diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc87.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc87.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc87.txt | 165 |
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc87.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc87.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a26496 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc87.txt @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group A. Vezza +Request for Comments: 87 12 January 1971 +NIC 5632 + + TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION AT THE NEXT NETWORK WORKING GROUP MEETING + -------------------------------------------------------------- + + Project MAC is planning a network graphics meeting to be held in + +April. It would be desirable to devote some portion of the February + +Urbana meeting to consideration of the length, format, structure and + +contents of the April meeting. Perhaps discussion on topics germane + +to network graphics can be started in an informal way at Urbana. + + Project MAC's present ideas about the length, structure, and + +format of the network graphics meeting are as follows: + + 1) The length of the meeting is expected to be two FULL days. + + 2) Each organization represented is expected to participate by + + presenting one or more working paper(s) on one or more of the areas + + chosen for discussion. The working paper(s) will minimally consist of + + a set of working notes and an oral presentation. Who presents the + + working paper for an organization, or how the labor is divided, is to + + be determined by the organization. + + 3) The bulk of the two full days is to be used for the prepared oral + + presentation with discussion after each presentation. About three + + hours at the end of the second day are reserved for open discussion. + + This three hour period is to be used for critiquing this meeting, + + planning the next one, and bidding for special assignments that + + participating organizations might wish to undertake as a contribution + + to the network graphics effort. + + + + [Page 1] + +Our ideas about content are: + + 1) A description of present or future graphical facilities that are or + + will be connected to the network, with a functional description of how + + they work or look (or might look) to a user (network user). + + 2) A functional description of a graphical facility one can envision + + or would like to see the network support. + + 3) Proposals on network graphic protocol, even proposal which are only + + intended to smoke out issues are acceptable. + + 4) A sharing of network graphic "Historic Moments." Description of + + your experiences in network graphics, what problems were encountered, + + how you solved or lived with them. What insight and understanding + + have you gained, what questions have been left unanswered by these + + experiences? + + +The foregoing are our present ideas. If you have suggestions, please + +convey them to one of the people from your site attending the Urbana + +meeting so they can be discussed, or notify either Fran Yost or me of + +your suggestion by calling 617-864-6900-6026 or writing to: + + Miss F. Yost + Project MAC/MIT + 545 Technology Square, Room 830 + Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 + +I hope we can come away from the Urbana meeting with a firm concept of + +the April network graphic meeting. + + + + + + + + + [Page 2] + +I would like to ask each participating organization to bring to + +the February meeting a list of its people who are actively engaged in + +graphics with facilities that are or will be on the network. + + + + + + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Phillip Jaenke 4/97] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + [Page 3] + |