summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt395
1 files changed, 395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7050c38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6694.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Moonesamy, Ed.
+Request for Comments: 6694 August 2012
+Category: Informational
+ISSN: 2070-1721
+
+
+ The "about" URI Scheme
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document describes the "about" URI scheme, which is widely used
+ by Web browsers and some other applications to designate access to
+ their internal resources, such as settings, application information,
+ hidden built-in functionality, and so on.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
+ published for informational purposes.
+
+ This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
+ (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
+ received public review and has been approved for publication by the
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
+ approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
+ Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6694.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
+ include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
+ the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
+ described in the Simplified BSD License.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction ....................................................2
+ 2. URI Scheme Specification ........................................2
+ 2.1. URI Scheme Syntax ..........................................2
+ 2.2. URI Scheme Semantics .......................................3
+ 2.2.1. Well-Known "about" URIs .............................3
+ 2.3. Encoding Considerations ....................................3
+ 3. "about:blank" ...................................................3
+ 4. Security Considerations .........................................3
+ 5. IANA Considerations .............................................4
+ 5.1. URI Scheme Registration ....................................4
+ 5.2. A Registry for Well-Known Tokens ...........................5
+ 5.2.1. Registration Procedure ..............................5
+ 6. References ......................................................6
+ 6.1. Normative References .......................................6
+ 6.2. Informative References .....................................6
+ Appendix A. Acknowledgments ........................................7
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ This document describes the "about" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
+ scheme. The "about" URI scheme is currently widely used by Web
+ browsers to designate access to their internal resources, such as
+ settings, application information, and so-called "Easter eggs" (i.e.,
+ a hidden feature or joke in an application).
+
+2. URI Scheme Specification
+
+2.1. URI Scheme Syntax
+
+ The "about" URI syntactically conforms to the <about-uri> rule below,
+ expressed using the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC5234]:
+
+ about-uri = "about:" about-token [ about-query ] [ about-fragment ]
+ about-token = *pchar
+ about-query = "?" query
+ about-fragment = "#" fragment
+ pchar = <as specified in RFC 3986, Appendix A>
+ query = <as specified in RFC 3986, Appendix A>
+ fragment = <as specified in RFC 3986, Appendix A>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+2.2. URI Scheme Semantics
+
+ The resource that is referenced by a particular "about" URI is
+ denoted by the <about-token> part of the URI. It is not a
+ hierarchical element for a naming authority. The <about-query> part
+ specifies additional information about its handling and/or the
+ information that should be returned by the resource referenced by
+ the URI.
+
+ It is impossible to specify a binding between all the possible tokens
+ and the semantics of "about" URIs that would contain such tokens.
+ Therefore, the resource referenced by the URI is generally considered
+ to be specific to a Web browser implementation.
+
+2.2.1. Well-Known "about" URIs
+
+ Some <about-token>s have been reserved, as the behavior of the
+ resource that is referenced is well-known (well-known tokens).
+
+ A well-known "about" URI is a URI that has a well-known token as its
+ <about-token> part. It is recommended that such URIs be handled in
+ accordance with the specification referenced in the "about" URI
+ Tokens registry (see Section 5.2).
+
+ Well-known "about" URIs are intended to be registered when there is a
+ need to codify the behavior of a particular <about-token>.
+
+2.3. Encoding Considerations
+
+ "about" URIs are subject to encoding rules as defined in RFC 3986
+ [RFC3986].
+
+3. "about:blank"
+
+ This document defines one well-known token: "blank". The
+ "about:blank" URI refers to a resource represented in the browser by
+ a blank page.
+
+4. Security Considerations
+
+ Security considerations for URIs are discussed in Section 7 of
+ RFC 3986 [RFC3986]. However, most of those provisions do not apply
+ to the "about" URI scheme, as they are mainly scoped to schemes used
+ in the Internet.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+ "about" URIs can sometimes refer to sensitive information, such as
+ user passwords stored in a cache, or parameters that, if changed,
+ could affect a user's data. The application therefore needs to
+ ensure that the user's data is secured and no threats are imposed by
+ "about" URIs.
+
+5. IANA Considerations
+
+5.1. URI Scheme Registration
+
+ The "about" URI scheme has been registered in the "Permanent URI
+ Schemes" registry. The information below is provided according to
+ the guidelines from RFC 4395 [RFC4395]:
+
+ URI scheme name: about
+
+ Status: Permanent
+
+ URI scheme syntax: See Section 2.1 of RFC 6694.
+
+ URI scheme semantics: See Section 2.2 of RFC 6694.
+
+ URI scheme encoding considerations: See Section 2.3 of RFC 6694.
+
+ Applications that use the scheme: "about" URIs are predominantly
+ used by Web browsers.
+
+ Security considerations: See Section 4 of RFC 6694.
+
+ Contact: IETF Applications Area Directors
+ <app-ads@tools.ietf.org>
+
+ Author/Change controller: IESG <iesg@ietf.org> (on behalf of the
+ IETF)
+
+ References: See Section 6 of RFC 6694.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+5.2. A Registry for Well-Known Tokens
+
+ This document creates the '"about" URI Tokens' registry.
+
+ The registry entries consist of three fields: Token, Description, and
+ Reference. The Token field has to conform to <about-token>
+ production as defined in Section 2.1. The initial assignment is as
+ follows:
+
+ +--------------+------------------------------------+-------------+
+ | Token | Description | Reference |
+ +--------------+------------------------------------+-------------+
+ | blank | The about:blank URI references a | RFC 6694 |
+ | | blank page. | |
+ +--------------+------------------------------------+-------------+
+
+5.2.1. Registration Procedure
+
+ The registration policy for this registry is "First Come First
+ Served", as described in RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. The registrant of the
+ token should provide the information mentioned in the following
+ registration template:
+
+ o Registered token: The desired well-known token to be used in
+ "about" URIs.
+
+ o Intended usage: A short description of how "about" URIs with the
+ registered token are handled, including information about the
+ referenced resource.
+
+ o Contact/change controller: Person (including contact information)
+ authorized to change this registration.
+
+ o Specification: A stable reference to a document that specifies
+ the registered "about" URI. The question of interoperability does
+ not arise. The key motivation is to have a reference to a
+ specification documenting well-known behavior of the "about" URI
+ in Web browsers. As a rule of thumb, if the behavior is common to
+ two or more Web browser implementations, it can be considered
+ well-known. An existing assignment may be duplicated if the
+ registered token is used in more than one Web browser
+ implementation.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+ The following is a template for the "blank" token:
+
+ o Registered token: blank
+
+ o Intended usage: The about:blank URI references a blank page.
+
+ o Contact/change controller: IESG <iesg@ietf.org> (on behalf of the
+ IETF).
+
+ o Specification: RFC 6694
+
+6. References
+
+6.1. Normative References
+
+ [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
+ Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
+ RFC 3986, January 2005.
+
+ [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
+ IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
+ May 2008.
+
+ [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
+ Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
+ January 2008.
+
+6.2. Informative References
+
+ [RFC4395] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
+ Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 35,
+ RFC 4395, February 2006.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 6694 The "about" URI Scheme August 2012
+
+
+Appendix A. Acknowledgments
+
+ This document was formed from a previous draft document initially
+ authored by Lachlan Hunt and Joseph Holsten. Additionally, the
+ contributions of Frank Ellermann and Alexey Melnikov are gratefully
+ acknowledged. Barry Leiba and Murray Kucherawy deserve special
+ credit for providing a great amount of text that was used in this
+ document.
+
+ Lachlan Hunt and Mykyta Yevstifeyev edited previous versions of this
+ document. Tim Bray and John Klensin provided suggestions about how
+ to improve the document.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ S. Moonesamy (editor)
+ 76 Ylang Ylang Avenue
+ Quatre Bornes
+ Mauritius
+
+ EMail: sm+ietf@elandsys.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Moonesamy Informational [Page 7]
+