summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt283
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..549ae56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc2143.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group B. Elliston
+Request for Comments: 2143 Compucat Research
+Category: Experimental May 1997
+
+
+ Encapsulating IP with the Small Computer System Interface
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
+ community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any
+ kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
+ Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
+ 2. Brief background to the Small Computer System Interface . 2
+ 3. Link Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 4. An Address Resolution Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 5. Scalability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 6. Possible applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 7. Security considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 9. Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ As the capacity of local area networks increases to meet the demands
+ of high volume application data, there is a class of network
+ intensive problems which may be applied to small clusters of
+ workstations with high bandwidth interconnection.
+
+ A general observation of networks is that the bit rate of the data
+ path typically decreases as the distance between hosts increases. It
+ is common to see regional networks connected at a rate of 64Kbps and
+ office networks connected at 100Mbps, but the inverse is far less
+ common.
+
+ The same is true of peripheral and memory interconnection. Memory
+ close to a CPU's core may run at speeds equivalent to a gigabit
+ network. More importantly, devices such as disks may connect a
+ number of metres away from its host at speeds well in excess of
+ current local area network capacity.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Elliston Experimental [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2143 Encapsulating IP with the SCSI May 1997
+
+
+ This document outlines a protocol for connecting hosts running the
+ TCP/IP protocol suite over a Small Computer System Interface (SCSI)
+ bus. Despite the limitation in the furthest distance between hosts,
+ SCSI permits close clusters of workstations to communicate between
+ each other at speeds approaching 360 megabits per second.
+
+ The proposed introduction of newer SCSI implementations such as
+ serial SCSI will bring much faster communication at greater
+ distances.
+
+2. Background to the Small Computer System Interface (SCSI)
+
+ SCSI defines a physical and data link protocol for connecting
+ peripherals to hosts. Devices connect autonomously to a bus and send
+ synchronous or asynchronous messages to other devices.
+
+ Devices are identified by a numeric identifier (ID). For the
+ original SCSI protocol, devices are given a user-selectable SCSI ID
+ between 0 and 7. Wide SCSI specifies a range of SCSI IDs between 0
+ and 15. The most typical SCSI configuration comprises of a host
+ adapter and one or more SCSI- capable peripherals responding to
+ asynchronous messages from the host adapter.
+
+ The most critical aspect of the protocol with respect to its use as a
+ data link for the Internet protocols is that a SCSI device must act
+ as an "initiator" (generator of SCSI commands/requests) or a "target"
+ (a device which responds to SCSI commands from the initiator). This
+ model is correct for a master/slave relationship between host adapter
+ and devices. The only time an initiator receives a message addressed
+ to it is in response to a command issued by it in the past and a
+ target device always generates a response to every command it
+ receives.
+
+ Clearly this is unsuitable for the peer-to-peer model required for
+ multiple host adapters to asynchronously send SCSI commands to one
+ another without surplus bus traffic. Furthermore, some host adapters
+ may refuse to accept a message from another adapter as it expects to
+ only initiate SCSI commands. This restriction to the protocol
+ requires that SCSI adapters used for IP encapsulation support what is
+ known as "target mode", with software device driver support to pass
+ these messages up to higher layer modules for processing.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Elliston Experimental [Page 2]
+
+RFC 2143 Encapsulating IP with the SCSI May 1997
+
+
+3. Link Encapsulation
+
+ The ANSI SCSI standard defines classes of peripherals which may be
+ interconnected with the SCSI protocol. One of these is the class of
+ "communication devices" [1].
+
+ The standard defines three message types capable of carrying a
+ general-purpose payload across communication devices. Each of these
+ are known as the "SEND MESSAGE" message type, but the size and and
+ structure of the message header differs amongst them. The three
+ forms of message header are six (6), ten (10) and twelve (12) bytes
+ long.
+
+ It was decided that the ten byte header offers the greatest
+ flexibility for encapsulating version 4 IP datagrams for the
+ following reasons:
+
+ a. The transfer length field is 16 bits in size which is perfectly
+ matched to the datagram length field in IP version 4.
+ Implementations of IP will run efficiently as datagrams will
+ never be fragmented over SCSI networks.
+
+ b. The SCSI "stream select" field, which was designed to permit
+ a device to specify the stream of data to which a block
+ belongs, may be used to encode the payload type (in a similar
+ manner to the Ethernet frame type field). For consistency, the
+ lowest four bits of the "stream select" field should match the
+ set of values assigned by the IEEE for Ethernet protocol types.
+
+ Encapsulating an IP datagram within a SCSI message is
+ straightforward:
+
+ +------------------+-----------------------------------+
+ | SCSI header | IP datagram |
+ +------------------+-----------------------------------+
+
+ The fields of the SCSI header should be completed as follows:
+
+ Byte 0: 0x2A (SEND_MESSAGE(10) opcode)
+ Byte 1: Logical unit number encoded into top 3 bits | 0x00
+ Byte 2: 0x00
+ Byte 3: 0x00
+ Byte 4: 0x00
+ Byte 5: Protocol type encoded into lowest 4 bits | 0x00
+ Byte 6: 0x00
+ Bytes 7/8: IP datagram length, big endian representation
+ Byte 9: 0x00
+
+
+
+
+Elliston Experimental [Page 3]
+
+RFC 2143 Encapsulating IP with the SCSI May 1997
+
+
+4. An Address Resolution Protocol
+
+ When IP decides that the next hop for a datagram will be onto a SCSI
+ network supported by a SCSI IP network interface implementation, it
+ is necessary to acquire a data link address to deliver the datagram.
+
+ Network interfaces such as Ethernet have well-known methods for
+ acquiring the media address for an Internet protocol address, the
+ most common being the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP). In existing
+ implementations, the forwarding host "yells" using a broadcast media
+ address and expects the named host to respond.
+
+ The SCSI protocol does not provide a broadcast data link address. An
+ acceptable solution to the address resolution problem for a SCSI
+ network is to simulate a broadcast by performing a series of round-
+ robin transmissions to each target. Depending on the SCSI protocol
+ being used, this would require upward of seven independent bus
+ accesses. This is not grossly inefficient, however, if combined with
+ an effective ARP caching policy. A further possible optimisation is
+ negative ARP caching, whereby incomplete ARP bindings are not queried
+ for some period in the future.
+
+5. Scalability
+
+ While the utility of a network architecture based around a bus
+ network which can span less than ten metres and support only eight
+ hosts may be questionable, the flexibility of IP and in particular,
+ IP routing, improves the scalability of this architecture.
+
+ Consider a network of eight hosts connected to a SCSI bus in which
+ each host acts as a multi-homed host with a second host adapter
+ connecting another seven hosts to it. When configured with IP packet
+ routing capability, each of the 64 total hosts may communicate with
+ one another at high speed in a packet switched manner.
+
+ Depending on the I/O bus capabilities of certain workstations, it may
+ also be possible to configure a multi-homed host with a greater
+ number of SCSI host adapters, permitting centralised star
+ configurations to be constructed.
+
+ It should be apparent that for little expense, massively parallel
+ virtual machines can be built based upon the IP protocol running over
+ the high-bandwidth SCSI protocol.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Elliston Experimental [Page 4]
+
+RFC 2143 Encapsulating IP with the SCSI May 1997
+
+
+6. Possible Applications
+
+ Research has been made into the capability of "networks of
+ workstations", and their performance compared to supercomputers. An
+ observation that has been made thus far is that bottlenecks exist in
+ the channels by which executable code is transported between hosts
+ for execution. A very high-speed network architecture based around
+ the Internet protocol would permit a seamless transition of existing
+ application software to a high-bandwidth environment.
+
+ Other applications that have been considered are server clusters for
+ fault-tolerant NFS, World-Wide Web and database services.
+
+7. Security Considerations
+
+ Transmitting IP datagrams across a SCSI bus raises similar security
+ issues to other local area networking architectures. The scale of
+ security problems relating to protocols above the data link layer
+ should be obvious to a reader current in Internet security.
+
+8. References
+
+ [1] ANSI X3T9 Technical Committee, "Small Computer System
+ Interface - 2", X3T9.2, Project 375D, Revision 10L, September
+ 1993.
+
+9. Author's Address
+
+ Ben Elliston
+ Compucat Research Pty Limited
+ Box 7305 Canberra Mail Centre
+ Canberra ACT 2610
+ Australia
+
+ Phone: +61 6 295 1331
+ Fax: +61 6 295 1855
+ Email: ben.elliston@compucat.com.au
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Elliston Experimental [Page 5]
+