diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt | 283 |
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c80ca9 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6543.txt @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Gundavelli +Request for Comments: 6543 Cisco +Updates: 5213 May 2012 +Category: Standards Track +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6 + +Abstract + + Proxy Mobile IPv6 (RFC 5213) requires that all mobile access gateways + use a fixed link-local address and a fixed link-layer address on any + of their access links that they share with mobile nodes. This + requirement was intended to ensure that a mobile node does not detect + any change with respect to its Layer 3 attachment, even after it + roams from one mobile access gateway to another. In the absence of + any reserved addresses for this use, coordination across vendors and + manual configuration of these addresses on all of the mobility + elements in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain are required. This document + attempts to simplify this operational requirement by making a + reservation for special addresses that can be used for this purpose. + This document also updates RFC 5213. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6543. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Gundavelli Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 6543 Reserved IPv6 IID for PMIPv6 May 2012 + + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction ....................................................2 + 2. Conventions and Terminology .....................................3 + 2.1. Conventions ................................................3 + 2.2. Terminology ................................................3 + 3. IANA Considerations .............................................4 + 4. Security Considerations .........................................4 + 5. Acknowledgements ................................................4 + 6. References ......................................................5 + 6.1. Normative References .......................................5 + 6.2. Informative References .....................................5 + +1. Introduction + + Proxy Mobile IPv6 [RFC5213] is a network-based mobility management + protocol that enables IP mobility support for a mobile node without + requiring its participation in any mobility-related signaling. The + mobility elements in the network ensure that the mobile node does not + detect any change with respect to its Layer 3 attachment, even after + it roams from one mobile access gateway to another and changes its + point of attachment in the network. All mobile access gateways in a + Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain use a fixed link-local address and a fixed + link-layer address on any of their access links that they share with + the mobile nodes. This essentially ensures that a mobile node, after + performing a handoff, does not detect any change with respect to the + IP network configuration. + + + + + + + + + +Gundavelli Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 6543 Reserved IPv6 IID for PMIPv6 May 2012 + + + Although the base Proxy Mobile IPv6 specification [RFC5213] requires + the use of a fixed link-local and a fixed link-layer address, it did + not reserve any specific addresses for this purpose. This is proving + to be an operational challenge in deployments involving multi-vendor + equipment. To address this problem, this specification makes the + following two reservations. + + 1. This specification reserves one Ethernet unicast address, + 00-00-5E-00-52-13, for use with Proxy Mobile IPv6. This reserved + link-layer address SHOULD be used by the mobile access gateway in + a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain, on all of the access links that it + shares with the mobile nodes. The protocol configuration + variable FixedMAGLinkLayerAddressOnAllAccessLinks [RFC5213] + SHOULD be set to this reserved address. The mobile access + gateway can use this address in all packet communication with the + mobile node on the access links. Considerations from [RFC5342] + apply with respect to the use of Ethernet parameters in IETF + protocols. This address is allocated from the registry "IANA + Ethernet Address Block - Unicast Use". + + 2. This specification reserves an IPv6 interface identifier, + 0200:5EFF:FE00:5213. This interface identifier is a modified + EUI-64 interface identifier generated from the allocated Ethernet + unicast address 00-00-5E-00-52-13. This reserved IPv6 interface + identifier SHOULD be used by all of the mobile access gateways in + a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain on all of the access links that they + share with the mobile nodes. The protocol configuration variable + FixedMAGLinkLocalAddressOnAllAccessLinks [RFC5213] SHOULD be set + to the link-local address generated using this reserved IPv6 + interface identifier. The mobile access gateway can use this + link-local address generated using this reserved IPv6 interface + identifier in all Neighbor Discovery-related [RFC4861] + communication with the mobile node. + +2. Conventions and Terminology + +2.1. Conventions + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. + +2.2. Terminology + + All of the mobility-related terms used in this document are to be + interpreted as defined in the base Proxy Mobile IPv6 specifications + ([RFC5213], [RFC5844]). All of the terminology related to IPv6 + addressing is to be interpreted as specified in [RFC4291]. + + + +Gundavelli Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 6543 Reserved IPv6 IID for PMIPv6 May 2012 + + +3. IANA Considerations + + o This specification reserves one Ethernet unicast address, + 00-00-5E-00-52-13, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This address has been + reserved in the registry "IANA Ethernet Address Block - Unicast + Use". + + o This specification reserves an IPv6 interface identifier, + 0200:5EFF:FE00:5213, for Proxy Mobile IPv6 [RFC5213] in the + registry "Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers" [RFC5453]. This + interface identifier is a modified EUI-64 interface identifier + generated from the allocated Ethernet unicast address + 00-00-5E-00-52-13, as specified in Appendix A of [RFC4291]. + +4. Security Considerations + + All of the security considerations specified in [RFC5213] and + [RFC5844] continue to apply to the mobility elements in a Proxy + Mobile IPv6 domain when those elements conform to this specification. + Specifically, the issues related to the use of fixed link-local and + link-layer addresses as documented in Section 6.9.3 of the base Proxy + Mobile IPv6 specification are equally relevant here. In some sense, + the reservations made in this specification result in the use of the + same set of link-local and link-layer address values beyond a single + Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain, thereby expanding the scope of the existing + problem related to asserting ownership of the configured addresses + from a single domain to a multi-domain environment. Future work may + be needed to address these issues. + +5. Acknowledgements + + The author would like to thank Jari Arkko and Dave Thaler for all of + the discussions around the use of fixed link-local and link-layer + addresses during work related to the standardization of Proxy Mobile + IPv6 [RFC5213]. The author would also like to thank Tero Kivinen, + Donald Eastlake 3rd, Stephen Farrell, Suresh Krishnan, Margaret + Wasserman, Thomas Narten, Basavaraj Patil, and Eric Voit for their + reviews and participation in the discussions related to this + document. + + + + + + + + + + + + +Gundavelli Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 6543 Reserved IPv6 IID for PMIPv6 May 2012 + + +6. References + +6.1. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing + Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006. + + [RFC5213] Gundavelli, S., Ed., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., + Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", + RFC 5213, August 2008. + + [RFC5453] Krishnan, S., "Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers", + RFC 5453, February 2009. + +6.2. Informative References + + [RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, + "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, + September 2007. + + [RFC5342] Eastlake 3rd, D., "IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol + Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters", BCP 141, RFC 5342, + September 2008. + + [RFC5844] Wakikawa, R. and S. Gundavelli, "IPv4 Support for Proxy + Mobile IPv6", RFC 5844, May 2010. + +Author's Address + + Sri Gundavelli + Cisco + 170 West Tasman Drive + San Jose, CA 95134 + USA + + EMail: sgundave@cisco.com + + + + + + + + + + + + +Gundavelli Standards Track [Page 5] + |