summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc289.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc289.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc289.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc289.txt165
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc289.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc289.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..116d42b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc289.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+NWG/RFC #289 21-DEC-71 16:29 8295
+What We Hope Is An Official List of Host Names Richard W. Watson
+ SRI-ARC
+
+ The enclosed is what we hope will be accepted as a list of
+ official formal host names and nicknames. As no other subject
+ worked on by the NWG has generated so much comment, it is
+ worthwhile to review briefly how this list came into being.
+
+ The need for some standard set of names recognized by NCP's and
+ Telnets and usable on hardcopy to designate a persons affiliation
+ had been recognized for some time and several sets of names were
+ in use.
+
+ Peggy Karp issued the first formal proposal of a set of standard
+ names in RFC 226, NIC 7625. This proposal was answered by a
+ number of counter proposals and culminated in RFC 247, NIC 7688.
+ People still were not happy with this proposal as names normally
+ associated with hosts or projects were not used.
+
+ At the last NWG meeting a number of people discussed the name
+ problem and agreed that the only reasonable compromise solution
+ was to have both formal names and nicknames and to let the people
+ at the hosts choose their own names within the guideline which the
+ previous dialog had seemed to agree on.
+
+ The guidelines were summarized in RFC 273, NIC 7837 and the NIC
+ agreed to collect and publish the names that the people at each
+ host indicated they desired. A number of names were received and
+ a tentative list was published as RFC 280, NIC 8060. More people
+ responded with their desired names or changed the ones in the
+ above list.
+
+ Almost all sites have since responded and the following list
+ resulted.
+
+ I think people should feel free to change their host name when
+ ever the situation warrants.
+
+ Formal Name Nickname Network Address
+
+ AMES-67 16
+
+ AMES-ILLIAC I4
+
+ AMES-TIP 144
+
+ BBN-NCC NCC 5
+
+
+
+ [Page 1]
+
+NWG/RFC #289 21-DEC-71 16:29 8295
+What We Hope Is An Official List of Host Names
+
+ BBN-TENEX BBN 69
+
+ BBN-TENEXB BBNB 133
+
+ BBN-TESTIP 158
+
+ BURR 15
+
+ BURR-TEST 79
+
+ CASE-10 13
+
+ CMU-10 14
+
+ ETAC-TIP 148
+
+ GWC-TIP 152
+
+ HARV-1 PDP1 73
+
+ HARV-10 ACL 9
+
+ HARV-11 137
+
+ ILL-ANTS ANTS 12
+
+ ILL-CAC CAC 76
+
+ LL-67 10
+
+ LL-TSP 138
+
+ LL-TX-2 TX-2 74
+
+ MCCL-418 22
+
+ MIT-AI 134
+
+ MIT-DMCG DMCG 70
+
+ MIT-MULTICS MIT-M 6
+
+ MITRE-TIP 145
+
+ NBS-CCST NBS 19
+
+
+
+ [Page 2]
+
+NWG/RFC #289 21-DEC-71 16:29 8295
+What We Hope Is An Official List of Host Names
+
+ NBS-TIP 147
+
+ NCAR-7600 25
+
+ NCAR-TIP 153
+
+ RADC-645 18
+
+ RADC-TIP 146
+
+ RAND-CSG 71
+
+ RAND-RCC 7
+
+ SDC-ADEPT SDC 8
+
+ SRI-AI 66
+
+ SRI-ARC 2
+
+ SU-AI 11
+
+ TINK-418 21
+
+ UCLA-CCN CCN 65
+
+ UCLA-NMC SEX 1
+
+ UCLA-MOD75 UCSB 3
+
+ USC-44 23
+
+ USC-TIP 151
+
+ UTAH-10 4
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ]
+ [ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ [Page 3]
+