summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt3027
1 files changed, 3027 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a21c2be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4220.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3027 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group M. Dubuc
+Request for Comments: 4220 Consultant
+Category: Standards Track T. Nadeau
+ Cisco Systems
+ J. Lang
+ Sonos, Inc.
+ November 2005
+
+
+ Traffic Engineering Link Management Information Base
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
+
+Abstract
+
+ This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
+ for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
+ In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling TE links as
+ described in the Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE)
+ document.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
+ 2. Introduction ....................................................3
+ 3. Terminology .....................................................3
+ 4. Feature Checklist ...............................................4
+ 5. Outline .........................................................4
+ 6. Brief Description of MIB Objects ................................4
+ 6.1. teLinkTable ................................................4
+ 6.2. teLinkDescriptorTable ......................................4
+ 6.3. teLinkSrlgTable ............................................5
+ 6.4. teLinkBandwidthTable .......................................5
+ 6.5. componentLinkTable .........................................5
+ 6.6. componentLinkDescriptorTable ...............................5
+ 6.7. componentLinkBandwidthTable ................................5
+ 7. Example of Bundled Link Setup ...................................5
+ 8. Application of the Interfaces Group to TE Links .................9
+ 8.1. Support of the TE Link Layer by ifTable ....................9
+ 8.2. Using ifStackTable ........................................11
+ 8.3. Applicability of ifRcvAddressTable ........................13
+ 9. TE Link MIB Module Definitions .................................13
+ 10. Security Considerations .......................................50
+ 11. Contributors ..................................................51
+ 12. Acknowledgements ..............................................51
+ 13. IANA Considerations ...........................................51
+ 13.1. IANA Considerations for the TE-LINK-STD-MIB .............51
+ 14. References ....................................................51
+ 14.1. Normative References ....................................51
+ 14.2. Informative References ..................................52
+
+1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
+
+ For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
+ Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
+ RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
+
+ Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
+ the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
+ accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
+ Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
+ Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
+ module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
+ RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
+ [RFC2580].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+2. Introduction
+
+ OSPF [RFC3630], Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) [RFC3471], and the Link
+ Management Protocol (LMP) [RFC4204] use the concept of traffic
+ engineering (TE) links to abstract link properties. The effect of
+ this approach is a reduction in the amount of routing information
+ exchanged in the network, which improves routing scalability. In
+ addition, the use of TE links allows the implementation of new
+ capabilities such as link protection.
+
+ In this document, we present a MIB module that can be used to manage
+ TE links and their extension, the bundled link. This MIB module
+ enables both the configuration and the performance monitoring of TE
+ links and the bundled link.
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
+
+3. Terminology
+
+ This document uses terminology from the documents describing link
+ bundling [RFC4201] and GMPLS [RFC3945].
+
+ The link bundling feature is designed to aggregate one or more
+ similar entities between a node pair into a bundled link [RFC4201].
+ In RFC 4201, those entities are referred to as TE links. A TE link
+ is a subinterface capable of carrying MPLS traffic engineered
+ traffic. A TE Link may be comprised of only one underlying component
+ link. In cases where more than one component links are to be
+ combined, multiple component links should be created with differing
+ priorities to indicate hot-standby or parallel utilization.
+
+ A bundled link is another kind of Traffic Engineering (TE) link (see
+ [RFC4203]). A link bundle is a subinterface that binds the traffic
+ of a group of one or more TE links. There should be more than one TE
+ Link in a link bundle, but this is not a requirement. Furthermore,
+ if there are more than one TE links in a link bundle at some time,
+ and at some point later, all but one of the links are deleted, the
+ agent may choose to either delete the link bundle, or it may choose
+ to leave it intact. Traffic counters on a link bundle are cumulative
+ for all subinterfaces that it binds together.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+4. Feature Checklist
+
+ The TE Link MIB module (TE-LINK-STD-MIB) is designed to satisfy the
+ following requirements and constraints:
+
+ - The MIB module supports the management of TE links, including
+ bundled links.
+
+ - Support is provided for configuration of traffic engineering
+ parameters associated with TE links.
+
+ - The MIB module is used to monitor the priority-based component
+ link and TE link bandwidth values.
+
+5. Outline
+
+ Configuring bundled links involves the following steps:
+
+ - Creating a bundled link.
+
+ - Creating TE links.
+
+ - Optionally specifying the shared risk link groups associated with
+ the TE links.
+
+ - Configuring the component links including the bandwidth parameters
+ and associating the component links with the appropriate TE link.
+
+ - Associating the TE links with the appropriate bundled link.
+
+6. Brief Description of MIB Objects
+
+ Sections 6.1 - 6.4 describe objects pertaining to TE links while
+ Sections 6.5 - 6.7 describe objects pertaining to component links.
+ The MIB objects were derived from the link bundling document
+ [RFC4201].
+
+6.1. teLinkTable
+
+ This table represents the TE links, including bundled links, and
+ their generic traffic engineering parameters.
+
+6.2. teLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ This table represents the TE link interface switching capability
+ descriptors.
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+6.3. teLinkSrlgTable
+
+ This table represents the shared risk link groups (SRLGs) associated
+ with TE links.
+
+6.4. teLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ This table specifies the priority-based bandwidth traffic engineering
+ parameters associated with TE links.
+
+6.5. componentLinkTable
+
+ This table enumerates the component links and their generic traffic
+ engineering parameters.
+
+6.6. componentLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ This table enumerates the interface switching capability descriptors
+ that each component link supports.
+
+6.7. componentLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ The component link bandwidth table specifies the priority-based
+ bandwidth values associated with the component links.
+
+ Component links that belong to the same TE link must be compatible.
+ If these two tables are managed independently, mechanisms should be
+ put in place to ensure consistency between the two tables. TE links
+ that form a bundled link must have compatible traffic engineering
+ parameters (resource class, link metric, and protection type).
+
+ The link descriptors of the teLinkDescriptorTable can be derived from
+ the link descriptors of the componentLinkDescrTable.
+
+ Some of the bandwidth parameters of the teLinkTable,
+ teLinkDescriptorTable, teLinkBandwidthTable are derived from the
+ bandwidth parameters of the componentLinkTable,
+ componentLinkDescriptorTable, and componentLinkBandwidthTable
+ (maximum reservable bandwidth, minimum LSP bandwidth, maximum LSP
+ bandwidth at specified priority, and unreserved bandwidth).
+
+7. Example of Bundled Link Setup
+
+ In this section, we provide a brief example of using the MIB objects
+ described in section 10 to set up a bundled link. While this example
+ is not meant to illustrate every nuance of the MIB module, it is
+ intended as an aid to understanding some of the key concepts. It is
+ meant to be read after going through the MIB module itself. Section
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ 8.2 provides more details on the use of the ifStackTable to establish
+ relationships between bundled links, TE links, and component links.
+
+ Suppose that one would like to manually create a bundled link out of
+ two 1:1 TE links, as depicted in the figure in Section 8.2. Assume
+ that the bundled link is associated with SRLGs 10 and 50. Finally,
+ let the component links be port entity interfaces (lambdas). The
+ following example illustrates which rows and corresponding objects
+ might be created to accomplish this.
+
+ First, a bundled link entry is created. An ifEntry with the same
+ ifIndex and with ifType teLink needs to be created beforehand.
+
+ In teLinkTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 2,
+ teLinkAddressType = unknown(0),
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkMetric = 5,
+ teLinkProtectionType = dedicated1For1(4),
+ teLinkWorkingPriority = 7,
+ teLinkResourceClass = 3,
+ teLinkIncomingIfId = 0,
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId = 2,
+ teLinkRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ teLinkStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In ifStackTable:
+ {
+ ifStackHigherLayer = 0,
+ ifStackLowerLayer = 2,
+ ifStackStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ }
+
+ Next, the two TE links are created.
+
+ In teLinkTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 3,
+ teLinkAddressType = unknown(0),
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkMetric = 5,
+ teLinkProtectionType = unprotected(2),
+ teLinkWorkingPriority = 7,
+ teLinkResourceClass = 3,
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ teLinkIncomingIfId = 0,
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId = 3,
+ teLinkRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ teLinkStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In ifStackTable:
+ {
+ ifStackHigherLayer = 2,
+ ifStackLowerLayer = 3,
+ ifStackStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ }
+
+ In teLinkTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 4,
+ teLinkAddressType = unknown(0),
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr = ''H,
+ teLinkMetric = 5,
+ teLinkProtectionType = unprotected(2),
+ teLinkWorkingPriority = 7,
+ teLinkResourceClass = 3,
+ teLinkIncomingIfId = 0,
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId = 4,
+ teLinkRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ teLinkStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In ifStackTable:
+ {
+ ifStackHigherLayer = 2,
+ ifStackLowerLayer = 4,
+ ifStackStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ }
+
+ We assign SRLGs to the TE links.
+
+ In the teLinkSrlgTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 3,
+ teLinkSrlg = 10,
+ teLinkSrlgRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ teLinkSrlgStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In the teLinkSrlgTable:
+ {
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ ifIndex = 4,
+ teLinkSrlg = 50,
+ teLinkSrlgRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ teLinkSrlgStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ The bundled link inherits the SRLG properties from the associated TE
+ links.
+
+ Next, for each unbundled TE link, a component link is created. An
+ ifEntry with the same ifIndex needs to be created beforehand.
+
+ In componentLinkTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 5,
+ componentLinkPreferredProtection = primary(1),
+ componentLinkRowStatus = createAndGo(4),
+ componentLinkStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In ifStackTable:
+ {
+ ifStackHigherLayer = 3,
+ ifStackLowerLayer = 5,
+ ifStackStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ }
+
+ In componentLinkTable:
+ {
+ ifIndex = 6,
+ componentLinkPreferredProtection = secondary(2),
+ componentLinkRowStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ componentLinkStorageType = nonVolatile(3)
+ }
+
+ In ifStackTable:
+ {
+ ifStackHigherLayer = 4,
+ ifStackLowerLayer = 6,
+ ifStackStatus = createAndGo(4)
+ }
+
+ In this example, once a component link is added to the
+ componentLinkTable, the associated link descriptors are implicitly
+ added to the componentLinkDescriptorTable.
+
+ TE link link descriptors are derived from their component link
+ descriptors.
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ Note that the bandwidth attributes in teLinkDescriptorTable,
+ componentLinkDescriptorTable, teLinkBandwidthTable, and
+ componentLinkBandwidthTable are maintained by the device according to
+ LSP creation/deletion at different priorities. The values in the
+ teLinkBandwidthTable are an aggregation of the values for the
+ component links of the TE links and the TE links of the bundled link.
+
+8. Application of the Interfaces Group to TE Links
+
+ The Interfaces Group [RFC2863] defines generic managed objects for
+ managing interfaces. This memo contains the media-specific
+ extensions to the Interfaces Group for managing TE Link interfaces as
+ logical interfaces.
+
+ This memo assumes the interpretation of the Interfaces Group to be in
+ accordance with [RFC2863], which states that the interfaces table
+ (ifTable) contains information on the managed resource's interfaces
+ and that each sub-layer below the internetwork layer of a network
+ interface is considered an interface. Thus, the TE Link interface is
+ represented as an entry in the ifTable. The interrelation of entries
+ in the ifTable is defined by Interfaces Stack Group, as defined in
+ [RFC2863].
+
+ When using TE Link interfaces, the interface stack table might appear
+ as follows:
+
+ +----------------------------------------+
+ | TE link-interface ifType = teLink(200) +
+ +----------------------------------------+
+ | Underlying Layer... +
+ +----------------------------------------+
+
+ In the above diagram, "Underlying Layer..." refers to the ifIndex of
+ any interface type, which has been defined for TE Link interworking.
+ Examples include ATM, Frame Relay, Ethernet, etc.
+
+8.1. Support of the TE Link Layer by ifTable
+
+ Some specific interpretations of ifTable for the TE Link layer
+ follow.
+
+ Object Use for the TE Link layer
+
+ ifIndex Each TE Link interface is represented by an ifEntry.
+
+ ifDescr Description of the TE Link interface.
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ ifType The value that is allocated for TE Link is 200
+ [IANAifType].
+
+ ifSpeed The total bandwidth in bits per second for use by the
+ TE Link layer.
+
+ ifPhysAddress Unused.
+
+ ifAdminStatus This variable indicates the administrator's intent as
+ to whether TE Link should be enabled, disabled, or
+ running in some diagnostic testing mode on this
+ interface. Also see [RFC2863].
+
+ ifOperStatus This value reflects the actual or operational status of
+ the TE Link on this interface.
+
+ ifLastChange See [RFC2863].
+
+ ifInOctets The number of received octets over the interface, i.e.,
+ the number of received octets in all component links
+ associated with the interface.
+
+ ifOutOctets The number of transmitted octets over the interface,
+ i.e., the number of octets transmitted over all
+ component links associated with the interface.
+
+ ifInErrors The number of packets dropped due to uncorrectable
+ errors.
+
+ ifInUnknownProtos
+ The number of received packets discarded during packet
+ header validation.
+
+ ifOutErrors See [RFC2863].
+
+ ifName Textual name (unique on this system) of the interface,
+ or an octet string of zero length.
+
+ ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable
+ Default is disabled (2).
+
+ ifConnectorPresent
+ Set to false (2).
+
+ ifHighSpeed See [RFC2863].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ ifHCInOctets The 64-bit version of ifInOctets; supported if required
+ by the compliance statements in [RFC2863].
+
+ ifHCOutOctets The 64-bit version of ifOutOctets; supported if
+ required by the compliance statements in [RFC2863].
+
+ ifAlias The non-volatile 'alias' name for the interface, as
+ specified by a network manager.
+
+ ifCounterDiscontinuityTime
+ See [RFC2863].
+
+ Support for ifInOctets, ifOutOctets, ifInErrors, ifInUnknownProtos,
+ ifOutErrors, ifHCInOctets, and ifHCOutOctets objects is not required
+ if the encoding type is clear. For other encoding types, traffic
+ counters on a TE link are cumulative for all subinterfaces that it
+ binds together.
+
+8.2. Using ifStackTable
+
+ This section describes, by example, how to use the ifStackTable to
+ represent the relationship of TE links with underlying TE-enabled
+ interfaces. Implementors of the stack table for TE link interfaces
+ should look at the appropriate RFC for the service being stacked on
+ TE links. The examples given below are for illustration purposes
+ only.
+
+ Example: MPLS is being carried on a bundled TE link. The bundled
+ TE link represents a 1:1 optical transport interface.
+
+ In this example, the component link is a TE link. The two component
+ links/TE links are grouped in a bundled link.
+
+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | MPLS interface ifType = mpls(166) |
+ | ifIndex = 1 |
+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | TE link (bundled link) ifType = teLink(200) |
+ | ifIndex = 2 |
+ +--------------------------------+-+--------------------------------+
+ | TE link ifType = teLink(200) | | TE link ifType = teLink(200) |
+ | ifIndex = 3 | | ifIndex = 4 |
+ +--------------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
+ | Component link | | Component link |
+ | ifType = opticalTransport(196) | | ifType = opticalTransport(196) |
+ | ifIndex = 5 | | ifIndex = 6 |
+ +--------------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ The assignment of the index values could, for example, be:
+
+ ifIndex Description
+ 1 mpls (type 166)
+ 2 teLink (type 200)
+ 3 teLink (type 200)
+ 4 teLink (type 200)
+ 5 opticalTransport (type 196)
+ 6 opticalTransport (type 196)
+
+ The ifStackTable is then used to show the relationships between the
+ various interfaces.
+
+ ifStackTable Entries
+
+ HigherLayer LowerLayer
+ 0 1
+ 1 2
+ 2 3
+ 2 4
+ 3 5
+ 4 6
+ 5 0
+ 6 0
+
+ In the case where MPLS is using a single TE link, then the upper TE
+ link layer (link bundle) is not required.
+
+ +-----------------------------------+
+ | MPLS interface ifType = mpls(166) |
+ +-----------------------------------+
+ | TE link ifType = teLink(200) |
+ +-----------------------------------+
+ | Component link |
+ | ifType = opticalTransport(196) |
+ +-----------------------------------+
+
+ The assignment of the index values could for example be:
+
+ ifIndex Description
+ 1 mpls (type 166)
+ 2 teLink (type 200)
+ 3 opticalTransport (type 196)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ The ifStackTable is then used to show the relationships between the
+ various interfaces.
+
+ ifStackTable Entries
+
+ HigherLayer LowerLayer
+ 0 1
+ 1 2
+ 2 3
+ 3 0
+
+8.3. Applicability of ifRcvAddressTable
+
+ TE link interfaces are logical interfaces with no media-level
+ addresses. As such, the ifRcvAddressTable is not applicable to these
+ interfaces.
+
+9. TE Link MIB Module Definitions
+
+ TE-LINK-STD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
+
+ IMPORTS
+ MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, transmission, Integer32, Unsigned32
+ FROM SNMPv2-SMI
+
+ MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
+ FROM SNMPv2-CONF
+
+ TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, RowStatus, StorageType
+ FROM SNMPv2-TC
+
+ InterfaceIndexOrZero, ifIndex
+ FROM IF-MIB
+
+ InetAddressType, InetAddress
+ FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB;
+
+
+ teLinkStdMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
+ LAST-UPDATED "200510110000Z" -- 11 October 2005
+ ORGANIZATION "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group"
+ CONTACT-INFO
+ " Martin Dubuc
+ Email: mdubuc@ncf.ca
+
+ Thomas D. Nadeau
+ Email: tnadeau@cisco.com
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ Jonathan P. Lang
+ Email: jplang@ieee.org
+
+ Comments about this document should be emailed directly to
+ the MPLS working group mailing list at mpls@uu.net."
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Copyright (C) 2005 The Internet Society. This version of
+ this MIB module is part of RFC 4220; see the RFC
+ itself for full legal notices.
+
+ This MIB module contains managed object definitions for
+ MPLS traffic engineering links as defined in
+ 'Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE)'."
+
+ -- Revision history.
+ REVISION
+ "200510110000Z" -- 11 October 2005
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Initial version published as RFC 4220."
+ ::= { transmission 200 }
+
+ -- Textual Conventions
+
+ TeLinkBandwidth ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This type is used to represent link bandwidth in bps. This
+ value is represented using a 4 octet IEEE floating point
+ format [IEEE]. The floating point representation is not
+ used to represent fractional value but rather to allow
+ specification of large numbers that cannot be expressed
+ with 32-bit integers."
+ REFERENCE
+ "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic,
+ Standard 754-1985"
+ SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(4))
+
+ TeLinkPriority ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ DISPLAY-HINT "d"
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This type is used to represent a priority. Each connection
+ is assigned a priority. This priority is used when
+ accounting for bandwidth on TE links or component
+ links, for resource allocation and for rerouting purposes.
+ Value 0 is the highest priority. Value 7 is the lowest
+ priority."
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0..7)
+
+ TeLinkProtection ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Link protection."
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ primary(1),
+ secondary(2)
+ }
+
+ TeLinkSwitchingCapability ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Switching capability as specified in the 'OSPF Extensions in
+ Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
+ (GMPLS)' document. The values specified in this document
+ are not contiguous."
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ packetSwitch1(1),
+ packetSwitch2(2),
+ packetSwitch3(3),
+ packetSwitch4(4),
+ layer2Switch(51),
+ tdm(100),
+ lambdaSwitch(150),
+ fiberSwitch(200)
+ }
+
+ TeLinkEncodingType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Link encoding type as specified in 'Generalized
+ Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
+ Functional Description' document. The values
+ specified in this document are not contiguous."
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ packet(1),
+ ethernet(2),
+ ansiEtsiPdh(3),
+ sdhItuSonetAnsi(5),
+ digitalWrapper(7),
+ lambda(8),
+ fiber(9),
+ fiberChannel(11)
+ }
+
+ TeLinkSonetSdhIndication ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This convention is used to indicate whether the interface
+ supports Standard or Arbitrary SONET/SDH. To simplify the
+ mapping process, the values used in this textual convention
+ match the values specified in the interface switching
+ capability specific information field, i.e., 0 for Standard
+ SONET/SDH and 1 for Arbitrary SONET/SDH."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ standard(0),
+ arbitrary(1)
+ }
+
+ -- Top level components of this MIB module
+
+ -- Notifications
+ teLinkNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { teLinkStdMIB 0 }
+ -- Tables, Scalars
+ teLinkObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { teLinkStdMIB 1 }
+ -- Conformance
+ teLinkConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { teLinkStdMIB 2 }
+
+ -- TE Link Table
+
+ teLinkTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF TeLinkEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the grouping of component links into
+ TE links and the grouping of TE links into bundled links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 1 }
+
+ teLinkEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table exists for each ifEntry with an
+ ifType of teLink(200), i.e., for every TE link. An ifEntry
+ in the ifTable must exist before a teLinkEntry is created
+ with the corresponding ifIndex. If a TE link entry in the
+ ifTable is destroyed, then so is the corresponding entry
+ in the teLinkTable. The administrative and operational
+ status values are controlled from the ifEntry."
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ INDEX { ifIndex }
+ ::= { teLinkTable 1 }
+
+ TeLinkEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ teLinkAddressType InetAddressType,
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr InetAddress,
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr InetAddress,
+ teLinkMetric Unsigned32,
+ teLinkMaximumReservableBandwidth TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkProtectionType INTEGER,
+ teLinkWorkingPriority TeLinkPriority,
+ teLinkResourceClass Unsigned32,
+ teLinkIncomingIfId Integer32,
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId InterfaceIndexOrZero,
+ teLinkRowStatus RowStatus,
+ teLinkStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ teLinkAddressType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX InetAddressType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The type of Internet address for the TE link."
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 1 }
+
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX InetAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The local Internet address for numbered links. The type of
+ this address is determined by the value of the
+ teLinkAddressType object.
+
+ For IPv4 and IPv6 numbered links, this object represents the
+ local IP address associated with the TE link. For an
+ unnumbered link, the local address is of type unknown, this
+ object is set to the zero length string, and the
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId object then identifies the unnumbered
+ address.
+
+ If the TE link is a Forwarding Adjacency (FA), the local
+ IP address is set to the head-end address of the FA-LSP.
+
+ If ipAddrTable is implemented, this object must have the
+ same value as the ipAdEntAddr object that belongs to the
+ row in ipAddrTable where ipAdEntIfIndex is equal to
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ ifIndex."
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 2 }
+
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX InetAddress
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The remote Internet address for numbered links. The type of
+ this address is determined by the value of the
+ teLinkAddressType object.
+
+ The remote IP address associated with the TE link (IPv4 and
+ IPv6 numbered links). For an unnumbered link, the remote
+ address is of type unknown, this object is set to the
+ zero length string, and the teLinkIncomingIfId object then
+ identifies the unnumbered address.
+
+ If the TE link is a Forwarding Adjacency, the remote IP
+ address is set to the tail-end address of the FA-LSP."
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 3 }
+
+ teLinkMetric OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The traffic engineering metric for the TE link is
+ derived from its component links. All component links
+ within the TE link must have the same traffic
+ engineering metric."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE), RFC 4201"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 4 }
+
+ teLinkMaximumReservableBandwidth OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum reservable bandwidth on
+ the TE link. This is the union of the maximum reservable
+ bandwidth of all the component links within the
+ TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 5 }
+
+ teLinkProtectionType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX INTEGER {
+ extraTraffic(1),
+ unprotected(2),
+ shared(3),
+ dedicated1For1(4),
+ dedicated1Plus1(5),
+ enhanced(6)
+ }
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the link protection type of the
+ TE link. Descriptions of the different protection types can
+ be found in the 'Routing Extensions in Support of
+ Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)'
+ document."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203 and
+ Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4202"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 6 }
+
+ teLinkWorkingPriority OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkPriority
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object represents a priority value such that a new
+ connection with a higher priority, i.e., numerically lower
+ than this value, is guaranteed to be setup on a primary
+ link and not on a secondary link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 7 }
+
+ teLinkResourceClass OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the TE link resource class.
+ The resource class is a 32 bit bitfield. The resource class
+ for a link bundle is derived from the resource class of its
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ TE links. All TE links within a link bundle must have the
+ same resource class. Encoding of the resource class is
+ described in the 'Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to
+ OSPF Version 2' document."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE), RFC 4201
+ and Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2,
+ RFC 3630"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 8 }
+
+ teLinkIncomingIfId OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "For unnumbered links, the incoming interface is set to the
+ outgoing interface identifier chosen by the neighboring LSR
+ for the reverse link corresponding to this TE link. If the
+ link is numbered, the value of this object is 0 and the
+ address is stored in the teLinkRemoteIpAddr instead."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE), RFC 4201"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 9 }
+
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX InterfaceIndexOrZero
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "If the link is unnumbered, the outgoing interface identifier
+ is set to the outgoing interface identifier chosen for the
+ TE link by the advertising LSR. If the link is numbered, the
+ value of this object is 0 and the address is stored in the
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr instead."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE), RFC 4201"
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 10 }
+
+ teLinkRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. None of the writable objects in
+ a row can be changed if status is active(1)."
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 11 }
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ teLinkStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ teLinkTable. Conceptual rows having the value
+ 'permanent' need not allow write-access to any
+ columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { teLinkEntry 12 }
+
+ -- End of teLinkTable
+
+
+ -- TE Link Descriptor Table
+
+ teLinkDescriptorTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF TeLinkDescriptorEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the interface switching capability
+ descriptors associated with the TE links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 2 }
+
+ teLinkDescriptorEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkDescriptorEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table is created for every TE link interface
+ switching capability descriptor. An ifEntry in the ifTable
+ must exist before a teLinkDescriptorEntry using the same
+ ifIndex is created. ifType of ifEntry must be teLink(200).
+ If a TE link entry in the ifTable is destroyed, then so are
+ all of the entries in the teLinkDescriptorTable that use the
+ ifIndex of this TE link."
+ INDEX { ifIndex, teLinkDescriptorId }
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorTable 1 }
+
+ TeLinkDescriptorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ teLinkDescriptorId Unsigned32,
+ teLinkDescrSwitchingCapability TeLinkSwitchingCapability,
+ teLinkDescrEncodingType TeLinkEncodingType,
+ teLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2 TeLinkBandwidth,
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrInterfaceMtu Unsigned32,
+ teLinkDescrIndication TeLinkSonetSdhIndication,
+ teLinkDescrRowStatus RowStatus,
+ teLinkDescrStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ teLinkDescriptorId OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object specifies the link descriptor identifier."
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 1 }
+
+ teLinkDescrSwitchingCapability OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkSwitchingCapability
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies interface switching capability of
+ the TE link, which is derived from its component links."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 2 }
+
+ teLinkDescrEncodingType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkEncodingType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the TE link encoding type."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
+ Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 3 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "This attribute specifies the minimum LSP bandwidth on
+ the TE link. This is derived from the union of the
+ minimum LSP bandwidth of all the component links
+ associated with the TE link that can be used to carry
+ live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 4 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 0 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 0 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 5 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 1 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 1 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 6 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 2 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 2 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 7 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 3 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 3 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 8 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 4 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 4 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 9 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 5 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 5 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 10 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 6 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 6 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 11 }
+
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 7 on the TE link. This is the union of the maximum
+ LSP bandwidth at priority 7 of all the component links within
+ the TE link that can be used to carry live traffic."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 12 }
+
+ teLinkDescrInterfaceMtu OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..65535)
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the interface MTU for the TE
+ link descriptor."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 13 }
+
+ teLinkDescrIndication OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkSonetSdhIndication
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies whether this interface supports
+ Standard or Arbitrary SONET/SDH."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 14 }
+
+ teLinkDescrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object
+ can be changed if teLinkDescrRowStatus is in the active(1)
+ state."
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 15 }
+
+ teLinkDescrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ teLinkDescriptorTable. Conceptual rows having the value
+ 'permanent' need not allow write-access to any
+ columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { teLinkDescriptorEntry 16 }
+
+ -- End of teLinkDescriptorTable
+
+
+ -- TE Link Shared Risk Link Group Table
+
+ teLinkSrlgTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF TeLinkSrlgEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the SRLGs associated with TE links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 3 }
+
+ teLinkSrlgEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkSrlgEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table contains information about an
+ SRLG associated with a TE link.
+ An ifEntry in the ifTable must exist before a
+ teLinkSrlgEntry using the same ifIndex is created.
+ The ifType of ifEntry must be teLink(200).
+ If a TE link entry in the ifTable is destroyed, then so
+ are all of the entries in the teLinkSrlgTable that use the
+ ifIndex of this TE link."
+ INDEX { ifIndex, teLinkSrlg }
+ ::= { teLinkSrlgTable 1 }
+
+ TeLinkSrlgEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ teLinkSrlg Unsigned32,
+ teLinkSrlgRowStatus RowStatus,
+ teLinkSrlgStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ teLinkSrlg OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0..4294967295)
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This identifies an SRLG supported by the TE link. An SRLG is
+ identified with a 32-bit number that is unique within an IGP
+ domain. Zero is a valid SRLG number."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { teLinkSrlgEntry 1 }
+
+ teLinkSrlgRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object can
+ be modified if teLinkSrlgRowStatus is active(1)."
+ ::= { teLinkSrlgEntry 2 }
+
+ teLinkSrlgStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ teLinkSrlgTable. Conceptual rows having the value
+ 'permanent' need not allow write-access to any
+ columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { teLinkSrlgEntry 3 }
+
+ -- End of teLinkSrlgTable
+
+
+ -- TE Link Bandwidth Table
+
+ teLinkBandwidthTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF TeLinkBandwidthEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the priority-based bandwidth table
+ for TE links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 4 }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidthEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table contains information about
+ the priority-based bandwidth of TE links. An ifEntry in the
+ ifTable must exist before a teLinkBandwidthEntry using the
+ same ifIndex is created. The ifType of ifEntry must be
+ teLink(200). If a TE link entry in the ifTable is destroyed,
+ then so are all of the entries in the teLinkBandwidthTable
+ that use the ifIndex of this TE link."
+ INDEX { ifIndex, teLinkBandwidthPriority }
+ ::= { teLinkBandwidthTable 1 }
+
+ TeLinkBandwidthEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ teLinkBandwidthPriority TeLinkPriority,
+ teLinkBandwidthUnreserved TeLinkBandwidth,
+ teLinkBandwidthRowStatus RowStatus,
+ teLinkBandwidthStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthPriority OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkPriority
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the priority. A value of 0 is valid
+ as specified in the 'Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ OSPF Version 2' document."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203 and
+ Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2,
+ RFC 3630"
+ ::= { teLinkBandwidthEntry 1 }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthUnreserved OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the TE link unreserved
+ bandwidth at priority p. It is the sum of the unreserved
+ bandwidths at priority p of all component links associated
+ with the TE link (excluding all links that are strictly
+ used as protecting links)."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE), RFC 4201"
+ ::= { teLinkBandwidthEntry 2 }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object
+ can be modified when teLinkBandwidthRowStatus is active(1)."
+ ::= { teLinkBandwidthEntry 3 }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ teLinkBandwidthTable. Conceptual rows having the value
+ 'permanent' need not allow write-access to any
+ columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { teLinkBandwidthEntry 4 }
+
+ -- End of teLinkBandwidthTable
+
+
+ -- Component Link Table
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ componentLinkTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF ComponentLinkEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the component link parameters."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 5 }
+
+ componentLinkEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX ComponentLinkEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table exists for each ifEntry that
+ represents a component link. An ifEntry must exist in
+ the ifTable before a componentLinkEntry is created with
+ the corresponding ifIndex. ifEntry's ifType can be
+ of any interface type that has been defined for TE Link
+ interworking. Examples include ATM, Frame Relay, Ethernet,
+ etc. If an entry representing a component link is destroyed
+ in the ifTable, then so is the corresponding entry in the
+ componentLinkTable. The administrative and operational
+ status values are controlled from the ifEntry."
+ INDEX { ifIndex }
+ ::= { componentLinkTable 1 }
+
+ ComponentLinkEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ componentLinkMaxResBandwidth TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkPreferredProtection TeLinkProtection,
+ componentLinkCurrentProtection TeLinkProtection,
+ componentLinkRowStatus RowStatus,
+ componentLinkStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ componentLinkMaxResBandwidth OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum reservable bandwidth on
+ the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkEntry 1 }
+
+ componentLinkPreferredProtection OBJECT-TYPE
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ SYNTAX TeLinkProtection
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies whether this component link is
+ a primary or secondary entity."
+ ::= { componentLinkEntry 2 }
+
+ componentLinkCurrentProtection OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkProtection
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies whether this component link is
+ currently used as primary or secondary link."
+ ::= { componentLinkEntry 3 }
+
+ componentLinkRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object
+ can be modified when componentLinkRowStatus is active(1)."
+ ::= { componentLinkEntry 4 }
+
+ componentLinkStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ componentLinkTable. Conceptual rows having the value
+ 'permanent' need not allow write-access to any
+ columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { componentLinkEntry 5 }
+
+ -- End of componentLinkTable
+
+
+ -- Component Link Descriptor Table
+
+ componentLinkDescriptorTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF ComponentLinkDescriptorEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "This table specifies the interface switching capability
+ descriptors associated with the component links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 6 }
+
+ componentLinkDescriptorEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX ComponentLinkDescriptorEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table is created for every component link
+ descriptor. An ifEntry in the ifTable must exist before a
+ componentLinkDescriptorEntry using the same ifIndex is
+ created. ifEntry's ifType can be of any interface type that
+ has been defined for TE Link interworking. Examples include
+ ATM, Frame Relay, Ethernet, etc. If a component link entry
+ in the ifTable is destroyed, then so are all entries in the
+ componentLinkDescriptorTable that use the ifIndex of this
+ component link."
+ INDEX { ifIndex, componentLinkDescrId }
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorTable 1 }
+
+ ComponentLinkDescriptorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ componentLinkDescrId Unsigned32,
+ componentLinkDescrSwitchingCapability TeLinkSwitchingCapability,
+ componentLinkDescrEncodingType TeLinkEncodingType,
+ componentLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7 TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrInterfaceMtu Unsigned32,
+ componentLinkDescrIndication TeLinkSonetSdhIndication,
+ componentLinkDescrRowStatus RowStatus,
+ componentLinkDescrStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ componentLinkDescrId OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This object specifies the link descriptor identifier."
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 1 }
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ componentLinkDescrSwitchingCapability OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkSwitchingCapability
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies link multiplexing capabilities of
+ the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 2 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrEncodingType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkEncodingType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the component link encoding type."
+ REFERENCE
+ "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
+ Functional Description, RFC 3471"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 3 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the minimum LSP bandwidth on
+ the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 4 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 0 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 5 }
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 1 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 6 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 2 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 7 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 3 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 8 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 4 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 9 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "thousand bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 5 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 10 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 6 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 11 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7 OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the maximum LSP bandwidth at
+ priority 7 on the component link."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 12 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrInterfaceMtu OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..65535)
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "This attribute specifies the interface MTU for the component
+ link descriptor."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 13 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrIndication OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkSonetSdhIndication
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies whether this interface supports
+ Standard or Arbitrary SONET/SDH."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 14 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object
+ can be modified when componentLinkDescrRowStatus
+ is active(1)."
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 15 }
+
+ componentLinkDescrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ componentLinkDescriptorTable. Conceptual rows
+ having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
+ to any columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { componentLinkDescriptorEntry 16 }
+
+ -- End of componentLinkDescriptorTable
+
+
+ -- Component Link Bandwidth Table
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthTable OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF ComponentLinkBandwidthEntry
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This table specifies the priority-based bandwidth
+ for component links."
+ ::= { teLinkObjects 7 }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthEntry OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX ComponentLinkBandwidthEntry
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "An entry in this table contains information about
+ the priority-based bandwidth on component links.
+ An ifEntry in the ifTable must exist before a
+ componentLinkBandwidthEntry using the same ifIndex is
+ created. ifEntry's ifType can be of any interface type that
+ has been defined for TE Link interworking. Examples
+ include ATM, Frame Relay, Ethernet, etc. If a component link
+ entry in the ifTable is destroyed, then so are all entries
+ in the componentLinkBandwidthTable that use the ifIndex of
+ this component link."
+ INDEX { ifIndex, componentLinkBandwidthPriority }
+ ::= { componentLinkBandwidthTable 1 }
+
+ ComponentLinkBandwidthEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
+ componentLinkBandwidthPriority TeLinkPriority,
+ componentLinkBandwidthUnreserved TeLinkBandwidth,
+ componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus RowStatus,
+ componentLinkBandwidthStorageType StorageType
+ }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthPriority OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX TeLinkPriority
+ MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the priority. A value of 0 is valid
+ as specified in the 'Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to
+ OSPF Version 2' document."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203 and
+ Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2,
+ RFC 3630"
+ ::= { componentLinkBandwidthEntry 1 }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthUnreserved OBJECT-TYPE
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ SYNTAX TeLinkBandwidth
+ UNITS "bps"
+ MAX-ACCESS read-only
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This attribute specifies the component link unreserved
+ bandwidth at priority p."
+ REFERENCE
+ "OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS), RFC 4203"
+ ::= { componentLinkBandwidthEntry 2 }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX RowStatus
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This variable is used to create, modify, and/or
+ delete a row in this table. No read-create object can
+ be modified when componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus is
+ active(1)."
+ ::= { componentLinkBandwidthEntry 3 }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
+ SYNTAX StorageType
+ MAX-ACCESS read-create
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "The storage type for this conceptual row in the
+ componentLinkBandwidthTable. Conceptual rows
+ having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
+ to any columnar object in the row."
+ ::= { componentLinkBandwidthEntry 4 }
+
+ -- End of componentLinkBandwidthTable
+
+
+ -- Module compliance
+
+ teLinkCompliances
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { teLinkConformance 1 }
+
+ teLinkGroups
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { teLinkConformance 2 }
+
+ teLinkModuleFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ "Compliance statement for agents that support read-create
+ so that both configuration and monitoring of TE links can
+ be accomplished via this MIB module."
+ MODULE -- this module
+
+ MANDATORY-GROUPS { teLinkGroup,
+ teLinkBandwidthGroup,
+ componentLinkBandwidthGroup }
+
+ GROUP teLinkSrlgGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for GMPLS enabled devices."
+
+ GROUP teLinkPscGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for devices that support the
+ packet switching capability."
+
+ GROUP teLinkTdmGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for devices that support the TDM
+ switching capability."
+
+ -- teLinkTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkAddressType
+ SYNTAX INTEGER { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Only ipv4(1) and ipv6(2) address types need to be
+ supported for numbered links. For unnumbered links, the
+ unknown(0) address type needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkLocalIpAddr
+ SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Size of TE link IP address depends on type of TE link.
+ TE link IP address size is zero if the link is unnumbered,
+ four if the link IP address is IPv4, and sixteen if the
+ link IP address is IPv6."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkRemoteIpAddr
+ SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Size of TE link IP address depends on type of TE link.
+ TE link IP address size is zero if the link is unnumbered,
+ four if the link IP address is IPv4, and sixteen if the
+ link IP address is IPv6."
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ OBJECT teLinkRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ -- teLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ -- teLinkSrlgTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkSrlgRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ -- teLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkBandwidthRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ -- componentLinkTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 40]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ -- componentLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ -- componentLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2) }
+ WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService(2),
+ createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Support for notReady(3) and createAndWait(5) is
+ not required."
+
+ ::= { teLinkCompliances 1 }
+
+ teLinkModuleReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Compliance statement for agents that support the
+ monitoring of the TE link MIB module."
+ MODULE -- this module
+
+ MANDATORY-GROUPS { teLinkGroup,
+ teLinkBandwidthGroup,
+ componentLinkBandwidthGroup }
+
+ GROUP teLinkSrlgGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for GMPLS enabled devices."
+
+ GROUP teLinkPscGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for devices that support the
+ packet switching capability."
+
+ GROUP teLinkTdmGroup
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "This group is mandatory for devices that support the TDM
+ switching capability."
+
+ -- teLinkTable
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 41]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ OBJECT teLinkAddressType
+ SYNTAX INTEGER { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Only ipv4(1) and ipv6(2) address types need to be
+ supported for numbered links. For unnumbered links, the
+ unknown(0) address type needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkLocalIpAddr
+ SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Size of TE link IP address depends on type of TE link.
+ TE link IP address size is zero if the link is unnumbered,
+ four if the link IP address is IPv4, and sixteen if the
+ link IP address is IPv6."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkRemoteIpAddr
+ SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Size of TE link IP address depends on type of TE link.
+ TE link IP address size is zero if the link is unnumbered,
+ four if the link IP address is IPv4, and sixteen if the
+ link IP address is IPv6."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkProtectionType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkWorkingPriority
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 42]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ -- teLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrSwitchingCapability
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrEncodingType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 43]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkDescrStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ -- teLinkSrlgTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkSrlgRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkSrlgStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ -- teLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ OBJECT teLinkBandwidthRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT teLinkBandwidthStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 44]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ -- componentLinkTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkMaxResBandwidth
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkPreferredProtection
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ -- componentLinkDescriptorTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrSwitchingCapability
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrEncodingType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 45]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrInterfaceMtu
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrIndication
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 46]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkDescrStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ -- componentLinkBandwidthTable
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus
+ SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) }
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required and active(1) is the
+ only status that needs to be supported."
+
+ OBJECT componentLinkBandwidthStorageType
+ MIN-ACCESS read-only
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Write access is not required."
+
+ ::= { teLinkCompliances 2 }
+
+ -- Units of conformance
+
+ teLinkGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { teLinkAddressType,
+ teLinkLocalIpAddr,
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr,
+ teLinkMetric,
+ teLinkProtectionType,
+ teLinkWorkingPriority,
+ teLinkResourceClass,
+ teLinkIncomingIfId,
+ teLinkOutgoingIfId,
+ teLinkRowStatus,
+ teLinkStorageType,
+ teLinkDescrSwitchingCapability,
+ teLinkDescrEncodingType,
+ teLinkDescrRowStatus,
+ teLinkDescrStorageType,
+ componentLinkPreferredProtection,
+ componentLinkCurrentProtection,
+ componentLinkRowStatus,
+ componentLinkStorageType,
+ componentLinkDescrSwitchingCapability,
+ componentLinkDescrEncodingType,
+ componentLinkDescrRowStatus,
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 47]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ componentLinkDescrStorageType
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for the management of
+ resources associated with TE links."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 1 }
+
+ teLinkSrlgGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { teLinkSrlgRowStatus,
+ teLinkSrlgStorageType
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for the management of
+ SRLG resources associated with TE links."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 2 }
+
+ teLinkBandwidthGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { teLinkMaximumReservableBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6,
+ teLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7,
+ teLinkBandwidthUnreserved,
+ teLinkBandwidthRowStatus,
+ teLinkBandwidthStorageType
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for the management of
+ the bandwidth resources associated with TE links and
+ component links."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 3 }
+
+ componentLinkBandwidthGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { componentLinkMaxResBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio0,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio1,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio2,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio3,
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 48]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio4,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio5,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio6,
+ componentLinkDescrMaxLspBandwidthPrio7,
+ componentLinkBandwidthUnreserved,
+ componentLinkBandwidthRowStatus,
+ componentLinkBandwidthStorageType
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for the management of the
+ bandwidth parameters associated with component links."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 4 }
+
+ teLinkPscGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { teLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrInterfaceMtu,
+ componentLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrInterfaceMtu
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for devices that are
+ packet switch capable."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 5 }
+
+ teLinkTdmGroup OBJECT-GROUP
+ OBJECTS { teLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth,
+ teLinkDescrIndication,
+ componentLinkDescrMinLspBandwidth,
+ componentLinkDescrIndication
+ }
+
+ STATUS current
+ DESCRIPTION
+ "Collection of objects needed for devices that are
+ TDM switching capable."
+ ::= { teLinkGroups 6 }
+
+ -- End of TE-LINK-STD-MIB
+ END
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 49]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+10. Security Considerations
+
+ There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB module
+ with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such
+ objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network
+ environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure
+ environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on
+ network operations. These are the tables and objects and their
+ sensitivity/vulnerability:
+
+ - All the tables in this MIB module have routing information in
+ them, so they all have the same security attributes. Unauthorized
+ changes to attributes of these tables can disrupt resource
+ allocation in the network.
+
+ Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a
+ MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or
+ vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to
+ control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly
+ to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over
+ the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their
+ sensitivity/vulnerability:
+
+ - IP address entries in the teLinkTable (teLinkLocalIpAddr and
+ teLinkRemoteIpAddr) may reveal the internals of a network provider
+ IP address space.
+
+ SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
+ Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec),
+ even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
+ allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects
+ in this MIB module.
+
+ It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as
+ provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8),
+ including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for
+ authentication and privacy).
+
+ Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
+ RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
+ enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator
+ responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
+ instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to
+ the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate
+ rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 50]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+11. Contributors
+
+ Sudheer Dharanikota
+ EMail: sudheer@ieee.org
+
+12. Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Dmitry
+ Ryumkin.
+
+13. IANA Considerations
+
+ The following "IANA Considerations" subsection requests IANA for a
+ new assignment. New assignments can only be made via Standards
+ Action as specified in [RFC2434].
+
+13.1. IANA Considerations for the TE-LINK-STD-MIB
+
+ The TE-LINK-STD-MIB should be rooted under the transmission subtree.
+ The IANA has assigned { transmission 200 } to the TE-LINK-STD-MIB
+ module specified in this document.
+
+14. References
+
+14.1. Normative References
+
+ [IANAifType] "IANAifType MIB Module",
+ http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib.
+
+ [IEEE] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point
+ Arithmetic", Standard 754-1985, 1985 (ISBN 1-5593-7653-
+ 8).
+
+ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
+ IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
+ October 1998.
+
+ [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder,
+ "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)",
+ STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder,
+ "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April
+ 1999.
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 51]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+ [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder,
+ "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580,
+ April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
+ MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
+
+ [RFC3471] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
+ (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,
+ January 2003.
+
+ [RFC3630] Katz, D., Kompella, K. and D. Yeung, "Traffic
+ Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2", RFC
+ 3630, September 2003.
+
+ [RFC4201] Kompella, K., Rekhter, Y. and L. Berger, "Link Bundling
+ in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE)", RFC 4201, October
+ 2005.
+
+ [RFC4202] Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "Routing
+ Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol
+ Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC 4202, October 2005.
+
+ [RFC4203] Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "OSPF Extensions
+ in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
+ (GMPLS)", RFC 4203, October 2005.
+
+ [RFC4206] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Label Switched Paths (LSP)
+ Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
+ Switching (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)", RFC 4206,
+ October 2005.
+
+ [RFC4204] Lang, J., Ed., "Link Management Protocol (LMP)", RFC
+ 4204, October 2005.
+
+14.2. Informative References
+
+ [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
+ "Introduction and Applicability Statements for
+ Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410,
+ December 2002.
+
+ [RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
+ (GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, October 2004.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 52]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Martin Dubuc
+
+ EMail: mdubuc@ncf.ca
+
+
+ Thomas D. Nadeau
+ Cisco Systems
+ 1414 Massachusetts Ave.
+ Boxborough, MA 01719
+
+ Phone: +1-978-244-3051
+ EMail: tnadeau@cisco.com
+
+
+ Jonathan P. Lang
+ Sonos, Inc.
+ 223 E. De La Guerra St.
+ Santa Barbara, CA 93101
+
+ EMail: jplang@ieee.org
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 53]
+
+RFC 4220 MPLS TE Link MIB Module November 2005
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
+
+ This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
+ contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
+ retain all their rights.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Intellectual Property
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
+ ipr@ietf.org.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dubuc, et al. Standards Track [Page 54]
+