diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt | 3587 |
1 files changed, 3587 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c270e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3202.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3587 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group R. Steinberger +Request for Comments: 3202 Paradyne Networks +Category: Standards Track O. Nicklass + RAD Data Communications Ltd. + January 2002 + + + Definitions of Managed Objects + for Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + +Status of this Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + This memo defines an extension of the Management Information Base + (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based + internets. In particular, it defines objects for managing the Frame + Relay Service Level Definitions. + +Table of Contents + + 1. The SNMP Management Framework ............................... 2 + 2. Conventions ................................................. 3 + 3. Overview .................................................... 3 + 3.1. Frame Relay Service Level Definitions ..................... 4 + 3.2. Terminology ............................................... 5 + 3.3. Network Model ............................................. 5 + 3.4. Reference Points .......................................... 6 + 3.5. Measurement Methodology ................................... 8 + 3.6. Theory of Operation ....................................... 9 + 3.6.1. Capabilities Discovery .................................. 9 + 3.6.2. Determining Reference Points for Row Creation ........... 10 + 3.6.2.1. Graphical Examples of Reference Points ................ 11 + 3.6.2.1.1. Edge-to-Edge Interface Reference Point Example ...... 12 + 3.6.2.1.2. Edge-to-Edge Egress Queue Reference Point Example ... 13 + 3.6.2.1.3. End-to-End Using Reference Point Example ............ 14 + 3.6.3. Creation Process ........................................ 15 + 3.6.4. Destruction Process ..................................... 15 + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + 3.6.4.1. Manual Row Destruction ................................ 15 + 3.6.4.2. Automatic Row Destruction ............................. 16 + 3.6.5. Modification Process .................................... 16 + 3.6.6. Collection Process ...................................... 16 + 3.6.6.1. Remote Polling ........................................ 16 + 3.6.6.2. Sampling .............................................. 17 + 3.6.6.3. User History .......................................... 17 + 3.6.7. Use of MIB Module in Calculation of Service Level + Definitions .................................................... 17 + 3.6.8. Delay ................................................... 20 + 3.6.9. Frame Delivery Ratio .................................... 20 + 3.6.10. Data Delivery Ratio .................................... 21 + 3.6.11. Service Availability ................................... 21 + 4. Relation to Other MIB Modules ............................... 22 + 5. Structure of the MIB Module ................................. 23 + 5.1. frsldPvcCtrlTable ......................................... 23 + 5.2. frsldSmplCtrlTable ........................................ 23 + 5.3. frsldPvcDataTable ......................................... 23 + 5.4. frsldPvcSampleTable ....................................... 24 + 5.5. frsldCapabilities ......................................... 24 + 6. Persistence of Data ......................................... 24 + 7. Object Definitions .......................................... 24 + 8. Acknowledgments ............................................. 61 + 9. References .................................................. 61 + 10. Security Considerations .................................... 63 + 11. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 63 + 12. Full Copyright Statement ................................... 64 + +1. The SNMP Management Framework + + The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major + components: + + o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [1]. + + o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the + purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of + Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD + 16, RFC 1155 [2], STD 16, RFC 1212 [3] and RFC 1215 [4]. The + second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 + [5], RFC 2579 [6] and RFC 2580 [7]. + + o Message protocols for transferring management information. The + first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and + described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP + message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track + protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [9] and RFC + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + 1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol is called + SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [10], RFC 2572 [11] and RFC 2574 + [12]. + + o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The + first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is + described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol + operations and associated PDU formats is described in RFC 1905 + [13]. + + o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573 [14] and + the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2575 + [15]. + + A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework + can be found in RFC 2570 [16]. + + Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed + the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are + defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI. + + This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A + MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate + translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically + equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no + translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable + information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in + SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine + readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the + MIB. + +2. Conventions + + The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, + SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when + they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in + RFC 2119 [22]. + +3. Overview + + This MIB module addresses the items required to manage the Frame + Relay Forum's Implementation Agreement for Service Level Definitions + (FRF.13 [17]). At present, this applies to these values of the + ifType variable in the Internet-standard MIB: + + o frameRelay (32) + + o frameRelayService (44) + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + This section provides an overview and background of how to use this + MIB module. + +3.1. Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + + The frame relay service level definitions address specific + characteristics of a frame relay service that can be used to + facilitate the following tasks: + + o Evaluation of frame relay service providers, offerings or + products. + + o Measurement of Quality of Service. + + o Enforcement of Service Level Agreements. + + o Planning or describing a frame relay network. + + The following parameters are defined in FRF.13 [17] as a sufficient + set of values to accomplish the tasks previously stated. + + o Delay - The amount of time elapsed, in microseconds, from the time + a frame exits the source to the time it reaches the destination. + NOTE: FRF.13 [17] defines this value in terms of milliseconds. + + o Frame Delivery Ratio - The ratio of the number of frames delivered + to the destination versus the number of frames sent by the source. + This ratio can be further divided by inspecting either only the + frames within the CIR or only the frames in excess of the CIR. + + o Data Delivery Ratio - The ratio of the amount of data delivered to + the destination versus the amount of data sent by the source. + This ratio can be further divided by inspecting either only the + data within the CIR or only the data in excess of the CIR. + + o Service Availability - The amount of time the frame relay service + was not available. There are three types of availability + statistics defined in FRF.13 [17]: Mean Time to Repair, Virtual + Connection Availability, and Mean Time Between Service Outages. + The later two require information about the scheduled outage time. + It is assumed that scheduled outage time information will be + maintained by the network management software, so it is not + included in the MIB module. + + Consult FRF.13 [17] for more details. + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +3.2. Terminology + + o CIR - The Committed Information Rate (CIR) is the subscriber data + rate (expressed in bits/second) that the network commits to + deliver under normal network conditions [18]. + + o DLCI - Data Link Connection Identifier [18]. + + o Logical Port - This term is used to model the Frame Relay + "interface" on a device [18]. + + o NNI - Network to Network Interface [18]. + + o Permanent Virtual Connection (PVC) - A virtual connection that has + its end-points and bearer capabilities defined at subscription + time [18]. + + o Reference Point (RP) - The point of reference within the network + model at which the calculations or data collection takes place. + + o UNI - User to Network Interface [18]. + +3.3. Network Model + + The basic model, as illustrated in figure 1 below, contains two frame + relay DTE endpoints connected to a network cloud via a frame relay + UNI interface. The network cloud can contain zero or more internal + frame relay NNI connections that interconnect multiple networks. The + calculations and data collection can be performed at any reference + point within the network. + + +-------------+ +-------------+ + | Frame Relay | | Frame Relay | + | DTE Device | | DTE Device | + +------+------+ +------+------+ + | | + UNI UNI + Connection Connection + | | + +------+------+ NNI +-------------+ NNI +------+------+ + | Network A +------------+ Network B +------------+ Network C | + +-------------+ Connection +-------------+ Connection +-------------+ + + Figure 1 + Frame Relay Network Reference Model + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +3.4. Reference Points + + The collection and calculations of the service level definitions + apply to two reference points within the network. These two points + are the locations where the frames are referenced in the collection + of the service level specific information. The reference points used + in the MIB module are shown in figure 2 below. For completeness, the + module also allows for proprietary reference points which MAY exist + anywhere in the network that is not a previously defined reference + point. The meaning of the proprietary reference points is + insignificant unless defined by the device manufacturer. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + +---------------------------+ + |+-----------+ +-----------+| + || | |Measurement|| + ||Frame Relay---Engine --(Source RP)----+ + ||DTE | |(If Exists)|| | + |+-----------+ +-----------+| | + +---------------------------+ | + Frame Relay Source | + +------------------------------------------+ + | Frame Relay Network + | +----------------------------------+ + | | +------------------------------+ | + | | | +---------+ +---------+ | | + | | | | | | Traffic | | | + +--(Ingress RP)--- L1 / L2 --- Policing| | | + | | | Control | | Engine | | | + | | +---------+ +----|----+ | | + | | | | | + | | (Traffic Policing RP)| | + | +------------------|-----------+ | + | Ingress Node | | + | | | + | +-----------|-----------+ | + | | Intermediate Nodes | | + | +-----------|-----------+ | + | | | + | Egress Node | | + | +--------------|-----------+ | + | | (Egress Queue Input RP) | | + | | | | | + | | +-------+------+ | | + | | | Egress Queue | | | + | | +-------+------+ | | + | | | | | + | | (Egress Queue Output RP) | | + | +--------------|-----------+ | + +--------------------|-------------+ + Frame Relay Destination | + +---------------------------+ +-----------+ + |+-----------+ +-----------+| | + || | |Measurement|| | + ||Frame Relay---Engine --(Destination RP)--+ + ||DTE | |(If Exists)|| + |+-----------+ +-----------+| + +---------------------------+ + + Figure 2 + Reference Points (FRF.13 [17]) + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 7] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + The MIB variables frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP and frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP + allow the user to view and configure the reference points at which + the calculations occur. These variables are specific to the device + on which they are located. Frame relay devices act as both frame + sources and frame destinations. The definitions in this MIB module + apply to the interaction of a pair of devices on the network path. + The same device can potentially use different reference points for + calculation and collection of the statistics based on whether the + referenced frame is sent or received by the device. When the device + is acting as a frame source, the value of frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP + reflects the reference point used for all source calculations + pertaining to the specified PVC. When the device is acting as a + frame destination, the value of frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP reflects the + reference point used for all destination calculations pertaining to + the specified PVC. + + For example, FRF.13 [17] defines an Edge-to-Edge Egress Queue + measurement domain as a domain in which measurement is performed + between an Ingress Reference Point and an Egress Queue Input + Reference Point. For this domain between a source device and a + destination device, the value of frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for the + source device would be set to ingTxLocalRP(2) and the value of + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP for the destination device would be set to + eqiRxLocalRP(4). While it is usually the case that the reference + points would be equivalent on the remote device when monitoring + frames going in the opposite direction, there is no requirement for + them to be so. + + It can be seen from the above example that a total of four reference + points are required in order to collect information for both + directions of traffic flow. The reference points represent the + transmit and receive directions at both ends of a PVC. If a device + has knowledge of the information from the remote device, it is + possible to collect the statistics from a single device. This is not + always the case. In most instances, two devices will need to be + monitored to capture a complete description of the service level on a + PVC. The reference points a single device is capable of monitoring + are contained in the frsldRPCaps object. + +3.5. Measurement Methodology + + This document neither recommends nor suggests a method of + implementation. This is left to the device manufacturer and should + be independent of the data that is actually collected. + + Periodic collection of this data can be performed through either + polling of the data table, use of the sample tables or use of the + user history group of RFC 2021 [19]. + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 8] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +3.6. Theory of Operation + + The following sections describe how to use this MIB module. They + include row handling, data collection and data calculation. The + recommendations here in are suggestions as to implementation and do + not infer that they are the only method that can be used to perform + such operations. + +3.6.1. Capabilities Discovery + + Three objects are provided specifically to aid the network manager in + discovering the capabilities of the device with respect to this MIB + module. + + o frsldPvcCtrlWriteCaps This object reports the write capabilities + of the PVC Control Table. Use this object + to determine which objects can be modified. + This need only be referenced if row + creation or modification is to be + performed. + + o frsldSmplCtrlWriteCaps This object reports the write capabilities + of the Sample Control Table. Use this + object to determine which objects can be + modified. The group need only be + referenced if the sample tables will be + used to collect historical information. + + o frsldRPCaps This object reports the reference points at + which the device is capable of collecting + information. This object needs to be + referenced if row creation is to be + performed in the PVC Control Table. + Devices can only create rows containing + supported reference points. + + These objects do not imply that there is no need for an Agent + Capabilities macro for devices that do not fully support every object + in this MIB module. They are provided specifically to aid in the + ensured network management operations of this MIB module with respect + to row creation and modification. + + An additional four objects are provided to report and control memory + the utilization of this MIB module. These objects are + frsldMaxPvcCtrls, frsldNumPvcCtrls, frsldMaxSmplCtrls are + frsldNumSmplCtrls. Together, they allow a manager to control the + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 9] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + amount of memory allocated for specific utilization by this MIB + module. This is done by setting the maximum allowed allocation of + controls. + +3.6.2. Determining Reference Points for Row Creation + + The performance of a PVC is monitored by evaluating the uni- + directional flow of frames from an ingress point to an egress point. + Reference points describe where each of the two measurements are + made. Monitoring both of the uni-directional flows that make-up the + PVC frame traffic requires a total of four reference points as shown + in Figures 3 through 5. A monitoring point that evaluates traffic is + restricted to counting frames that pass the reference points hosted + locally on the monitoring point. Thus, if the monitoring point is + near the ingress point of the flow, it will count the frames entering + into the frame relay network. The complete picture of frame loss for + the uni-directional flow requires information from the downstream + reference point located at another (remote) monitoring point. + + The local monitoring point MAY be implemented in such way that the + information from the downstream monitoring point is moved to the + local monitoring point using implementation-specific mechanisms. In + this case all information required to calculate frame loss becomes + available from the local measurement point. The local measurement + point agent is capable of reporting all the objects in the + FrsldPvcDataEntry row - the counts for offered frames entering the + network and delivered frames exiting the network. + + Alternatively, the local monitoring point MAY be restricted to counts + of frames observed on the local device only. In this case, the + objects of the FrsldPvcDataEntry row reporting what happened on the + remote device are not available. + + The following list shows the possible valid reference points for an + FRF.13 SLA from the source reference point to the destination + reference point in both directions. + + o Local Information Only + + Local Device: srcLocalRP, desLocalRP + Remote Device: srcLocalRP, desLocalRP + + o Remote Information Only + + Local Device: srcRemoteRP, desRemoteRP + Remote Device: srcRemoteRP, desRemoteRP + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 10] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + o Mixed Two Device Model 1 (Local Device Always Transmitter) + + Local Device: srcLocalRP, desRemoteRP + Remote Device: srcLocalRP, desRemoteRP + + o Mixed Two Device Model 2 (Local Device Always Receiver) + + Local Device: srcRemoteRP, desLocalRP + Remote Device: srcRemoteRP, desLocalRP + + o Mixed One Device Model 1 (Directional Rows) + + First Row: srcRemoteRP, desLocalRP (Receiver Row) + Second Row: srcLocalRP, desRemoteRP (Sender Row) + + o Mixed One Device Model 2 (Device Based Rows) + + First Row: srcLocalRP, desLocalRP (Local Row) + Second Row: srcRemoteRP, desRemoteRP (Remote Row) + + Each of the above combinations is valid and provides the same + information. + + The following steps are recommended to find which reference points + need to be configured: + + 1) Locate both of the devices at either end of the PVC to be + monitored. + + 2) Determine the capabilities by referencing the frsldRPCaps object + of each device. + + 3) Locate the best combination of the two devices such that the + necessary reference points are all represented. + + 4) If any one of the necessary reference points does not exist in the + combination of the two devices, it is not possible to monitor the + FRF.13 defined SLA between the two reference point on the PVC. + +3.6.2.1. Graphical Examples of Reference Points + + FRF.13 [17] defines three specific combinations of reference points: + Edge-to-Edge Interface, Edge-to-Edge Egress Queue and End-to-End. + + Examples of valid reference points that may be used for each of these + are discussed in the sections below. + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 11] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + It is often the case that a device knows as a minimum either only + local information or both local and remote information. Because + these are two common examples, each will be illustrated below. + +3.6.2.1.1. Edge-to-Edge Interface Reference Point Example + + Device 1 Device 2 + +-------------+ +-------------+ + | Ingress | | Egress | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + |(A)| | | Traffic Flow | | |(B)| + -->-->-- -->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->- -->-->--> + | | | | From Device 1 to 2 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + | | | | + | Egress | | Ingress | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + |(D)| | | Traffic Flow | | |(C)| + <--<--<- -<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<-- --<--<-- + | | | | From Device 2 to 1 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + +-------------+ +-------------+ + + where (A), (B), (C) and (D) are reference points + + Figure 3 + + For devices with only local knowledge, one row is required on each + device as follows: + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = eqoRxLocalRP(5) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = eqoRxLocalRP(5) + + In which a single row is created on Device 1 containing reference + points (A) and (D), and a single row is created on Device 2 + containing reference points (C) and (B). + + For devices with both local and remote knowledge, the two rows can + exist in any combination on either device. For this example, the + transmitting devices will be responsible for information regarding + the flow for which they are the origin. Only one row is required per + device for this example. + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 12] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = eqoRxRemoteRP(11) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = eqoRxRemoteRP(11) + +3.6.2.1.2. Edge-to-Edge Egress Queue Reference Point Example + + Device 1 Device 2 + +-------------+ +-------------+ + | Ingress | | Egress | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + |(A)| | | Traffic Flow |(B)| | | + -->-->-- -->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->- -->-->--> + | | | | From Device 1 to 2 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + | | | | + | Egress | | Ingress | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + | | |(D)| Traffic Flow | | |(C)| + <--<--<- -<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<-- --<--<-- + | | | | From Device 2 to 1 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + +-------------+ +-------------+ + + where (A), (B), (C) and (D) are reference points + + Figure 4 + + For devices with only local knowledge, one row is required on each + device as follows: + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = eqiRxLocalRP(4) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = eqiRxLocalRP(4) + + In which a single row is created on Device 1 containing reference + points (A) and (D), and a single row is created on Device 2 + containing reference points (C) and (B). + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 13] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + For devices with both local and remote knowledge, the two rows can + exist in any combination on either device. For this example, the + transmitting devices will be responsible for information regarding + the flow for which they are the origin. Only one row is required per + device for this example. + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = eqiRxRemoteRP(10) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = ingTxLocalRP(2) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = eqiRxRemoteRP(10) + +3.6.2.1.3. End-to-End Using Reference Point Example + + Device 1 Device 2 + +-------------+ +-------------+ + | Source | | Destination | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + |(A)| | | Traffic Flow | | |(B)| + -->-->-- -->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->- -->-->--> + | | | | From Device 1 to 2 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + | | | | + | Destination | | Source | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + |(D)| | | Traffic Flow | | |(C)| + <--<--<- -<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<--<-- --<--<-- + | | | | From Device 2 to 1 | | | | + | +-----+ | | +-----+ | + +-------------+ +-------------+ + + where (A), (B), (C) and (D) are reference points + + Figure 5 + + For devices with only local knowledge, one row is required on each + device as follows: + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = srcLocalRP(1) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = desLocalRP(1) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = srcLocalRP(1) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = desLocalRP(1) + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 14] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + In which a single row is created on Device 1 containing reference + points (A) and (D), and a single row is created on Device 2 + containing reference points (C) and (B). + + For devices with both local and remote knowledge, the two rows can + exist in any combination on either device. For this example, the + transmitting devices will be responsible for information regarding + the flow for which they are the origin. Only one row is required per + device for this example. + + (A) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 1 = srcLocalRP(1) + + (B) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 1 = desRemoteRP(7) + + (C) frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP for Device 2 = srcLocalRP(1) + + (D) frsldPvcCtlrReceiveRP for Device 2 = desRemoteRP(7) + +3.6.3. Creation Process + + In some cases, devices will automatically populate the rows of PVC + Control Table and potentially the Sample Control Table. However, in + many cases, it may be necessary for a network manager to manually + create rows. + + Manual creation of rows requires the following steps: + + 1) Ensure the PVC exists between the two devices. + + 2) Determine the necessary reference points for row creation. + + 3) Create the row(s) in each device as needed. + + 4) Create the row(s) in the sample control tables if desired. + +3.6.4. Destruction Process + +3.6.4.1. Manual Row Destruction + + Manual row destruction is straight forward. Any row can be destroyed + and the resources allocated to it are freed by setting the value of + its status object (either frsldPvcCtrlStatus or frsldSmplCtrlStatus) + to destroy(6). It should be noted that when frsldPvcCtrlStatus is + set to destroy(6) all associated sample control, sample and data + table rows will also be destroyed. Similarly, when + frsldSmplCtrlStatus is set to destroy(6) all sample rows will also be + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 15] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + destroyed. The frsldPvcCtrlPurge objects do not apply to manual row + destruction. If the row is set to destroy(6) manually, the rows are + destroyed as part of the set. + +3.6.4.2. Automatic Row Destruction + + Rows is the tables may be destroyed automatically based on the + existence of the DLCI on which they rely. This behavior is + controlled by the frsldPvcCtrlPurge and frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge + objects. When a DLCI no longer exists in the device, the data in the + tables has no relation to anything known on the network. However, + there may be some need to keep the historic information active for a + short period after the destruction or removal of a DLCI. If the + basis for the row no longer exists, the row will be destroyed at the + end of the purge interval that is controlled by frsldPvcCtrlPurge. + + The effects of automatic row destruction are the same as manual row + destruction. + +3.6.5. Modification Process + + All read-create items in this MIB module can be modified at any time + if they are fully supported. Write access is not required. To + simplify the use of the MIB frsldPvcCtrlWriteCaps and + frsldSmplCtrlWriteCaps state which of the read-create variables can + actually be written on a particular device. + +3.6.6. Collection Process + +3.6.6.1. Remote Polling + + This MIB module supports data collection through remote polling of + the free running counters in the PVC Data Table. Remote polling is a + common method used to capture real-time statistics. A remote + management station polls the device to collect the desired + information. It is recommended all statistics for a single PVC be + collected in a single PDU. + + The following objects are designed around the concept of real-time + polling: + + o frsldPvcDataMissedPolls + o frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC + o frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE + o frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC + o frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE + o frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC + o frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 16] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + o frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC + o frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE + o frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredC + o frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredE + o frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedC + o frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedE + o frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredC + o frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredE + o frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedC + o frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedE + o frsldPvcDataUnavailableTime + o frsldPvcDataUnavailables + +3.6.6.2. Sampling + + The sample tables provide the ability to historically sample data + without requiring the additional overhead of polling. At key + periods, a network management station can collect the samples needed. + This method allows the manager to perform the collection of data at + times that will least affect the active network traffic. + + The sample data can be collected using a series of SNMP getNext or + getBulk operations. The value of frsldPvcSmplIdx increments with + each new collection bucket. This allows the managers to skip + information that has already been collected. However, care should be + taken in that the value can roll over after a long period of time. + + The start and end times of a collection period allow the manager to + know what the actual period of collection was. It is possible for + there to be discontinuities in the sample table, so both start and + end should be referenced. + +3.6.6.3. User History + + User history, as defined in RFC 2021 [19], is an alternative + mechanism that can be used to get the same benefits as the sample + table by using the objects provided for real-time polling. Some + devices MAY have the ability to use user history and opt not to + support the sample tables. If this is the case, the information from + the data table can be used to define a group of user history objects. + +3.6.7. Use of MIB Module in Calculation of Service Level Definitions + + The objects in this MIB module can be used to calculate the + statistics defined in FRF.13 [17]. The description below describes + the calculations for one direction of the data flow, i.e., data sent + from local transmitter to a remote receiver. A complete set of + bidirectional information would require calculations based on both + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 17] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + directions. For the purposes of this description, the reference + points used SHOULD consistently represent data that is sent by one + device and received by the other. + + A complete evaluation requires the combination of two uni-directional + flows. It is possible for a management station to combine all of the + calculated information into one conceptual row. Doing this requires + that each of the metrics are collected for both flow directions and + grouped by direction If the information is split between two + devices, the management station must know which two devices to + communicate with for the collection of all information. The grouping + of information SHOULD be from ingress to egress in each flow + direction. + + The calculations below use the following terminology: + + o DelayAvg + + The average delay on the PVC. This is represented within the + MIB module by frsldPvcSmplDelayAvg. + + o FrDeliveredC + + The number of frames received by the receiving device through + the receive reference point that were delivered within CIR. + This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC, frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredC, or frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredC. + + o FrDeliveredE + + The number of frames received by the receiving device through + the receive reference point that were delivered in excess of + CIR. This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE, frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredE, + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredE, or frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredE. + + o FrOfferedC + + The number of frames offered by the transmitting device through + the transmit reference point that were sent within CIR. This + is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC, frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedC, or frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedC. + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 18] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + o FrOfferedE + + The number of frames offered by the transmitting device through + the transmit reference point that were sent in excess of CIR. + This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE, frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedE, + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedE, or frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedE. + + o DataDeliveredC + + The number of octets received by the receiving device through + the receive reference point that were delivered within CIR. + This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC, frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredC, or frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredC. + + o DataDeliveredE + + The number of octets received by the receiving device through + the receive reference point that were delivered in excess of + CIR. This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE, frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredE, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredE, or frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredE. + + o DataOfferedC + + The number of octets offered by the transmitting device through + the transmit reference point that were sent within CIR. This + is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC, frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedC, or frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedC. + + o DataOfferedE + + The number of octets offered by the transmitting device through + the transmit reference point that were sent in excess of CIR. + This is represented within the MIB module by one of + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE, frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedE, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedE, or frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedE. + + o UnavailableTime + + The amount of time the PVC was not available during the + interval of interest. This is represented within the MIB + module by either frsldPvcDataUnavailableTime or + frsldPvcSmplUnavailableTime. + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 19] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + o Unavailables + + The number of times the PVC was declared to be unavailable + during the interval of interest. This is represented within + the MIB module by either frsldPvcDataUnavailables or + frsldPvcSmplUnavailables. + +3.6.8. Delay + + The frame transfer delay is defined as the amount of time elapsed, in + microseconds, from the time a frame exits the source to the time it + reaches the destination. The average delay can be found using the + MIB variable described in DelayAvg above. The delay may be + calculated as either round trip or one way, and this information is + held in the frsldPvcCtrlDelayType MIB variable. If the delay be + calculated as round trip, the value of DelayAvg represents the + average of the total delays of the round trips. In this case, the + manager SHOULD divide the value returned by the agent by two to + obtain the frame transfer delay. In the case that + frsldPvcCtrlDelayType is oneWay, the value of DelayAvg represents the + average of the frame transfer delays and SHOULD be used as is. + +3.6.9. Frame Delivery Ratio + + The frame delivery ratio is defined as the total number of frames + delivered to the destination divided by the frames offered by the + source. The destination values can be obtained using FrDeliveredC + and FrDeliveredE. The source values can be obtained using FrOfferedC + and FrOfferedE. + + FrDeliveredC + FrDeliveredE + Frame Delivery Ratio = --------------------------- + FrOfferedC + FrOfferedE + + FrDeliveredC + Committed Frame Delivery Ratio = ------------ + FrOfferedC + + FrDeliveredE + Excess Frame Delivery Ratio = ------------ + FrOfferedE + + + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 20] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +3.6.10. Data Delivery Ratio + + The data delivery ratio is defined as the total amount of data + delivered to the destination divided by the data offered by the + source. The destination values can be obtained using DataDeliveredC + and DataDeliveredE. The source values can be obtained using + DataOfferedC and DataOfferedE. + + DataDeliveredC + DataDeliveredE + Data Delivery Ratio = ------------------------------- + DataOfferedC + DataOfferedE + + DataDeliveredC + Committed Data Delivery Ratio = -------------- + DataOfferedC + + DataDeliveredE + Excess Data Delivery Ratio = -------------- + DataOfferedE + +3.6.11. Service Availability + + Some forms of service availability measurement defined in FRF.13 [17] + require knowledge of the amount of time the network is allowed to be + unavailable during the period of measurement. This is called the + excluded outage time and will be represented in the measurements + below as ExcludedTime. It is assumed that the management software + will maintain this information in that it often relates to specific + times and dates that many devices are not capable of maintaining. + Further, it may change based on a moving maintenance window that the + device cannot track well. + + Mean Time to Repair (FRMTTR) = 0 if Unavailables is 0. + + UnavailableTime + Otherwise, FRMTTR = --------------- + Unavailables + + + Virtual Connection Availability (FRVCA) = 0 if IntervalTime equals + ExcludedTime. + + IntervalTime - ExcludedTime - UnavailableTime + Otherwise, FRVCA = --------------------------------------------- *100 + IntervalTime - ExcludedTime + + + Mean Time Between Service Outages (FRMTBSO) = 0 if Unavailables is 0. + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 21] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + Otherwise, FRMTBSO = IntervalTime - ExcludedTime - UnavailableTime + --------------------------------------------- + Unavailables + +4. Relation to Other MIB Modules + + There is no explicit relation to any other frame relay MIB module nor + are any required to implement this MIB module. However, there is a + need for knowledge of ifIndexes and some understanding of DLCIs. The + ifIndex information can be found in the IF-MIB [21] which is + required. The DLCI information can be found in either the Frame + Relay DTE MIB (RFC 2115) [20] or the Frame Relay Network Services MIB + (RFC 2954) [18]; however, neither is required. + + Upon setting of frsldPvcCtrlStatus in the frsldPvcCtrlTable to + active(1) the system can be in one of the following three states: + + (1) The respective DLCI is known and is active. This corresponds to + a state in which frPVCEndptRowStatus is active(1) and + frPVCEndptRcvdSigStatus is either active(2) or none(4) for the + Frame Relay Network Services MIB (RFC 2954) [18]. For the Frame + Relay DTE MIB, the same state is shown by frCircuitRowStatus of + active(1) and frCircuitState of active(2). + + (2) The respective DLCI has not been created. This corresponds to a + state in which the row with either frPVCEndptDLCIIndex or + frCircuitDlci equal to the respective DLCI does not exist in + either the frPVCEndptTable or the frCircuitTable respectively. + + (3) The respective DLCI has just been removed. This corresponds to a + state in which either frPVCEndptRowStatus is no longer active(1) + or frPVCEndptRcvdSigStatus is no longer active(2) or none(4) for + the Frame Relay Network Services MIB (RFC 2954) [18]. For the + Frame Relay DTE MIB, the same state is shown when either + frCircuitRowStatus is no longer active(1) or frCircuitState is no + longer active(2). + + For the first case, the row in the frsldPvcDataTable will be filled. + If frsldSmplCtrlStatus in the frsldSmplCtrlTable for the respective + DLCI is also `active' the frsldPvcSampleTable will be filled as well. + + For the second case, the respective rows will not be added to any of + the data or sample tables and frsldPvcCtrlStatus SHOULD report + notReady(3). + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 22] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + For the third case, frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge should direct the + behavior of the system. If all tables are purged, this case will be + equivalent to the second case above. Otherwise, frsldPvcCtrlStatus + SHOULD remain active(1). + +5. Structure of the MIB Module + + The FRSLD-MIB consists of the following components: + + o frsldPvcCtrlTable + + o frsldSmplCtrlTable + + o frsldPvcDataTable + + o frsldPvcSampleTable + + o frsldCapabilities + + Refer to the compliance statement defined within for a definition of + what objects MUST be implemented. + +5.1. frsldPvcCtrlTable + + The frsldPvcCtrlTable is the central control table for operations of + the Frame Relay Service Level Definitions MIB. It provides variables + to control the parameters required to calculate the objects in the + other tables. + + A row in this table MUST exist in order for a row to exist in any + other table in this MIB module. + +5.2. frsldSmplCtrlTable + + This is an optional table to allow control of sampling of the data in + the data table. + +5.3. frsldPvcDataTable + + This table contains the calculated data. It relies on configuration + from the control table. + + + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 23] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +5.4. frsldPvcSampleTable + + This table contains samples of the delivery and availability + information from the data table as well as delay information + calculated over the sample period. It relies on configuration from + both the control table and the sample control table. + +5.5. frsldCapabilities + + This is a group of objects that define write capabilities of the + read-create objects in the tables above. + +6. Persistence of Data + + The data in frsldPvcCtrlTable and frsldSmplCtrlTable SHOULD persist + through power cycles. Note, however, that the symantics of readiness + for the rows still applies. This means that it is possible for a row + to be reprovisioned as notReady(3) if the underlying DLCI does not + persist. The data collected in the other tables SHOULD NOT persist + through power cycles in that the reference TimeStamp is no longer + valid. + +7. Object Definitions + +FRSLD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN + +IMPORTS + MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, + Counter32, Gauge32, Integer32, + Counter64, TimeTicks, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI + CounterBasedGauge64 FROM HCNUM-TC + TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, RowStatus, + TimeStamp FROM SNMPv2-TC + MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF + ifIndex FROM IF-MIB + DLCI FROM FRAME-RELAY-DTE-MIB; + + frsldMIB MODULE-IDENTITY + LAST-UPDATED "200201030000Z" -- January 3, 2002 + ORGANIZATION "IETF Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group" + CONTACT-INFO + "IETF Frame Relay Service MIB (frnetmib) Working Group + + WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ + frnetmib-charter.html + WG-email: frnetmib@sunroof.eng.sun.com + Subscribe: frnetmib-request@sunroof.eng.sun.com + Email Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 24] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + Chair: Andy Malis + Vivace Networks + Email: Andy.Malis@vivacenetworks.com + + WG editor: Robert Steinberger + Paradyne Networks and + Fujitsu Network Communications + Email: robert.steinberger@fnc.fujitsu.com + + Co-author: Orly Nicklass + RAD Data Communications Ltd. + EMail: Orly_n@rad.co.il" + DESCRIPTION + "The MIB module to describe generic objects for + FRF.13 Frame Relay Service Level Definitions." + REVISION "200201030000Z" -- January 3, 2002 + DESCRIPTION + "Initial version, published as RFC 3202" + ::= { mib-2 95 } + + -- + -- Textual Conventions + -- + FrsldTxRP ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The reference point a PVC uses for calculation + of transmitter related statistics. + + The valid values for this type of object are as follows: + - srcLocalRP(1) for the local source + - ingTxLocalRP(2) for the local ingress queue input + - tpTxLocalRP(3) for the local traffic policing + - eqiTxLocalRP(4) for the local egress queue input + - eqoTxLocalRP(5) for the local egress queue output + - otherTxLocalRP(6) for any other local transmit point + - srcRemoteRP(7) for the remote source + - ingTxLocalRP(8) for the remote ingress queue input + - tpTxLocalRP(9) for the remote traffic policing + - eqiTxRemoteRP(10) for the remote egress queue input + - eqoTxRemoteRP(11) for the remote egress queue output + - otherTxRemoteRP(12) for any other remote xmit point" + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 2.3" + SYNTAX INTEGER { + srcLocalRP(1), + ingTxLocalRP(2), + tpTxLocalRP(3), + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 25] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + eqiTxLocalRP(4), + eqoTxLocalRP(5), + otherTxLocalRP(6), + srcRemoteRP(7), + ingTxRemoteRP(8), + tpTxRemoteRP(9), + eqiTxRemoteRP(10), + eqoTxRemoteRP(11), + otherTxRemoteRP(12) + } + + FrsldRxRP ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The reference point a PVC uses for calculation + of receiver related statistics. + + The valid values for this object are as follows: + - desLocalRP(1) for the local destination + - ingRxLocalRP(2) for the local ingress queue input + - tpRxLocalRP(3) for the local traffic policing + - eqiRxLocalRP(4) for the local egress queue input + - eqoRxLocalRP(5) for the local egress queue output + - otherRxLocalRP(6) for any other local receive point + - desRemoteRP(7) for the remote destination + - ingRxRemoteRP(8) for the remote ingress input + - tpRxRemoteRP(9) for the remote traffic policing + - eqiRxRemoteRP(10) for the remote egress queue input + - eqoRxRemoteRP(11) for the remote egress queue output + - otherRxRemoteRP(12) for any other remote receive point" + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 2.3" + SYNTAX INTEGER { + desLocalRP(1), + ingRxLocalRP(2), + tpRxLocalRP(3), + eqiRxLocalRP(4), + eqoRxLocalRP(5), + otherRxLocalRP(6), + desRemoteRP(7), + ingRxRemoteRP(8), + tpRxRemoteRP(9), + eqiRxRemoteRP(10), + eqoRxRemoteRP(11), + otherRxRemoteRP(12) + } + + -- + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 26] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + -- Base Objects + --- + + frsldObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frsldMIB 1 } + frsldCapabilities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frsldMIB 2 } + frsldConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frsldMIB 3 } + + -- The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions PVC Control Table + -- + -- This table is used to define and display the parameters of + -- service level definitions on individual PVCs. + + frsldPvcCtrlTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrsldPvcCtrlEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + PVC control table." + ::= { frsldObjects 1 } + + frsldPvcCtrlEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldPvcCtrlEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry in the Frame Relay Service Level + Definitions PVC control table." + INDEX { ifIndex, frsldPvcCtrlDlci, + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP, frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP} + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlTable 1 } + + FrsldPvcCtrlEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + -- + -- Index Control Variables + -- + frsldPvcCtrlDlci DLCI, + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP FrsldTxRP, + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP FrsldRxRP, + frsldPvcCtrlStatus RowStatus, + -- + -- Service Level Definitions Setup Variables + -- + frsldPvcCtrlPacketFreq Integer32, + -- + -- Delay Specific Setup Variables + -- + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 27] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcCtrlDelayFrSize Integer32, + frsldPvcCtrlDelayType INTEGER, + frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut Integer32, + -- + -- Data Persistence Control Variables + -- + frsldPvcCtrlPurge Integer32, + frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge INTEGER, + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime TimeStamp + } + + frsldPvcCtrlDlci OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX DLCI + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The value of this object is equal to the DLCI + value for this PVC." + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 1 } + + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldTxRP + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The reference point this PVC uses for calculation + of transmitter related statistics. This object + together with frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP define the + measurement domain." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 2.3" + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 2 } + + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldRxRP + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The reference point this PVC uses for calculation + of receiver related statistics. This object + together with frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP define the + measurement domain." + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 3 } + + frsldPvcCtrlStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 28] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + DESCRIPTION + "The status of the current row. This object is + used to add, delete, and disable rows in this + table. When the status changes to active(1) for the + first time, a row will also be added to the data + table below. This row SHOULD not be removed until + the status is changed to deleted. + + When this object is set to destroy(6), all associated + sample and data table rows will also be deleted. + When this object is changed from active(1) to any + other valid value, the defined purge behavior will + affect the data and sample tables. + + The rows added to this table MUST have a valid + ifIndex and an ifType related to frame relay. Further, + the reference points referred to by frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP + and frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP MUST be supported (see the + frsldRPCaps object). + + If at any point the row is not in the active(1) state + and the DLCI no longer exists, the state SHOULD + report notReady(3). + + The data in this table SHOULD persist through power + cycles. The symantics of readiness for the rows still + applies. This means that it is possible for a row to be + reprovisioned as notReady(3) if the underlying DLCI does + not persist." + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 4 } + + frsldPvcCtrlPacketFreq OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..3600) + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The frequency in seconds between initiation of + specialized packets used to collect delay and / or + delivery information as supported by the device. + A value of zero indicates that no packets will + be sent." + DEFVAL { 60 } + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 5 } + + frsldPvcCtrlDelayFrSize OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..8188) + UNITS "octets" + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 29] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The size of the payload in the frame used for + calculation of network delay." + DEFVAL { 128 } + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 6 } + + frsldPvcCtrlDelayType OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + oneWay(1), + roundTrip(2) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The type of delay measurement performed." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 3" + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 7 } + + frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..3600) + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A delay frame will count as a missed poll if + it is not updated in the time specified by + frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut." + DEFVAL { 60 } + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 8 } + + frsldPvcCtrlPurge OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..172800) -- up to 48 hours + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This object defines the amount of time the device + will wait, after discovering that a DLCI does not exist, + the DLCI was deleted or the value of frsldPvcCtrlStatus + changes from active(1) to either notInService(2) or + notReady(3), prior to automatically purging the history + in the sample tables and resetting the data in the data + tables to all zeroes. If frsldPvcCtrlStatus is manually + set to destroy(6), this object does not apply." + DEFVAL { 0 } + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 30] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 9 } + + frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX INTEGER { + none(1), + sampleContols(2), + all(3) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This object defines whether rows will + automatically be deleted from the tables + when the information is purged. + + - A value of none(1) indicates that no rows + will deleted. The last known values will + be preserved. + - A value of sampleControls(2) indicates + that all associated sample control rows + will be deleted. + - A value of all(3) indicates that all + associated rows SHOULD be deleted." + DEFVAL { all } + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 10 } + + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This object returns the value of sysUpTime + at the time the information was last purged. + This value SHOULD be set to the sysUpTime + upon setting frsldPvcCtrlStatus to active(1) + for the first time. Each time a + discontinuity in the counters occurs, this + value MUST be set to the sysUpTime. + + If frsldPvcCtrlStatus has never been active(1), + this object SHOULD return 0. + + This object SHOULD be used as the discontinuity + timer for the counters in frsldPvcDataTable." + ::= { frsldPvcCtrlEntry 11 } + + -- The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions Sampling Control + -- Table + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 31] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + -- + -- This table is used to define the sample control parameters + -- of service level definitions on individual PVCs. + + frsldSmplCtrlTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrsldSmplCtrlEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + sampling control table." + ::= { frsldObjects 2 } + + frsldSmplCtrlEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldSmplCtrlEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry in the Frame Relay Service Level + Definitions sample control table." + INDEX { ifIndex, frsldPvcCtrlDlci, + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP, frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP, + frsldSmplCtrlIdx } + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlTable 1 } + + FrsldSmplCtrlEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + -- + -- Index Control Variables + -- + frsldSmplCtrlIdx Integer32, + frsldSmplCtrlStatus RowStatus, + -- + -- Collection Control Variables + -- + frsldSmplCtrlColPeriod Integer32, + frsldSmplCtrlBuckets Integer32, + frsldSmplCtrlBucketsGranted Integer32 + } + + frsldSmplCtrlIdx OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..256) + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The unique index for this row in the + sample control table." + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlEntry 1 } + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 32] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldSmplCtrlStatus OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX RowStatus + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The status of the current row. This object is + used to add, delete, and disable rows in this + table. This row SHOULD NOT be removed until the + status is changed to destroy(6). When the status + changes to active(1), the collection in the sample + tables below will be activated. + + The rows added to this table MUST have a valid + ifIndex, an ifType related to frame relay, + frsldPvcCtrlDlci MUST exist for the specified + ifIndex and frsldPvcCtrlStatus MUST have a + value of active(1). + + The value of frsldPvcCtrlStatus MUST be active(1) + to transition this object to active(1). If + the value of frsldPvcCtrlStatus becomes anything + other than active(1) when the state of this object + is not active(1), this object SHOULD be set to + notReady(3). + + The data in this table SHOULD persist through power + cycles. The symantics of readiness for the rows still + applies. This means that it is possible for a row to be + reprovisioned as notReady(3) if the underlying DLCI does + not persist." + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlEntry 2 } + + frsldSmplCtrlColPeriod OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) + UNITS "seconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The amount of time in seconds that defines a + period of collection for the statistics. + At the end of each period, the statistics will be + sampled and a row is added to the sample table." + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlEntry 3 } + + frsldSmplCtrlBuckets OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..65535) + MAX-ACCESS read-create + STATUS current + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 33] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + DESCRIPTION + "The number of discrete buckets over which the + data statistics are sampled. + + When this object is created or modified, the device + SHOULD attempt to set the frsldSmplCtrlBuckets- + Granted to a value as close as is possible + depending upon the implementation and the available + resources." + DEFVAL { 60 } + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlEntry 4 } + + frsldSmplCtrlBucketsGranted OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535) + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of discrete buckets granted. This + object will return 0 until frsldSmplCtrlStatus is + set to active(1). At that time the buckets will be + allocated depending upon implementation and + available resources." + ::= { frsldSmplCtrlEntry 5 } + + -- The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions PVC Data Table + -- + -- This table contains the accumulated values of + -- the collected data. This table is the table that should + -- be referenced by external polling mechanisms if time + -- based polling be desired. + + frsldPvcDataTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrsldPvcDataEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + data table. + + This table contains accumulated values of the + collected data. It is the table that should be + referenced by external polling mechanisms if + time based polling be desired." + ::= { frsldObjects 3 } + + frsldPvcDataEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldPvcDataEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 34] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry in the Frame Relay Service Level + Definitions data table." + INDEX { ifIndex, frsldPvcCtrlDlci, + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP, frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP} + ::= { frsldPvcDataTable 1 } + + FrsldPvcDataEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + frsldPvcDataMissedPolls Counter32, + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC Counter32, + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE Counter32, + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC Counter32, + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE Counter32, + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC Counter32, + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE Counter32, + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC Counter32, + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE Counter32, + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredC Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredE Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedC Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedE Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredC Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredE Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedC Counter64, + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedE Counter64, + frsldPvcDataUnavailableTime TimeTicks, + frsldPvcDataUnavailables Counter32 + } + + frsldPvcDataMissedPolls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of polls that have been determined + to be missed. These polls are typically associated + with the calculation of delay but may also be + used for the calculation of other statistics. If an + anticipated poll is not received in a reasonable + amount of time, it should be counted as missed. + The value used to determine the reasonable amount + of time is contained in frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 35] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 1 } + + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 2 } + + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 3 } + + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 36] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 4 } + + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 5 } + + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 6 } + + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 37] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 7 } + + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 8 } + + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 9 } + + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR. This object is a 64-bit version + of frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC. + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 38] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 10 } + + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR. This object is a 64-bit + version of frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 11 } + + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR. This object is + a 64-bit version of frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 12 } + + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 39] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR. This + object is a 64-bit version of frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 13 } + + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR. This object is a 64-bit version of + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 14 } + + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR. This object is a 64-bit + version of frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 15 } + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 40] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR. This object is + a 64-bit version of frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 16 } + + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR. + This object is a 64-bit version of + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 17 } + + frsldPvcDataUnavailableTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The amount of time this PVC was declared unavailable + for any reason since this row was created." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 6.1 (OutageTime)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 18 } + + frsldPvcDataUnavailables OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Counter32 + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 41] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of times this PVC was declared unavailable + for any reason since this row was created. + + Discontinuities in the value of this counter can + occur at re-initialization of the management system + and at other times as indicated by + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 6.1 (OutageCount)" + ::= { frsldPvcDataEntry 19 } + + -- The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions PVC Sample Table + -- + -- This table contains the sampled delay, delivery and + -- availability information. + + frsldPvcSampleTable OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrsldPvcSampleEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The Frame Relay Service Level Definitions + sample table." + ::= { frsldObjects 4 } + + frsldPvcSampleEntry OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX FrsldPvcSampleEntry + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "An entry in the Frame Relay Service Level + Definitions data sample table." + INDEX { ifIndex, frsldPvcCtrlDlci, + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP, frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP, + frsldSmplCtrlIdx, frsldPvcSmplIdx } + ::= { frsldPvcSampleTable 1 } + + FrsldPvcSampleEntry ::= + SEQUENCE { + frsldPvcSmplIdx Integer32, + frsldPvcSmplDelayMin Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDelayMax Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDelayAvg Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplMissedPolls Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredC Gauge32, + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 42] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredE Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedC Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedE Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredC Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredE Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedC Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedE Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredC CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredE CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedC CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedE CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredC CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredE CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedC CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedE CounterBasedGauge64, + frsldPvcSmplUnavailableTime TimeTicks, + frsldPvcSmplUnavailables Gauge32, + frsldPvcSmplStartTime TimeStamp, + frsldPvcSmplEndTime TimeStamp + } + + frsldPvcSmplIdx OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) + MAX-ACCESS not-accessible + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The bucket index of the current sample. This + increments once for each new bucket in the + table." + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 1 } + + frsldPvcSmplDelayMin OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + UNITS "microseconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The minimum delay reported in microseconds measured + for any information packet that arrived during this + interval. + + A value of zero means that no data is available." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 3.1 (FTD)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 2 } + + frsldPvcSmplDelayMax OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 43] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + UNITS "microseconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The largest delay reported in microseconds measured + for any information packet that arrived during this + interval. + + A value of zero means that no data is available." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 3.1 (FTD)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 3 } + + frsldPvcSmplDelayAvg OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + UNITS "microseconds" + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The average delay reported in microseconds measured + for all delay packets that arrived during this + interval. + + A value of zero means that no data is available." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 3.1 (FTD)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 4 } + + frsldPvcSmplMissedPolls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The total number of polls that were missed during + this interval." + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 5 } + + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR during this interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 44] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 6 } + + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR during this interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliverede))" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 7 } + + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR during this + interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 8 } + + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR + during this interval. + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 45] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 9 } + + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR during this interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 10 } + + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlDeliveredRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR during this interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 11 } + + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 46] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR during this + interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferredC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 12 } + + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR + during this interval. + + If it is the case that the high capacity counters + are also used, this MUST report the value of the + lower 32 bits of the CounterBasedGauge64 value of + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 13 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR during this interval. This object + is a 64-bit version of frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 14 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 47] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + sent in excess of the CIR during this interval. + This object is a 64-bit version of frsldPvcSmpl- + FrDeliveredE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 15 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR during this + interval. This object is a 64-bit version of + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 16 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of frames that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR + during this interval. This object is a 64-bit + version of frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 4.1 (FramesOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 17 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent within CIR during this interval. This value + is a 64-bit version of frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliveredc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 18 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 48] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were received at + frsldPvcCtrlReceiveRP and determined to have been + sent in excess of the CIR during this interval. This + value is a 64-bit version of frsldPvcSmplData- + DeliveredE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataDeliverede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 19 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedC OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP within CIR during this + interval. This value is a 64-bit version of + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedC." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferedc)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 20 } + + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedE OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX CounterBasedGauge64 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of octets that were offered through + frsldPvcCtrlTransmitRP in excess of the CIR + during this interval. This object is a 64-bit + version of frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedE." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 5.1 (DataOfferede)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 21 } + + frsldPvcSmplUnavailableTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeTicks + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The amount of time this PVC was declared + unavailable for any reason during this interval." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 6.1 (OutageTime)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 22 } + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 49] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcSmplUnavailables OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The number of times this PVC was declared + unavailable for any reason during this interval." + REFERENCE + "FRF.13: Section 6.1 (OutageCount)" + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 23 } + + frsldPvcSmplStartTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The value of sysUpTime when this sample interval + started." + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 24 } + + frsldPvcSmplEndTime OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX TimeStamp + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The value of sysUpTime when this sample interval + ended. No data will be reported and the row will + not appear in the table until the sample has + been collected." + ::= { frsldPvcSampleEntry 25 } + + -- Capabilities Group + -- This group provides capabilities objects for the tables + -- that control configuration. + + frsldPvcCtrlWriteCaps OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BITS { + frsldPvcCtrlStatus(0), + frsldPvcCtrlPacketFreq(1), + frsldPvcCtrlDelayFrSize(2), + frsldPvcCtrlDelayType(3), + frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut(4), + frsldPvcCtrlPurge(5), + frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge(6) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 50] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + "This object specifies the write capabilities + for the read-create objects of the PVC Control + table. If the corresponding bit is enabled (1), + the agent supports writes to that object." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 1 } + + frsldSmplCtrlWriteCaps OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BITS { + frsldSmplCtrlStatus(0), + frsldSmplCtrlBuckets(1) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This object specifies the write capabilities + for the read-create objects of the Sample Control + table. If the corresponding bit is enabled (1), + the agent supports writes to that object." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 2 } + + frsldRPCaps OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX BITS { + srcLocalRP(0), + ingTxLocalRP(1), + tpTxLocalRP(2), + eqiTxLocalRP(3), + eqoTxLocalRP(4), + otherTxLocalRP(5), + srcRemoteRP(6), + ingTxRemoteRP(7), + tpTxRemoteRP(8), + eqiTxRemoteRP(9), + eqoTxRemoteRP(10), + otherTxRemoteRP(11), + desLocalRP(12), + ingRxLocalRP(13), + tpRxLocalRP(14), + eqiRxLocalRP(15), + eqoRxLocalRP(16), + otherRxLocalRP(17), + desRemoteRP(18), + ingRxRemoteRP(19), + tpRxRemoteRP(20), + eqiRxRemoteRP(21), + eqoRxRemoteRP(22), + otherRxRemoteRP(23) + } + MAX-ACCESS read-only + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 51] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "This object specifies the reference points that + the agent supports. This object allows the management + application to discover which rows can be created on + a specific device." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 3 } + + frsldMaxPvcCtrls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The maximum number of control rows that can be created + in frsldPvcCtrlTable. Sets to this object lower than + the current value of frsldNumPvcCtrls should result in + inconsistentValue." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 4 } + + frsldNumPvcCtrls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The current number of rows in frsldPvcCtrlTable." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 5 } + + + frsldMaxSmplCtrls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) + MAX-ACCESS read-write + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The maximum number of control rows that can be created + in frsldSmplCtrlTable. Sets to this object lower than + the current value of frsldNumSmplCtrls should result in + inconsistentValue." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 6 } + + frsldNumSmplCtrls OBJECT-TYPE + SYNTAX Gauge32 + MAX-ACCESS read-only + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The current number of rows in frsldSmplCtrlTable." + ::= { frsldCapabilities 7 } + + -- Conformance Information + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 52] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frsldConformance 1 } + frsldMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frsldConformance 2 } + + -- + -- Compliance Statements + -- + + frsldCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "The compliance statement for SNMP entities + which support with Frame Relay Service Level + Definitions. This group defines the minimum + level of support required for compliance." + MODULE -- this module + MANDATORY-GROUPS { frsldPvcReqCtrlGroup, + frsldPvcReqDataGroup, + frsldCapabilitiesGroup} + + GROUP frsldPvcHCFrameDataGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory only for those network + interfaces with corresponding instance of ifSpeed + greater than 650,000,000 bits/second." + + GROUP frsldPvcHCOctetDataGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory only for those network + interfaces with corresponding instance of ifSpeed + greater than 650,000,000 bits/second." + + GROUP frsldPvcPacketGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is optional. Network interfaces that + allow control of the packets used to collect + information are encouraged to implement this + group." + + GROUP frsldPvcDelayCtrlGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is optional. Network interfaces that + offer control of the delay measurement are + strongly encouraged to implement this group." + + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory only for those network + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 53] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + interfaces that allow data sampling." + + GROUP frsldPvcDelayDataGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is only mandatory when + frsldPvcDelayCtrlGroup is implemented. It is + strongly encouraged that any device capable + of measuring delay implement this group." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleDelayGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is only mandatory when both + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup and frsldPvcDelayDataGroup + are supported." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleDataGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory whenever + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup is supported." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleHCFrameGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory whenever both + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup and frsldPvcHCFrameDataGroup + are supported." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleHCDataGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory whenever both + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup and frsldPvcHCOctetDataGroup + are supported." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleAvailGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory whenever + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup is supported." + + GROUP frsldPvcSampleGeneralGroup + DESCRIPTION + "This group is mandatory whenever + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup is supported." + + OBJECT frsldPvcCtrlStatus + SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) } -- subset of RowStatus + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Row creation can be done outside of the scope of + the SNMP protocol. If this object is implemented + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 54] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + with max-access of read-only, then the only value + that MUST be returned is active(1) and + frsldPvcCtrlWriteCaps MUST return 0 for the + frsldPvcCtrlStatus(0) bit." + + OBJECT frsldPvcCtrlPurge + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required. If this object is + implemented with a max-access of read-only, then + the frsldPvcCtrlPurge(5) bit must return 0." + + OBJECT frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required. If this object is + implemented with a max-access of read-only, then + the frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge(6) bit must return + 0." + + OBJECT frsldMaxPvcCtrls + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required if the device either + dynamically allocates memory or statically allocates + a fixed number of entries. In the case of static + allocation, the device should always report the + correct maximum number of controls. In the case + of dynamic allocation, the device SHOULD always + report a number greater than frsldNumPvcCtrls + when allocation is possible and a number equal to + frsldNumPvcCtrls when allocation is not possible." + OBJECT frsldMaxSmplCtrls + MIN-ACCESS read-only + DESCRIPTION + "Write access is not required if the device either + dynamically allocates memory or statically allocates + a fixed number of entries. In the case of static + allocation, the device should always report the + correct maximum number of controls. In the case + of dynamic allocation, the device SHOULD always + report a number greater than frsldNumSmplCtrls + when allocation is possible and a number equal to + frsldNumSmplCtrls when allocation is not possible." + + ::= { frsldMIBCompliances 1 } + + -- + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 55] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + -- Units of Conformance + -- + frsldPvcReqCtrlGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcCtrlStatus, + frsldPvcCtrlPurge, + frsldPvcCtrlDeleteOnPurge, + frsldPvcCtrlLastPurgeTime + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of required objects providing + control information applicable to a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 1 } + + frsldPvcPacketGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcCtrlPacketFreq + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing packet + level control information applicable to a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 2 } + + frsldPvcDelayCtrlGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcCtrlDelayFrSize, + frsldPvcCtrlDelayType, + frsldPvcCtrlDelayTimeOut + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing delay + control information applicable to a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcPacketGroup + and frsldPvcDelayDataGroup MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 3 } + + frsldPvcSampleCtrlGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldSmplCtrlStatus, + frsldSmplCtrlColPeriod, + frsldSmplCtrlBuckets, + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 56] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldSmplCtrlBucketsGranted + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing sample + control information applicable to a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcReqDataGroup + and frsldPvcSampleGeneralGroup MUST also be + implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 4 } + + frsldPvcReqDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredC, + frsldPvcDataFrDeliveredE, + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedC, + frsldPvcDataFrOfferedE, + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredC, + frsldPvcDataDataDeliveredE, + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedC, + frsldPvcDataDataOfferedE, + frsldPvcDataUnavailableTime, + frsldPvcDataUnavailables + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of required objects providing data + collected on a PVC which implements Service + Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 5 } + + frsldPvcDelayDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcDataMissedPolls + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing delay + data collected on a PVC which implements Service + Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcDelayCtrlGroup + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 6 } + + frsldPvcHCFrameDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 57] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredC, + frsldPvcDataHCFrDeliveredE, + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedC, + frsldPvcDataHCFrOfferedE + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing high + capacity frame data collected on a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 7 } + + frsldPvcHCOctetDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredC, + frsldPvcDataHCDataDeliveredE, + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedC, + frsldPvcDataHCDataOfferedE + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing high + capacity octet data collected on a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 8 } + + frsldPvcSampleDelayGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplDelayMin, + frsldPvcSmplDelayMax, + frsldPvcSmplDelayAvg, + frsldPvcSmplMissedPolls + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing delay + sample data collected on a PVC which implements + Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcDelayCtrlGroup + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 9 } + + frsldPvcSampleDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplFrDeliveredE, + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 58] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplFrOfferedE, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplDataDeliveredE, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplDataOfferedE + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing data + and frame delivery sample data collected on a PVC + which implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcReqDataGroup + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 10 } + + frsldPvcSampleHCFrameGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrDeliveredE, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplHCFrOfferedE + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing high + capacity frame delivery sample data collected on a PVC + which implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcHCFrameDataGroup + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 11 } + + frsldPvcSampleHCDataGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredC, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataDeliveredE, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedC, + frsldPvcSmplHCDataOfferedE + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing high + capacity data delivery sample data collected on a PVC + which implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcHCOctetDataGroup + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 59] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 12 } + + frsldPvcSampleAvailGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplUnavailableTime, + frsldPvcSmplUnavailables + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing + availability sample data collected on a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions. + + If this group is implemented, frsldPvcReqDataGroup + MUST also be implemented." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 13 } + + frsldPvcSampleGeneralGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcSmplStartTime, + frsldPvcSmplEndTime + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of optional objects providing + general sample data collected on a PVC which + implements Service Level Definitions." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 14 } + + frsldCapabilitiesGroup OBJECT-GROUP + OBJECTS { + frsldPvcCtrlWriteCaps, + frsldSmplCtrlWriteCaps, + frsldRPCaps, + frsldMaxPvcCtrls, + frsldNumPvcCtrls, + frsldMaxSmplCtrls, + frsldNumSmplCtrls + } + STATUS current + DESCRIPTION + "A collection of required objects providing + capability information and control for this + MIB module." + ::= { frsldMIBGroups 15 } +END + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 60] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +8. Acknowledgments + + This document was produced by the Frame Relay Service MIB Working + Group. It is based on the Frame Relay Forum's implementation + agreement on service level definitions, FRF.13 [17]. + + The editors would like to thank the following people for their + helpful comments: + + o Ken Rehbehn, Visual Networks + + o Santa Dasu, Quick Eagle Networks + +9. References + + [1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for + Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999. + + [2] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of + Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC + 1155, May 1990. + + [3] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16, + RFC 1212, March 1991. + + [4] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the + SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991. + + [5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, + M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information + Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999. + + [6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, + M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, + RFC 2579, April 1999. + + [7] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, + M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD + 58, RFC 2580, April 1999. + + [8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple + Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990. + + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 61] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + + [9] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, + "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January + 1996. + + [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport + Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol + (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996. + + [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message + Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management + Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999. + + [12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) + for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol + (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999. + + [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol + Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management + Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996. + + [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC + 2573, April 1999. + + [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access + Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol + (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999. + + [16] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction + to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management + Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999. + + [17] Frame Relay Forum Technical Committee, "Service Level + Definitions Implementations Agreement", FRF.13, August 1998. + + [18] Rehbehn, K. and D. Fowler, "Definitions of Managed Objects for + Frame Relay Service", RFC 2954, October 2000. + + [19] Waldbusser, S., "Remote Network Monitoring Management + Information Base Version 2 using SMIv2", RFC 2021, January 1997. + + [20] Brown, C. and F. Baker, "Management Information Base for Frame + Relay DTEs Using SMIv2", RFC 2115, September 1997. + + [21] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB", + RFC 2863, June 2000. + + [22] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement + Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 62] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +10. Security Considerations + + There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB that + have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such + objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network + environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure + environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on + network operations. + + SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network + itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no + control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and + GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB. + + It is recommended that the implementers consider the security + features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use + of the User-based Security Model RFC 2574 [12] and the View-based + Access Control Model RFC 2575 [15] is recommended. + + It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP + entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly + configured to give access to the objects only to those principals + (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET + (change/create/delete) them. + +11. Authors' Addresses + + Robert Steinberger + Fujitsu Network Communications + 2801 Telecom Parkway + Richardson, TX 75082 + + Phone: 1-972-479-4739 + EMail: robert.steinberger@fnc.fujitsu.com + + + Orly Nicklass, Ph.D + RAD Data Communications Ltd. + 12 Hanechoshet Street + Tel Aviv, Israel 69710 + + Phone: 972 3 7659969 + EMail: Orly_n@rad.co.il + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 63] + +RFC 3202 Frame Relay Service Level Defs MIB January 2002 + + +12. Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Steinberger & Nicklass Standards Track [Page 64] + |