summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt731
1 files changed, 731 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f389102
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3188.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,731 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Hakala
+Request for Comments: 3188 Helsinki University Library
+Category: Informational October 2001
+
+
+ Using National Bibliography Numbers as
+ Uniform Resource Names
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
+ not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
+ memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document discusses how national bibliography numbers (persistent
+ and unique identifiers assigned by the national libraries) can be
+ supported within the URN (Uniform Resource Names) framework and the
+ syntax for URNs defined in RFC 2141. Much of the discussion is based
+ on the ideas expressed in RFC 2288.
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ As part of the validation process for the development of URNs the
+ IETF working group agreed that it is important to demonstrate that
+ the current URN syntax proposal can accommodate existing identifiers
+ from well established namespaces. One such infrastructure for
+ assigning and managing names comes from the bibliographic community.
+ Bibliographic identifiers function as names for objects that exist
+ both in print and, increasingly, in electronic formats. RFC 2288
+ [Lynch] investigated the feasibility of using three identifiers
+ (ISBN, ISSN and SICI) as URNs.
+
+ This document will analyse the usage of national bibliography numbers
+ (NBNs) as URNs. The need to extend analysis to new identifier
+ systems was briefly discussed in RFC 2288 as well, with the following
+ summary: "The issues involved in supporting those additional
+ identifiers are anticipated to be broadly similar to those involved
+ in supporting ISBNs, ISSNs, and SICIs".
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ A registration request for acquiring a Namespace Identifier (NID)
+ "NBN" for national bibliography numbers has been written by the
+ National Library of Finland on the request of the Conference of
+ Directors of National Libraries (CDNL) and the Conference of the
+ European National Librarians (CENL). Chapter 5 contains a URN
+ namespace registration request modeled according to the template in
+ RFC 2611.
+
+ The document at hand is part of a global co-operation of the national
+ libraries to foster identification of electronic documents in general
+ and utilisation of URNs in particular. Some national libraries,
+ including the national libraries of Finland, Norway and Sweden, are
+ already assigning NBN-based URNs for electronic resources.
+
+ We have used the URN Namespace Identifier "NBN" for the national
+ bibliographic numbers in examples below.
+
+2. Identification vs. Resolution
+
+ As a rule the national bibliography numbers identify finite,
+ manageably-sized objects, but these objects may still be large enough
+ that resolution to a hierarchical system is appropriate.
+
+ The materials identified by a national bibliography number may exist
+ only in printed or other physical form, not electronically. The best
+ that a resolver will be able to offer in this case is bibliographic
+ data from a national bibliography database, including information
+ about where the physical resource is stored in a national library's
+ holdings.
+
+ The URN Framework provides resolution services that may be used to
+ describe any differences between the resource identified by a URN and
+ the resource that would be returned as a result of resolving that
+ URN. However, NBNs will be used for instance to identify resources
+ in digital Web archives created by harvester robot applications. In
+ this case, NBN will identify exactly the resource the user expects to
+ see.
+
+3. National bibliography numbers
+
+3.1 Overview
+
+ National Bibliography Number (NBN) is a generic name referring to a
+ group of identifier systems utilised by the national libraries and
+ only by them for identification of deposited publications which lack
+ an identifier, or to descriptive metadata (cataloging) that describes
+ the resources. In many countries legal (or voluntary) deposit is
+ being extended to electronic publications.
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ Each national library uses its own NBN strings independently of other
+ national libraries; there is no global authority which controls them.
+ For this reason NBNs are unique only on national level. When used as
+ URNs, NBN strings must be augmented with a controlled prefix such as
+ country code. These prefixes guarantee uniqueness of the NBN-based
+ URNs on the global scale.
+
+ NBNs have traditionally been given to documents that do not have a
+ publisher-assigned identifier, but are cataloged to the national
+ bibliography. NBNs can be seen as a fall-back mechanism: if no
+ other, better established identifier such as ISBN can be given, an
+ NBN is assigned. In principle, NBN usage enables identification of
+ any Internet document. Local policies may limit the NBN usage to a
+ much smaller subset of documents.
+
+ Some national libraries (e.g., Finland, Norway, Sweden) have
+ established Web-based URN generators, which enable authors and
+ publishers to fetch NBN-based URNs for their network documents. At
+ least national libraries of Sweden and Finland are harvesting and
+ archiving domestic Web documents (and a number of other libraries
+ plan to start this activity), and long-time preservation of these
+ materials requires persistent and unique identification. NBNs can be
+ and are in fact already used as internal identifiers in these Web
+ archives.
+
+ Both syntax and scope of NBNs can be decided by each national library
+ independently. Typically, an NBN consist of one or more letters
+ and/or digits. This simple syntax makes NBNs infinitely extensible
+ and very suitable for e.g., naming of the Web documents. For
+ instance the application used by the national library of Finland for
+ Web harvesting creates NBNs which are based on the MD5 checksum of
+ the archived resource.
+
+3.2 F-code
+
+ F-code is the NBN used by the National Library of Finland.
+
+ F-codes have been used since early 20th century to identify catalogue
+ cards and later MARC records in the national bibliography. In 1998
+ the national library decided to enable the Finnish authors and
+ publishers to assign F-codes to their Internet documents, if these
+ documents do not qualify for other identifiers such as ISBN. F-
+ codes, embedded into URNs, can be fetched from the URN generator
+ (http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/cgi-bin/urn.pl) developed in co-operation
+ between the national library of Finland and the Lund University
+ library, NETLAB unit. Attached to the generator there is a user
+ guide (http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/meta/URN-opas.html; only in
+ Finnish), which tells the users how to use URNs.
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ F-codes are also used within the Web harvesting and archiving
+ software (http://www.csc.fi/sovellus/nedlib/), which has been built
+ for the Networked European Deposit Library (NEDLIB) project (see
+ http://www.kb.nl/nedlib). NEDLIB harvester calculates MD5 checksum
+ for each archived resource, and then builds an NBN-based URN from the
+ checksum. The URN serves then as a unique identifier to the archived
+ resource. Traditional identifiers can not be used for this purpose,
+ since there may for instance be several variants of a book which
+ (quite rightly so) all have the same ISBN. Moreover, identifiers
+ embedded into a document do not necessarily belong to the document
+ itself; thus the Web archiving application can not trust the
+ identifiers embedded into the body of the document.
+
+ The F-code built by the URN generator consist of:
+
+ Prefix (for example fe)
+ Year (YYYY; for example 1999)
+ Number (for example 1055)
+
+ The generator also adds namespace identifier "NBN" and ISO 3166
+ country code. Thus a URN based on F-code would in this case be for
+ instance urn:nbn:fi-fe19991055.
+
+ URNs created by the Web archiving application have similar overall
+ structure, except that prefix (which may be defined by the operator)
+ is fea and year is not used. An example: urn:nbn:fi-fea-
+ 5c5875e6e49ae649cad63e5ee4f6c346.
+
+ F-codes never need any special encoding when used as URNs, since they
+ consist of alphanumeric codes only (0-9, a-z). This is often the
+ case for other national libraries' NBN systems as well.
+
+3.3 Encoding Considerations and Lexical Equivalence
+
+ Embedding NBNs within the URN framework usually presents no
+ particular encoding problems, since all of the characters that can
+ appear in commonly used NBN systems can be expressed in special
+ encoding, as described in RFC 2141 [MOATS].
+
+ When an NBN is used as a URN, the namespace specific string will
+ consist of three parts: prefix, consisting of either a two-letter ISO
+ 3166 country code or other registered string, delimiting character
+ which is either hyphen (-) or colon (:), and NBN string assigned by
+ the national library. Delimiting characters are not lexically
+ equivalent.
+
+ Hyphen is always used for separating the prefix and the NBN string.
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ Colon is used as the delimiting character if and only if a country
+ code-based NBN namespace is split further in smaller sub-namespaces.
+ If there are several national libraries in one country, these
+ libraries can split their national namespace into smaller parts using
+ this method.
+
+ A national library may also assign a trusted organisation(s) its own
+ sub-namespace. For instance, the national library of Finland has
+ given Statistics Finland (http://www.stat.fi/index_en.html) a sub-
+ namespace "st" (e.g., urn:nbn:fi:st:). The Finnish Council of State
+ (http://www.vn.fi/vn/english/index.htm) will use sub-namespace "vn"
+ (e.g., urn:nbn:fi:vn).
+
+ Non-ISO 3166-prefixes, if used, must be registered on the global
+ level. The Library of Congress will maintain the central register of
+ reserved codes. This register will be available to the national
+ libraries and other users in the Web.
+
+ Sub-namespace codes beneath a country-code-based namespace need to be
+ registered on the national level by the national library which
+ assigned the code. The national register must be available in the
+ Web and should also be linked to the global register maintained by
+ the Library of Congress.
+
+ Two-letter codes may not be used as non-ISO prefixes, since all such
+ codes are reserved for existing and possible future ISO country
+ codes. If there are several national libraries in one country who use
+ the same prefix - for instance, a country code -, they need to agree
+ on how to split the namespace between them.
+
+ Models:
+ URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 country code>-<assigned NBN string>
+ URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 country code>:<sub-namespace code>-<assigned NBN
+ string>
+ URN:NBN:<non-ISO 3166 prefix>-<assigned NBN string>
+
+ Examples:
+ URN:NBN:fi-fe19981001 (A "real" URN assigned by the National Library
+ of Finland).
+
+3.4 Resolution of NBN-based URNs
+
+ The (usually) country code-based prefix part of the URN namespace
+ specific string will provide a guide to where to find a resolution
+ service, and the NBN register will identify the assigning agency.
+ Once the NBN-based URN resolution is in global usage, the number of
+ prefixes will slowly approach and may eventually exceed the number of
+ national libraries.
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ If NBN assignment for a given country is limited to the national
+ bibliography database, then all NBN-based URNs for that country will
+ be resolved there. In one model these databases contain detailed
+ resource descriptions including URLs, which will point both to the
+ copy of the document in the Internet and to the copy in the national
+ library's (legal) deposit collection. Due to the limitations in the
+ usage of legal deposit documents it is possible that the deposited
+ electronic materials can not be delivered in electronic form outside
+ the premises of the national library.
+
+ If it is possible for the authors and publishers to retrieve NBNs to
+ Web documents and there is no obligation to deposit thus identified
+ documents to the national library, URN resolution service is not
+ possible without a national Web index and archive, maintained by the
+ national library or other organisation(s). A Web index/archive will
+ also resolve machine-generated URNs to the archived Web documents.
+
+3.5 Additional considerations
+
+ Guidelines adopted by each national library define when different
+ versions of a work should be assigned the same or differing NBNs.
+ These rules apply only if identifier assignment is done manually. If
+ identifiers are allocated programmatically, the only criteria that
+ can be used is that two documents which are identical on the bit
+ level (have the same MD5 checksum) are deemed identical and should
+ receive the same NBN. The likelihood of this happening to dissimilar
+ documents is about 2^64, according to the RFC 1321.
+
+ The rules governing the usage of NBNs are less strict than those
+ specifying the usage of ISBN or other, better established
+ identifiers. Since the NBNs have up to now been given only by the
+ personnel (cataloguers) working in the national libraries, the
+ identifier assignment has in practice been well co-ordinated.
+
+ A NBN-based URN will resolve to single instance of the work if
+ identifier assignment has been automatic. Given the nature of NBNs
+ it is also likely that different versions of the same work will
+ receive different NBNs even if the identifier is given manually.
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ This document proposes means of encoding several existing
+ bibliographic identifiers within the URN framework. This document
+ does not discuss resolution except at a very generic level; thus
+ questions of secure or authenticated resolution mechanisms are out of
+ scope. It does not address means of validating the integrity or
+ authenticating the source or provenance of URNs that contain
+ bibliographic identifiers. Issues regarding intellectual property
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ rights associated with objects identified by the various
+ bibliographic identifiers are also beyond the scope of this document,
+ as are questions about rights to the databases that might be used to
+ construct resolvers.
+
+5. Namespace registration
+
+ URN Namespace ID Registration for the National Bibliography Number
+ (NBN)
+
+ Namespace ID:
+
+ NBN
+
+ This Namespace ID has been in production use in demonstrator systems
+ since summer 1998; thousands of URNs from this namespace have already
+ been delivered in Finland, Sweden and Norway.
+
+ Registration Information:
+
+ Version: 3
+ Date: 2001-01-30
+ The first registration of the NID "NBN" was done via the URN WG in
+ 1998. The second, slightly edited registration request was done in
+ 1999.
+
+ Declared registrant of the namespace:
+
+ Name: Juha Hakala
+ E-mail: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi
+ Affiliation: Helsinki University Library - The National Library of
+ Finland, Conference of European National Librarians (CENL) and
+ Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL)
+ Address: P.O.Box 26, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
+
+ Both CENL and CDNL made decisions to foster the usage of URNs during
+ 1998. The latter organisation has set up a working group for this
+ purpose. One item in the common work plan is utilisation of national
+ bibliography numbers as URNs for identification of grey literature
+ published in the Internet. The NBN namespace will be available for
+ free for all national libraries in the world.
+
+ Declaration of syntactic structure:
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 7]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ The namespace specific string will consist of three parts:
+
+ prefix, consisting of either a two-letter ISO 3166 country code or
+ other registered string and sub-namespace codes,
+
+ delimiting characters (colon (:), or hyphen (-), and
+
+ NBN string assigned by the national library.
+
+ Colon is used as a delimiting character only within the prefix,
+ between ISO 3166 country code and sub-namespace code, which splits
+ the national namespace into smaller parts. This technique can be
+ used when there are several national libraries, which all need their
+ own namespaces, or when the national library allows trusted partners
+ to set up their own sub-namespaces within the national NBN namespace.
+
+ Dividing non-ISO 3166-based namespaces further with sub-namespace
+ codes is not allowed.
+
+ Hyphen is used as a delimiting character between the prefix and the
+ NBN string. Within the NBN string, hyphen can be used for separating
+ different sections of the code from one another.
+
+ Non-ISO prefixes used instead of the ISO country code must be
+ registered. A global registry, maintained by the Library of
+ Congress, will be created and made available via the Web. Contact
+ information: nbn.register@loc.gov.us.
+
+ All two-letter codes are reserved for existing and possible future
+ ISO country codes and may not be used as non-ISO prefixes.
+
+ Sub-namespace codes must be registered on the national level by the
+ national library which assigned the code. The register must be
+ available via the Web, and it should be accessible via the global
+ registry set up by the Library of Congress.
+
+ Models:
+
+ URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 country code>-<assigned NBN string>
+ URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 country code:sub-namespace code>-<assigned NBN
+ string>
+ URN:NBN:<non-ISO 3166 prefix>-<assigned NBN string>
+
+ Example:
+
+ A country code-based URN: URN:NBN:fi-fe19981001 (A URN assigned by
+ the National Library of Finland).
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 8]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ Relevant ancillary documentation:
+
+ National Bibliography Number (NBN) is a generic name referring to a
+ group of identifier systems used by the national libraries for
+ identification of deposited publications which lack an identifier, or
+ to descriptive metadata (cataloguing) that describes the resources.
+ Each national library uses its own NBN system independently of other
+ national libraries; there is no global authority which controls
+ syntax of these identifier systems.
+
+ Each national library can decide freely which resources will receive
+ NBNs. These identifiers have traditionally been assigned to
+ documents that do not have a publisher-assigned identifier, but are
+ nevertheless catalogued to the national bibliography. Typically
+ identification of grey publications have largely been dependent on
+ NBNs.
+
+ Some national libraries (Finland, Norway, Sweden) have established
+ Web-based URN generators, which enable authors and publishers to
+ fetch NBN-based URNs for their network documents.
+
+ Both syntax and scope of NBNs is decided by each national library
+ independently. Typically, a NBN consist of one or more letters and a
+ number.
+
+ Identifier uniqueness considerations:
+
+ NBN strings assigned by two national libraries may be identical. For
+ this reason usage of a controlled prefix in the namespace specific
+ string is obligatory in order to guarantee global uniqueness of NBN-
+ based URNs.
+
+ In the national level, libraries utilise different policies for
+ guaranteeing uniqueness. A national library may automate the
+ delivery of NBN-based URNs. In this case, the NBNs are assigned
+ sequentially by a program (URN generator).
+
+ Identifier persistence considerations:
+
+ Persistence of the NBNs as identifiers is guaranteed by the
+ persistence of national libraries and information systems, such as
+ national bibliographies, maintained by them. NBNs have been used for
+ several centuries for printed materials. NBN-based identification of
+ electronic documents is a recent practice, but it is likely to
+ continue for a very long time.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 9]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ Process of identifier assignment:
+
+ Assignment of NBN-based URNs is always controlled on national level
+ by the national library / national libraries. The Conference of
+ Directors of National Librarians (CDNL) has established in 1999 a
+ task force, which will co-ordinate the URN usage in all national
+ libraries.
+
+ National libraries may choose different strategies in assigning NBN-
+ based URNs. One option is assignment by the library personnel only.
+ This is done when the document is catalogued into the national
+ bibliography. Thus in this case the national bibliography database
+ will serve as the URN resolution service.
+
+ A national library may also set up a URN generator (generators), and
+ allow publishers and authors to retrieve NBN-based URNs from there.
+ In this case there is no guarantee that the identified resource will
+ ever be catalogued into the national bibliography, and URN resolution
+ is dependent on Web index/archive.
+
+ Process for identifier resolution:
+
+ URNs based on NBNs will be primarily resolved via the national
+ bibliography databases. In one model these databases contain
+ detailed resource descriptions including URLs, which will point both
+ to the copy of the document in the Internet and to the copy in the
+ national library's (legal) deposit collection. Due to the
+ limitations in the usage of legal deposit documents it is possible
+ that the deposited materials can not be delivered outside the
+ premises of the national library.
+
+ For those documents not catalogued into the national bibliography
+ database URN resolution may take place via national or international
+ Web indexes and/or archives. Nordic national libraries have
+ established in autumn 2000 a joint initiative called Nordic Web
+ Archive (NWA), which aims at creating a national Web archive into all
+ Nordic countries. Indexes to these archive systems will be able to
+ act as URN resolution services of any document which a) is or has
+ been available via the Web, and b) had an URN embedded into it.
+
+ Country code and additional sub-namespace information will provide a
+ guide to where to find appropriate resolution services. For
+ instance, if the country code is "fi", the primary resolution service
+ is the national bibliography database. Secondary resolution service
+ is the Web archive.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 10]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+ Generally, there will be one or more resolution services specified
+ for each country, depending on the assignment policy and services of
+ the national library. If NBN assignment is limited to the national
+ bibliography database, then all NBN-based URNs for that country will
+ be resolved there. If the authors and publishers have been allowed
+ to retrieve NBNs to their Web resources, URN resolution services
+ require a national Web archive. If other organisations have been
+ allowed to assign NBNs, they may also set up their own URN resolution
+ services.
+
+ Rules for Lexical Equivalence:
+
+ None in the global level. Any national library may provide its own
+ rules, on the basis of its NBN syntax.
+
+ Conformance with URN Syntax:
+
+ All NBNs we know of are ASCII strings consisting of letters (a-z) and
+ numbers (0-9). If NBN contains characters that are reserved in the
+ URN syntax, this data must be presented in hex encoded form as
+ defined in RFC 2141. A national library may limit the full scope of
+ its NBN strings in URN usage in such a way that there are no reserved
+ characters in the URN namespace specific strings.
+
+ Validation mechanism:
+
+ None specified on the global level. A national library may use NBNs,
+ which contain a checksum and can therefore be validated, but this is
+ for the time being not a common practice.
+
+ Scope:
+
+ Global.
+
+6. References
+
+ [Daigle] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R. and P. Faltstrom,
+ "URN Namespace Definition Mechanisms", RFC 2611, June 1999.
+
+ [Lynch] Lynch, C., Preston, C. and R. Daniel, "Using Existing
+ Bibliographic Identifiers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC
+ 2288, February 1998.
+
+ [Moats] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 11]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+7. Author's Address
+
+ Juha Hakala
+ Helsinki University Library - The National Library of Finland
+ P.O. Box 26
+ FIN-00014 Helsinki University
+ FINLAND
+
+ EMail: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 12]
+
+RFC 3188 Using National Bibliography Numbers as URNs October 2001
+
+
+8. Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hakala Informational [Page 13]
+