summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc657.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc657.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc657.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc657.txt112
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc657.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc657.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a1ff0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc657.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+D. Crocker (UCLA-NMC)
+RFC 657, NIC 31160 (Oct. 25, 1974)
+Online file: [ISI]<DCROCKER>NAOVTD.TXT
+
+ TELNET OUTPUT VERTICAL TAB DISPOSITION OPTION
+
+1. Command name and code
+ NAOVTD 15
+ (Negotiate About Output Vertcial Tab Disposition)
+
+2. Command meanings
+ In the following, we are discussing a simplex connection, as
+ described in the NAOL and NAOP Telnet Options specifications.
+ IAC DO NAOVTD
+ The data sender requests or agrees to negotiate about output
+ vertical tab character disposition with the data receiver.
+ In the case where agreement has been reached and in the
+ absence of further subnegotiations, the data receiver is
+ assumed to be handling output vertical tab character considerations.
+ IAC DON'T NAOVTD
+ The data sender refuses to negotiate about output vertical tab
+ character disposition with the data receiver, or demands a
+ return to the unnegotiated default mode.
+ IAC WILL NAOVTD
+ The data receiver requests or agrees to negotiate about output
+ vertical tab character disposition with the sender. In the
+ case where agreement has been reached and in the absence of further
+ subnegotiations, the data receiver alone is assumed to be
+ handling output vertical tab character considerations.
+ IAC WON'T NAOVTD
+ The data receiver refuses to negotiate about output vertical
+ tab character disposition, or demands a return to the unnegotiated
+ default mode.
+ IAC SB NAOVTD DS <8-bit value> IAC SE
+ The data sender specifies, with the 8-bit value, which party
+ should handle output vertical tab characters and what their
+ disposition should be. The code for DS is 1.
+ IAC SB NAOVTD DR <8-bit value> IAC SE
+ The data receiver specifies, with the 8-bit value, which party
+ should handle output vertical tab characters and what their
+ disposition should be. The code for DR is 0.
+
+3. Default
+ DON'T NAOVTD/WON'T NAOVTD
+ In the default absence of negotiations concerning which party,
+ data sender or data receiver, is handling output vertical tab character
+ considerations, neither party is required to handle vertical tab
+ characters and neither party is prohibited from handling them; but
+ it is appropriate if at least the data receiver handles vertical tab
+ character considerations, albeit primitively.
+
+4. Motivation for the Option
+ Please refer to section 4 of the NAOL and of the NAOVTD Telnet option
+ descriptions.
+
+5. Description of the Option
+ The data sender and the data receiver use the 8-bit value along with
+ the DS and DR SB commands as follows:
+
+ 8 bit value Meaning
+
+ 0 Command sender suggests that he alone will handle
+ vertical tab characters, for the connection.
+ 1 to 250 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ should handle tab characters, but suggests that a
+ delay of the indicated value be used. The value is
+ the number of character-times to wait or number of
+ NULs to insert in the data stream before sending the
+ next data character.
+ 251 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ handle vertical tabs, but suggests that each
+ occurrence of the character be replaced by
+ carriage-return/linefeed.
+ 252 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ handle vertical tabs, but suggests that they be discarded.
+ 253 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ should handle tab characters, but suggests that
+ tabbing be simulated.
+ 254 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ should handle the output disposition but suggests
+ waiting for a character to be transmitted (on the
+ other simplex connection) before sending more data.
+ Note that, due to the assynchrony of the two
+ simplex connections, phase problems can occur with
+ this option.
+ 255 Command sender suggests that the other party alone
+ should handle the output disposition and suggests
+ nothing about how it should be done.
+
+ The guiding rules are that:
+
+ 1. if neither data receiver nor data sender wants to handle the
+ output vertical tab characters, the data receiver must do it, and
+ 2. if both data receiver and data sender want to handle the output
+ vertical tab characters, the data sender gets to do it.
+
+ The reasoning for the former rule is that if neither want to do it, then
+ the default in the NAOVTD option dominates. If both want to do it, the
+ sender, who is presumed to have special knowledge about the data, should
+ be allowed to do it, taking into account any suggestions the receiver may
+ make. Simulation is defined as the replacement of the character by
+ enough line-feeds (only) to advance the paper (or line-pointer) to the
+ next vertical tab stop.
+ Note that delays, controlled by the data sender, must consist of NUL
+ characters, inserted immediately after the line-feed character. This is
+ necessary due to the assynchrony of network transmissions. As with all
+ option negotiations, neither party should suggest a state already in
+ effect except to refuse to negotiate; changes should be acknowledged; and
+ once refused, an option should not be resuggested until "something
+ changes" (e.g., another process starts). At any time, either party can
+ disable further negotiation by giving the appropriate WON'T NAOVTD or
+ DON'T NAOVTD command.