summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt283
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..32adb49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc5957.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Karp
+Request for Comments: 5957 Zimbra
+Updates: 5256 July 2010
+Category: Standards Track
+ISSN: 2070-1721
+
+
+ Display-Based Address Sorting for the IMAP4 SORT Extension
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document describes an IMAP protocol extension enabling server-
+ side message sorting on the commonly displayed portion of the From
+ and To header fields.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This is an Internet Standards Track document.
+
+ This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
+ (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
+ received public review and has been approved for publication by the
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
+ Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5957.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
+ include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
+ the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
+ described in the Simplified BSD License.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Karp IMAP4 Display-Based Address Sorting [Page 1]
+
+RFC 5957 July 2010
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction ....................................................2
+ 2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................2
+ 3. DISPLAY Sort Value for an Address ...............................2
+ 4. The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO Sort Criteria .....................3
+ 5. Formal Syntax ...................................................3
+ 6. Security Considerations .........................................3
+ 7. Internationalization Considerations .............................4
+ 8. IANA Considerations .............................................4
+ 9. Normative References ............................................4
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ The [SORT] extension to the [IMAP] protocol provides a means for the
+ server-based sorting of messages. It defines a set of sort criteria
+ and the mechanism for determining the sort value of a message for
+ each such ordering.
+
+ The [SORT] FROM and TO orderings sort messages lexically on the
+ [IMAP] addr-mailbox of the first address in the message's From and To
+ headers, respectively. This document provides two alternative
+ orderings, DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO, which sort messages based on
+ the first From or To address's [IMAP] addr-name (generally the same
+ as its [RFC5322] display-name), when present.
+
+ A server that supports the full [SORT] extension as well as both the
+ DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO sort criteria indicates this by returning
+ "SORT=DISPLAY" in its CAPABILITY response.
+
+2. Conventions Used in This Document
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
+
+3. DISPLAY Sort Value for an Address
+
+ For the purposes of the sort criteria defined in this document, the
+ sort value for an [IMAP] address structure is defined as follows:
+
+ o If the address structure's [IMAP] addr-name is non-NIL, apply the
+ procedure from [RFC5255], Section 4.6. (That is, decode any
+ [RFC2047] encoded-words and convert the resulting character string
+ into a charset valid for the currently active [RFC4790] collation,
+ with a default of UTF-8.) If the resulting octet string is not
+ the empty string, use it as the sort value for the address.
+
+
+
+
+Karp IMAP4 Display-Based Address Sorting [Page 2]
+
+RFC 5957 July 2010
+
+
+ o Otherwise, if the address structure's [IMAP] addr-mailbox and
+ [IMAP] addr-host are both non-NIL, the sort value for the address
+ is addr-mailbox@addr-host.
+
+ o Otherwise, if the address structure's [IMAP] addr-mailbox is non-
+ NIL, the sort value for the address is its addr-mailbox.
+
+ o If none of the above conditions are met, the sort value for the
+ address is the empty string.
+
+4. The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO Sort Criteria
+
+ This document introduces two new [SORT] sort criteria, DISPLAYFROM
+ and DISPLAYTO. A message's sort value under these orderings MUST be
+ derived as follows:
+
+ A "derived-addr" value is created from the [IMAP] envelope structure
+ resulting from a FETCH ENVELOPE on the message. For DISPLAYFROM, the
+ derived-addr value is the [IMAP] env-from value. For DISPLAYTO, the
+ derived-addr value is the [IMAP] env-to value.
+
+ o If the derived-addr value is NIL, the message's sort value is the
+ empty string.
+
+ o Otherwise, the message's sort value is the DISPLAY sort value of
+ the first [IMAP] address in the derived-addr value.
+
+5. Formal Syntax
+
+ The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
+ Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC5234]. [IMAP] defines the
+ non-terminal "capability", and [SORT] defines "sort-key".
+
+ capability =/ "SORT=DISPLAY"
+
+ sort-key =/ "DISPLAYFROM" / "DISPLAYTO"
+
+6. Security Considerations
+
+ This document defines an additional IMAP4 capability. As such, it
+ does not change the underlying security considerations of [IMAP].
+ The author believes that no new security issues are introduced with
+ this additional IMAP4 capability.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Karp IMAP4 Display-Based Address Sorting [Page 3]
+
+RFC 5957 July 2010
+
+
+7. Internationalization Considerations
+
+ DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO are string-based sort criteria. As stated
+ in [SORT], the active [RFC4790] collation as per [RFC5255] MUST be
+ used when sorting such strings.
+
+ The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO orderings sort on the full decoded
+ [IMAP] addr-name, when present. They do not attempt to parse this
+ string in a locale- or language-dependent manner in order to
+ determine and sort on some semantically meaningful substring such as
+ the surname.
+
+8. IANA Considerations
+
+ [IMAP] capabilities are registered by publishing a Standards Track or
+ IESG-approved Experimental RFC. This document constitutes
+ registration of the SORT=DISPLAY capability in the [IMAP]
+ capabilities registry.
+
+9. Normative References
+
+ [IMAP] Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION
+ 4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.
+
+ [RFC2047] Moore, K., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)
+ Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text",
+ RFC 2047, November 1996.
+
+ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [RFC4790] Newman, C., Duerst, M., and A. Gulbrandsen, "Internet
+ Application Protocol Collation Registry", RFC 4790, March
+ 2007.
+
+ [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
+ Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January
+ 2008.
+
+ [RFC5255] Newman, C., Gulbrandsen, A., and A. Melnikov, "Internet
+ Message Access Protocol Internationalization", RFC 5255,
+ June 2008.
+
+ [RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
+ October 2008.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Karp IMAP4 Display-Based Address Sorting [Page 4]
+
+RFC 5957 July 2010
+
+
+ [SORT] Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, "Internet Message Access
+ Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions", RFC 5256, June
+ 2008.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Dan Karp
+ Zimbra
+ 3401 Hillview Avenue
+ Palo Alto, CA 94304
+ USA
+
+ EMail: dkarp@zimbra.com
+ URI: http://www.zimbra.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Karp IMAP4 Display-Based Address Sorting [Page 5]
+