diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt | 1683 |
1 files changed, 1683 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2acc499 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc5196.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1683 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group M. Lonnfors +Request for Comments: 5196 K. Kiss +Category: Standards Track Nokia + September 2008 + + + Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to + Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) + +Status of This Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Abstract + + Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) defines a common presence + data format for Common Profile for Presence (CPP) compliant presence + protocols. This memo defines a PIDF extension to represent SIP User + Agent capabilities. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................3 + 1.1. Motivation .................................................3 + 1.2. Scope ......................................................4 + 2. Conventions .....................................................4 + 3. Extension for "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the + Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" in PIDF Documents ............4 + 3.1. Overview of Operation ......................................4 + 3.2. Service capabilities .......................................5 + 3.2.1. <servcaps> Element ..................................5 + 3.2.2. <audio> Element .....................................5 + 3.2.3. <application> Element ...............................5 + 3.2.4. <data> Element ......................................6 + 3.2.5. <control> Element ...................................6 + 3.2.6. <video> Element .....................................6 + 3.2.7. <text> Element ......................................6 + 3.2.8. <message> Element ...................................7 + 3.2.9. <type> Element ......................................7 + 3.2.10. <automata> Element .................................7 + 3.2.11. <class> Element ....................................7 + 3.2.12. <duplex> Element ...................................8 + 3.2.13. <description> Element ..............................8 + 3.2.14. <event-packages> Element ...........................9 + 3.2.15. <priority> Element .................................9 + 3.2.16. <methods> Element .................................10 + 3.2.17. <extensions> Element ..............................11 + 3.2.18. <schemes> Element .................................11 + 3.2.19. <actor> Element ...................................12 + 3.2.20. <isfocus> Element .................................12 + 3.2.21. <languages> Element ...............................13 + 3.3. Device Capabilities .......................................13 + 3.3.1. <devcaps> Element ..................................13 + 3.3.2. <mobility> Element .................................14 + 3.3.3. <description> Element ..............................14 + 4. Usage Guidelines ...............................................15 + 4.1. Use of <supported> and <notsupported> Elements ............15 + 5. Examples .......................................................16 + 6. XML Schema Definitions .........................................17 + 7. IANA Considerations ............................................26 + 7.1. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for ........................26 + 7.2. Schema Registration for Schema ............................27 + 8. Security Considerations ........................................27 + 9. Acknowledgments ................................................27 + 10. References ....................................................27 + 10.1. Normative References .....................................27 + 10.2. Informative References ...................................28 + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +1. Introduction + + Common Profile for Presence (CPP) [RFC3859] and Common Profile for + Instant Messaging (CPIM) [RFC3860] define common operations and + formats that all presence and instant messaging services must agree + upon so that basic interoperability is possible. The actual base + format for the presence is defined in the Presence Information + Document Format (PIDF) [RFC3863]. The PIDF has been designed to + reduce the need for gatewaying and to allow end-to-end security of + presence information. It has taken a very minimalistic approach to + support such operations. In order to make the PIDF usable by + different presence applications, these applications usually must + extend the basic PIDF by standard XML mechanisms as defined in PIDF + [RFC3863]. + + The aim of this memo is to introduce a SIP-specific extension + mechanism to the PIDF that conveys the same SIP media feature tags as + described in [RFC3840]. With this extension, presence applications + based on SIP can have richer and more usable presence information + compared to the baseline PIDF. + +1.1. Motivation + + The PIDF [RFC3863] defines a <contact> element that may appear once + inside every <tuple> element. The content of the <contact> element + encodes the CONTACT ADDRESS and CONTACT MEANS as defined in + [RFC2778]. The <contact> element is defined to be a URI of any + scheme. In some implementations, the URI scheme can uniquely + identify the service the tuple intends to describe (e.g., im: URI + scheme usually represents Instant Messaging service). However, this + may not be the case in all implementations. For example in SIP, a + SIP URI scheme can represent different kinds of services. A SIP URI + scheme can be used to contact voice services, video services, or + messaging services. If it is not known by other means, it might be + hard for applications processing the presence information containing + only a SIP URI contact addresses to know what particular service the + tuple intends to describe. Also, watchers receiving presence + information would probably benefit from getting more descriptive + information about what particular communication means or services are + supported by the presentity. + + The User Agent Capabilities extension [RFC3840] defines a set of + extensions that allow user agents to express preferences about + request handling in SIP servers. The same information can provide + value to watchers as well so that they can make more rational + decisions on how a presentity should be contacted if a presence + document contained this information. + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +1.2. Scope + + This document defines a PIDF extension, which enables SIP presence + implementations to represent User Agent Capabilities [RFC3840] within + presence information. + + This extension does not replace media negotiation mechanisms defined + for SIP (e.g., SDP [RFC4566]). The purpose of this extension is for + a presentity to give watchers hints about the presentity's + preferences, willingness, and capabilities to communicate before + watchers initiate communication with the presentity. + +2. Conventions + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. + + This memo makes use of the vocabulary defined in [RFC2778] and + [RFC3863]. + +3. Extension for "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session + Initiation Protocol (SIP)" in PIDF Documents + + This section presents the extension elements, attributes, their + values, and semantics. This section also describes how this + extension can be further extended. + + This extension is intended to be used within the PIDF [RFC3863] and + that particular usage is described here. This extension may also be + used with other XML documents if appropriate. + +3.1. Overview of Operation + + This document defines how the features presented in [RFC3840] can be + provided as part of presence information. Additionally, this memo + includes the "type" feature tag [RFC2913], "message" media type + feature tag [RFC4569], and the "language" feature tag [RFC4646] + definitions. Adding these features to the PIDF means mapping them to + an XML formatted structure. + + The presence data model [RFC4479] defines presence information + consisting of three types of data elements: person, service, and + device. This memo follows this model so that one XML extension is + defined to describe device capabilities and another one to describe + service capabilities. + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + The namespace URIs for elements defined by this document are URNs + using the namespace identifier 'ietf' defined by [RFC2648] and + extended by [RFC3688]. + + When these extension namespaces are congregated with the PIDF + document, the combined document MUST follow the same general + formatting rules as specified in Section 4.1 of [RFC3863]. + +3.2. Service capabilities + + Elements belonging to service capabilities are used to describe + dynamic characteristics of a service. These capabilities are + enclosed within the <servcaps> element which SHOULD be located in the + PIDF document as a child element of urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf + namespace <tuple> [RFC3863] element. + + The namespace identifier for these elements is: + + urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps + +3.2.1. <servcaps> Element + + The root element of service capabilities is <servcaps>. The root + element always has to be present. This element can contain the + following child elements: <audio>, <application>, <data>, <control>, + <video>, <text>, <message>, <type>, <automata>, <class>, <duplex>, + <description>, <event-packages>, <priority>, <methods>, <extensions>, + <schemes>, <actor>, <isfocus>, and <languages> followed by any number + of optional extension elements from other namespaces. + + A <servcaps> element can contain any number of optional extension + attributes from other namespaces. + +3.2.2. <audio> Element + + The <audio> element indicates that the service supports audio as a + streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <audio> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports audio + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support audio media type. + +3.2.3. <application> Element + + The <application> element indicates that the service supports + application as a streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + The <application> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports + application media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service + does not support application media type. + +3.2.4. <data> Element + + The <data> element indicates that the service supports data as a + streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <data> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports data + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support data media type. + +3.2.5. <control> Element + + The <control> element indicates that the service supports control as + a streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <control> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports control + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support control media type. + +3.2.6. <video> Element + + The <video> element indicates that the service supports video as a + streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <video> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports video + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support video media type. + +3.2.7. <text> Element + + The <text> element indicates that the service supports text as a + streaming media type as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <text> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports text + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support text media type. + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.2.8. <message> Element + + The <message> element indicates that the service supports messaging + as a streaming media type as defined in [RFC4569]. + + The <message> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service supports message + media type, and the value 'false' indicates that service does not + support message media type. + +3.2.9. <type> Element + + The <type> element indicates a MIME media content type (i.e., that + appears in a 'Content-type:' header of the corresponding MIME- + formatted data) as defined in [RFC2913]. + + The <type> element is a string type and does not have any attributes. + It MUST be a string of the form "type/subtype", where 'type' and + 'subtype' are defined by the MIME specification [RFC2045]. Only + lowercase letters SHOULD be used. + +3.2.10. <automata> Element + + The <automata> element indicates whether the service represents an + automaton (such as a voicemail server, conference server, or + recording device) or a human as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <automata> element is a boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that the service represents + an automaton, and the value 'false' indicates that it represents a + human. + +3.2.11. <class> Element + + The <class> element indicates the setting, business or personal, in + which a communications service is used as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <class> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Classes that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and classes that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain <business> and + <personal> elements followed by any number of optional extension + elements from other namespaces. The semantics of business and + personal are defined in [RFC3840] as: + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 7] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + o <business>: The service is used for business communications. + + o <personal>: The service is used for personal communications. + + Any value that is registered with IANA for the SIP media feature tag + registration tree as a sip.class media feature tag can be used as a + value of an extension element. If the appropriate value is not + registered, it SHOULD be registered as defined in [RFC3840]. + +3.2.12. <duplex> Element + + The <duplex> element lists whether a communications service can + simultaneously send and receive media ("full"), alternate between + sending and receiving ("half"), only receive ("receive-only"), or + only send ("send-only") as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <duplex> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Duplex modes that are supported by the service can + be listed under the <supported> element, and duplex modes that are + not supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain <full>, <half>, + <receive-only>, and <send-only> elements followed by any number of + optional extension elements from other namespaces. The semantics of + these elements are defined in [RFC3840] as: + + o <full>: The service can simultaneously send and receive media. + + o <half>: The service can alternate between sending and receiving + media. + + o <receive-only>: The service can only receive media. + + o <send-only>: The service can only send media. + + Any value that is registered with IANA for the SIP media feature tag + registration tree as a sip.duplex media feature tag can be used as a + value of an extension element. If the appropriate value is not + registered, it SHOULD be registered as defined in [RFC3840]. + +3.2.13. <description> Element + + The <description> element provides a textual description of the + service as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <description> element is of string type and does not have any + attributes. + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 8] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + The <description> element SHOULD be labeled with the 'xml:lang' + attribute to indicate its language and script. The specification + allows multiple occurrences of this elements so that the presentity + can convey <description> elements in multiple scripts and languages. + If no 'xml:lang' attribute is provided, the default value is + "i-default" as defined in [RFC2277]. + +3.2.14. <event-packages> Element + + The <event-packages> element lists the event packages supported by a + service. + + The <event-packages> element can contain two elements: <supported> + and <notsupported>. Event packages that are supported by the service + can be listed under the <supported> element, and event packages that + are not supported by the service can be listed under the + <notsupported> element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any values + from the IANA SIP event types namespace registry followed by any + number of optional extension elements from other namespaces. As of + this writing, the IANA SIP event types namespace registry includes + the following packages: <conference>, <dialog>, <kpml>, + <message-summary>, <poc-settings>, <presence>, <reg>, <refer>, + <Siemens-RTP-Stats>, <spirits-INDPs>, <spirits-user-prof>, and + <winfo>. + +3.2.15. <priority> Element + + The <priority> element indicates the call priorities the service is + willing to handle as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <priority> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Priority values that are supported by the service + can be listed under the <supported> element, and priority values that + are not supported by the service can be listed under the + <notsupported> element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any number of + <lowerthan>, <higherthan>, <equals>, and <range> elements followed by + any number of optional extension elements from other namespaces. + +3.2.15.1. <lowerthan> Element + + The <lowerthan> element has a single attribute called "maxvalue". + The "maxvalue" attribute is used to give the highest priority value + that the service is willing to support. All values equal and below + that value are supported. + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 9] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.2.15.2. <higherthan> Element + + The <higherthan> element has a single attribute called "minvalue". + The "minvalue" attribute is used to give the lowest priority value + that the service is willing to support. All values equal and above + that value are supported. + +3.2.15.3. <equals> Element + + The <equals> element is used to indicate the exact priority value + that the service is willing to handle. The <equals> element has a + single attribute called "value". The "value" attribute is used to + indicate the exact supported priority value. + +3.2.15.4. <range> Element + + The <range> element is used to indicate the priority range that the + service is willing to handle. The <range> element has two attributes + called "minvalue" and "maxvalue". The value of the "minvalue" + attribute indicates the lowest priority value supported by the + service, and the value of the "maxvalue" attribute indicates the + highest priority value supported by the service. + +3.2.16. <methods> Element + + The <methods> element indicates the SIP methods supported by a + service. In this case, "supported" means that the service can + receive requests with this method. In that sense, it has the same + connotation as the Allow header field as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <methods> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Methods that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and methods that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any values + from the methods table of the IANA SIP parameters registry table + followed by any number of optional extension elements from other + namespaces. As of this writing, the IANA SIP parameters registry + includes the following methods:<ACK>, <BYE>, <CANCEL>, <INFO>, + <INVITE>, <MESSAGE>, <NOTIFY>, <OPTIONS>, <PRACK>, <PUBLISH>, + <REFER>, <REGISTER>, <SUBSCRIBE>, and <UPDATE>. + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 10] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.2.17. <extensions> Element + + The <extensions> element is a list of SIP extensions (each of which + is defined by an option-tag registered with IANA) that are understood + by the service. Understood, in this context, means that the option + tag would be included in a Supported header field in a request as + defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <extensions> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Extensions that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and extensions that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any values + from the option tags table of the IANA SIP parameters registry table + followed by any number of optional extension elements from other + namespaces. As of this writing, the IANA SIP parameters registry + includes the following option tags: <rel100>, <early-session>, + <eventlist>, <from-change>, <gruu>, <histinfo>, <join>, <norefersub>, + <path>, <precondition>, <pref>, <privacy>, <recipient-list-invite>, + <recipient-list-subscribe>, <replaces>, <resource-priority>, <sdp- + anat>, <sec-agree>, <tdialog>, and <timer>. + +3.2.18. <schemes> Element + + The <schemes> element provides the set of URI schemes that are + supported by a service. "Supported" implies, for example, that the + service would know how to handle a URI of that scheme in the Contact + header field of a redirect response as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <schemes> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Schemes that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and schemes that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any number of <s> + elements, which can be used to describe individual schemes supported + by the service. + +3.2.18.1. <s> Element + + The <s> element is of string type and is used to describe an + individual scheme supported by the service. Values that can be used + here are scheme names that are registered to the IANA URI scheme + registry. + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 11] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.2.19. <actor> Element + + The <actor> element indicates the type of entity that is available at + this URI as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <actor> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Actor types that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and actor types that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain <principal>, + <attendant>, <msg-taker>, and <information> elements followed by any + number of optional extension elements from other namespaces. + + The semantics of these elements are defined in [RFC3840] as: + + o <principal>: The service provides communication with the principal + that is associated with the service. Often this will be a + specific human being, but it can be an automaton (for example, + when calling a voice portal). + + o <attendant>: The service provides communication with an automaton + or a person that will act as an intermediary in contacting the + principal associated with the service, or a substitute. + + o <msg-taker>: The service provides communication with an automaton + or a person that will take messages and deliver them to the + principal. + + o <information>: The service provides communication with an + automaton or a person that will provide information about the + principal. + + Any value that is registered with IANA for the SIP media feature tag + registration tree as a sip.actor media feature tag can be used as a + value of an extension element. If the appropriate value is not + registered, it SHOULD be registered as defined in [RFC3840]. + +3.2.20. <isfocus> Element + + The <isfocus> element indicates that the service is a conference + server, also known as a focus as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <isfocus> element is of boolean type and does not have any + attributes. The value 'true' indicates that service is a conference + server and the value 'false' indicates that service does not support + conferencing. + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 12] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.2.21. <languages> Element + + The <languages> element indicates the ability to display particular + human languages as defined in [RFC4646]. + + The <languages> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Languages that are supported by the service can be + listed under the <supported> element, and languages that are not + supported by the service can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain any number of <l> + elements which can be used to describe individual languages supported + by the service. + +3.2.21.1. <l> Element + + The <l> element is of string type and is used to describe an + individual language supported by the service. Values that can be + used here are language subtags that are registered to the IANA + language subtag registry as per [RFC4646]. + +3.3. Device Capabilities + + Elements belonging to device capabilities are used to describe + dynamic characteristics of a device. These capabilities are enclosed + within the <devcaps> element, which SHOULD be located in the PIDF + document as a child element of the + urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model namespace <device> element + [RFC4479]. + + The namespace identifier for these elements is urn: + + ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps + +3.3.1. <devcaps> Element + + The root element of device capabilities is <devcaps>. The root + element always has to be present. This element can contain the + following child elements: <mobility> and <description> followed by + any number of optional extension elements from other namespaces. + + A <devcaps> element can contain any number of optional extension + attributes from other namespaces. + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 13] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +3.3.2. <mobility> Element + + The <mobility> element indicates whether the device is fixed (meaning + that it is associated with a fixed point of contact with the network) + or mobile (meaning that it is not associated with a fixed point of + contact). Note that cordless phones are fixed, not mobile, based on + this definition as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <mobility> element can contain two elements: <supported> and + <notsupported>. Mobility modes that are supported by the device can + be listed under the <supported> element and mobility modes that are + not supported by the device can be listed under the <notsupported> + element. + + The <supported> and <notsupported> elements can contain <fixed> and + <mobile> elements followed by any number of optional extension + elements from other namespaces. + + The semantics of these elements are defined in [RFC3840] as: + + o <fixed>: The device is stationary. + + o <mobile>: The device can move around with the user. + + Any value that is registered with IANA to the SIP media feature tag + registration tree as sip.mobility media feature tag can be used as a + value of an extension element. If the appropriate value is not + registered, it SHOULD be registered as defined in [RFC3840]. + +3.3.3. <description> Element + + The <description> element provides a textual description of the + device as defined in [RFC3840]. + + The <description> element is of string type and does not have any + attributes. + + The <description> element SHOULD be labeled with the 'xml:lang' + attribute to indicate its language and script. The specification + allows multiple occurrences of this element so that the presentity + can convey <description> elements in multiple scripts and languages. + If no 'xml:lang' attribute is provided, the default value is + "i-default" as defined in [RFC2277]. + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 14] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +4. Usage Guidelines + + The User Agent Capabilities extension [RFC3840] recommends that a UA + provides complete information in its contact predicate. However, it + may be that the presentity is not willing to publish presence + information that would be consistent with actual device or service + capabilities (e.g., presentity may not want to indicate that he/she + supports voice when the service actually is able to support it). + Authorization rules or policies in the presence server may limit or + modify the presence information published by the presentity. Also, + combining presence information from multiple sources may result in + loss or mismatch of information. + + It is RECOMMENDED that Presence User Agents (PUAs) using this + extension provide as complete presence information as they can. If + the PUA is publishing sensitive information using this extension, it + SHOULD obtain permission from the presentity. PUAs can indicate the + explicitly supported capabilities using the <supported> element, and + the capabilities that are explicitly not supported using the + <notsupported> element. + + It is not mandated that presence information be consistent with + actual service or device capabilities. However, it is in the + presentity's best interest to avoid publishing false presence + information and provide accurate information to help minimize + unsuccessful communication invitations. Otherwise, watchers may + conclude that communication cannot be established with the + presentity, but in reality it would be possible; or watchers may + conclude that certain communication capabilities are available, but + in reality a communication establishment attempt would fail using + those capabilities. In any case, watchers should not expect the + presence information represented by this extension to be fully + aligned with the actual presentity's service or device capabilities. + As explained in Section 1.2, presence of this extension does not + replace the use of SIP signaling for capability negotiation. + +4.1. Use of <supported> and <notsupported> Elements + + PUAs should add information under <supported> and <notsupported> + elements only when they believe it may affect the decision making in + the watcher's end, i.e., information should be relevant and valuable + for the watcher. Listing all possible information under <supported> + and <notsupported> is rarely needed. + + For example, if the PUA wants to advertise a message service that + supports the MESSAGE method, it should add it under the <supported> + element in the <methods> element. Even if the service does not + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 15] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + support other methods, it is unlikely that listing all the methods + not supported under the <notsupported> element would provide any + value to the watcher. + + In case of conflicting information, i.e., the same child element + appears under the <supported> and <notsupported> elements with the + same value, the watcher can safely assume that the listed capability + is supported regardless of the inclusion of the capability under the + <notsupported> element. + +5. Examples + + <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> + <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" + xmlns:caps="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps" + xmlns:mod="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" + entity="pres:someone@example.com"> + + <tuple id="joi9877866786ua9"> + <status> + <basic>open</basic> + </status> + <caps:servcaps> + <caps:audio>true</caps:audio> + <caps:description xml:lang="en"> + Example service + </caps:description> + <caps:description xml:lang="hu"> + Pe'lda szolga'ltata's + </caps:description> + <caps:duplex> + <caps:supported> + <caps:full/> + </caps:supported> + </caps:duplex> + <caps:message>true</caps:message> + <caps:methods> + <caps:supported> + <caps:ACK/> + <caps:BYE/> + <caps:INVITE/> + <caps:MESSAGE/> + </caps:supported> + </caps:methods> + <caps:priority> + <caps:supported> + <caps:lowerthan maxvalue="10"/> + </caps:supported> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 16] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + </caps:priority> + <caps:schemes> + <caps:supported> + <caps:s>sip</caps:s> + </caps:supported> + </caps:schemes> + <caps:video>false</caps:video> + </caps:servcaps> + <contact>sip:someone@example.com</contact> + </tuple> + <mod:device id="hgt67"> + <caps:devcaps> + <caps:mobility> + <caps:supported> + <caps:mobile/> + </caps:supported> + </caps:mobility> + </caps:devcaps> + <mod:deviceID + >urn:uuid:d27459b7-8213-4395-aa77-ed859a3e5b3a</mod:deviceID> + </mod:device> + </presence> + +6. XML Schema Definitions + + This section gives the XML schema definitions for the extensions + defined in this document. The namespace identifier for this schema + is urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps. + +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<xs:schema xmlns:tns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps" + xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" + targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps" + elementFormDefault="qualified" + attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> + +<!-- This import brings in the XML language + attribute xml:lang--> + + <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" + schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd"/> + +<!-- ROOT --> + <xs:element name="servcaps" type="tns:servcapstype"/> + <xs:complexType name="servcapstype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="actor" type="tns:actortype" + minOccurs="0"/> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 17] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <xs:element name="application" type="tns:applicationtype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="audio" type="tns:audiotype" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="automata" type="tns:automatatype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="class" type="tns:classtype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="control" type="tns:controltype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="data" type="tns:datatype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="description" type="tns:descriptiontype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:element name="duplex" type="tns:duplextype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="event-packages" type="tns:event-packagestype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="extensions" type="tns:extensionstype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="isfocus" type="tns:isfocustype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="message" type="tns:messagetype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="methods" type="tns:methodstype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="languages" type="tns:languagestype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="priority" type="tns:prioritytype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="schemes" type="tns:schemestype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="text" type="tns:texttype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="type" type="tns:typetype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:element name="video" type="tns:videotype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> + </xs:complexType> + + <xs:element name="devcaps" type="tns:devcaps"/> + <xs:complexType name="devcaps"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="description" type="tns:descriptiontype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 18] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <xs:element name="mobility" type="tns:mobilitytype" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- AUDIO --> + <xs:simpleType name="audiotype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- APPLICATION --> + <xs:simpleType name="applicationtype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- DATA --> + <xs:simpleType name="datatype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- CONTROL --> + <xs:simpleType name="controltype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- VIDEO --> + <xs:simpleType name="videotype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- TEXT --> + <xs:simpleType name="texttype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- MESSAGE --> + <xs:simpleType name="messagetype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- TYPE --> + <xs:simpleType name="typetype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:string"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 19] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <!-- AUTOMATA --> + <xs:simpleType name="automatatype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- CLASS --> + <xs:complexType name="classtype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:classtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:classtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="classtypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="business" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="personal" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" + maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- DUPLEX --> + <xs:complexType name="duplextype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:duplextypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:duplextypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="duplextypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="full" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="half" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="receive-only" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="send-only" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 20] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- DESCRIPTION --> + <xs:complexType name="descriptiontype"> + <xs:simpleContent> + <xs:extension base="xs:string"> + <xs:attribute ref="xml:lang"/> + </xs:extension> + </xs:simpleContent> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- EVENT-PACKAGES --> + <xs:complexType name="event-packagestype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:eventtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:eventtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="eventtypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="conference" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="dialog" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="kpml" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="message-summary" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="poc-settings" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="presence" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="reg" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="refer" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="Siemens-RTP-Stats" + type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="spirits-INDPs" + type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="spirits-user-prof" + type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="winfo" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 21] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- PRIORITY --> + <xs:complexType name="prioritytype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:prioritytypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:prioritytypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="prioritytypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="equals" type="tns:equalstype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:element name="higherhan" type="tns:higherthantype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:element name="lowerthan" type="tns:lowerthantype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:element name="range" type="tns:rangetype" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="lowerthantype"> + <xs:attribute name="maxvalue" type="xs:integer" + use="required"/> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="higherthantype"> + <xs:attribute name="minvalue" type="xs:integer" + use="required"/> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="equalstype"> + <xs:attribute name="value" type="xs:integer" + use="required"/> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="rangetype"> + <xs:attribute name="minvalue" type="xs:integer" + use="required"/> + <xs:attribute name="maxvalue" type="xs:integer" + use="required"/> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- METHODS --> + <xs:complexType name="methodstype"> + <xs:sequence> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 22] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:methodtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:methodtypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="methodtypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="ACK" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="BYE" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="CANCEL" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="INFO" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="INVITE" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="MESSAGE" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="NOTIFY" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="OPTIONS" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="PRACK" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="PUBLISH" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="REFER" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="REGISTER" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="SUBSCRIBE" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="UPDATE" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" + maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- EXTENSIONS --> + <xs:complexType name="extensionstype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:extensiontypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:extensiontypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="extensiontypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="rel100" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="early-session" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="eventlist" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="from-change" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="gruu" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="hist-info" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="join" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="norefersub" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="path" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="precondition" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 23] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <xs:element name="pref" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="privacy" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="recipient-list-invite" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="recipient-list-subscribe" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="replaces" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="resource-priority" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="sdp-anat" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="sec-agree" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="tdialog" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="timer" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" + minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- SCHEMES --> + <xs:complexType name="schemestype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" minOccurs="0"> + <xs:complexType> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="s" type="xs:string" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + </xs:element> + <xs:element name="notsupported" minOccurs="0"> + <xs:complexType> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="s" type="xs:string" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + </xs:element> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- ACTOR --> + <xs:complexType name="actortype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:actortypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:actortypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="actortypes"> + <xs:sequence> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 24] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + <xs:element name="attendant" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="information" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="msg-taker" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="principal" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" + maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- ISFOCUS --> + <xs:simpleType name="isfocustype"> + <xs:restriction base="xs:boolean"/> + </xs:simpleType> + + <!-- LANGUAGES --> + <xs:complexType name="languagestype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" minOccurs="0"> + <xs:complexType> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="l" type="xs:string" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + </xs:element> + <xs:element name="notsupported" minOccurs="0"> + <xs:complexType> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="l" type="xs:string" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + </xs:element> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + + <!-- MOBILITY --> + <xs:complexType name="mobilitytype"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="supported" type="tns:mobilitytypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="notsupported" type="tns:mobilitytypes" + minOccurs="0"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> + <xs:complexType name="mobilitytypes"> + <xs:sequence> + <xs:element name="fixed" type="xs:string" + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:element name="mobile" type="xs:string" + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 25] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + minOccurs="0"/> + <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" + maxOccurs="unbounded"/> + </xs:sequence> + </xs:complexType> +</xs:schema> + +7. IANA Considerations + + IANA has registered one new XML namespace URN and one schema as + defined in [RFC3688]. + +7.1. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for + 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps' + + URI: + urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps + + Description: + This is the XML namespace for XML elements defined by RFC 5196 to + describe service and device capabilities in application/pidf+xml + content type. + + Registrant Contact: + IETF, SIMPLE working group, <simple@ietf.org> + Mikko Lonnfors, <mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com> + + XML: + + BEGIN + <?xml version="1.0"?> + <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd"> + <html> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" + <head> + <meta http-equiv="content-type" + content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/> + <title>Namespace for PIDF user agent capability + extension</title> + </head> + <body> + <h1>Namespace for PIDF service capability extension</h1> + <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps</h2> + <p> + See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5196.txt">RFC + 5196</a>. + </p> + </body> + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 26] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + </html> + END + +7.2. Schema Registration for Schema + 'urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:caps' + + URI: + urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:caps + + Registrant Contact: + IESG + + XML: + See Section 6 + +8. Security Considerations + + All security considerations specified in [RFC3859] and [RFC3863] + apply to this document. Compared to PIDF [RFC3863], this presence + document format may reveal additional information about user's + service and device capabilities. Thus, the PUA SHOULD always obtain + permission from the presentity when publishing sensitive information + using this extension. + +9. Acknowledgments + + Authors of this document would like to thank the following people for + their contributions and valuable comments: Paul Kyzivat, Jonathan + Rosenberg, Markus Isomaki, Eva Leppanen, Miguel Garcia, Jari + Urpalainen, and Hisham Khartabil. + +10. References + +10.1. Normative References + + [RFC2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail + Extensions (MIME) part one: Format of Internet Message + Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996. + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC2277] Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and + Languages", BCP 18, RFC 2277, January 1998. + + [RFC2913] Klyne, G., "MIME Content Types in Media Feature + Expressions", RFC 2913, September 2000. + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 27] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + + [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, + January 2004. + + [RFC3840] Schulzrinne, H., Rosenberg, J., and P. Kyzivat, + "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session + Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3840, August 2004. + + [RFC3859] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Presence (CPP)", + RFC 3859, August 2004. + + [RFC3863] Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, + W., and J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format + (PIDF)", RFC 3863, August 2004. + + [RFC4479] Rosenberg, J., "A Data Model for Presence", RFC 4479, + July 2006. + + [RFC4646] Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Tags for Identifying + Languages", BCP 47, RFC 4646, September 2006. + +10.2. Informative References + + [RFC2648] Moats, R., "A URN namespace for IETF documents", RFC 2648, + August 1999. + + [RFC2778] Day, M., Rosenberg, J., and H. Sugano, "A Model for + Presence and Instant Messaging", RFC 2778, February 2000. + + [RFC3860] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Instant Messaging + (CPIM)", RFC 3860, August 2004. + + [RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session + Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006. + + [RFC4569] Camarillo, G., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) + Registration of the Message Media Feature Tag", RFC 4569, + July 2006. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 28] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +Authors' Addresses + + Mikko Lonnfors + Nokia + P.O. Box 321 + Helsinki + Finland + + Phone: +358 71 8008000 + EMail: mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com + + + Krisztian Kiss + Nokia + 313 Fairchild Dr + Mountain View, CA 94043 + US + + Phone: +1 650 391 5969 + EMail: krisztian.kiss@nokia.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 29] + +RFC 5196 User Agent Capability Presence Status September 2008 + + +Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). + + This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions + contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors + retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND + THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS + OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF + THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Intellectual Property + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be + found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this + specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + + + + + + + + + + + + +Lonnfors & Kiss Standards Track [Page 30] + |