summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc913.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc913.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc913.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc913.txt855
1 files changed, 855 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc913.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc913.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3e806b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc913.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,855 @@
+
+
+Network Working Group Mark K. Lottor
+Request for Comments: 913 MIT
+ September 1984
+
+ Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+STATUS OF THIS MEMO
+
+ This RFC suggests a proposed protocol for the ARPA-Internet
+ community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
+ Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+ SFTP is a simple file transfer protocol. It fills the need of people
+ wanting a protocol that is more useful than TFTP but easier to
+ implement (and less powerful) than FTP. SFTP supports user access
+ control, file transfers, directory listing, directory changing, file
+ renaming and deleting.
+
+ SFTP can be implemented with any reliable 8-bit byte stream oriented
+ protocol, this document describes its TCP specification. SFTP uses
+ only one TCP connection; whereas TFTP implements a connection over
+ UDP, and FTP uses two TCP connections (one using the TELNET
+ protocol).
+
+THE PROTOCOL
+
+ SFTP is used by opening a TCP connection to the remote hosts' SFTP
+ port (115 decimal). You then send SFTP commands and wait for
+ replies. SFTP commands sent to the remote server are always 4 ASCII
+ letters (of any case) followed by a space, the argument(s), and a
+ <NULL>. The argument can sometimes be null in which case the command
+ is just 4 characters followed by <NULL>. Replies from the server are
+ always a response character followed immediately by an ASCII message
+ string terminated by a <NULL>. A reply can also be just a response
+ character and a <NULL>.
+
+ <command> : = <cmd> [<SPACE> <args>] <NULL>
+
+ <cmd> : = USER ! ACCT ! PASS ! TYPE ! LIST ! CDIR
+ KILL ! NAME ! DONE ! RETR ! STOR
+
+ <response> : = <response-code> [<message>] <NULL>
+
+ <response-code> : = + | - | | !
+
+ <message> can contain <CRLF>
+
+ Commands that can be sent to the server are listed below. The server
+
+
+Lottor [Page 1]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ replies to each command with one of the possible response codes
+ listed under each message. Along with the response, the server
+ should optionally return a message explaining the error in more
+ detail. Example message texts are listed but do not have to be
+ followed. All characters used in messages are ASCII 7-bit with the
+ high-order bit zero, in an 8 bit field.
+
+ The response codes and their meanings:
+
+ + Success.
+
+ - Error.
+
+ An error occurred while processing your command.
+
+ Number.
+
+ The number-sign is followed immediately by ASCII digits
+ representing a decimal number.
+
+ ! Logged in.
+
+ You have sent enough information to be able to log yourself in.
+ This is also used to mean you have sent enough information to
+ connect to a directory.
+
+ To use SFTP you first open a connection to the remote SFTP server.
+ The server replies by sending either a positive or negative greeting,
+ such as:
+
+ +MIT-XX SFTP Service
+
+ (the first word should be the host name)
+
+ -MIT-XX Out to Lunch
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 2]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ If the server send back a '-' response it will also close the
+ connection, otherwise you must now send a USER command.
+
+ USER user-id
+
+ Your userid on the remote system.
+
+ The reply to this command will be one of:
+
+ !<user-id> logged in
+
+ Meaning you don't need an account or password or you
+ specified a user-id not needing them.
+
+ +User-id valid, send account and password
+
+ -Invalid user-id, try again
+
+ If the remote system does not have user-id's then you should
+ send an identification such as your personal name or host name
+ as the argument, and the remote system would reply with '+'.
+
+ ACCT account
+
+ The account you want to use (usually used for billing) on the
+ remote system.
+
+ Valid replies are:
+
+ ! Account valid, logged-in
+
+ Account was ok or not needed. Skip the password.
+
+ +Account valid, send password
+
+ Account ok or not needed. Send your password next.
+
+ -Invalid account, try again
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 3]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ PASS password
+
+ Your password on the remote system.
+
+ Valid replies are:
+
+ ! Logged in
+
+ Password is ok and you can begin file transfers.
+
+ +Send account
+
+ Password ok but you haven't specified the account.
+
+ -Wrong password, try again
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 4]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ You cannot specify any of the following commands until you receive a
+ '!' response from the remote system.
+
+ TYPE { A | B | C }
+
+ The mapping of the stored file to the transmission byte stream
+ is controlled by the type. The default is binary if the type
+ is not specified.
+
+ A - ASCII
+
+ The ASCII bytes are taken from the file in the source
+ system, transmitted over the connection, and stored in the
+ file in the destination system.
+
+ The data is the 7-bit ASCII codes, transmitted in the
+ low-order 7 bits of 8-bit bytes. The high-order bit of the
+ transmission byte must be zero, and need not be stored in
+ the file.
+
+ The data is "NETASCII" and is to follow the same rules as
+ data sent on Telnet connections. The key requirement here
+ is that the local end of line is to be converted to the pair
+ of ASCII characters CR and LF when transmitted on the
+ connection.
+
+ For example, TOPS-20 machines have 36-bit words. On TOPS-20
+ machines, The standard way of labeling the bits is 0 through
+ 35 from high-order to low-order. On TOPS-20 the normal way
+ of storing ASCII data is to use 5 7-bit bytes per word. In
+ ASCII mode, the bytes transmitted would be [0-6], [7-13],
+ [14-20], [21-27], [28-34], (bit 35 would not be
+ transmitted), each of these 7-bit quantities would be
+ transmitted as the low-order 7 bits of an 8-bit byte (with
+ the high-order bit zero).
+
+ For example, one disk page of a TOPS-20 file is 512 36-bit
+ words. But using only 35 bits per word for 7-bit bytes, a
+ page is 17920 bits or 2560 bytes.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 5]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ B - BINARY
+
+ The 8-bit bytes are taken from the file in the source
+ system, transmitted over the connection, and stored in the
+ file in the destination system.
+
+ The data is in 8-bit units. In systems with word sizes
+ which are not a multiple of 8, some bits of the word will
+ not be transmitted.
+
+ For example, TOPS-20 machines have 36-bit words. In binary
+ mode, the bytes transmitted would be [0-7], [8-15], [16-23],
+ [24-31], (bits 32-35 would not be transmitted).
+
+ For example, one disk page of a TOPS-20 file is 512 36-bit
+ words. But using only 32 bits per word for 8-bit bytes, a
+ page is 16384 bits or 2048 bytes.
+
+ C - CONTINUOUS
+
+ The bits are taken from the file in the source system
+ continuously, ignoring word boundaries, and sent over the
+ connection packed into 8-bit bytes. The destination system
+ stores the bits received into the file continuously,
+ ignoring word boundaries.
+
+ For systems on machines with a word size that is a multiple
+ of 8 bits, the implementation of binary and continuous modes
+ should be identical.
+
+ For example, TOPS-20 machines have 36-bit words. In
+ continuous mode, the bytes transmitted would be [first word,
+ bits 0-7], [first word, bits 8-15], [first word, bits
+ 16-23], [first word, bits 24-31], [first word, bits 32-35 +
+ second word, bits 0-3], [second word, bits 4-11], [second
+ word, bits 12-19], [second word, bits 20-27], [second word,
+ bits 28-35], then the pattern repeats.
+
+ For example, one disk page of a TOPS-20 file is 512 36-bit
+ words. This is 18432 bits or 2304 8-bit bytes.
+
+ Replies are:
+
+ +Using { Ascii | Binary | Continuous } mode
+
+ -Type not valid
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 6]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ LIST { F | V } directory-path
+
+ A null directory-path will return the current connected
+ directory listing.
+
+ F specifies a standard formatted directory listing.
+
+ An error reply should be a '-' followed by the error message
+ from the remote systems directory command. A directory
+ listing is a '+' followed immediately by the current
+ directory path specification and a <CRLF>. Following the
+ directory path is a single line for each file in the
+ directory. Each line is just the file name followed by
+ <CRLF>. The listing is terminated with a <NULL> after the
+ last <CRLF>.
+
+ V specifies a verbose directory listing.
+
+ An error returns '-' as above. A verbose directory listing
+ is a '+' followed immediately by the current directory path
+ specification and a <CRLF>. It is then followed by one line
+ per file in the directory (a line ending in <CRLF>). The
+ line returned for each file can be of any format. Possible
+ information to return would be the file name, size,
+ protection, last write date, and name of last writer.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 7]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ CDIR new-directory
+
+ This will change the current working directory on the remote
+ host to the argument passed.
+
+ Replies are:
+
+ !Changed working dir to <new-directory>
+
+ -Can't connect to directory because: (reason)
+
+ +directory ok, send account/password
+
+ If the server replies with '+' you should then send an ACCT or
+ PASS command. The server will wait for ACCT or PASS commands
+ until it returns a '-' or '!' response.
+
+ Replies to ACCT could be:
+
+ !Changed working dir to <new-directory>
+
+ +account ok, send password
+
+ -invalid account
+
+ Replies to PASS could be:
+
+ !Changed working dir to <new-directory>
+
+ +password ok, send account
+
+ -invalid password
+
+ KILL file-spec
+
+ This will delete the file from the remote system.
+
+ Replies are:
+
+ +<file-spec> deleted
+
+ -Not deleted because (reason)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 8]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ NAME old-file-spec
+
+ Renames the old-file-spec to be new-file-spec on the remote
+ system.
+
+ Replies:
+
+ +File exists
+
+ -Can't find <old-file-spec>
+
+ NAME command is aborted, don't send TOBE.
+
+ If you receive a '+' you then send:
+
+ TOBE new-file-spec
+
+ The server replies with:
+
+ +<old-file-spec> renamed to <new-file-spec>
+
+ -File wasn't renamed because (reason)
+
+ DONE
+
+ Tells the remote system you are done.
+
+ The remote system replies:
+
+ +(the message may be charge/accounting info)
+
+ and then both systems close the connection.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 9]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ RETR file-spec
+
+ Requests that the remote system send the specified file.
+
+ Receiving a '-' from the server should abort the RETR command
+ and the server will wait for another command.
+
+ The reply from the remote system is:
+
+ <number-of-bytes-that-will-be-sent> (as ascii digits)
+
+ -File doesn't exist
+
+ You then reply to the remote system with:
+
+ SEND (ok, waiting for file)
+
+ The file is then sent as a stream of exactly the number
+ of 8-bit bytes specified. When all bytes are received
+ control passes back to you (the remote system is waiting
+ for the next command). If you don't receive a byte
+ within a reasonable amount of time you should abort the
+ file transfer by closing the connection.
+
+ STOP (You don't have enough space to store file)
+
+ Replies could be:
+
+ +ok, RETR aborted
+
+ You are then ready to send another command to the remote host.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 10]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ STOR { NEW | OLD | APP } file-spec
+
+ Tells the remote system to receive the following file and save
+ it under that name.
+
+ Receiving a '-' should abort the STOR command sequence and the
+ server should wait for the next command.
+
+ NEW specifies it should create a new generation of the file and
+ not delete the existing one.
+
+ Replies could be:
+
+ +File exists, will create new generation of file
+
+ +File does not exist, will create new file
+
+ -File exists, but system doesn't support generations
+
+ OLD specifies it should write over the existing file, if any,
+ or else create a new file with the specified name.
+
+ Replies could be:
+
+ +Will write over old file
+
+ +Will create new file
+
+ (OLD should always return a '+')
+
+ APP specifies that what you send should be appended to the file
+ on the remote site. If the file doesn't exist it will be
+ created.
+
+ Replies could be:
+
+ +Will append to file
+
+ +Will create file
+
+ (APP should always return a '+')
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 11]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ You then send:
+
+ SIZE <number-of-bytes-in-file> (as ASCII digits)
+
+ where number-of-bytes-in-file
+
+ is the exact number of 8-bit bytes you will be
+ sending.
+
+ The remote system replies:
+
+ +ok, waiting for file
+
+ You then send the file as exactly the number of bytes
+ specified above.
+
+ When you are done the remote system should reply:
+
+ +Saved <file-spec>
+
+ -Couldn't save because (reason)
+
+ -Not enough room, don't send it
+
+ This aborts the STOR sequence, the server is waiting for
+ your next command.
+
+ You are then ready to send another command to the remote host.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 12]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+AN EXAMPLE
+
+ An example file transfer. 'S' is the sender, the user process. 'R'
+ is the reply from the remote server. Remember all server replies are
+ terminated with <NULL>. If the reply is more than one line each line
+ ends with a <CRLF>.
+
+ R: (listening for connection)
+ S: (opens connection to R)
+ R: +MIT-XX SFTP Service
+ S: USER MKL
+ R: +MKL ok, send password
+ S: PASS foo
+ R: ! MKL logged in
+ S: LIST F PS: <MKL>
+ R: +PS: <MKL>
+ Small.File
+ Large.File
+ S: LIST V
+ R: +PS: <MKL>
+ Small.File 1 69(7) P775240 2-Aug-84 20:08 MKL
+ Large.File 100 255999(8) P770000 9-Dec-84 06:04 MKL
+ S: RETR SMALL.FILE
+ R: 69
+ S: SEND
+ R: This is a small file, the file is sent without
+ a terminating null.
+ S: DONE
+ R: +MIT-XX closing connection
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 13]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+EDITORS NOTE
+
+ Mark Lotter receives full credit for all the good ideas in this memo.
+ As RFC editor, i have made an number of format changes, a few wording
+ changes, and one or two technical changes (mostly in the TYPEs). I
+ accept full responsibility for any flaws i may have introduced.
+
+ A draft form of this memo was circulated for comments. I will
+ attempt to list the issues raised and summarize the pros and cons,
+ and resolution for each.
+
+ ASCII Commands vs Binary Operation Codes
+
+ The ASCII command style is easier to debug, the extra
+ programming cost in minimal, the extra transmission cost is
+ trivial.
+
+ Binary operation codes are more efficient, and a few days of
+ debugging should not out weigh years of use.
+
+ Resolution: I have kept the ASCII Commands.
+
+ Additional Modes
+
+ Pro: For some machines you can't send all the bits in a word
+ using this protocol. There should be some additional mode to
+ allow it.
+
+ Con: Forget it, this is supposed to be SIMPLE file transfer.
+ If you need those complex modes use real FTP.
+
+ Resolution: I have added the Continuous mode.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 14]
+
+
+
+RFC 913 September 1984
+Simple File Transfer Protocol
+
+
+ CRLF Conversion
+
+ Pro: In ASCII type, convert the local end of line indicator to
+ CRLF on the way out of the host and onto the network.
+
+ Con: If you require that you have to look at the bytes as you
+ send them, otherwise you can just send them. Most of the time
+ both sides will have the same end of line convention anyway.
+ If someone needs a conversion it can be done with a TECO macro
+ separately.
+
+ Resolution: I have required CRLF conversion in ASCII type. If
+ you have the same kind of machines and the same end of line
+ convention you can avoid the extra cost of conversion by using
+ the binary or continuous type.
+
+ TCP Urgent
+
+ Pro: Use TCP Urgent to abort a transfer, instead of aborting
+ the connection. Then one could retry the file, or try a
+ different file without having to login again.
+
+ Con: That would couple SFTP to TCP too much. SFTP is supposed
+ to be able to be work over any reliable 8-bit data stream.
+
+ Resolution: I have not made use of TCP Urgent.
+
+ Random Access
+
+ Pro: Wouldn't it be nice if (WIBNIF) SFTP had a way of
+ accessing parts of a file?
+
+ Con: Forget it, this is supposed to be SIMPLE file transfer.
+ If you need random access use real FTP (oops, real FTP doesn't
+ have random access either -- invent another protocol?).
+
+ Resolution: I have not made any provision for Random Access.
+
+ -- jon postel.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Lottor [Page 15]
+