)
+
+3. Default
+
+ WON'T TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Terminal type information will not be exchanged.
+
+ DON'T TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Terminal type information will not be exchanged.
+
+4. Motivation for the Option
+
+ On most machines with bit-mapped displays (e.g., PCs and graphics
+ workstations) a client terminal emulation program is used to simulate
+ a conventional ASCII terminal. Most of these programs have multiple
+ emulation modes, frequently with widely varying characteristics.
+ Likewise, modern host system software and applications can deal with
+ a variety of terminal types. What is needed is a means for the
+ client to present a list of available terminal emulation modes to the
+ server, from which the server can select the one it prefers (for
+ arbitrary reasons). There is also need for a mechanism to change
+ emulation modes during the course of a session, perhaps according to
+ the needs of applications programs.
+
+ Existing terminal-type passing mechanisms within Telnet were not
+ designed with multiple emulation modes in mind. While multiple names
+ are allowed, they are assumed to be synonyms. Emulation mode changes
+ are not defined, and the list of modes can only be scanned once.
+
+ This document defines a simple extension to the existing mechanisms,
+ which meets both of the above criteria. It makes one assumption
+ about the behaviour of implementations coded to the previous standard
+ in order to obtain full backwards-compatibility.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 2]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+5. Description of the Option
+
+ Willingness to exchange terminal-type information is agreed upon via
+ conventional Telnet option negotiation. WILL and DO are used only to
+ obtain and grant permission for future discussion. The actual
+ exchange of status information occurs within option subcommands (IAC
+ SB TERMINAL-TYPE...).
+
+ Once the two hosts have exchanged a WILL and a DO, the sender of the
+ DO TERMINAL-TYPE (the server) is free to request type information.
+ Only the server may send requests (IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE)
+ and only the client may transmit actual type information (within an
+ IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ... IAC SE command). Terminal type
+ information may not be sent spontaneously, but only in response to a
+ request.
+
+ The terminal type information is an NVT ASCII string. Within this
+ string, upper and lower case are considered equivalent. The complete
+ list of valid terminal type names can be found in the latest
+ "Assigned Numbers" RFC [4].
+
+ The transmission of terminal type information by the Telnet client in
+ response to a query from the Telnet server implies that the client
+ must simultaneously change emulation mode, unless the terminal type
+ sent is a synonym of the preceding terminal type, or there are other
+ prerequisites for entering the new regime (e.g., having agreed upon
+ the Telnet binary option). The receipt of such information by the
+ Telnet server does not imply any immediate change of processing.
+ However, the information may be passed to a process, which may alter
+ the data it sends to suit the particular characteristics of the
+ terminal. For example, some operating systems have a terminal driver
+ that accepts a code indicating the type of terminal being driven.
+ Using the TERMINAL TYPE and BINARY options, a telnet server program
+ on such a system could arrange to have terminals driven as if they
+ were directly connected, including special functions not available to
+ a standard Network Virtual Terminal.
+
+ Note that this specification is deliberately asymmetric. It is
+ assumed that server operating systems and applications in general
+ cannot change terminal types at arbitrary points in a session. Thus,
+ the client may only send a new type (and potentially change emulation
+ modes) when the server requests that it do so.
+
+6. Implementation Issues
+
+ The "terminal type" information may be any NVT ASCII string
+ meaningful to both ends of the negotiation. The list of terminal
+ type names in "Assigned Numbers" is intended to minimize confusion
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 3]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+ caused by alternative "spellings" of the terminal type. For example,
+ confusion would arise if one party were to call a terminal "IBM3278-
+ 2" while the other called it "IBM-3278/2". There is no negative
+ acknowledgement for a terminal type that is not understood, but
+ certain other options (such as switching to BINARY mode) may be
+ refused if a valid terminal type name has not been specified.
+
+ In some cases, either a particular terminal may be known by more than
+ one name, for example a specific type and a more generic type, or the
+ client may be a workstation with integrated display capable of
+ emulating more than one kind of terminal. In such cases, the sender
+ of the TERMINAL-TYPE IS command should reply to successive TERMINAL-
+ TYPE SEND commands with the various names. In this way, a telnet
+ server that does not understand the first response can prompt for
+ alternatives. If different terminal emulations are supported by the
+ client, the mode of the emulator must be changed to match the last
+ type sent, unless the particular emulation has other Telnet options
+ (e.g., BINARY) as prerequisites (in which case, the emulation will
+ switch to the last type sent when the prerequisite is fulfilled).
+ When types are synonyms, they should be sent in order from most to
+ least specific.
+
+ When the server (the receiver of the TERMINAL-TYPE IS) receives the
+ same response two consecutive times, this indicates the end of the
+ list of available types. Similarly, the client should indicate it
+ has sent all available names by repeating the last one sent. If an
+ additional request is received, this indicates that the server (the
+ sender of the IS) wishes to return to the top of the list of
+ available types (probably to select the least of N evils).
+
+ Server implementations conforming to the previous standard will cease
+ sending TERMINAL-TYPE SEND commands after receiving the same response
+ two consecutive times, which will work according to the old standard.
+ It is assumed that client implementations conforming to the previous
+ standard will send the last type on the list in response to a third
+ query (as well as the second). New-style servers must recognize this
+ and not send more queries.
+
+ The type "UNKNOWN" should be used if the type of the terminal is
+ unknown or unlikely to be recognized by the other party.
+
+ The complete and up-to-date list of terminal type names will be
+ maintained in the "Assigned Numbers". The maximum length of a
+ terminal type name is 40 characters.
+
+7. User Interfaces
+
+ Telnet clients and servers conforming to this specification should
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 4]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+ provide the following functions in their user interfaces:
+
+ Clients supporting multiple emulation modes should allow the user to
+ specify which of the modes is preferred (which name is sent first),
+ prior to connection establishment. The order of the names sent
+ cannot be changed after the negotiation has begun. This initial mode
+ will also become the default with servers which do not support
+ TERMINAL TYPE.
+
+ Servers should store the current terminal type name and the list of
+ available names in a manner such that they are accessible to both the
+ user (via a keyboard command) and any applications which need the
+ information. In addition, there should be a corresponding mechanism
+ to request a change of terminal types, by initiating a series of
+ SEND/IS sub-negotiations.
+
+8. Examples
+
+ In this example, the server finds the first type acceptable.
+
+ Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS IBM-3278-2 IAC SE
+
+ In this example, the server requests additional terminal types, and
+ accepts the second (and last on the client's list) type sent (RFC 930
+ compatible):
+
+ Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ZENITH-H19 IAC SE
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS UNKNOWN IAC SE
+
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 5]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS UNKNOWN IAC SE
+
+ In this example, the server requests additional terminal types, and
+ proceeds beyond the end-of-list, to select the first type offered by
+ the client (new-type client and server):
+
+ Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
+
+ (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT220 IAC SE
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT100 IAC SE
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT52 IAC SE
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT52 IAC SE
+
+ Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE
+
+ Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT220 IAC SE
+
+9. References:
+
+ [1] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
+ RFC 854, USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Option Specification",
+ RFC 855, USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.
+
+ [3] Solomon, M., and E. Wimmers, "Telnet Terminal Type Option",
+ RFC 930, University of Wisconsin - Madison, January 1985.
+
+ [4] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC 1010,
+ USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1987.
+
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 6]
+
+RFC 1091 Telnet Terminal-Type Option February 1989
+
+
+Reviser's note:
+
+ I owe much of this text to RFCs 884 and 930, by Marvin Solomon and
+ Edward Wimmers of the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and I owe
+ the idea of the extension to discussions on the "tn3270" mailing list
+ in the Summer of 1987.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ James VanBokkelen
+ FTP Software, Inc.
+ 26 Princess Street
+ Wakefield, MA 01880-3004
+
+ Phone: (617) 246-0900
+
+ Email: jbvb@ftp.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+VanBokkelen [Page 7]
+ \ No newline at end of file