summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc255.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc255.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc255.txt115
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f9e52af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group Ellen Wentheimer
+Request for Comments: 255 Bolt, Beranek and Newman
+Updates: 252 October 26, 1971
+NIC: 7696
+
+
+ This RFC reports on the status of most Network Hosts from October 12
+ to October 22. (Monday, October 11 was Columbus Day.) During these
+ two weeks, the general status of these Hosts remained as it had been
+ previously.
+
+ The table on the following page summarizes the daily information on
+ Host status for this period.
+
+ NETWORK SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (Eastern)
+ ADDRESS T W TH F M
+ 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/18
+ 1530 1600 1600 1700 1730
+ 1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O O O O O
+ 65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O O O O O
+ 2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 O O #T O O
+ 66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D D
+ 3 UCSB IBM-360/75 O O O O O
+ 4 UTAH PDP-10 T D T D D
+ 69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 D D O O D
+ 6 MIT(Multics) H-645 O D R T T
+ 70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 T D T T D
+ 8 SDC IBM-360-67 D D D D D
+ 9 HARVARD PDP-10 O D D D D
+ 10 LINCOLN IBM-360-67 D D D H D
+
+
+ NETWORK SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (Eastern)
+ ADDRESS T W TH F
+ 10/19 10/20 10/21 10/22
+ 1630 1230 1330 1430
+ 1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O O O O
+ 65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O O O O
+ 2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 T O O O
+ 66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D
+ 3 UCSB IBM-360/75 O O D O
+ 4 UTAH PDP-10 T D T D
+ 69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 D O O O
+ 6 MIT(Multics) H-645 T D D O
+ 70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 D H H H
+ 8 SDC IBM-360-67 D D D D
+ 9 HARVARD PDP-10 D D D D
+ 10 LINCOLN IBM-360-67 D H T H
+
+
+
+Wentheimer [Page 1]
+
+RFC 255 October 1971
+
+
+ where
+
+ D = Dead (Destination Host either dead or inaccessible [due to
+ network partitioning or local IMP failure] from the BBN Terminal
+ IMP.)
+
+ R = Refused (Destination Host returned a CLS to the initial RFC.)
+
+ T = Timed out (Destination Host did not respond in any way to the
+ initial RFC, although not dead.)
+
+ H = 1/2 Open (Destination Host opened a connection but then
+ either immediately closed it, or did not respond any further.)
+
+ O = Opened (Destination Host opened a connection and was
+ accessible to user.)
+
+ * The UCLA IMB-360/91 currently has Remote Job Service (NETRJS),
+ but has not implemented a full server Telnet System. The BBN
+ Terminal IMP is not equipped to test NETRJS however, we are
+ assuming that receipt of the UCLA explanatory message indicates
+ that NETRJS is also functioning.
+
+ # These sites advertise that they may not have their system
+ available at these times.
+
+
+
+ [This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry]
+ [into the online RFC archives by Kelly Tardif, Viagenie 10/99]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Wentheimer [Page 2]
+