diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt | 283 |
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..92f215e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3001.txt @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group M. Mealling +Request for Comments: 3001 Network Solutions, Inc. +Category: Informational November 2000 + + + A URN Namespace of Object Identifiers + +Status of this Memo + + This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does + not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this + memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + This document describes a Uniform Resource Names (URN) namespace that + contains Object Identifiers (OIDs). + +1. Introduction + + An Object Identifier is a series of digits delimited in some way. + The rules roughly state that once an entity is assigned an Object + Identifier (OID) it has sole discretion to further subdelegate off of + that OID. Some examples of OIDs include: + + o 1.3.6.1 - the Internet OID + o 1.3.6.1.4.1 - IANA-assigned company OIDs, used for private MIBs + and such things + o 1.3.6.1.2.1.27 - The Applications MIB + o 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4 - Object ID's used in the directory pilot + project to identify X.500 Object Classes. Mostly defined in RFC- + 1274. + + This document specifies the "oid" URN namespace [1]. This namespace + is for encoding an Object Identifier as specified in ASN.1 [2] as a + URI. + + The namespace specification is for a formal namespace. + +2. Specification Template + + Namespace ID: + + "oid" requested. + + + +Mealling Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 3001 URN Namespace of Object Identifiers November 2000 + + + Registration Information: + + Registration Version Number: 1 + Registration Date: 2000-04-30 + + Declared registrant of the namespace: + + I need help here. I'm not comfortable being the 'registrant'. So + who do I actually put here? + + The ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 - SubCommittee 6 The + actual real authority is the ASN.1 specification itself but at + present SC6 is the committee that has the authority to interpret + what that means. + + Declaration of structure: + + The NSS portion of the identifier follows the string encoding + rules found in RFC 1778 Section 2.15 [3] which specifies a series + of digits separated by a period with the most significant digit + being at the left and the least significant being at the right. + + No changes are anticipated since Object Identifiers are fairly + simple and have been standardized with no changes for many years. + + Relevant ancillary documentation: + + Relevant documentation can be found in X.660/Amd 2 | ISO/IEC + 9834-1/Amd 2 [2]. + + Identifier uniqueness considerations: + + The rules for assignment of OIDs requires that each OID be unique + to the OID space and that it cannot be reassigned or reused. By + reference this URN namespace inherents those rules. + + Identifier persistence considerations: + + The rules concerning the use of OIDs requires that they not be + reused once assigned. By reference this URN namespace inherents + those rules. + + Process of identifier assignment: + + Once an OID is assigned to some entity, that entity can then + create and assign new OIDs below that particular OID. There are + multiple entities that assign new OIDs to the general public. The + top three levels are pre-assigned as follows: + + + +Mealling Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 3001 URN Namespace of Object Identifiers November 2000 + + + 0 - ITU-T assigned + 1 - ISO assigned + 2 - Joint ISO/ITU-T assignment + + several assigned OIDs that are of importance to the Internet are: + + 1.3.6.1 - the Internet OID + 1.3.6.1.4.1 - IANA-assigned company OIDs, used for private + MIBs and such things + + Process of identifier resolution: + + At this time no resolution mechanism is defined. + + Rules for Lexical Equivalence: + + OIDs are composed of multiple occurrences of digits and the "." + character. Lexical equivalence is achieved by exact string match. + + Conformance with URN Syntax: + + There are no additional characters reserved. + + Validation mechanism: + + None. + + Scope: + + Global + +3. Examples + + The following examples are taken from the example OIDs from the + Introduction: + + urn:oid:1.3.6.1 + urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1 + urn:oid:1.3.6.1.2.1.27 + URN:OID:0.9.2342.19200300.100.4 + +4. Security Considerations + + None not already inherent to using unverifiable OIDs + + + + + + + +Mealling Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 3001 URN Namespace of Object Identifiers November 2000 + + +5. Acknowledgements + + The author would like to thank Harald Alvestrand for the use of his + OID database as a source for examples and references. + +References + + [1] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. + + [2] CCITT, "Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract + Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)", CCITT Recommendation X.209, + January 1988. + + [3] Howes, T., Kille, S., Yeong, W. and C. Robbins, "The String + Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes", RFC 1778, March + 1995. + +Author's Address + + Michael Mealling + Network Solutions, Inc. + 505 Huntmar Park Drive + Herndon, VA 22070 + US + + Phone: +1 770 935 5492 + EMail: michaelm@netsol.com + URI: http://www.netsol.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Mealling Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 3001 URN Namespace of Object Identifiers November 2000 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Mealling Informational [Page 5] + |