diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc255.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc255.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc255.txt | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f9e52af --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc255.txt @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group Ellen Wentheimer +Request for Comments: 255 Bolt, Beranek and Newman +Updates: 252 October 26, 1971 +NIC: 7696 + + + This RFC reports on the status of most Network Hosts from October 12 + to October 22. (Monday, October 11 was Columbus Day.) During these + two weeks, the general status of these Hosts remained as it had been + previously. + + The table on the following page summarizes the daily information on + Host status for this period. + + NETWORK SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (Eastern) + ADDRESS T W TH F M + 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15 10/18 + 1530 1600 1600 1700 1730 + 1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O O O O O + 65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O O O O O + 2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 O O #T O O + 66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D D + 3 UCSB IBM-360/75 O O O O O + 4 UTAH PDP-10 T D T D D + 69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 D D O O D + 6 MIT(Multics) H-645 O D R T T + 70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 T D T T D + 8 SDC IBM-360-67 D D D D D + 9 HARVARD PDP-10 O D D D D + 10 LINCOLN IBM-360-67 D D D H D + + + NETWORK SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (Eastern) + ADDRESS T W TH F + 10/19 10/20 10/21 10/22 + 1630 1230 1330 1430 + 1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O O O O + 65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O O O O + 2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 T O O O + 66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D + 3 UCSB IBM-360/75 O O D O + 4 UTAH PDP-10 T D T D + 69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 D O O O + 6 MIT(Multics) H-645 T D D O + 70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 D H H H + 8 SDC IBM-360-67 D D D D + 9 HARVARD PDP-10 D D D D + 10 LINCOLN IBM-360-67 D H T H + + + +Wentheimer [Page 1] + +RFC 255 October 1971 + + + where + + D = Dead (Destination Host either dead or inaccessible [due to + network partitioning or local IMP failure] from the BBN Terminal + IMP.) + + R = Refused (Destination Host returned a CLS to the initial RFC.) + + T = Timed out (Destination Host did not respond in any way to the + initial RFC, although not dead.) + + H = 1/2 Open (Destination Host opened a connection but then + either immediately closed it, or did not respond any further.) + + O = Opened (Destination Host opened a connection and was + accessible to user.) + + * The UCLA IMB-360/91 currently has Remote Job Service (NETRJS), + but has not implemented a full server Telnet System. The BBN + Terminal IMP is not equipped to test NETRJS however, we are + assuming that receipt of the UCLA explanatory message indicates + that NETRJS is also functioning. + + # These sites advertise that they may not have their system + available at these times. + + + + [This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry] + [into the online RFC archives by Kelly Tardif, Viagenie 10/99] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Wentheimer [Page 2] + |