summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt451
1 files changed, 451 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..081190e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc2690.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,451 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group S. Bradner
+Request for Comments: 2690 Harvard University
+Category: Informational September 1999
+
+
+ A Proposal for an MOU-Based ICANN Protocol Support Organization
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
+ not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
+ memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
+
+1. Abstract
+
+ This is a copy of the proposal for an MOU-based Protocol Supporting
+ Organization that was submitted to ICANN on April 23, 1999.
+
+2. Cover Letter
+
+ This is a copy of the cover letter that was used to submit the draft
+ to ICANN.
+
+ Dear Esther,
+
+ Enclosed please find a description of a proposed Protocol
+ Support Organization (PSO) for ICANN's consideration. This
+ description is purposefully informal as it is meant to be a basis for
+ discussion and not a final formal legal document.
+
+ This proposal was developed primarily by using the open
+ Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) poisson working group mailing
+ list to discuss successive versions of the proposal. In addition the
+ proposal has benefited from extensive discussion within the IETF's
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) and Internet Architecture
+ Board (IAB). The proposal also benefited from extended discussions
+ with representatives of the International Telecommunication Union
+ (ITU) and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
+
+ I look forward to ICANN's evaluation of this proposal and am
+ also looking forward to the MOU development meeting noted in section
+ 1.c of the proposal.
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+ Thanks
+
+ Scott
+
+3. Proposal for a MOU-based PSO
+
+ ICANN Protocol Supporting Organization
+
+ 1. Definition of the PSO.
+
+ a. Purpose.
+
+ The Protocol Support Organization (PSO) will be a consensus-
+ based advisory body within the ICANN framework.
+
+ b. Components.
+
+ The PSO will establish a "Protocol Council" and host an annual
+ open meeting (known as the "General Assembly" (described
+ below)).
+
+ c. Creation through a Memorandum of Understanding.
+
+ Arrangements regarding the PSO are to be reflected in a
+ Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among ICANN and a group of
+ open international Internet related standards development
+ organizations (SDOs). SDOs must satisfy a set of objective
+ criteria before they can be considered for membership. (see
+ Appendix A) After ICANN has accepted a proposal for an ICANN
+ PSO, including the SDO criteria, a meeting, open to all SDOs
+ that believe they meet the criteria, will be held to develop
+ the MOU.
+
+ All existing MOU signatories must agree to the admission of new
+ signatories. Rejected applicants can appeal to the ICANN Board
+ where a 2/3rds majority can override such a rejection if the
+ board finds the SDO meets the criteria.
+
+ 2. The Protocol Council
+
+ a. Members
+
+ The Protocol Council will have up to [12] individual members
+ selected by the SDO signatories of the MOU. (see below)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+ b. Term
+
+ The term of Protocol Council members will be 2 years. Removal
+ will be pursuant to procedures established through the MOU.
+ (Initial terms will be 1 and 2 years to provide initial
+ conditions for staggered terms.)
+
+ c. Powers/Duties of the Protocol Council
+
+ i Appointment of ICANN Directors
+
+ The Protocol Council will nominate 3 Directors to the ICANN
+ Board (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 4(iii)). The initial directors
+ would have terms of 1, 2 and 3 years (By-laws, Art. V, Sec.
+ 9(d)
+
+ The Protocol Council will conduct an open call for
+ nominations for any open PSO seats on the ICANN board. Each
+ SDO signatory to the MOU is entitled to nominate candidates
+ by procedures of its own choosing. Additionally,
+ nominations from the public at large should be allowed
+ under conditions to be defined by the Protocol Council.
+
+ The Protocol Council will select the PSO nominees to the
+ ICANN board from among these nominees by a means of its own
+ choosing.
+
+ ii Qualifications of ICANN Directors
+
+ No more than 2 PSO-nominated Directors may come from the
+ same geographic region.
+
+ iii Role of ICANN Directors
+
+ The Directors appointed by the Protocol Council will not
+ represent the PSO on the Board, but will function as full
+ Directors of ICANN. (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 8)
+
+ iv Advisory Role
+
+ The Protocol Council will advise the Board of ICANN on
+ matters referred to the Protocol Council by the ICANN
+ Board. As per the ICANN By-laws, only matters relating to
+ the assignment of parameters for Internet protocols would
+ be so referred.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+ d. Policy Development
+
+ In the tradition of the Internet, standards development
+ policies and conflict resolution mechanisms should be created
+ by those institutions most directly involved, without undue
+ interference from centralized bodies.
+
+ The ICANN By-laws vest in the PSO the primary responsibility
+ for developing and recommending substantive policies in the
+ area of protocol parameter assignment. The PSO is committed to
+ the proposition that policies for parameter assignments for
+ particular protocols are the responsibility of the individual
+ SDO that developed the protocol. The Protocol Council will be
+ available as needed by the SDOs to develop policies and
+ procedures for conflict resolution between SDOs. (By-laws, New
+ Art. VI, Sec. 2(b)). Any policies must be adopted by consensus
+ of all SDOs. The ICANN Board of Directors will take no
+ addition action regarding disputes between SDOs related to
+ protocol assignment or registration.
+
+ 3. Annual Open Meeting (General Assembly)
+
+ a. Hosting an open meeting
+
+ The Protocol Council will periodically host an open meeting
+ ("General Assembly") for promoting discussion and receiving
+ input regarding the work of the PSO. A General Assembly meeting
+ will be held at least once per year, and will permit open
+ participation by all interested individuals.
+
+ The annual open meeting will be held in conjunction with a
+ major meeting of one of the SDOs that have signed the MOU.
+ (with an effort to hold no 2 consecutive meetings in the same
+ geographic region.
+
+ It is expected that the major SDOs within the Internet protocol
+ standards development community will provide the constituency
+ of the General Assembly.
+
+ b. Selection of Protocol Council Members
+
+ Prior to the annual open meeting, the Protocol Council shall
+ make an open call for nominations to the upcoming vacancies in
+ the Protocol Council. Each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU will be
+ entitled to make nominations for some or all of the vacant
+ seats by a procedure of its own choosing. In the event that
+ there are more nominees than vacancies, an election will be
+ held in which each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU has equal votes.
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+ Protocol Council Members should fairly represent, to the extent
+ reasonable, all constituencies within the member SDOs,
+ including the major technical areas and geographical regions.
+
+ 4. Open Proceedings and Documents
+
+ a. Communications between ICANN and the PSO
+
+ All communications between ICANN and the PSO will be made
+ public on the PSO web site. In the event that ICANN requests
+ that a communication be kept confidential, the PSO will honor
+ this request for a fixed period of time not to exceed one year,
+ and then make the communication public.
+
+ b. PSO Proceedings
+
+ All discussions of PSO business will be conducted on a
+ publicly-archived mailing list accessible through the PSO web
+ site. The schedule for the PSO meetings will be posted 90 days
+ in advance of the meeting date. The agenda for the Protocol
+ Council and annual open meetings will be posted on the PSO web
+ site at least 30 days before the meetings. The minutes from
+ all PSO meetings will be publicly posted on the PSO web site
+ within 30 days of the meeting.
+
+ 5. Review of MOU
+
+ The MOU signatories will periodically review the results and
+ consequences of their cooperation under the MOU. When appropriate,
+ the signatories will consider the need for improvements in the MOU
+ and make suitable proposals for modifying and updating the
+ arrangements and scope of the MOU.
+
+ 6. Recognition
+
+ ICANN will officially recognize the PSO described in this memo as
+ the PSO under the ICANN By-laws Art. 6, Sec. 3.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+Appendix A - requirements for consideration as a PSO-qualified SDO
+
+ SDOs must be open, international, voluntary technical standard and
+ technical specification development organizations which:
+
+ 1) Develop standards and/or specifications for use over the public
+ Internet.
+
+ 2) Can demonstrate active membership in the IP-related standards
+ and/or specification development process of more than 1000
+ individuals, if individual memberships are used by the
+ organization, or 100 companies, if corporate memberships are
+ used by the organization.
+
+ 3) Has been in operation for 3 or more years at the time of their
+ application.
+
+ 4) Can demonstrate that there is significant deployment of its
+ standards on the Internet.
+
+ 5) The significant protocols controlled by the organization can be
+ implemented without paying a licensing fee to the organization
+
+ Open international voluntary standards bodies are defined as
+ international organizations that plan, develop or establish
+ voluntary standards.
+
+ An organization shall be considered open and international if its
+ standards and/or specifications development process is open to any
+ person or organization of any nationality on equitable terms. It
+ shall be considered voluntary if it makes no claim to compel use
+ of its standards and specifications.
+
+ In either case, to be considered as 'international', the voting
+ (or other "full") membership must include individuals or companies
+ primarily located in at least three different regions and at least
+ two different countries within each of those regions.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ This type of non-protocol document does not directly effect the
+ security of the Internet.
+
+5. Editor's Address
+
+ Scott Bradner
+ Harvard University
+ 1350 Mass Ave, rm 876
+ Cambridge, MA
+ 02138
+ USA
+
+ Phone: +1 617 495 3864
+ EMail: sob@harvard.edu
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 7]
+
+RFC 2690 ICANN PSO Proposal September 1999
+
+
+6. Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Bradner Informational [Page 8]
+