summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..235a211
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6085.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Gundavelli
+Request for Comments: 6085 M. Townsley
+Updates: 2464 O. Troan
+Category: Standards Track W. Dec
+ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco
+ January 2011
+
+
+ Address Mapping of IPv6 Multicast Packets on Ethernet
+
+Abstract
+
+ When transmitting an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
+ address, the IPv6 destination address is mapped to an Ethernet link-
+ layer multicast address. This document clarifies that a mapping of
+ an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address may in some
+ circumstances map to an Ethernet link-layer unicast address.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This is an Internet Standards Track document.
+
+ This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
+ (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
+ received public review and has been approved for publication by the
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
+ Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6085.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
+ include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
+ the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
+ described in the Simplified BSD License.
+
+
+
+
+
+Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 6085 Unicast Transmission on Link Layer January 2011
+
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks" ([RFC2464],
+ Section 7) specifies how an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
+ address is mapped into an Ethernet link-layer address. This document
+ extends this mapping to explicitly allow for a mapping of an IPv6
+ packet with a multicast destination address into an Ethernet link-
+ layer unicast address, when it is clear that only one address is
+ relevant.
+
+ This mapping does not replace the mapping described in [RFC2464],
+ Section 7. The determination of the unicast Ethernet link-layer
+ address and the construction of the outgoing IPv6 packet are out of
+ scope for this document.
+
+2. Conventions
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
+
+3. Receiving IPv6 Multicast Packets
+
+ An IPv6 node receiving an IPv6 packet with a multicast destination
+ address and an Ethernet link-layer unicast address MUST NOT drop the
+ packet as a result of the use of this form of address mapping.
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ This document does not introduce any new security vulnerabilities.
+
+5. Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to acknowledge Bernard Aboba, Fred Baker, Wes
+ Beebee, Ron Bonica, Olaf Bonness, Jean-Michel Combes, Ralph Droms,
+ Alain Durand, Suresh Krishnan, Eric Levy-Abegnoli, Phil Roberts,
+ Behcet Sarikaya, Hemant Singh, Mark Smith, Dave Thaler, Pascal
+ Thubert, Stig Venaas, and Eric Voit for their contributions and
+ discussions on this topic.
+
+6. Normative References
+
+ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [RFC2464] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet
+ Networks", RFC 2464, December 1998.
+
+
+
+
+Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 6085 Unicast Transmission on Link Layer January 2011
+
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Sri Gundavelli
+ Cisco
+ 170 West Tasman Drive
+ San Jose, CA 95134
+ USA
+
+ EMail: sgundave@cisco.com
+
+
+ Mark Townsley
+ Cisco
+ L'Atlantis, 11, Rue Camille Desmoulins
+ ISSY LES MOULINEAUX, ILE DE FRANCE 92782
+ France
+
+ EMail: townsley@cisco.com
+
+
+ Ole Troan
+ Cisco
+ Oslo,
+ Norway
+
+ EMail: ot@cisco.com
+
+
+ Wojciech Dec
+ Cisco
+ Haarlerbergweg 13-19
+ Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1101 CH
+ Netherlands
+
+ EMail: wdec@cisco.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
+