diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt | 395 |
1 files changed, 395 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b6ccc2a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc7259.txt @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ + + + + + + +Independent Submission P. Saint-Andre +Request for Comments: 7259 &yet +Category: Informational May 2014 +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + The Jabber-ID Header Field + +Abstract + + This document defines a header field that enables the author of an + email or netnews message to include a Jabber ID in the message header + block for the purpose of associating the author with a particular + Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) address. + +Status of This Memo + + This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is + published for informational purposes. + + This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other + RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at + its discretion and makes no statement about its value for + implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by + the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet + Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7259. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. + + + + + + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 2. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3. Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3.1. Inclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3.2. Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3.3. Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 3.4. Disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 5. Security and Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 + Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 + +1. Introduction + + The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), documented in + [RFC6120], is a streaming XML technology that enables any two + entities on a network to exchange well-defined but extensible XML + elements (called "XML stanzas") in close to real time. Given XMPP's + heritage in the Jabber open-source community, one of the primary uses + for XMPP is instant messaging and presence as documented in + [RFC6121], and XMPP addresses are still referred to as Jabber IDs. + + Because almost all human users of Jabber/XMPP instant messaging and + presence systems also use email systems [RFC5322] and because many + also use netnews systems [RFC5536], it can be helpful for them to + associate their Jabber IDs with the messages they author. The + Jabber-ID header field provides a standard location for that + information. + + Members of the XMPP instant messaging and presence community have + been experimenting with the Jabber-ID header field for many years. + This document defines the syntax and usage of the Jabber-ID header + field, including the information necessary to register the field in + the Provisional Message Header Field Names registry maintained by the + IANA. + + + + + + + + + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + +2. Syntax + + The syntax of the Jabber-ID header field is defined below using + Augmented Backus-Naur Form [RFC5234], where the "pathxmpp" rule is + defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122] and the remaining + rules are defined in the Internet Message Format specification + [RFC5322]: + + Jabber-ID = SP *WSP pathxmpp *WSP CRLF + + Although a native XMPP address can contain virtually any Unicode + character [UNICODE], the header of an email or netnews message is + allowed to contain only printable ASCII characters (see Section 2 of + [RFC5322]). Therefore, any characters outside the ASCII range + [RFC20] in an XMPP address need to be converted to ASCII before + inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field, in accordance with the rules + defined in the XMPP URI specification [RFC5122]. In addition, + characters allowed in XMPP localparts and XMPP resourceparts but + disallowed by the relevant URI rules need to be percent-encoded in + accordance with the rules defined in the URI specification [RFC3986]. + +3. Usage + +3.1. Inclusion + + The Jabber-ID header field is associated with the author of the + message; see [RFC5322]. If the "From:" header field of an email + message contains more than one mailbox, it is best not to add the + Jabber-ID header field to the message. To reduce the possibility of + confusion, it is best to include only one instance of the Jabber-ID + header field in a given message. + +3.2. Generation + + For a user whose XMPP address is "juliet@example.com", the + corresponding Jabber-ID header field would be: + + Jabber-ID: juliet@example.com + + As noted, non-ASCII characters in XMPP addresses need to be converted + into ASCII before inclusion in a Jabber-ID header field. Consider + the following XMPP address: + + jiři@čechy.example + + In the foregoing example, the string "ř" stands for the Unicode + character LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON and the string "č" + stands for the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON, + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + + following the "XML Notation" used in [RFC3987] to represent + characters that cannot be rendered in ASCII-only documents. For + those who do not read Czech, this example could be anglicized as + "george@czech-lands.example". + + Following the rules in [RFC5122] and the Jabber-ID header field + syntax, the resulting header field might be as shown below (note that + this representation includes folding white space, which is allowed in + accordance with the ABNF): + + Jabber-ID: + ji%C5%99i@%C4%8Dechy.example + +3.3. Processing + + Upon receiving an email message or netnews message containing a + Jabber-ID header field, a user agent that supports the field ought to + process the field by converting any escaped characters to characters + outside the ASCII range in accordance with the rules defined in + [RFC5122], thus yielding a Jabber ID that can be used for native + communication on the XMPP network. + +3.4. Disposition + + A user agent that has processed a Jabber-ID header field can provide + appropriate interface elements if it has independent information + linking the author of the email or netnews message with the specified + Jabber ID (e.g., via a user-controlled address book or automated + directory lookup). Such interface elements might include an + indicator of "presence" (i.e., that the author is online and + available for communication via XMPP) if the user is subscribed to + the presence of the author, and an element that enables the user to + send an instant message or initiate a text chat session with the + author. + +4. IANA Considerations + + The IANA has added "Jabber-ID" to the Provisional Message Header + Field Names registry. The completed registration template follows. + + Header field name: Jabber-ID + + Applicable protocol: mail, netnews + + Status: provisional + + Author/Change controller Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org> + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + + Specification document: RFC 7259 + + Related information: See RFC 6120 + +5. Security and Privacy Considerations + + Message headers are an existing standard and are designed to easily + accommodate new types. Although the Jabber-ID header field could be + forged, this problem is inherent in Internet email and netnews. + However, because a forged Jabber-ID header field might break + automated processing, applications are discouraged from depending on + the Jabber-ID header field to indicate the authenticity of an email + or netnews message, or the identity of its author or sender. + Including the Jabber-ID header field among the signer header fields + in DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) can help to mitigate against + forging of the header (see [RFC6376]). + + Advertising XMPP addresses in email or netnews headers might make it + easier for malicious users to harvest XMPP addresses and therefore to + send unsolicited bulk communications to the users or applications + represented by those addresses. Providing such a binding between an + email address and a Jabber ID can also increase the possibility of + drawing a connection between different kinds of communications + traffic for purposes of surveillance and other breaches of privacy. + Care ought to be taken in balancing the benefits of open information + exchange against the potential costs of security and privacy + weaknesses. An email or netnews user agent that is capable of + including the Jabber-ID header field in outgoing email or netnews + messages needs to provide an option for its user to disable inclusion + of the Jabber-ID header field generally, on a per-recipient basis, + and on a per-message basis. + + The security and privacy considerations discussed in [RFC3986], + [RFC3987], [RFC5122], [RFC6120], and [RFC6121] also apply to the + Jabber-ID message header. + +6. References + +6.1. Normative References + + [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform + Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC + 3986, January 2005. + + [RFC3987] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource + Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005. + + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 5] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + + [RFC5122] Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers + (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the + Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC + 5122, February 2008. + + [RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008. + + [RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322, + October 2008. + + [RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence + Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, March 2011. + + [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version + 6.3", (Mountain View, CA: The Unicode Consortium, 2013. + ISBN 978-1-936213-08-5), + <http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.3.0/>. + +6.2. Informative References + + [RFC20] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20, + October 1969. + + [RFC5536] Murchison, K., Lindsey, C., and D. Kohn, "Netnews Article + Format", RFC 5536, November 2009. + + [RFC6121] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence + Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC + 6121, March 2011. + + [RFC6376] Crocker, D., Hansen, T., and M. Kucherawy, "DomainKeys + Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", RFC 6376, September + 2011. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 6] + +RFC 7259 Jabber-ID May 2014 + + +Appendix A. Acknowledgements + + Thanks to Dave Cridland, Stephen Farrell, Russ Housley, and Alexey + Melnikov for their feedback. + +Author's Address + + Peter Saint-Andre + &yet + + EMail: ietf@stpeter.im + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Saint-Andre Informational [Page 7] + |