summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt227
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec35dcf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4156.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group P. Hoffman
+Request for Comments: 4156 VPN Consortium
+Category: Historic August 2005
+
+
+ The wais URI Scheme
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. It
+ does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
+ this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document specifies the wais Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
+ scheme that was originally specified in RFC 1738. The purpose of
+ this document is to allow RFC 1738 to be made obsolete while keeping
+ the information about the scheme on standards track.
+
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ URIs were previously defined in RFC 2396 [RFC2396], which was updated
+ by RFC 3986 [RFC3986]. Those documents also specify how to define
+ schemes for URIs.
+
+ The first definitions for many URI schemes appeared in RFC 1738
+ [RFC1738]. Because that document has been made obsolete, this
+ document copies the wais URI scheme from it to allow that material to
+ remain on standards track.
+
+
+2. Scheme Definition
+
+ The WAIS URL scheme is used to designate WAIS databases, searches, or
+ individual documents available from a WAIS database. The WAIS
+ protocol is described in RFC 1625 [RFC1625]. Although the WAIS
+ protocol is based on Z39.50-1988, the WAIS URL scheme is not intended
+ for use with arbitrary Z39.50 services.
+
+ Historical note: The WAIS protocol was not widely implemented and
+ almost no WAIS servers are in use today.
+
+
+
+
+Hoffman Historic [Page 1]
+
+RFC 4156 The wais URI Scheme August 2005
+
+
+ A WAIS URL takes one of the following forms:
+
+ wais://<host>:<port>/<database>
+ wais://<host>:<port>/<database>?<search>
+ wais://<host>:<port>/<database>/<wtype>/<wpath>
+
+ If :<port> is omitted, the port defaults to 210. The first form
+ designates a WAIS database that is available for searching. The
+ second form designates a particular search. <database> is the name of
+ the WAIS database being queried.
+
+ The third form designates a particular document, within a WAIS
+ database, to be retrieved. In this form <wtype> is the WAIS
+ designation of the type of the object. Many WAIS implementations
+ require that a client know the "type" of an object prior to
+ retrieval; the type is returned along with the internal object
+ identifier in the search response. The <wtype> is included in the
+ URL in order to give the client interpreting the URL adequate
+ information to actually retrieve the document.
+
+ The <wpath> of a WAIS URL consists of the WAIS document-id. The WAIS
+ document-id should be treated opaquely; it may only be decomposed by
+ the server that issued it.
+
+3. Security Considerations
+
+ Many security considerations for URI schemes are discussed in
+ [RFC3986]. There are no security considerations listed in [RFC1625],
+ but it should be noted that there is no privacy nor authentication
+ specified in the WAIS protocol.
+
+4. Informative References
+
+ [RFC1738] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, "Uniform
+ Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.
+
+ [RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
+ Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396,
+ August 1998.
+
+ [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
+ Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
+ RFC 3986, January 2005.
+
+ [RFC1625] St. Pierre, M., Fullton, J., Gamiel, K., Goldman, J.,
+ Kahle, B., Kunze, J., Morris, H., and F. Schiettecatte,
+ "WAIS over Z39.50-1988", RFC 1625, June 1994.
+
+
+
+
+Hoffman Historic [Page 2]
+
+RFC 4156 The wais URI Scheme August 2005
+
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Paul Hoffman
+ VPN Consortium
+ 127 Segre Place
+ Santa Cruz, CA 95060
+ US
+
+ EMail: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hoffman Historic [Page 3]
+
+RFC 4156 The wais URI Scheme August 2005
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
+
+ This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
+ contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
+ retain all their rights.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Intellectual Property
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
+ ipr@ietf.org.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hoffman Historic [Page 4]
+