summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt1851
1 files changed, 1851 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..51a5e3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4338.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1851 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group C. DeSanti
+Request for Comments: 4338 Cisco Systems
+Obsoletes: 3831, 2625 C. Carlson
+Category: Standards Track QLogic Corporation
+ R. Nixon
+ Emulex
+ January 2006
+
+
+ Transmission of IPv6, IPv4, and
+ Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Packets over Fibre Channel
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document specifies the way of encapsulating IPv6, IPv4, and
+ Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets over Fibre Channel. This
+ document also specifies the method of forming IPv6 link-local
+ addresses and statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on Fibre
+ Channel networks, and a mechanism to perform IPv4 address resolution
+ over Fibre Channel networks.
+
+ This document obsoletes RFC 2625 and RFC 3831.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction ....................................................3
+ 2. Summary of Fibre Channel ........................................4
+ 2.1. Overview ...................................................4
+ 2.2. Identifiers and Login ......................................5
+ 2.3. FC Levels and Frame Format .................................5
+ 2.4. Sequences and Exchanges ....................................6
+ 3. IP-capable Nx_Ports .............................................7
+ 4. IPv6, IPv4, and ARP Encapsulation ...............................7
+ 4.1. FC Sequence Format for IPv6 and IPv4 Packets ...............7
+ 4.2. FC Sequence Format for ARP Packets .........................9
+ 4.3. FC Classes of Service .....................................10
+ 4.4. FC Header Code Points .....................................10
+ 4.5. FC Network_Header .........................................11
+ 4.6. LLC/SNAP Header ...........................................12
+ 4.7. Bit and Byte Ordering .....................................12
+ 4.8. Maximum Transfer Unit .....................................12
+ 5. IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration .......................13
+ 5.1. IPv6 Interface Identifier and Address Prefix ..............13
+ 5.2. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 1 N_Port_Name ....14
+ 5.3. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 2 N_Port_Name ....15
+ 5.4. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 5 N_Port_Name ....16
+ 5.5. Generating an Interface ID from an EUI-64 Mapped
+ N_Port_Name ...............................................17
+ 6. Link-local Addresses ...........................................18
+ 7. ARP Packet Format ..............................................18
+ 8. Link-layer Address/Hardware Address ............................20
+ 9. Address Mapping for Unicast ....................................20
+ 9.1. Overview ..................................................20
+ 9.2. IPv6 Address Mapping ......................................20
+ 9.3. IPv4 Address Mapping ......................................21
+ 10. Address Mapping for Multicast .................................22
+ 11. Sequence Management ...........................................23
+ 12. Exchange Management ...........................................23
+ 13. Interoperability with RFC 2625 ................................24
+ 14. Security Considerations .......................................25
+ 15. IANA Considerations ...........................................25
+ 16. Acknowledgements ..............................................25
+ 17. Normative References ..........................................26
+ 18. Informative References ........................................26
+ A. Transmission of a Broadcast FC Sequence over FC Topologies
+ (Informative) ..................................................28
+ B. Validation of the <N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID> Mapping
+ (Informative) ..................................................29
+ C. Fibre Channel Bit and Byte Numbering Guidance ..................30
+ D. Changes from RFC 2625 ..........................................31
+ E. Changes from RFC 3831 ..........................................31
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ Fibre Channel (FC) is a high-speed serial interface technology that
+ supports several Upper Layer Protocols including Small Computer
+ System Interface (SCSI), IPv6 [IPv6], and IPv4 [IPv4].
+
+ [RFC-2625] defined how to encapsulate IPv4 and Address Resolution
+ Protocol (ARP) packets over Fibre Channel for a subset of Fibre
+ Channel devices. This specification enables the support of IPv4 for
+ a broader category of Fibre Channel devices. In addition, this
+ specification simplifies [RFC-2625] by removing unused options and
+ clarifying current implementations. This document obsoletes
+ [RFC-2625].
+
+ Specific [RFC-2625] limitations that this document aims to resolve
+ are the following:
+
+ - N_Port_Name format restriction. [RFC-2625] restricts the use of
+ IPv4 to Fibre Channel devices having the format 0x1 N_Port_Name,
+ but many current implementations use other N_Port_Name formats.
+
+ - Use of Fibre Channel Address Resolution Protocol (FARP).
+ [RFC-2625] requires the support of FARP to map N_Port_Names to
+ N_Port_IDs, but many current implementations use other methods,
+ such as the Fibre Channel Name Server.
+
+ - Missing support for IPv4 multicast. [RFC-2625] does not specify
+ how to transmit IPv4 packets with a multicast destination address
+ over Fibre Channel.
+
+ [RFC-3831] defines how to encapsulate IPv6 over Fibre Channel and a
+ method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses [AARCH] and statelessly
+ autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on Fibre Channel networks. [RFC-3831]
+ also describes the content of the Source/Target Link-layer Address
+ option used in Neighbor Discovery [DISC] when the messages are
+ transmitted on a Fibre Channel network. This document obsoletes
+ [RFC-3831].
+
+ Warning to readers familiar with Fibre Channel: both Fibre Channel
+ and IETF standards use the same byte transmission order. However,
+ the bit numbering is different. See Appendix C for guidance.
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+2. Summary of Fibre Channel
+
+2.1. Overview
+
+ Fibre Channel (FC) is a gigabit-speed network technology primarily
+ used for storage networking. Fibre Channel is standardized in the
+ T11 Technical Committee of the InterNational Committee for
+ Information Technology Standards (INCITS), an American National
+ Standard Institute (ANSI) accredited standards committee.
+
+ Fibre Channel devices are called Nodes. Each Node has one or more
+ Ports that connect to Ports of other devices. Fibre Channel may be
+ implemented using any combination of the following three topologies:
+
+ - a point-to-point link between two Ports;
+ - a set of Ports interconnected by a switching network called a
+ Fabric, as defined in [FC-FS];
+ - a set of Ports interconnected with a loop topology, as defined in
+ [FC-AL-2].
+
+ A Node Port that does not operate in a loop topology is called an
+ N_Port. A Node Port that operates in a loop topology using the
+ loop-specific protocols is designated as an NL_Port. The term
+ Nx_Port is used to indicate a Node Port that is capable of operating
+ in either mode.
+
+ A Fabric Port that does not operate in a loop topology is called an
+ F_Port. A Fabric Port that operates in a loop topology using the
+ loop-specific protocols is designated as an FL_Port. The term
+ Fx_Port is used to indicate a Fabric Port that is capable of
+ operating in either mode.
+
+ A Fibre Channel network, built with any combination of the FC
+ topologies described above, is a multiaccess network with broadcast
+ capabilities.
+
+ From an IPv6 point of view, a Fibre Channel network is an IPv6 Link
+ [IPv6]. IP-capable Nx_Ports are what [IPv6] calls Interfaces.
+
+ From an IPv4 point of view, a Fibre Channel network is an IPv4 Local
+ Network [IPv4]. IP-capable Nx_Ports are what [IPv4] calls Local
+ Network Interfaces.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+2.2. Identifiers and Login
+
+ Fibre Channel entities are identified by non-volatile 64-bit
+ Name_Identifiers. [FC-FS] defines several formats of
+ Name_Identifiers. The value of the most significant 4 bits defines
+ the format of a Name_Identifier. These Name_Identifiers are referred
+ to in a more concise manner as follows:
+
+ - an Nx_Port's Name_Identifier is called N_Port_Name;
+ - an Fx_Port's Name_Identifier is called F_Port_Name;
+ - a Node's Name_Identifier is called Node_Name;
+ - a Fabric's Name_Identifier is called Fabric_Name.
+
+ An Nx_Port connected to a Fibre Channel network is associated with
+ two identifiers, its non-volatile N_Port_Name and a volatile 24-bit
+ address called N_Port_ID. The N_Port_Name is used to identify the
+ Nx_Port, and the N_Port_ID is used for communications among Nx_Ports.
+
+ Each Nx_Port acquires an N_Port_ID from the Fabric by performing a
+ process called Fabric Login, or FLOGI. The FLOGI process is used
+ also to negotiate several communications parameters between the
+ Nx_Port and the Fabric, such as the receive data field size, which
+ determines the maximum size of the Fibre Channel frames that may be
+ transferred between the Nx_Port and the Fabric.
+
+ Before effective communication may take place between two Nx_Ports,
+ they must complete a process called Port Login, or PLOGI. The PLOGI
+ process provides each Nx_Port with the other Nx_Port's N_Port_Name,
+ and negotiates several communication parameters, such as the receive
+ data field size, which determines the maximum size of the Fibre
+ Channel frames that may be transferred between the two Nx_Ports.
+
+ Both Fabric Login and Port Login may be explicit (i.e., performed
+ using specific FC control messages called Extended Link Services, or
+ ELSes) or implicit (i.e., in which the parameters are specified by
+ configuration or other methods).
+
+2.3. FC Levels and Frame Format
+
+ [FC-FS] describes the Fibre Channel protocol using 5 different
+ levels. The FC-2 and FC-4 levels are relevant for this
+ specification. The FC-2 level defines the FC frame format, the
+ transport services, and the control functions necessary for
+ information transfer. The FC-4 level supports Upper Level Protocols,
+ such as IPv6, IPv4, and SCSI. The Fibre Channel frame format is
+ shown in figure 1.
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ +-----+-----------+-----------+--------//-------+-----+-----+
+ | | | Data Field | | |
+ | SOF | FC Header |<--------------------------->| CRC | EOF |
+ | | | Optional | Frame | | |
+ | | | Header(s) | Payload | | |
+ +-----+-----------+-----------+--------//-------+-----+-----+
+
+ Figure 1: Fibre Channel Frame Format
+
+ The Start of Frame (SOF) and End of Frame (EOF) are special FC
+ transmission words that act as frame delimiters. The Cyclic
+ Redundancy Check (CRC) is 4 octets long and is used to verify the
+ integrity of a frame.
+
+ The FC Header is 24 octets long and contains several fields
+ associated with the identification and control of the Data Field.
+
+ The Data Field is of variable size, ranging from 0 to 2112 octets,
+ and includes the user data in the Frame Payload field and Optional
+ Headers. The currently defined Optional Headers are the following:
+
+ - ESP_Header;
+ - Network_Header;
+ - Association_Header;
+ - Device_Header.
+
+ The value of the SOF field determines the FC Class of service
+ associated with the frame. Five Classes of service are specified in
+ [FC-FS]. They are distinguished primarily by the method of flow
+ control between the communicating Nx_Ports and by the level of data
+ integrity provided. A given Fabric or Nx_Port may support one or
+ more of the following Classes of service:
+
+ - Class 1: Dedicated physical connection with delivery confirmation;
+ - Class 2: Frame multiplexed service with delivery confirmation;
+ - Class 3: Datagram service;
+ - Class 4: Fractional bandwidth;
+ - Class 6: Reliable multicast via dedicated connections.
+
+ Classes 3 and 2 are commonly used for storage networking
+ applications; Classes 1 and 6 are typically used for specialized
+ applications in avionics. Class 3 is recommended for IPv6, IPv4, and
+ ARP (see section 4.3).
+
+2.4. Sequences and Exchanges
+
+ An application-level payload such as an IPv6 or IPv4 packet is called
+ an Information Unit at the FC-4 level of Fibre Channel. Each FC-4
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ Information Unit is mapped to an FC Sequence by the FC-2 level. An
+ FC Sequence consists of one or more FC frames related by the value of
+ the Sequence_ID (SEQ_ID) field of the FC Header.
+
+ The architectural maximum data that may be carried by an FC frame is
+ 2112 octets. The maximum usable frame size depends on the Fabric and
+ Nx_Port implementations and is negotiated during the Login process.
+ Whenever an Information Unit to be transmitted exceeds this value,
+ the FC-2 level segments it into multiple FC frames, sent as a single
+ Sequence. The receiving Nx_Port reassembles the Sequence of frames
+ and delivers a reassembled Information Unit to the FC-4 level. The
+ Sequence Count (SEQ_CNT) field of the FC Header may be used to ensure
+ frame ordering.
+
+ Multiple Sequences may be grouped together as belonging to the same
+ FC Exchange. The Exchange is a mechanism used by two Nx_Ports to
+ identify and manage an operation between them. The Exchange is
+ opened when the operation is started between the two Nx_Ports, and
+ closed when the operation ends. FC frames belonging to the same
+ Exchange are related by the value of the Exchange_ID fields in the FC
+ Header. An Originator Exchange_ID (OX_ID) and a Responder
+ Exchange_ID (RX_ID) uniquely identify the Exchange between a pair of
+ Nx_Ports.
+
+3. IP-capable Nx_Ports
+
+ This specification requires an IP-capable Nx_Port to have the
+ following properties:
+
+ - The format of its N_Port_Name MUST be one of 0x1, 0x2, 0x5, 0xC,
+ 0xD, 0xE, 0xF (see section 5.1);
+ - It MUST support Class 3;
+ - It MUST support continuously increasing SEQ_CNT [FC-FS];
+ - It MUST be able to transmit and receive an FC-4 Information Unit
+ at least 1304 octets long (see section 4.1);
+ - It SHOULD support a receive data field size for Device_Data FC
+ frames of at least 1024 octets (see section 10).
+
+4. IPv6, IPv4, and ARP Encapsulation
+
+4.1. FC Sequence Format for IPv6 and IPv4 Packets
+
+ An IPv6 or IPv4 packet is mapped to an Information Unit at the FC-4
+ level of Fibre Channel, which in turn is mapped to an FC Sequence by
+ the FC-2 level [FC-FS]. An FC Information Unit containing an IP
+ packet MUST carry the FC Network_Header [FC-FS] and the Logical Link
+ Control/SubNetwork Access Protocol (LLC/SNAP) header [IEEE-LLC],
+ resulting in the FC Information Unit format shown in figure 2.
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | Network_Header |
+ +- (16 octets) -+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | LLC/SNAP header |
+ +- (8 octets) -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ / IPv6 or IPv4 Packet /
+ / /
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 2: FC Information Unit Mapping an IP Packet
+
+ In order to support the minimum IPv6 MTU (i.e., 1280 octets), an
+ Nx_Port supporting IP MUST be able to transmit and receive an FC-4
+ Information Unit at least 1304 octets long (i.e., 1280 + 8 + 16).
+
+ The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] MAY be used to secure the FC frames
+ composing an IP FC Sequence. Other FC Optional Headers MUST NOT be
+ used in an IP FC Sequence.
+
+ An IP FC Sequence often consists of more than one frame, all frames
+ having the same TYPE (see section 4.4). The first frame of the
+ Sequence MUST include the FC Network_Header and the LLC/SNAP header.
+ The other frames MUST NOT include them, as shown in figure 3.
+
+ First Frame of an IP FC Sequence
+ +-----------+-------------------+-----------------+-------//--------+
+ | FC Header | FC Network_Header | LLC/SNAP header | First chunk of |
+ | | | | the IP Packet |
+ +-----------+-------------------+-----------------+-------//--------+
+
+ Subsequent Frames of an IP FC Sequence
+ +-----------+-----------------//--------------------+
+ | FC Header | Additional chunk of the IP Packet |
+ +-----------+----------------//---------------------+
+
+ Figure 3: Optional Headers in an IP FC Sequence
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+4.2. FC Sequence Format for ARP Packets
+
+ An ARP packet is mapped to an Information Unit at the FC-4 level of
+ Fibre Channel, which in turn is mapped to an FC Sequence by the FC-2
+ level. An FC Information Unit containing an ARP packet MUST carry
+ the FC Network_Header [FC-FS] and the LLC/SNAP header [IEEE-LLC],
+ resulting in the FC Information Unit format shown in figure 4.
+
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | Network_Header |
+ +- (16 octets) -+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | LLC/SNAP header |
+ +- (8 octets) -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ / ARP Packet /
+ / /
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 4: FC Information Unit Mapping an ARP Packet
+
+ Given the limited size of an ARP packet (see section 7), an FC
+ Sequence carrying an ARP packet MUST be mapped to a single FC frame
+ that MUST include the FC Network_Header and the LLC/SNAP header.
+
+ The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] MAY be used to secure an FC frame carrying
+ an ARP packet. Other FC Optional Headers MUST NOT be used in an FC
+ frame carrying an ARP packet.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+4.3. FC Classes of Service
+
+ This specification uses FC Class 3. The following types of packets
+ MUST be mapped in Class 3 FC frames:
+
+ - multicast IPv6 packets;
+ - multicast/broadcast IPv4 packets;
+ - Control Protocol packets (e.g., ARP packets; IPv6 packets carrying
+ ICMPv6 [ICMPv6], Neighbor Discovery [DISC], or Multicast Listener
+ Discovery [MLDv2] messages; IPv4 packets carrying ICMP [ICMPv4] or
+ IGMP [IGMPv3] messages; IPv6 and IPv4 Routing Protocols packets).
+
+ Other IPv6 and IPv4 packets (i.e., unicast IP packets carrying data
+ traffic) SHOULD be mapped in Class 3 FC frames as well. Support for
+ reception of IPv4 or IPv6 packets mapped in FC frames of any Class
+ other than Class 3 is OPTIONAL; receivers MAY ignore them.
+
+4.4. FC Header Code Points
+
+ The fields of the Fibre Channel Header are shown in figure 5. The
+ D_ID and S_ID fields contain, respectively, the destination N_Port_ID
+ and the source N_Port_ID.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | R_CTL | D_ID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | CS_CTL/Prio | S_ID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | TYPE | F_CTL |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | SEQ_ID | DF_CTL | SEQ_CNT |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | OX_ID | RX_ID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | Parameter |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 5: FC Header Format
+
+ To encapsulate IPv6 and IPv4 over Fibre Channel, the following code
+ points apply. When a single value is listed without further
+ qualification, that value MUST be used:
+
+ - R_CTL: 0x04 (Device_Data frame with Unsolicited Data Information
+ Category [FC-FS]);
+ - TYPE: 0x05 (IP over Fibre Channel);
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ - CS_CTL/Prio: 0x00 is the default, see [FC-FS] for other values;
+ - DF_CTL: 0x20 (Network_Header) for the first FC frame of an IPv6 or
+ IPv4 Sequence, 0x00 for the following FC frames. If the FC
+ ESP_Header is used, then 0x60 for the first FC frame of an IPv6 or
+ IPv4 Sequence, 0x40 for the following FC frames;
+ - F_CTL, SEQ_ID, SEQ_CNT, OX_ID, RX_ID: see section 11, section 12,
+ and [FC-FS] for additional requirements;
+ - Parameter: if Relative Offset [FC-FS] is not used, the content of
+ this field MUST be ignored by the receiver, and SHOULD be set to
+ zero by the sender. If Relative Offset is used, see [FC-FS].
+
+ To encapsulate ARP over Fibre Channel, the following code points
+ apply. When a single value is listed without further qualification,
+ that value MUST be used:
+
+ - R_CTL: 0x04 (Device_Data frame with Unsolicited Data Information
+ Category [FC-FS]);
+ - TYPE: 0x05 (IP over Fibre Channel);
+ - CS_CTL/Prio: 0x00 is the default, see [FC-FS] for other values;
+ - DF_CTL: 0x20 (Network_Header). If the FC ESP_Header is used, then
+ 0x60;
+ - F_CTL, SEQ_ID, SEQ_CNT, OX_ID, RX_ID: see section 11, section 12,
+ and [FC-FS] for additional requirements;
+ - Parameter: SHOULD be set to zero.
+
+4.5. FC Network_Header
+
+ The fields of the FC Network_Header are shown in figure 6. For use
+ with IPv6, IPv4, and ARP, the N_Port_Names formats MUST be one of
+ 0x1, 0x2, 0x5, 0xC, 0xD, 0xE, 0xF [FC-FS].
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | |
+ +- Destination N_Port_Name -+
+ | |
+ +---------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | |
+ +- Source N_Port_Name -+
+ | |
+ +---------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+ Figure 6: FC Network_Header Format
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+4.6. LLC/SNAP Header
+
+ The fields of the LLC/SNAP header [IEEE-LLC] are shown in figure 7.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | DSAP | SSAP | CTRL | OUI |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | OUI | PID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 7: LLC/SNAP Header Format
+
+ To encapsulate IPv6, IPv4, and ARP over Fibre Channel, the following
+ code points MUST be used:
+
+ - DSAP: 0xAA;
+ - SSAP: 0xAA;
+ - CTRL: 0x03;
+ - OUI: 0x000000;
+ - PID: 0x86DD for IPv6, 0x0800 for IPv4, 0x0806 for ARP.
+
+4.7. Bit and Byte Ordering
+
+ IPv6, IPv4, and ARP packets are mapped to the FC-4 level using the
+ big-endian byte ordering that corresponds to the standard network
+ byte order or canonical form.
+
+4.8. Maximum Transfer Unit
+
+ The default MTU size for IPv6 packets over Fibre Channel is 65280
+ octets. Large IPv6 packets are mapped to a Sequence of FC frames
+ (see section 2.4). This size may be reduced by a Router
+ Advertisement [DISC] containing an MTU option that specifies a
+ smaller MTU, or by manual configuration of each Nx_Port. However, as
+ required by [IPv6], the MTU MUST NOT be lower than 1280 octets. If a
+ Router Advertisement received on an Nx_Port has an MTU option
+ specifying an MTU larger than 65280, or larger than a manually
+ configured value, that MTU option MAY be logged to system management
+ but MUST be otherwise ignored.
+
+ As the default MTU size far exceeds the message sizes typically used
+ in the Internet, an IPv6 over FC implementation SHOULD implement Path
+ MTU Discovery [PMTUD6], or at least maintain different MTU values for
+ on-link and off-link destinations.
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ For correct operation of IPv6 in a routed environment, it is
+ critically important to configure an appropriate MTU option in Router
+ Advertisements.
+
+ For correct operation of IPv6 when mixed media (e.g., Ethernet and
+ Fibre Channel) are bridged together, the smallest MTU of all the
+ media must be advertised by routers in an MTU option. If there are
+ no routers present, this MTU must be manually configured in each node
+ that is connected to a medium with a default MTU larger than the
+ smallest MTU.
+
+ The default MTU size for IPv4 packets over Fibre Channel is 65280
+ octets. Large IPv4 packets are mapped to a Sequence of FC frames
+ (see section 2.4). This size may be reduced by manual configuration
+ of each Nx_Port or by the Path MTU Discovery technique [PMTUD4].
+
+5. IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
+
+5.1. IPv6 Interface Identifier and Address Prefix
+
+ The IPv6 Interface ID [AARCH] for an Nx_Port is based on the EUI-64
+ address [EUI64] derived from the Nx_Port's N_Port_Name. The IPv6
+ Interface Identifier is obtained by complementing the Universal/Local
+ (U/L) bit of the OUI field of the derived EUI-64 address. The U/L
+ bit has no function in Fibre Channel; however, it has to be properly
+ handled when a Name_Identifier is converted to an EUI-64 address.
+
+ [FC-FS] specifies a method to map format 0x1 (IEEE 48-bit address),
+ 0x2 (IEEE Extended), or 0x5 (IEEE Registered) FC Name_Identifiers in
+ EUI-64 addresses. This allows the usage of these Name_Identifiers to
+ support IPv6. [FC-FS] also defines EUI-64 mapped FC Name_Identifiers
+ (formats 0xC, 0xD, 0xE, and 0xF) that are derived from an EUI-64
+ address. It is possible to reverse this address mapping to obtain
+ the original EUI-64 address in order to support IPv6.
+
+ IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration MUST be performed as
+ specified in [ACONF]. An IPv6 Address Prefix used for stateless
+ address autoconfiguration of an Nx_Port MUST have a length of 64
+ bits.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+5.2. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 1 N_Port_Name
+
+ The Name_Identifier format 0x1 is shown in figure 8.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ |0 0 0 1| 0x000 | OUI |
+ +-------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | OUI | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 8: Format 0x1 Name_Identifier
+
+ The EUI-64 address derived from this Name_Identifier has the format
+ shown in figure 9 [FC-FS].
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI with complemented U/L bit |0 0 0 1| VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID | 0x000 |
+ +---------------+---------------+-------+-------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 9: EUI-64 Address from a Format 0x1 Name_Identifier
+
+ The IPv6 Interface Identifier is obtained from this EUI-64 address by
+ complementing the U/L bit in the OUI field. Therefore, the OUI in
+ the IPv6 Interface ID is exactly as in the FC Name_Identifier. The
+ resulting IPv6 Interface Identifier has local scope [AARCH] and the
+ format shown in figure 10.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI |0 0 0 1| VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID | 0x000 |
+ +---------------+---------------+-------+-------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 10: IPv6 Interface ID from a Format 0x1 Name_Identifier
+
+ As an example, the FC Name_Identifier 0x10-00-34-63-46-AB-CD-EF
+ generates the IPv6 Interface Identifier 3463:461A:BCDE:F000.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+5.3. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 2 N_Port_Name
+
+ The Name_Identifier format 0x2 is shown in figure 11.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ |0 0 1 0| Vendor Specific | OUI |
+ +-------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | OUI | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 11: Format 0x2 Name_Identifier
+
+ The EUI-64 address derived from this Name_Identifier has the format
+ shown in figure 12 [FC-FS].
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI with complemented U/L bit |0 0 1 0| VSID |
+ +---------------+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID | Vendor Specific |
+ +---------------+-----------------------+-------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 12: EUI-64 Address from a Format 0x2 Name_Identifier
+
+ The IPv6 Interface Identifier is obtained from this EUI-64 address by
+ complementing the U/L bit in the OUI field. Therefore, the OUI in
+ the IPv6 Interface ID is exactly as in the FC Name_Identifier. The
+ resulting IPv6 Interface Identifier has local scope [AARCH] and the
+ format shown in figure 13.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI |0 0 1 0| VSID |
+ +---------------+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID | Vendor Specific |
+ +---------------+-----------------------+-------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 13: IPv6 Interface ID from a Format 0x2 Name_Identifier
+
+ As an example, the FC Name_Identifier 0x27-89-34-63-46-AB-CD-EF
+ generates the IPv6 Interface Identifier 3463:462A:BCDE:F789.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+5.4. Generating an Interface ID from a Format 5 N_Port_Name
+
+ The Name_Identifier format 0x5 is shown in figure 14.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ |0 1 0 1| OUI | VSID |
+ +-------+-------+---------------+---------------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 14: Format 0x5 Name_Identifier
+
+ The EUI-64 address derived from this Name_Identifier has the format
+ shown in figure 15 [FC-FS].
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI with complemented U/L bit |0 1 0 1| VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 15: EUI-64 Address from a Format 0x5 Name_Identifier
+
+ The IPv6 Interface Identifier is obtained from this EUI-64 address
+ complementing the U/L bit in the OUI field. Therefore, the OUI in
+ the IPv6 Interface ID is exactly as in the FC Name_Identifier. The
+ resulting IPv6 Interface Identifier has local scope [AARCH] and the
+ format shown in figure 16.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI |0 1 0 1| VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+-------+-------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 16: IPv6 Interface ID from a Format 0x5 Name_Identifier
+
+ As an example, the FC Name_Identifier 0x53-46-34-6A-BC-DE-F7-89
+ generates the IPv6 Interface Identifier 3463:465A:BCDE:F789.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+5.5. Generating an Interface ID from an EUI-64 Mapped N_Port_Name
+
+ The EUI-64 mapped Name_Identifiers formats (formats 0xC through 0xF)
+ are derived from an EUI-64 address by compressing the OUI field of
+ such addresses. The compression is performed by removing the
+ Universal/Local and Individual/Group bits from the OUI, and by
+ putting bits 0 to 5 of the OUI in the first octet of the
+ Name_Identifier, and bits 8 to 23 of the OUI in the second and third
+ octet of the Name_Identifier, as shown in figure 17.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ |1 1| OUI[0..5] | OUI[8..23] | VSID |
+ +---+-----------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 17: EUI-64 Mapped Name_Identifiers Format
+
+ The EUI-64 address used to generate the Name_Identifier shown in
+ figure 17 has the format shown in figure 18.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI[0..5] |0 0| OUI[8..23] | VSID |
+ +-----------+---+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 18: EUI-64 Address from an EUI-64 Mapped Name_Identifier
+
+ The IPv6 Interface Identifier is obtained from this EUI-64 address by
+ complementing the U/L bit in the OUI field. The resulting IPv6
+ Interface Identifier has global scope [AARCH] and the format shown in
+ figure 19.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | OUI[0..5] |1 0| OUI[8..23] | VSID |
+ +-----------+---+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | VSID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 19: IPv6 Interface ID from an EUI-64 Mapped Name_Identifier
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ As an example, the FC Name_Identifier 0xCD-63-46-AB-01-25-78-9A
+ generates the IPv6 Interface Identifier 3663:46AB:0125:789A.
+
+6. Link-local Addresses
+
+ The IPv6 link-local address [AARCH] for an Nx_Port is formed by
+ appending the Interface Identifier (as defined in section 5) to the
+ prefix FE80::/64. The resulting address is shown in figure 20.
+
+ 10 bits 54 bits 64 bits
+ +----------+-----------------------+----------------------------+
+ |1111111010| (zeros) | Interface Identifier |
+ +----------+-----------------------+----------------------------+
+
+ Figure 20: IPv6 Link-local Address Format
+
+7. ARP Packet Format
+
+ The Address Resolution Protocol defined in [ARP] is designed to be a
+ general purpose protocol, to accommodate many network technologies
+ and many Upper Layer Protocols.
+
+ [RFC-2625] chose to use for Fibre Channel the same ARP packet format
+ used for Ethernet networks. In order to do that, [RFC-2625]
+ restricted the use of IPv4 to Nx_Ports having N_Port_Name format 0x1.
+ Although this may have been a reasonable choice at that time, today
+ there are Nx_Ports with an N_Port_Name format other than 0x1 in
+ widespread use.
+
+ This specification accommodates Nx_Ports with N_Port_Names of a
+ format different from 0x1 by defining a Fibre Channel specific
+ version of the ARP protocol (FC ARP), carrying both N_Port_Name and
+ N_Port_ID as Hardware (HW) Address.
+
+ IANA has registered the number 18 (decimal) to identify Fibre Channel
+ as ARP HW type. The FC ARP packet format is shown in figure 21. The
+ length of the FC ARP packet is 40 octets.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | HW Type = 0x0012 | Protocol = 0x0800 |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | HW Len = 12 | Proto Len = 4 | Opcode |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | HW Address of Sender |
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | Protocol Address of Sender |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +- -+
+ | HW Address of Target |
+ +- -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | Protocol Address of Target |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 21: FC ARP Packet Format
+
+ The following code points MUST be used with FC ARP:
+
+ - HW Type: 0x0012 (Fibre Channel);
+ - Protocol: 0x0800 (IPv4);
+ - HW Len: 12 (Length in octets of the HW Address);
+ - Proto Len: 4 (Length in octets of the Protocol Address);
+ - Opcode: 0x0001 for ARP Request, 0x0002 for ARP Reply [ARP];
+ - HW Address of Sender: the HW Address (see section 8) of the
+ Requester in an ARP Request, or the HW Address of the Responder in
+ an ARP Reply;
+ - Protocol Address of Sender: the IPv4 address of the Requester in
+ an ARP Request, or that of the Responder in an ARP Reply;
+ - HW Address of Target: set to zero in an ARP Request, and to the HW
+ Address (see section 8) of the Requester in an ARP Reply;
+ - Protocol Address of Target: the IPv4 address of the Responder in
+ an ARP Request, or that of the Requester in an ARP Reply.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+8. Link-layer Address/Hardware Address
+
+ The Link-layer Address used in the Source/Target Link-layer Address
+ option (see section 9.2) and the Hardware Address used in FC ARP (see
+ section 7) have the same format, shown in figure 22.
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | |
+ +- N_Port_Name -+
+ | |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+ | Reserved | N_Port_ID |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 22: Link-layer Address/HW Address Format
+
+ Reserved fields MUST be set to zero when transmitting, and MUST be
+ ignored when receiving.
+
+9. Address Mapping for Unicast
+
+9.1. Overview
+
+ An Nx_Port has two kinds of Fibre Channel addresses:
+
+ - a non-volatile 64-bit address, called N_Port_Name;
+ - a volatile 24-bit address, called N_Port_ID.
+
+ The N_Port_Name is used to uniquely identify the Nx_Port, and the
+ N_Port_ID is used to route frames to the Nx_Port. Both FC addresses
+ are required to resolve an IPv6 or IPv4 unicast address. The fact
+ that the N_Port_ID is volatile implies that an Nx_Port MUST validate
+ the mapping between its N_Port_Name and N_Port_ID when certain Fibre
+ Channel events occur (see Appendix B).
+
+9.2. IPv6 Address Mapping
+
+ The procedure for mapping IPv6 unicast addresses into Fibre Channel
+ link-layer addresses uses the Neighbor Discovery Protocol [DISC].
+ The Source/Target Link-layer Address option has the format shown in
+ figure 23 when the link layer is Fibre Channel.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ 0 1 2 3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+ | Type | Length = 2 | |
+ +---------------+---------------+ -+
+ | |
+ +- Link-layer Address -+
+ | |
+ +- +---------------+---------------+
+ | | Padding |
+ +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
+
+ Figure 23: Source/Target Link-layer Address Option for Fibre Channel
+
+ Type: 1 for Source Link-layer address.
+ 2 for Target Link-layer address.
+
+ Length: 2 (in units of 8 octets).
+
+ Padding: MUST be set to zero when transmitting,
+ MUST be ignored when receiving.
+
+ Link-layer Address: the Nx_Port's Link-layer Address (see section
+ 8).
+
+9.3. IPv4 Address Mapping
+
+ The procedure for mapping IPv4 unicast addresses into Fibre Channel
+ link-layer addresses uses the FC ARP protocol, as specified in
+ section 7 and [ARP]. A source Nx_Port that has to send IPv4 packets
+ to a destination Nx_Port, known by its IPv4 address, MUST perform the
+ following steps:
+
+ 1) The source Nx_Port first consults its local mapping tables for a
+ mapping <destination IPv4 address, N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID>.
+
+ 2) If such a mapping is found, and a valid Port Login is in place
+ with the destination Nx_Port, then the source Nx_Port sends the
+ IPv4 packets to the destination Nx_Port using the retrieved
+ N_Port_ID as D_ID.
+
+ 3) If such a mapping is not found, or a valid Port Login is not in
+ place with the destination Nx_Port, then the source Nx_Port sends
+ a broadcast FC ARP Request (see section 10) to its connected FC
+ network.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ 4) When a broadcast FC ARP Request is received by the Nx_Port with
+ the matching IPv4 address, that Nx_Port caches the information
+ carried in the FC ARP Request in its local mapping tables and
+ generates a unicast FC ARP Reply. If a valid Port Login to the
+ Nx_Port that sent the broadcast FC ARP Request does not exist, the
+ Nx_Port MUST perform such a Port Login, and then use it for the
+ unicast reply. The N_Port_ID to which the Port Login is directed
+ is taken from the N_Port_ID field of the Sender HW Address field
+ in the received FC ARP packet.
+
+ 5) If no Nx_Port has the matching IPv4 address, no unicast FC ARP
+ Reply is returned.
+
+10. Address Mapping for Multicast
+
+ IPv6 multicast packets, IPv4 multicast/broadcast packets, and ARP
+ broadcast packets MUST be mapped to FC Sequences addressed to the
+ broadcast N_Port_ID 0xFFFFFF, sent in FC Class 3 in a unidirectional
+ Exchange (see section 12). Appendix A specifies how to transmit a
+ Class 3 broadcast FC Sequence over various Fibre Channel topologies.
+ The Destination N_Port_Name field of the FC Network_Header MUST be
+ set to the value:
+
+ - for broadcast ARP and IPv4 packets: 0x10-00-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF;
+ - for multicast IPv6 packets: 0x10-00-33-33-XX-YY-ZZ-QQ, where
+ XX-YY-ZZ-QQ are the 4 least significant octets of the multicast
+ destination IPv6 address;
+ - for multicast IPv4 packets: 0x10-00-01-00-5E-XX-YY-ZZ, where the
+ 23 least significant bits of XX-YY-ZZ are the 23 least significant
+ bits of the multicast destination IPv4 address and the most
+ significant bit of XX-YY-ZZ is set to zero.
+
+ An Nx_Port supporting IPv6 or IPv4 MUST be able to map a received
+ broadcast Class 3 Device_Data FC frame to an implicit Port Login
+ context in order to handle IPv6 multicast packets, IPv4 multicast or
+ broadcast packets, and ARP broadcast packets. The receive data field
+ size of this implicit Port Login MUST be the same across all the
+ Nx_Ports connected to the same Fabric, otherwise FC broadcast
+ transmission does not work. In order to reduce the need for FC
+ Sequence segmentation, the receive data field size of this implicit
+ Port Login SHOULD be 1024 octets. This receive data field size
+ requirement applies to broadcast Device_Data FC frames, not to ELSes.
+
+ Receiving an FC Sequence carrying an IPv6 multicast packet, an IPv4
+ multicast/broadcast packet, or an FC ARP broadcast packet triggers
+ some additional processing by the Nx_Port when that IPv6, IPv4, or
+ FC ARP packet requires a unicast reply. In this case, if a valid
+ Port Login to the Nx_Port that sent the multicast or broadcast packet
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ does not exist, the Nx_Port MUST perform such a Port Login, and then
+ use it for the unicast reply. In the case of Neighbor Discovery
+ messages [DISC], the N_Port_ID to which the Port Login is directed is
+ taken from the N_Port_ID field of the Source Link-layer Address in
+ the received Neighbor Discovery message. In the case of FC ARP
+ messages, the N_Port_ID to which the Port Login is directed is taken
+ from the N_Port_ID field of the Sender HW Address field in the
+ received FC ARP packet.
+
+ As an example, if a received broadcast FC Sequence carries an IPv6
+ multicast unsolicited Router Advertisement [DISC], the receiving
+ Nx_Port processes it simply by passing the carried IPv6 packet to the
+ IPv6 layer. Instead, if a received broadcast FC Sequence carries an
+ IPv6 multicast solicitation message [DISC] requiring a unicast reply,
+ and no valid Port Login exists with the Nx_Port sender of the
+ multicast packet, then a Port Login MUST be performed in order to
+ send the unicast reply message. If a received broadcast FC Sequence
+ carries an IPv6 multicast solicitation message [DISC] requiring a
+ multicast reply, the reply is sent to the broadcast N_Port_ID
+ 0xFFFFFF.
+
+11. Sequence Management
+
+ FC Sequences carrying IPv6, IPv4, or ARP packets are REQUIRED to be
+ non-streamed [FC-FS]. In order to avoid missing FC frame aliasing by
+ Sequence_ID reuse, an Nx_Port supporting IPv6 or IPv4 is REQUIRED to
+ use continuously increasing SEQ_CNT [FC-FS]. Each Exchange MUST
+ start by setting SEQ_CNT to zero in the first frame; every frame
+ transmitted after that MUST increment the previous SEQ_CNT by one.
+ The Continue Sequence Condition field in the F_CTL field of the FC
+ Header MUST be set to zero [FC-FS].
+
+12. Exchange Management
+
+ To transmit IPv6, IPv4, or ARP packets to another Nx_Port or to a
+ multicast/broadcast address, an Nx_Port MUST use dedicated
+ unidirectional Exchanges (i.e., Exchanges dedicated to IPv6, IPv4, or
+ ARP packet transmission and that do not transfer Sequence
+ Initiative). As such, the Sequence Initiative bit in the F_CTL field
+ of the FC Header MUST be set to zero [FC-FS]. The RX_ID field of the
+ FC Header MUST be set to 0xFFFF.
+
+ Unicast FC Sequences carrying unicast Control Protocol packets (e.g.,
+ ARP packets; IPv6 packets carrying ICMPv6 [ICMPv6], Neighbor
+ Discovery [DISC], or Multicast Listener Discovery [MLDv2] messages;
+ IPv4 packets carrying ICMP [ICMPv4] or IGMP [IGMPv3] messages) SHOULD
+ be sent in short-lived unidirectional Exchanges (i.e., Exchanges
+ containing only one Sequence, in which both the First_Sequence and
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ Last_Sequence bits in the F_CTL field of the FC Header are set to one
+ [FC-FS]). Unicast FC Sequences carrying other IPv6 and IPv4 packets
+ (i.e., unicast IP packets carrying data traffic) MUST be sent in a
+ long-lived unidirectional Exchange (i.e., an Exchange containing one
+ or more Sequences). IP multicast packets MUST NOT be carried in
+ unicast FC Sequences (see section 10).
+
+ Broadcast FC Sequences carrying multicast or broadcast Control
+ Protocol packets (e.g., ARP packets; IPv6 packets carrying ICMPv6
+ [ICMPv6], Neighbor Discovery [DISC], or Multicast Listener Discovery
+ [MLDv2] messages; IPv4 packets carrying ICMP [ICMPv4] or IGMP
+ [IGMPv3] messages) MUST be sent in short-lived unidirectional
+ Exchanges. Broadcast FC Sequences carrying other IPv6 or IPv4
+ multicast traffic (i.e., multicast IP packets carrying data traffic)
+ MAY be sent in long-lived unidirectional Exchanges to enable a more
+ efficient multicast distribution.
+
+ Reasons to terminate a long-lived Exchange include the termination of
+ Port Login and the completion of the IP communication. A long-lived
+ Exchange MAY be terminated by setting the Last_Sequence bit in the
+ F_CTL field of the FC Header to one, or via the ABTS (Abort Sequence)
+ protocol [FC-FS]. A long-lived Exchange SHOULD NOT be terminated by
+ transmitting the LOGO ELS, since this may terminate active Exchanges
+ on other FC-4s [FC-FS].
+
+13. Interoperability with RFC 2625
+
+ The IPv4 encapsulation defined in this document, along with Exchange
+ and Sequence management, are as defined in [RFC-2625].
+ Implementations following this specification are expected to
+ interoperate with implementations compliant to [RFC-2625] for IPv4
+ packet transmission and reception.
+
+ The main difference between this document and [RFC-2625] is in the
+ address resolution procedure. [RFC-2625] uses the Ethernet format of
+ the ARP protocol and requires all Nx_Ports to have a format 0x1
+ N_Port_Name. This specification defines a Fibre Channel format for
+ the ARP protocol that supports all commonly used N_Port_Names. In
+ addition, this specification does not use FARP [RFC-2625].
+
+ An Nx_Port following this specification, and not having a format 0x1
+ N_Port_Name, is able to interoperate with an [RFC-2625]
+ implementation by manually configuring the mapping <destination IPv4
+ address, N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID> on the involved Nx_Ports. Through
+ this manual configuration, the ARP protocol does not need to be
+ performed. However, IPv4 communication is not possible if the
+ [RFC-2625] implementation strictly enforces the requirement for
+ Nx_Ports to use N_Port_Names of format 0x1.
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ An Nx_Port following this specification, and having a format 0x1
+ N_Port_Name, is able to interoperate with an [RFC-2625]
+ implementation by manually configuring the mapping <destination IPv4
+ address, N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID> on the involved Nx_Ports, or by
+ performing the IPv4 address resolution in compatibility mode, as
+ described below:
+
+ - When IPv4 address resolution is attempted, the Nx_Port MUST send
+ two ARP Requests, the first one according to the FC ARP format and
+ the second one according to the Ethernet ARP format. If only an
+ Ethernet ARP Reply is received, it provides the N_Port_Name of the
+ Nx_Port having the destination IPv4 address. The N_Port_ID
+ associated with the N_Port_Name received in an Ethernet ARP Reply
+ may be retrieved from the S_ID field of the received ARP Reply, or
+ by querying the Fibre Channel Name Server;
+ - The Nx_Port MUST respond to a received Ethernet ARP Request with
+ an Ethernet ARP Reply;
+ - The Nx_Port MAY respond to FARP Requests [RFC-2625].
+
+ The reception of a particular format of ARP message does not imply
+ that the sending Nx_Port will continue to use the same format later.
+
+ Support of compatibility mode is REQUIRED by each implementation.
+ The use of compatibility mode MUST be administratively configurable.
+
+14. Security Considerations
+
+ IPv6, IPv4, and ARP do not introduce any additional security concerns
+ beyond those that already exist within the Fibre Channel protocols.
+ Zoning techniques based on FC Name Server masking (soft zoning) do
+ not work with IPv6 and IPv4, because IPv6 and IPv4 over Fibre Channel
+ do not use the FC Name Server. The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] may be used
+ to secure the FC frames composing FC Sequences carrying IPv6, IPv4,
+ and ARP packets. All the techniques defined to secure IP traffic at
+ the IP layer may be used in a Fibre Channel environment.
+
+15. IANA Considerations
+
+ The directory of ARP parameters has been updated to reference this
+ document for hardware type 18.
+
+16. Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to acknowledge the ANSI INCITS T11.3 Task
+ Group members who reviewed this document as well as the authors of
+ [RFC-2625] and [RFC-3831]. The authors also thank the IMSS WG and
+ Brian Haberman for their review and comments.
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+17. Normative References
+
+ [FC-FS] ANSI INCITS 373-2003, "Fibre Channel - Framing and
+ Signaling (FC-FS)".
+
+ [FC-AL-2] ANSI INCITS 332-1999, "Fibre Channel - Arbitrated Loop-2
+ (FC-AL-2)".
+
+ [IPv6] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
+ (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
+
+ [AARCH] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6
+ (IPv6) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003.
+
+ [ACONF] Thomson, S. and T. Narten, "IPv6 Stateless Address
+ Autoconfiguration", RFC 2462, December 1998.
+
+ [DISC] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., and W. Simpson, "Neighbor
+ Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December
+ 1998.
+
+ [PMTUD6] McCann, J., Deering, S., and J. Mogul, "Path MTU
+ Discovery for IP version 6", RFC 1981, August 1996.
+
+ [IPv4] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
+ September 1981.
+
+ [ARP] Plummer, D., "Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or
+ converting network protocol addresses to 48.bit Ethernet
+ address for transmission on Ethernet hardware", STD 37,
+ RFC 826, November 1982.
+
+ [IEEE-LLC] IEEE Std 802-2001, "IEEE Standard for Local and
+ Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview and Architecture".
+
+ [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+18. Informative References
+
+ [RFC-3831] DeSanti, C., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Fibre
+ Channel", RFC 3831, July 2004.
+
+ [RFC-2625] Rajagopal, M., Bhagwat, R., and W. Rickard, "IP and ARP
+ over Fibre Channel", RFC 2625, June 1999.
+
+ [MLDv2] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery
+ Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004.
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+ [IGMPv3] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
+ Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
+ 3", RFC 3376, October 2002.
+
+ [PMTUD4] Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191,
+ November 1990.
+
+ [ICMPv6] Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Internet Control Message
+ Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6
+ (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2463, December 1998.
+
+ [ICMPv4] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5,
+ RFC 792, September 1981.
+
+ [EUI64] "Guidelines For 64-bit Global Identifier (EUI-64)
+ Registration Authority",
+ http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/tutorials/
+ EUI64.html
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+A. Transmission of a Broadcast FC Sequence over FC Topologies
+ (Informative)
+
+A.1. Point-to-Point Topology
+
+ No particular mechanisms are required for this case. The Nx_Port
+ connected at the other side of the cable receives the broadcast FC
+ Sequence having D_ID 0xFFFFFF.
+
+A.2. Private Loop Topology
+
+ An NL_Port attached to a private loop must transmit a Class 3
+ broadcast FC Sequence by using the OPN(fr) primitive signal
+ [FC-AL-2].
+
+ 1) The source NL_Port first sends an Open Broadcast Replicate
+ (OPN(fr)) primitive signal, forcing all the NL_Ports in the loop
+ (except itself) to replicate the frames that they receive while
+ examining the FC Header's D_ID field.
+
+ 2) The source NL_Port then removes the OPN(fr) signal when it returns
+ to it.
+
+ 3) The source NL_Port then sends the Class 3 broadcast FC Sequence
+ having D_ID 0xFFFFFF.
+
+A.3. Public Loop Topology
+
+ An NL_Port attached to a public loop must not use the OPN(fr)
+ primitive signal. Rather, it must send the Class 3 broadcast FC
+ Sequence having D_ID 0xFFFFFF to the FL_Port at AL_PA = 0x00
+ [FC-AL-2].
+
+ The Fabric propagates the broadcast to all other FC_Ports [FC-FS],
+ including the FL_Port that the broadcast arrives on. This includes
+ all F_Ports, and other FL_Ports.
+
+ Each FL_Port propagates the broadcast by using the primitive signal
+ OPN(fr), in order to prepare the loop to receive the broadcast
+ sequence.
+
+A.4. Fabric Topology
+
+ An N_Port connected to an F_Port must transmit the Class 3 broadcast
+ FC Sequence having D_ID 0xFFFFFF to the F_Port. The Fabric
+ propagates the broadcast to all other FC_Ports [FC-FS].
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+B. Validation of the <N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID> Mapping
+ (Informative)
+
+B.1. Overview
+
+ At all times, the <N_Port_Name, N_Port_ID> mapping must be valid
+ before use.
+
+ After an FC link interruption occurs, the N_Port_ID of an Nx_Port may
+ change, as well as the N_Port_IDs of all other Nx_Ports that have
+ previously performed Port Login with this Nx_Port. Because of this,
+ address validation is required after a Loop Initialization Primitive
+ Sequence (LIP) in a loop topology [FC-AL-2] or after Not_Operational
+ Primitive Sequence / Offline Primitive Sequence (NOS/OLS) in a
+ point-to-point topology [FC-FS].
+
+ N_Port_IDs do not change as a result of Link Reset (LR) [FC-FS];
+ thus, address validation is not required in this case.
+
+B.2. FC Layer Address Validation in a Point-to-Point Topology
+
+ No validation is required after Link Reset (LR). In a point-to-point
+ topology, NOS/OLS causes implicit Logout of each N_Port and after an
+ NOS/OLS each N_Port must again perform a Port Login [FC-FS].
+
+B.3. FC Layer Address Validation in a Private Loop Topology
+
+ After a LIP [FC-AL-2], an NL_Port must not transmit any data to
+ another NL_Port until the address of the other port has been
+ validated. The validation consists of completing the Address
+ Discovery procedure with the ADISC ELS [FC-FS].
+
+ If the three FC addresses (N_Port_ID, N_Port_Name, Node_Name) of a
+ logged remote NL_Port exactly match the values prior to the LIP, then
+ any active Exchange with that NL_Port may continue.
+
+ If any of the three FC addresses has changed, then the remote NL_Port
+ must be logged out.
+
+ If an NL_Port's N_Port_ID changes after a LIP, then all active
+ logged-in NL_Ports must be logged out.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+B.4. FC Layer Address Validation in a Public Loop Topology
+
+ A Fabric Address Notification (FAN) ELS may be sent by the Fabric to
+ all known previously logged-in NL_Ports following an initialization
+ event. Therefore, after a LIP [FC-AL-2], NL_Ports may wait for this
+ notification to arrive, or they may perform an FLOGI.
+
+ If the F_Port_Name and Fabric_Name contained in the FAN ELS or FLOGI
+ response exactly match the values before the LIP and if the AL_PA
+ [FC-AL-2] obtained by the NL_Port is the same as the one before the
+ LIP, then the port may resume all Exchanges. If not, then FLOGI must
+ be performed with the Fabric and all logged-in Nx_Ports must be
+ logged out.
+
+ A public loop NL_Port must perform the private loop validation as
+ specified in section B.3 to any NL_Port on the local loop that has an
+ N_Port_ID of the form 0x00-00-XX (i.e., to any private loop NL_Port).
+
+B.5. FC Layer Address Validation in a Fabric Topology
+
+ No validation is required after Link Reset (LR).
+
+ After NOS/OLS, an N_Port must perform FLOGI. If, after FLOGI, the
+ N_Port's N_Port_ID, the F_Port_Name, and the Fabric_Name are the same
+ as before the NOS/OLS, then the N_Port may resume all Exchanges. If
+ not, all logged-in Nx_Ports must be logged out [FC-FS].
+
+C. Fibre Channel Bit and Byte Numbering Guidance
+
+ Both Fibre Channel and IETF standards use the same byte transmission
+ order. However, the bit numbering is different.
+
+ Fibre Channel bit numbering can be observed if the data structure
+ heading shown in figure 24 is cut and pasted at the top of the
+ figures present in this document.
+
+ 3 2 1 0
+ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+
+ Figure 24: Fibre Channel Bit Numbering
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+D. Changes from RFC 2625
+
+ - Nx_Ports with N_Port_Name format 0x2, 0x5, 0xC, 0xD, 0xE, and 0xF
+ are supported, in addition to format 0x1;
+ - An IP-capable Nx_Port MUST support Class 3;
+ - An IP-capable Nx_Port MUST support continuously increasing
+ SEQ_CNT;
+ - An IP-capable Nx_Port SHOULD support a receive data field size for
+ Device_Data FC frames of at least 1024 octets;
+ - The FC ESP_Header MAY be used;
+ - FC Classes of services other than 3 are not recommended;
+ - Defined a new FC ARP format;
+ - Removed support for FARP because some FC implementations do not
+ tolerate receiving broadcast ELSes;
+ - Added support for IPv4 multicast;
+ - Clarified the usage of the CS_CTL and Parameter fields of the FC
+ Header;
+ - Clarified the usage of FC Classes of service;
+ - Clarified the usage of FC Sequences and Exchanges.
+
+E. Changes from RFC 3831
+
+ - Clarified the usage of the CS_CTL and Parameter fields of the FC
+ Header;
+ - Clarified the usage of FC Classes of service;
+ - Clarified and updated the mapping of IPv6 multicast on Fibre
+ Channel;
+ - Clarified the usage of FC Sequences and Exchanges;
+ - Clarified and updated the format of the Neighbor Discovery
+ Link-layer option for Fibre Channel.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Claudio DeSanti
+ Cisco Systems, Inc.
+ 170 W. Tasman Dr.
+ San Jose, CA 95134
+ USA
+
+ Phone: +1 408 853-9172
+ EMail: cds@cisco.com
+
+
+ Craig W. Carlson
+ QLogic Corporation
+ 6321 Bury Drive
+ Eden Prairie, MN 55346
+ USA
+
+ Phone: +1 952 932-4064
+ EMail: craig.carlson@qlogic.com
+
+
+ Robert Nixon
+ Emulex
+ 3333 Susan Street
+ Costa Mesa, CA 92626
+ USA
+
+ Phone: +1 714 885-3525
+ EMail: bob.nixon@emulex.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
+
+RFC 4338 IP over Fibre Channel January 2006
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+ This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
+ contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
+ retain all their rights.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Intellectual Property
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
+ ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
+ Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+DeSanti, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
+