diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt | 619 |
1 files changed, 619 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e00113b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1350.txt @@ -0,0 +1,619 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group K. Sollins +Request For Comments: 1350 MIT +STD: 33 July 1992 +Obsoletes: RFC 783 + + + THE TFTP PROTOCOL (REVISION 2) + +Status of this Memo + + This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet + community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. + Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol + Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. + Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Summary + + TFTP is a very simple protocol used to transfer files. It is from + this that its name comes, Trivial File Transfer Protocol or TFTP. + Each nonterminal packet is acknowledged separately. This document + describes the protocol and its types of packets. The document also + explains the reasons behind some of the design decisions. + +Acknowlegements + + The protocol was originally designed by Noel Chiappa, and was + redesigned by him, Bob Baldwin and Dave Clark, with comments from + Steve Szymanski. The current revision of the document includes + modifications stemming from discussions with and suggestions from + Larry Allen, Noel Chiappa, Dave Clark, Geoff Cooper, Mike Greenwald, + Liza Martin, David Reed, Craig Milo Rogers (of USC-ISI), Kathy + Yellick, and the author. The acknowledgement and retransmission + scheme was inspired by TCP, and the error mechanism was suggested by + PARC's EFTP abort message. + + The May, 1992 revision to fix the "Sorcerer's Apprentice" protocol + bug [4] and other minor document problems was done by Noel Chiappa. + + This research was supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency + of the Department of Defense and was monitored by the Office of Naval + Research under contract number N00014-75-C-0661. + +1. Purpose + + TFTP is a simple protocol to transfer files, and therefore was named + the Trivial File Transfer Protocol or TFTP. It has been implemented + on top of the Internet User Datagram protocol (UDP or Datagram) [2] + + + +Sollins [Page 1] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + so it may be used to move files between machines on different + networks implementing UDP. (This should not exclude the possibility + of implementing TFTP on top of other datagram protocols.) It is + designed to be small and easy to implement. Therefore, it lacks most + of the features of a regular FTP. The only thing it can do is read + and write files (or mail) from/to a remote server. It cannot list + directories, and currently has no provisions for user authentication. + In common with other Internet protocols, it passes 8 bit bytes of + data. + + Three modes of transfer are currently supported: netascii (This is + ascii as defined in "USA Standard Code for Information Interchange" + [1] with the modifications specified in "Telnet Protocol + Specification" [3].) Note that it is 8 bit ascii. The term + "netascii" will be used throughout this document to mean this + particular version of ascii.); octet (This replaces the "binary" mode + of previous versions of this document.) raw 8 bit bytes; mail, + netascii characters sent to a user rather than a file. (The mail + mode is obsolete and should not be implemented or used.) Additional + modes can be defined by pairs of cooperating hosts. + + Reference [4] (section 4.2) should be consulted for further valuable + directives and suggestions on TFTP. + +2. Overview of the Protocol + + Any transfer begins with a request to read or write a file, which + also serves to request a connection. If the server grants the + request, the connection is opened and the file is sent in fixed + length blocks of 512 bytes. Each data packet contains one block of + data, and must be acknowledged by an acknowledgment packet before the + next packet can be sent. A data packet of less than 512 bytes + signals termination of a transfer. If a packet gets lost in the + network, the intended recipient will timeout and may retransmit his + last packet (which may be data or an acknowledgment), thus causing + the sender of the lost packet to retransmit that lost packet. The + sender has to keep just one packet on hand for retransmission, since + the lock step acknowledgment guarantees that all older packets have + been received. Notice that both machines involved in a transfer are + considered senders and receivers. One sends data and receives + acknowledgments, the other sends acknowledgments and receives data. + + Most errors cause termination of the connection. An error is + signalled by sending an error packet. This packet is not + acknowledged, and not retransmitted (i.e., a TFTP server or user may + terminate after sending an error message), so the other end of the + connection may not get it. Therefore timeouts are used to detect + such a termination when the error packet has been lost. Errors are + + + +Sollins [Page 2] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + caused by three types of events: not being able to satisfy the + request (e.g., file not found, access violation, or no such user), + receiving a packet which cannot be explained by a delay or + duplication in the network (e.g., an incorrectly formed packet), and + losing access to a necessary resource (e.g., disk full or access + denied during a transfer). + + TFTP recognizes only one error condition that does not cause + termination, the source port of a received packet being incorrect. + In this case, an error packet is sent to the originating host. + + This protocol is very restrictive, in order to simplify + implementation. For example, the fixed length blocks make allocation + straight forward, and the lock step acknowledgement provides flow + control and eliminates the need to reorder incoming data packets. + +3. Relation to other Protocols + + As mentioned TFTP is designed to be implemented on top of the + Datagram protocol (UDP). Since Datagram is implemented on the + Internet protocol, packets will have an Internet header, a Datagram + header, and a TFTP header. Additionally, the packets may have a + header (LNI, ARPA header, etc.) to allow them through the local + transport medium. As shown in Figure 3-1, the order of the contents + of a packet will be: local medium header, if used, Internet header, + Datagram header, TFTP header, followed by the remainder of the TFTP + packet. (This may or may not be data depending on the type of packet + as specified in the TFTP header.) TFTP does not specify any of the + values in the Internet header. On the other hand, the source and + destination port fields of the Datagram header (its format is given + in the appendix) are used by TFTP and the length field reflects the + size of the TFTP packet. The transfer identifiers (TID's) used by + TFTP are passed to the Datagram layer to be used as ports; therefore + they must be between 0 and 65,535. The initialization of TID's is + discussed in the section on initial connection protocol. + + The TFTP header consists of a 2 byte opcode field which indicates + the packet's type (e.g., DATA, ERROR, etc.) These opcodes and the + formats of the various types of packets are discussed further in the + section on TFTP packets. + + + + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 3] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + --------------------------------------------------- + | Local Medium | Internet | Datagram | TFTP | + --------------------------------------------------- + + Figure 3-1: Order of Headers + + +4. Initial Connection Protocol + + A transfer is established by sending a request (WRQ to write onto a + foreign file system, or RRQ to read from it), and receiving a + positive reply, an acknowledgment packet for write, or the first data + packet for read. In general an acknowledgment packet will contain + the block number of the data packet being acknowledged. Each data + packet has associated with it a block number; block numbers are + consecutive and begin with one. Since the positive response to a + write request is an acknowledgment packet, in this special case the + block number will be zero. (Normally, since an acknowledgment packet + is acknowledging a data packet, the acknowledgment packet will + contain the block number of the data packet being acknowledged.) If + the reply is an error packet, then the request has been denied. + + In order to create a connection, each end of the connection chooses a + TID for itself, to be used for the duration of that connection. The + TID's chosen for a connection should be randomly chosen, so that the + probability that the same number is chosen twice in immediate + succession is very low. Every packet has associated with it the two + TID's of the ends of the connection, the source TID and the + destination TID. These TID's are handed to the supporting UDP (or + other datagram protocol) as the source and destination ports. A + requesting host chooses its source TID as described above, and sends + its initial request to the known TID 69 decimal (105 octal) on the + serving host. The response to the request, under normal operation, + uses a TID chosen by the server as its source TID and the TID chosen + for the previous message by the requestor as its destination TID. + The two chosen TID's are then used for the remainder of the transfer. + + As an example, the following shows the steps used to establish a + connection to write a file. Note that WRQ, ACK, and DATA are the + names of the write request, acknowledgment, and data types of packets + respectively. The appendix contains a similar example for reading a + file. + + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 4] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + 1. Host A sends a "WRQ" to host B with source= A's TID, + destination= 69. + + 2. Host B sends a "ACK" (with block number= 0) to host A with + source= B's TID, destination= A's TID. + + At this point the connection has been established and the first data + packet can be sent by Host A with a sequence number of 1. In the + next step, and in all succeeding steps, the hosts should make sure + that the source TID matches the value that was agreed on in steps 1 + and 2. If a source TID does not match, the packet should be + discarded as erroneously sent from somewhere else. An error packet + should be sent to the source of the incorrect packet, while not + disturbing the transfer. This can be done only if the TFTP in fact + receives a packet with an incorrect TID. If the supporting protocols + do not allow it, this particular error condition will not arise. + + The following example demonstrates a correct operation of the + protocol in which the above situation can occur. Host A sends a + request to host B. Somewhere in the network, the request packet is + duplicated, and as a result two acknowledgments are returned to host + A, with different TID's chosen on host B in response to the two + requests. When the first response arrives, host A continues the + connection. When the second response to the request arrives, it + should be rejected, but there is no reason to terminate the first + connection. Therefore, if different TID's are chosen for the two + connections on host B and host A checks the source TID's of the + messages it receives, the first connection can be maintained while + the second is rejected by returning an error packet. + +5. TFTP Packets + + TFTP supports five types of packets, all of which have been mentioned + above: + + opcode operation + 1 Read request (RRQ) + 2 Write request (WRQ) + 3 Data (DATA) + 4 Acknowledgment (ACK) + 5 Error (ERROR) + + The TFTP header of a packet contains the opcode associated with + that packet. + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 5] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + 2 bytes string 1 byte string 1 byte + ------------------------------------------------ + | Opcode | Filename | 0 | Mode | 0 | + ------------------------------------------------ + + Figure 5-1: RRQ/WRQ packet + + + RRQ and WRQ packets (opcodes 1 and 2 respectively) have the format + shown in Figure 5-1. The file name is a sequence of bytes in + netascii terminated by a zero byte. The mode field contains the + string "netascii", "octet", or "mail" (or any combination of upper + and lower case, such as "NETASCII", NetAscii", etc.) in netascii + indicating the three modes defined in the protocol. A host which + receives netascii mode data must translate the data to its own + format. Octet mode is used to transfer a file that is in the 8-bit + format of the machine from which the file is being transferred. It + is assumed that each type of machine has a single 8-bit format that + is more common, and that that format is chosen. For example, on a + DEC-20, a 36 bit machine, this is four 8-bit bytes to a word with + four bits of breakage. If a host receives a octet file and then + returns it, the returned file must be identical to the original. + Mail mode uses the name of a mail recipient in place of a file and + must begin with a WRQ. Otherwise it is identical to netascii mode. + The mail recipient string should be of the form "username" or + "username@hostname". If the second form is used, it allows the + option of mail forwarding by a relay computer. + + The discussion above assumes that both the sender and recipient are + operating in the same mode, but there is no reason that this has to + be the case. For example, one might build a storage server. There + is no reason that such a machine needs to translate netascii into its + own form of text. Rather, the sender might send files in netascii, + but the storage server might simply store them without translation in + 8-bit format. Another such situation is a problem that currently + exists on DEC-20 systems. Neither netascii nor octet accesses all + the bits in a word. One might create a special mode for such a + machine which read all the bits in a word, but in which the receiver + stored the information in 8-bit format. When such a file is + retrieved from the storage site, it must be restored to its original + form to be useful, so the reverse mode must also be implemented. The + user site will have to remember some information to achieve this. In + both of these examples, the request packets would specify octet mode + to the foreign host, but the local host would be in some other mode. + No such machine or application specific modes have been specified in + TFTP, but one would be compatible with this specification. + + It is also possible to define other modes for cooperating pairs of + + + +Sollins [Page 6] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + hosts, although this must be done with care. There is no requirement + that any other hosts implement these. There is no central authority + that will define these modes or assign them names. + + + 2 bytes 2 bytes n bytes + ---------------------------------- + | Opcode | Block # | Data | + ---------------------------------- + + Figure 5-2: DATA packet + + + Data is actually transferred in DATA packets depicted in Figure 5-2. + DATA packets (opcode = 3) have a block number and data field. The + block numbers on data packets begin with one and increase by one for + each new block of data. This restriction allows the program to use a + single number to discriminate between new packets and duplicates. + The data field is from zero to 512 bytes long. If it is 512 bytes + long, the block is not the last block of data; if it is from zero to + 511 bytes long, it signals the end of the transfer. (See the section + on Normal Termination for details.) + + All packets other than duplicate ACK's and those used for + termination are acknowledged unless a timeout occurs [4]. Sending a + DATA packet is an acknowledgment for the first ACK packet of the + previous DATA packet. The WRQ and DATA packets are acknowledged by + ACK or ERROR packets, while RRQ + + + 2 bytes 2 bytes + --------------------- + | Opcode | Block # | + --------------------- + + Figure 5-3: ACK packet + + + and ACK packets are acknowledged by DATA or ERROR packets. Figure + 5-3 depicts an ACK packet; the opcode is 4. The block number in + an ACK echoes the block number of the DATA packet being + acknowledged. A WRQ is acknowledged with an ACK packet having a + block number of zero. + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 7] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + + 2 bytes 2 bytes string 1 byte + ----------------------------------------- + | Opcode | ErrorCode | ErrMsg | 0 | + ----------------------------------------- + + Figure 5-4: ERROR packet + + + An ERROR packet (opcode 5) takes the form depicted in Figure 5-4. An + ERROR packet can be the acknowledgment of any other type of packet. + The error code is an integer indicating the nature of the error. A + table of values and meanings is given in the appendix. (Note that + several error codes have been added to this version of this + document.) The error message is intended for human consumption, and + should be in netascii. Like all other strings, it is terminated with + a zero byte. + +6. Normal Termination + + The end of a transfer is marked by a DATA packet that contains + between 0 and 511 bytes of data (i.e., Datagram length < 516). This + packet is acknowledged by an ACK packet like all other DATA packets. + The host acknowledging the final DATA packet may terminate its side + of the connection on sending the final ACK. On the other hand, + dallying is encouraged. This means that the host sending the final + ACK will wait for a while before terminating in order to retransmit + the final ACK if it has been lost. The acknowledger will know that + the ACK has been lost if it receives the final DATA packet again. + The host sending the last DATA must retransmit it until the packet is + acknowledged or the sending host times out. If the response is an + ACK, the transmission was completed successfully. If the sender of + the data times out and is not prepared to retransmit any more, the + transfer may still have been completed successfully, after which the + acknowledger or network may have experienced a problem. It is also + possible in this case that the transfer was unsuccessful. In any + case, the connection has been closed. + +7. Premature Termination + + If a request can not be granted, or some error occurs during the + transfer, then an ERROR packet (opcode 5) is sent. This is only a + courtesy since it will not be retransmitted or acknowledged, so it + may never be received. Timeouts must also be used to detect errors. + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 8] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + +I. Appendix + +Order of Headers + + 2 bytes + ---------------------------------------------------------- + | Local Medium | Internet | Datagram | TFTP Opcode | + ---------------------------------------------------------- + +TFTP Formats + + Type Op # Format without header + + 2 bytes string 1 byte string 1 byte + ----------------------------------------------- + RRQ/ | 01/02 | Filename | 0 | Mode | 0 | + WRQ ----------------------------------------------- + 2 bytes 2 bytes n bytes + --------------------------------- + DATA | 03 | Block # | Data | + --------------------------------- + 2 bytes 2 bytes + ------------------- + ACK | 04 | Block # | + -------------------- + 2 bytes 2 bytes string 1 byte + ---------------------------------------- + ERROR | 05 | ErrorCode | ErrMsg | 0 | + ---------------------------------------- + +Initial Connection Protocol for reading a file + + 1. Host A sends a "RRQ" to host B with source= A's TID, + destination= 69. + + 2. Host B sends a "DATA" (with block number= 1) to host A with + source= B's TID, destination= A's TID. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 9] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + +Error Codes + + Value Meaning + + 0 Not defined, see error message (if any). + 1 File not found. + 2 Access violation. + 3 Disk full or allocation exceeded. + 4 Illegal TFTP operation. + 5 Unknown transfer ID. + 6 File already exists. + 7 No such user. + +Internet User Datagram Header [2] + + (This has been included only for convenience. TFTP need not be + implemented on top of the Internet User Datagram Protocol.) + + Format + + 0 1 2 3 + 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | Source Port | Destination Port | + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | Length | Checksum | + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + + + Values of Fields + + + Source Port Picked by originator of packet. + + Dest. Port Picked by destination machine (69 for RRQ or WRQ). + + Length Number of bytes in UDP packet, including UDP header. + + Checksum Reference 2 describes rules for computing checksum. + (The implementor of this should be sure that the + correct algorithm is used here.) + Field contains zero if unused. + + Note: TFTP passes transfer identifiers (TID's) to the Internet User + Datagram protocol to be used as the source and destination ports. + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 10] + +RFC 1350 TFTP Revision 2 July 1992 + + +References + + [1] USA Standard Code for Information Interchange, USASI X3.4-1968. + + [2] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol," RFC 768, USC/Information + Sciences Institute, 28 August 1980. + + [3] Postel, J., "Telnet Protocol Specification," RFC 764, + USC/Information Sciences Institute, June, 1980. + + [4] Braden, R., Editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts -- + Application and Support", RFC 1123, USC/Information Sciences + Institute, October 1989. + +Security Considerations + + Since TFTP includes no login or access control mechanisms, care must + be taken in the rights granted to a TFTP server process so as not to + violate the security of the server hosts file system. TFTP is often + installed with controls such that only files that have public read + access are available via TFTP and writing files via TFTP is + disallowed. + +Author's Address + + Karen R. Sollins + Massachusetts Institute of Technology + Laboratory for Computer Science + 545 Technology Square + Cambridge, MA 02139-1986 + + Phone: (617) 253-6006 + + EMail: SOLLINS@LCS.MIT.EDU + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Sollins [Page 11] +
\ No newline at end of file |