diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt | 451 |
1 files changed, 451 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8466a44 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc5490.txt @@ -0,0 +1,451 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group A. Melnikov +Request for Comments: 5490 Isode Limited +Category: Standards Track March 2009 + + + The Sieve Mail-Filtering Language -- +Extensions for Checking Mailbox Status and Accessing Mailbox Metadata + +Status of This Memo + + This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the + Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for + improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet + Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state + and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of + publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). + Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights + and restrictions with respect to this document. + + This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF + Contributions published or made publicly available before November + 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this + material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow + modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. + Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling + the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified + outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may + not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format + it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other + than English. + +Abstract + + This memo defines an extension to the Sieve mail filtering language + (RFC 5228) for accessing mailbox and server annotations, checking for + mailbox existence, and controlling mailbox creation on "fileinto" + action. + + + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................2 + 2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................2 + 3. "mailbox" and "mboxmetadata" Extensions .........................2 + 3.1. Test "mailboxexists" .......................................2 + 3.2. ":create" Argument to "fileinto" Command ...................3 + 3.3. Test "metadata" ............................................4 + 3.4. Test "metadataexists" ......................................4 + 4. "servermetadata" Extension ......................................5 + 4.1. Test "servermetadata" ......................................5 + 4.2. Test "servermetadataexists" ................................6 + 5. Security Considerations .........................................6 + 6. IANA Considerations .............................................7 + 7. Acknowledgements ................................................7 + 8. References ......................................................8 + 8.1. Normative References .......................................8 + 8.2. Informative References .....................................8 + +1. Introduction + + This memo defines an extension to the Sieve mail filtering language + [SIEVE] for accessing mailbox and server annotations. This allows + for customization of the Sieve engine behaviour based on variables + set using [METADATA]. + + This document also defines an extension for checking for mailbox + existence and for controlling mailbox creation on "fileinto" action. + +2. Conventions Used in This Document + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS]. + + Conventions for notations are as in [SIEVE] Section 1.1, including + the use of [ABNF]. + + This document is written with an assumption that readers are familiar + with the data model and terms defined in Section 3 of [METADATA]. + +3. "mailbox" and "mboxmetadata" Extensions + +3.1. Test "mailboxexists" + + Usage: mailboxexists <mailbox-names: string-list> + + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + + The "mailboxexists" test is true if all mailboxes listed in the + "mailbox-names" argument exist in the mailstore, and each allows the + user in whose context the Sieve script runs to "deliver" messages + into it. When the mailstore is an IMAP server, "delivery" of + messages is possible if: + + a. the READ-WRITE response code is present for the mailbox (see + Section 7.1 of [IMAP]), if IMAP Access Control List (ACL) + [IMAPACL] is not supported by the server, or + + b. the user has 'p' or 'i' rights for the mailbox (see Section 5.2 + of [IMAPACL]). + + Note that a successful "mailboxexists" test for a mailbox doesn't + necessarily mean that a "fileinto" action on this mailbox would + succeed. For example, the "fileinto" action might put user over + quota. The "mailboxexists" only verifies existence of the mailbox + and whether the user in whose context the Sieve script runs has + permissions to execute "fileinto" on it. + + The capability string for use with the require command is "mailbox". + + Example: The following example assumes that the Sieve engine also + supports "reject" [REJECT] and "fileinto" [SIEVE]. However, these + extensions are not required in order to implement the "mailbox" + extension. + + require ["fileinto", "reject", "mailbox"]; + if mailboxexists "Partners" { + fileinto "Partners"; + } else { + reject "This message was not accepted by the Mailstore"; + } + +3.2. ":create" Argument to "fileinto" Command + + Usage: fileinto [:create] <mailbox: string> + + If the optional ":create" argument is specified with "fileinto", it + instructs the Sieve interpreter to create the specified mailbox, if + needed, before attempting to deliver the message into the specified + mailbox. If the mailbox already exists, this argument is ignored. + Failure to create the specified mailbox is considered to be an error. + + The capability string for use with the ":create" parameter is + "mailbox". + + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + +3.3. Test "metadata" + + Usage: metadata [MATCH-TYPE] [COMPARATOR] + <mailbox: string> + <annotation-name: string> <key-list: string-list> + + This test retrieves the value of the mailbox annotation "annotation- + name" for the mailbox "mailbox" [METADATA]. The retrieved value is + compared to the "key-list". The test returns true if the annotation + exists and its value matches any of the keys. + + The default match type is ":is" [SIEVE]. The default comparator is + "i;ascii-casemap" [SIEVE]. + + The capability string for use with the require command is + "mboxmetadata". + + Annotations MUST be accessed with the permissions of the user in + whose context the Sieve script runs, and annotations starting with + the "/private" prefix MUST be those of the user in whose context the + Sieve script runs. + + Example: The following example assumes that the Sieve engine also + supports the "vacation" [VACATION] extension. However, this + extension is not required in order to implement the "mboxmetadata" + extension. + + require ["mboxmetadata", "vacation"]; + + if metadata :is "INBOX" + "/private/vendor/vendor.isode/auto-replies" "on" { + + vacation text: + I'm away on holidays till March 2009. + Expect a delay. + . + } + +3.4. Test "metadataexists" + + Usage: metadataexists <mailbox: string> <annotation-names: string- + list> + + The "metadataexists" test is true if all of the annotations listed in + the "annotation-names" argument exist (i.e., have non-NIL values) for + the specified mailbox. + + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + + The capability string for use with the require command is + "mboxmetadata". + +4. "servermetadata" Extension + +4.1. Test "servermetadata" + + Usage: servermetadata [MATCH-TYPE] [COMPARATOR] + <annotation-name: string> <key-list: string-list> + + This test retrieves the value of the server annotation "annotation- + name" [METADATA]. The retrieved value is compared to the "key-list". + The test returns true if the annotation exists and its value matches + any of the keys. + + The default match type is ":is". The default comparator is "i;ascii- + casemap". + + The capability string for use with the require command is + "servermetadata". + + Annotations MUST be accessed with the permissions of the user in + whose context the Sieve script runs, and annotations starting with + the "/private" prefix MUST be those of the user in whose context the + Sieve script runs. + + Example: The following example assumes that the Sieve engine also + supports "variables" [VARIABLES], "enotify" [NOTIFY], and "envelope" + [SIEVE] extensions. However, these extensions are not required in + order to implement the "servermetadata" extension. + + require ["enotify", "servermetadata", "variables", "envelope"]; + + if servermetadata :matches + "/private/vendor/vendor.isode/notification-uri" "*" { + set "notif_uri" "${0}"; + } + + if not string :is "${notif_uri}" "none" { + # :matches is used to get the MAIL FROM address + if envelope :all :matches "from" "*" { + set "env_from" " [really: ${1}]"; + } + + # :matches is used to get the value of the Subject header + if header :matches "Subject" "*" { + set "subject" "${1}"; + } + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + + # :matches is used to get the address from the From header + if address :matches :all "from" "*" { + set "from_addr" "${1}"; + } + + notify :message "${from_addr}${env_from}: ${subject}" + "${notif_uri}"; + } + +4.2. Test "servermetadataexists" + + Usage: servermetadataexists + <annotation-names: string-list> + + The "servermetadataexists" test is true if all of the server + annotations listed in the "annotation-names" argument exist (i.e., + have non-NIL values). + + The capability string for use with the require command is + "servermetadata". + +5. Security Considerations + + Extensions defined in this document deliberately don't provide a way + to modify annotations. + + A failure to retrieve data due to the server storing the annotations + being down or otherwise inaccessible may alter the result of Sieve + processing. So implementations SHOULD treat a temporary failure to + retrieve annotations in the same manner as a temporary failure to + retrieve a Sieve script. For example, if the Sieve script is stored + in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the script + can't be retrieved when a message is processed, then the agent + performing Sieve processing can, for example, assume that the script + doesn't exist or delay message delivery until the script can be + retrieved successfully. Annotations should be treated as if they are + a part of the script itself, so a temporary failure to retrieve them + should be handled in the same way as a temporary failure to retrieve + the Sieve script itself. + + Protocols/APIs used to retrieve annotations MUST provide at least the + same level of confidentiality as protocols/APIs used to retrieve + Sieve scripts. For example, if Sieve scripts are retrieved using + LDAP secured with Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption, then the + protocol used to retrieve annotations must use a comparable mechanism + for providing connection confidentiality. In particular, the + protocol used to retrieve annotations must not be lacking encryption. + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 6] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + +6. IANA Considerations + + IANA has added the following registrations to the list of Sieve + extensions: + + To: iana@iana.org + Subject: Registration of new Sieve extension + Capability name: mailbox + Description: adds test for checking for mailbox existence and a new + optional argument to fileinto for creating a mailbox + before attempting mail delivery. + RFC number: this RFC + Contact address: + The Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org> + + Capability name: mboxmetadata + Description: adds tests for checking for mailbox metadata item + existence and for retrieving of a mailbox metadata + value. + RFC number: this RFC + Contact address: + The Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org> + + Capability name: servermetadata + Description: adds tests for checking for server metadata item + existence and for retrieving of a server metadata + value. + RFC number: this RFC + Contact address: + The Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org> + +7. Acknowledgements + + Thanks to Cyrus Daboo for initial motivation for this document. + + Thanks to Barry Leiba, Randall Gellens, and Aaron Stone for helpful + comments on this document. + + The author also thanks the Open Mobile Alliance's Mobile Email + working group for providing a set of requirements for mobile devices, + guiding some of the extensions in this document. + + + + + + + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 7] + +RFC 5490 Sieve METADATA March 2009 + + +8. References + +8.1. Normative References + + [ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. + + [IMAP] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version + 4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003. + + [IMAPACL] Melnikov, A., "IMAP4 Access Control List (ACL) + Extension", RFC 4314, December 2005. + + [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [METADATA] Daboo, C., "The IMAP METADATA Extension", RFC 5464, + February 2009. + + [SIEVE] Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, "Sieve: An Email + Filtering Language", RFC 5228, January 2008. + +8.2. Informative References + + [NOTIFY] Melnikov, A., Leiba, B., Segmuller, W., and T. Martin, + "Sieve Email Filtering: Extension for Notifications", + RFC 5435, January 2009. + + [REJECT] Stone, A., "Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended + Reject Extensions", RFC 5429, March 2009. + + [VACATION] Showalter, T. and N. Freed, "Sieve Email Filtering: + Vacation Extension", RFC 5230, January 2008. + + [VARIABLES] Homme, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Variables Extension", + RFC 5229, January 2008. + +Author's Address + + Alexey Melnikov + Isode Limited + 5 Castle Business Village + 36 Station Road + Hampton, Middlesex TW12 2BX + UK + + EMail: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com + + + + +Melnikov Standards Track [Page 8] + |