diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc386.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc386.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc386.txt | 283 |
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc386.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc386.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ffd1cef --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc386.txt @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group Bernard P. Cosell +Request For Comments # 386 David C. Walden +NIC # 11358 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. +Categories: August 16, 1972 +Updates: +Obsoletes: + + + LETTER TO TIP USERS -- 2 + + + This is the second letter to TIP users. The first was RFC #365. +There will be more letters to TIP users as they seem to us to be a +good way to keep you informed about what's going on. We suggest you +keep these letters with your TIP User's Guide (TUG) as we will use the +letters to provide documentation of TIP system changes which are made +before we can get TUG revisions printed and distributed. (It is almost +inevitable that the TUG revisions follow actual system changes. +Further- more, these letters will allow us more discussion of new +commands than in TUG.) + + Some of the changes we will be making to the TIP have been +suggested by TIP users. We won't bother with acknowledg- ments. + + The @PROTOCOL TO LOGIN and @PROTOCOL TO CLOSE BOTH commands will +be removed very soon. We presume no one uses these commands any more +since they have been replaced by @LOGIN and @CLOSE. + + As we warned in TIP Letter 1, the @LOGIN command will be given a +parameter soon, the Host number up to now given with the @HOST +command. At the same time, @HOST will be changed so it does a +simultaneous @RECEIVE FROM HOST and @SEND TO HOST. Presently, @HOST +is the same as @SEND TO HOST. + + Several changes will be made to the @TRANSMIT commands very soon. +First @TRANSMIT ON NO CHARACTERS and @TRANSMIT ON EVERY CHARACTER will +be removed. Their functions will be covered by the other @TRANSMIT +commands. @TRANSMIT NOW will continue to function as at present; it +will cause the one message presently being accumulated to be sent as +soon as possible. @TRANSMIT ON LINEFEED and @TRANSMIT ON MESSAGE-END +will continue to cause the message being accumulated to be sent on +linefeed and CONTROL-S. However, they will additionally cause the +message being accumulated to be sent when the character buffer is +almost full. Thus, it will no longer be necessary to give a @TRANSMIT +EVERY <big number> with @TRANSMIT ON LINEFEED and @TRANSMIT ON +MESSAGE-END. @TRANSMIT EVERY # will continue to cause the message +being accumulated to be sent as near as possible to every #th +character. However, values of # which are bigger than the size of the + + + + [Page 1] + +RFC # 386 NIC #11358 + + +input buffer will cause transmission when the buffer is almost full; +and a value of 0 for # will reset the terminal to its initial setting +-- TRANSMIT-ON-LINEFEED mode off, TRANSMIT ON MESSAGE- END mode off, +and transmitting every character. Thus, TRANSMIT EVERY 0 has the +effect of the removed @TRANSMIT ON NO CHARACTER command, and @TRANSMIT +EVERY 1 has the effect of the removed @TRANSMIT ON EVERY CHARACTER +command. + + There are two ways outside of letters and the telephone to +communicate your suggestions and complaints to us: log into BBN-TENEX +and SNDMSG to WALDEN or use the NIC Journal system to send a message +to DCW3. Dave likes letters best, incidentally. + + We are going to remove the "NEWS" herald from the TIP's HELLO +message. The problem is that we don't know when everybody has read the +latest news so that we can turn off the herald. Therefore, we can't +turn it off. Therefore, it is useless. Check the NEWS every time you +use the TIP. If once the news begins printing you discover you have +already seen it, you can stop it by typing @CLOSE _LF_ (on a 2741 hit +"attention" first). + + A new TIP message will have been added by the time you get this +letter, the message TIP GOING DOWN. This message will be printed on +every TIP terminal shortly before the TIP is taken down for preventive +maintenance, new software releases, etc. (see RFC #381 for further +discussion of this topic). When this message is printed, all TIP users +should cleanly stop what they are doing with a Host. Eventually, this +message will include information on how long until the TIP will go +down, for how long it will be down, and why. + + While we are on the subject of TIP messages, let us mention that +we will be adding a number of new messages which we believe will +remove some of the present confusion about what the TIP is doing. +Unfortunately, we don't have the space to store the message text +strings, so, we will use numbers for the new messages. The format of +these messages will probably be something like M46 for message 46. +Perhaps when the TIPs get more core we can replace the number-messages +by text-messages. + + We are thinking of changing all the TIP LOGIN commands to OPEN +commands which would be more opposite to the CLOSE commands and not so +liable to confusion with Host LOGIN. + + On page 12 of the TUG is a description of how Hosts can send +commands to a TIP terminal. Be warned, if you decide to use this +facility, that we are changing the TIP command language slowly and we +will not be constrained in these changes by the fact that some Hosts +are sending TIP commands. Therefore, if a Host is going to send a + + + + [Page 2] + +RFC # 386 NIC #11358 + + +command to a TIP it ought to implement this in a manner that can be +changed easily. + + Some TIP users have been seeing the following problem. They are +communicating with a Host when suddenly they get the message DEAD. If +they try to LOGIN to the Host again they do not get the DEAD message, +but the Host refuses to allow the LOGIN by either doing nothing, +closing, or refusing. The problem was that occasionally the network +partitioned briefly; for instance, one of the two cross-country lines +was down and the other got flaky for a few seconds. If, during a +period when the network is partitioned, a TIP user sends a message to +a Host which cannot be reached, the TIP types DEAD and closes the +connection to the Host. The Host, on the other hand, may not have been +trying to send to the TIP when the network partitioned; in that case +it might not have noticed that the network partitioned and therefore +still thinks it has an open connection to the TIP. When the TIP then +tries to re-LOGIN to the Host, the Host refuses because it already has +an open connection with that particular TIP device. + + Now that we have three independent cross-country paths we do not +expect this problem to occur often, but if it does we see no +short-term solution. We can't just let a CLOSE reset the connection +since the user's immediately preceeding LOGIN destroyed the Host +supplied socket numbers. One can get out of this state by executing +the Host/Host protocol command from the TIP which resets _all_ TIP +users at the given TIP talking to the given Host; but this is a little +gross. What is maybe needed is a Host/Host protocol command to reset +the Host's connections with a particular user (TIP) socket; we will +try to understand the ramifications of such a command and perhaps +undertake promotion of a Host/Host protocol change. In the meantime, +frequently when the above problem happens some other TIP terminal can +still LOGIN to the Host and then halt the hung terminal's job from the +Host side. If it is not possible to get through on another +connection, a telephone call to the Host, asking them to log the job +out, may be necessary. Or, if there is really no other user talking to +the particular Host, the reset command can be executed -- this command +is not documented but we will tell a responsible person at each TIP +site how to execute the command. + + There is a problem related to the above problem which some TIP +users have seen. Occasionally, an IMP crashes somewhere in the network +and takes a packet of a message along with it. Eventually, the source +of the message gets an incomplete transmission message from the +network. When the TIP gets this message, it closes the connection and +calls the destination dead. This is what most other Hosts do also, we +understand. A more reasonable thing to do might be to retransmit the +message or to tell the user and then let him continue; we would like +to do one of these. But before retransmission or letting the user + + + + [Page 3] + +RFC # 386 NIC #11358 + + +continue, the TIP and Host's allocate counters must be resynchronized. +However, there is no Host/Host protocol way to synchronize simple +enough for the TIP to use. What may be needed is a simple Host/Host +protocol reset allocate command. We will try to understand this issue +and, again, perhaps undertake promotion of a Host/Host protocol +change. + + The above two problems explain part of the "lost allocates" but +not all. We have now instrumented the TIP program in a manner which we +hope will help us find the rest of the lost allocate problem soon. + + The TIP's logger (opener?) has been causing users some problems. +Upon examination, the problems were seen to originate from basic +design assumptions within the logger which we are working on changing. +In the short term, however, we think that a discussion of what the +logger is doing and how it works will alleviate some of the grief. + + For the user, opening proceeds in three phases. In the first, the +user is queued up waiting to "get" the TIP's logger. In the second, +the user has gotten the TIP's logger and is beginning the login +sequence. In the third, the user has completed the login sequence and +is waiting for the Host to open up the actual data connections. Many +of the problems stem from the fact that _only_one_user_ may be +proceeding through phase 2 at a time. Hence the need for the queue of +phase 1. Any single user may tie up phase 2 for at most about 1 +minute. This is the canonical "timeout" in the logger. Notice that +this does not include the times in either the first or third phases. +Thus, the actual delay before you get a "timeout" after you type @L +can be 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes...depending on how many other +people are having difficulty logging in at the same time. Abort Login +(@A L) does three different things depending on which phase of logging +in the user is in. In phase 2 it resets the timer to be close to +overflowing so that it is responded to with a "timeout" shortly after +the command is given. In phase 3 it does nothing at all, and in phase +1 it merely removes the user (silently) from the logging queue. + + We will, medium term, have the TIP type out something like "YOUR +LOGGER" when you get off the queue and the logger begins trying to +open your connections. This will at least alleviate user uncertainty +as to whether he is in phase 1 or phase 2. Long term, we will +probably make the logging process reentrant so that users will not +interact with one another quite so destructively. In the short term, +here is a small "cookbook" on how to undo a login that seems to not be +working. + + When you have waited as long as you would like to for the login +to take place, you may type "@A L". If the TIP responds with +"TIMEOUT" in a few second and has not typed T OPEN or R OPEN, then you + + + + [Page 4] + +RFC # 386 NIC #11358 + + +are aborted and may attempt logging in again. If it types "TIMEOUT" +but has typed out T OPEN or R OPEN then you should type @C and wait +for that to be responded to (You _must_ wait.) If you get no response +at all to @A L, and the TIP has typed that one or the other connection +is open, you should type @C and wait, as above. Finally, if the TIP +makes no response and has not opened any connection, than you are free +to proceed. + + From now on the name of the DEVICE CODE EXECUPORT command will be +DEVICE CODE EXTRA-PADDING, since there are a number of other terminals +which require this feature. The latest to be added to the list is the +DATAPOINT 3300. + + + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ] + [ direction of Alex McKenzie. 1/97 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + [Page 5] + |