diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt | 171 |
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..235a211 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Gundavelli +Request for Comments: 6085 M. Townsley +Updates: 2464 O. Troan +Category: Standards Track W. Dec +ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco + January 2011 + + + Address Mapping of IPv6 Multicast Packets on Ethernet + +Abstract + + When transmitting an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination + address, the IPv6 destination address is mapped to an Ethernet link- + layer multicast address. This document clarifies that a mapping of + an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address may in some + circumstances map to an Ethernet link-layer unicast address. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6085. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + + + + + +Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 6085 Unicast Transmission on Link Layer January 2011 + + +1. Introduction + + "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks" ([RFC2464], + Section 7) specifies how an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination + address is mapped into an Ethernet link-layer address. This document + extends this mapping to explicitly allow for a mapping of an IPv6 + packet with a multicast destination address into an Ethernet link- + layer unicast address, when it is clear that only one address is + relevant. + + This mapping does not replace the mapping described in [RFC2464], + Section 7. The determination of the unicast Ethernet link-layer + address and the construction of the outgoing IPv6 packet are out of + scope for this document. + +2. Conventions + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. + +3. Receiving IPv6 Multicast Packets + + An IPv6 node receiving an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination + address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address MUST NOT drop the + packet as a result of the use of this form of address mapping. + +4. Security Considerations + + This document does not introduce any new security vulnerabilities. + +5. Acknowledgements + + The authors would like to acknowledge Bernard Aboba, Fred Baker, Wes + Beebee, Ron Bonica, Olaf Bonness, Jean-Michel Combes, Ralph Droms, + Alain Durand, Suresh Krishnan, Eric Levy-Abegnoli, Phil Roberts, + Behcet Sarikaya, Hemant Singh, Mark Smith, Dave Thaler, Pascal + Thubert, Stig Venaas, and Eric Voit for their contributions and + discussions on this topic. + +6. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC2464] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet + Networks", RFC 2464, December 1998. + + + + +Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 6085 Unicast Transmission on Link Layer January 2011 + + +Authors' Addresses + + Sri Gundavelli + Cisco + 170 West Tasman Drive + San Jose, CA 95134 + USA + + EMail: sgundave@cisco.com + + + Mark Townsley + Cisco + L'Atlantis, 11, Rue Camille Desmoulins + ISSY LES MOULINEAUX, ILE DE FRANCE 92782 + France + + EMail: townsley@cisco.com + + + Ole Troan + Cisco + Oslo, + Norway + + EMail: ot@cisco.com + + + Wojciech Dec + Cisco + Haarlerbergweg 13-19 + Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1101 CH + Netherlands + + EMail: wdec@cisco.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 3] + |