summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt395
1 files changed, 395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b6ccc2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Independent Submission P. Saint-Andre
+Request for Comments: 7259 &yet
+Category: Informational May 2014
+ISSN: 2070-1721
+
+
+ The Jabber-ID Header Field
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document defines a header field that enables the author of an
+ email or netnews message to include a Jabber ID in the message header
+ block for the purpose of associating the author with a particular
+ Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) address.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
+ published for informational purposes.
+
+ This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other
+ RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
+ its discretion and makes no statement about its value for
+ implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by
+ the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet
+ Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7259.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 1]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
+ 2. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 3. Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 3.1. Inclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 3.2. Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ 3.3. Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 3.4. Disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
+ 5. Security and Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
+ 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
+ Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), documented in
+ [RFC6120], is a streaming XML technology that enables any two
+ entities on a network to exchange well-defined but extensible XML
+ elements (called "XML stanzas") in close to real time. Given XMPP's
+ heritage in the Jabber open-source community, one of the primary uses
+ for XMPP is instant messaging and presence as documented in
+ [RFC6121], and XMPP addresses are still referred to as Jabber IDs.
+
+ Because almost all human users of Jabber/XMPP instant messaging and
+ presence systems also use email systems [RFC5322] and because many
+ also use netnews systems [RFC5536], it can be helpful for them to
+ associate their Jabber IDs with the messages they author. The
+ Jabber-ID header field provides a standard location for that
+ information.
+
+ Members of the XMPP instant messaging and presence community have
+ been experimenting with the Jabber-ID header field for many years.
+ This document defines the syntax and usage of the Jabber-ID header
+ field, including the information necessary to register the field in
+ the Provisional Message Header Field Names registry maintained by the
+ IANA.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 2]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+2. Syntax
+
+ The syntax of the Jabber-ID header field is defined below using
+ Augmented Backus-Naur Form [RFC5234], where the "pathxmpp" rule is
+ defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122] and the remaining
+ rules are defined in the Internet Message Format specification
+ [RFC5322]:
+
+ Jabber-ID = SP *WSP pathxmpp *WSP CRLF
+
+ Although a native XMPP address can contain virtually any Unicode
+ character [UNICODE], the header of an email or netnews message is
+ allowed to contain only printable ASCII characters (see Section 2 of
+ [RFC5322]). Therefore, any characters outside the ASCII range
+ [RFC20] in an XMPP address need to be converted to ASCII before
+ inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field, in accordance with the rules
+ defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122]. In addition,
+ characters allowed in XMPP localparts and XMPP resourceparts but
+ disallowed by the relevant URI rules need to be percent-encoded in
+ accordance with the rules defined in the URI specification [RFC3986].
+
+3. Usage
+
+3.1. Inclusion
+
+ The Jabber-ID header field is associated with the author of the
+ message; see [RFC5322]. If the "From:" header field of an email
+ message contains more than one mailbox, it is best not to add the
+ Jabber-ID header field to the message. To reduce the possibility of
+ confusion, it is best to include only one instance of the Jabber-ID
+ header field in a given message.
+
+3.2. Generation
+
+ For a user whose XMPP address is "juliet@example.com", the
+ corresponding Jabber-ID header field would be:
+
+ Jabber-ID: juliet@example.com
+
+ As noted, non-ASCII characters in XMPP addresses need to be converted
+ into ASCII before inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field. Consider
+ the following XMPP address:
+
+ ji&#x159;i@&#x10D;echy.example
+
+ In the foregoing example, the string "&#x159;" stands for the Unicode
+ character LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON and the string "&#x10D;"
+ stands for the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON,
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 3]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+ following the "XML Notation" used in [RFC3987] to represent
+ characters that cannot be rendered in ASCII-only documents. For
+ those who do not read Czech, this example could be anglicized as
+ "george@czech-lands.example".
+
+ Following the rules in [RFC5122] and the Jabber-ID header field
+ syntax, the resulting header field might be as shown below (note that
+ this representation includes folding white space, which is allowed in
+ accordance with the ABNF):
+
+ Jabber-ID:
+ ji%C5%99i@%C4%8Dechy.example
+
+3.3. Processing
+
+ Upon receiving an email message or netnews message containing a
+ Jabber-ID header field, a user agent that supports the field ought to
+ process the field by converting any escaped characters to characters
+ outside the ASCII range in accordance with the rules defined in
+ [RFC5122], thus yielding a Jabber ID that can be used for native
+ communication on the XMPP network.
+
+3.4. Disposition
+
+ A user agent that has processed a Jabber-ID header field can provide
+ appropriate interface elements if it has independent information
+ linking the author of the email or netnews message with the specified
+ Jabber ID (e.g., via a user-controlled address book or automated
+ directory lookup). Such interface elements might include an
+ indicator of "presence" (i.e., that the author is online and
+ available for communication via XMPP) if the user is subscribed to
+ the presence of the author, and an element that enables the user to
+ send an instant message or initiate a text chat session with the
+ author.
+
+4. IANA Considerations
+
+ The IANA has added "Jabber-ID" to the Provisional Message Header
+ Field Names registry. The completed registration template follows.
+
+ Header field name: Jabber-ID
+
+ Applicable protocol: mail, netnews
+
+ Status: provisional
+
+ Author/Change controller Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 4]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+ Specification document: RFC 7259
+
+ Related information: See RFC 6120
+
+5. Security and Privacy Considerations
+
+ Message headers are an existing standard and are designed to easily
+ accommodate new types. Although the Jabber-ID header field could be
+ forged, this problem is inherent in Internet email and netnews.
+ However, because a forged Jabber-ID header field might break
+ automated processing, applications are discouraged from depending on
+ the Jabber-ID header field to indicate the authenticity of an email
+ or netnews message, or the identity of its author or sender.
+ Including the Jabber-ID header field among the signer header fields
+ in DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) can help to mitigate against
+ forging of the header (see [RFC6376]).
+
+ Advertising XMPP addresses in email or netnews headers might make it
+ easier for malicious users to harvest XMPP addresses and therefore to
+ send unsolicited bulk communications to the users or applications
+ represented by those addresses. Providing such a binding between an
+ email address and a Jabber ID can also increase the possibility of
+ drawing a connection between different kinds of communications
+ traffic for purposes of surveillance and other breaches of privacy.
+ Care ought to be taken in balancing the benefits of open information
+ exchange against the potential costs of security and privacy
+ weaknesses. An email or netnews user agent that is capable of
+ including the Jabber-ID header field in outgoing email or netnews
+ messages needs to provide an option for its user to disable inclusion
+ of the Jabber-ID header field generally, on a per-recipient basis,
+ and on a per-message basis.
+
+ The security and privacy considerations discussed in [RFC3986],
+ [RFC3987], [RFC5122], [RFC6120], and [RFC6121] also apply to the
+ Jabber-ID message header.
+
+6. References
+
+6.1. Normative References
+
+ [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
+ Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC
+ 3986, January 2005.
+
+ [RFC3987] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
+ Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005.
+
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 5]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+ [RFC5122] Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers
+ (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the
+ Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC
+ 5122, February 2008.
+
+ [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
+ Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.
+
+ [RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
+ October 2008.
+
+ [RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
+ Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, March 2011.
+
+ [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version
+ 6.3", (Mountain View, CA: The Unicode Consortium, 2013.
+ ISBN 978-1-936213-08-5),
+ <http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.3.0/>.
+
+6.2. Informative References
+
+ [RFC20] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20,
+ October 1969.
+
+ [RFC5536] Murchison, K., Lindsey, C., and D. Kohn, "Netnews Article
+ Format", RFC 5536, November 2009.
+
+ [RFC6121] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
+ Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC
+ 6121, March 2011.
+
+ [RFC6376] Crocker, D., Hansen, T., and M. Kucherawy, "DomainKeys
+ Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", RFC 6376, September
+ 2011.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 6]
+
+RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014
+
+
+Appendix A. Acknowledgements
+
+ Thanks to Dave Cridland, Stephen Farrell, Russ Housley, and Alexey
+ Melnikov for their feedback.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Peter Saint-Andre
+ &yet
+
+ EMail: ietf@stpeter.im
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Saint-Andre Informational [Page 7]
+