diff options
author | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> | 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100 |
commit | 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch) | |
tree | e3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt | |
parent | ea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff) |
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c9bd423 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) T. Li +Request for Comments: 9650 Juniper Networks +Updates: 5029 August 2024 +Category: Standards Track +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute + Bit Values + +Abstract + + RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", defines an + IANA registry called "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". + This document changes the registration procedure for that registry + from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review". This document updates + RFC 5029. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9650. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the + Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described + in the Revised BSD License. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction + 2. IANA Considerations + 3. Security Considerations + 4. References + 4.1. Normative References + 4.2. Informative References + Acknowledgements + Author's Address + +1. Introduction + + [RFC5029] defines the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values" + registry and specifies a registration procedure of "Standards + Action". In practice, this registration procedure is unnecessarily + restrictive, as it prevents allocation of bits to experimental + protocols, which in turn increases the risk of conflicts introduced + by use of unregistered code points (so-called "code point + squatting"). + + Accordingly, this document changes the registration procedure for the + registry, as described in Section 2. + +2. IANA Considerations + + IANA has changed the registration procedure for the "IS-IS Neighbor + Link-Attribute Bit Values" registry to "Expert Review" [RFC8126] and + has listed this document as a reference for the registry. General + guidance for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370], and more + specific guidance can be found in [RFC5029]. + +3. Security Considerations + + This document does not affect the security issues discussed in + [RFC5029]. + +4. References + +4.1. Normative References + + [RFC5029] Vasseur, JP. and S. Previdi, "Definition of an IS-IS Link + Attribute Sub-TLV", RFC 5029, DOI 10.17487/RFC5029, + September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5029>. + +4.2. Informative References + + [RFC7370] Ginsberg, L., "Updates to the IS-IS TLV Codepoints + Registry", RFC 7370, DOI 10.17487/RFC7370, September 2014, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7370>. + + [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for + Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, + RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, + <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. + +Acknowledgements + + The author would like to thank John Scudder for his contributions. + +Author's Address + + Tony Li + Juniper Networks + Email: tony.li@tony.li |