summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
committerThomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com> 2024-11-27 20:54:24 +0100
commit4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 (patch)
treee3989f47a7994642eb325063d46e8f08ffa681dc /doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt
parentea76e11061bda059ae9f9ad130a9895cc85607db (diff)
doc: Add RFC documents
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt116
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9bd423
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc9650.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) T. Li
+Request for Comments: 9650 Juniper Networks
+Updates: 5029 August 2024
+Category: Standards Track
+ISSN: 2070-1721
+
+
+ Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute
+ Bit Values
+
+Abstract
+
+ RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", defines an
+ IANA registry called "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values".
+ This document changes the registration procedure for that registry
+ from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review". This document updates
+ RFC 5029.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This is an Internet Standards Track document.
+
+ This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
+ (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
+ received public review and has been approved for publication by the
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
+ Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9650.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
+ include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
+ Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
+ in the Revised BSD License.
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction
+ 2. IANA Considerations
+ 3. Security Considerations
+ 4. References
+ 4.1. Normative References
+ 4.2. Informative References
+ Acknowledgements
+ Author's Address
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ [RFC5029] defines the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values"
+ registry and specifies a registration procedure of "Standards
+ Action". In practice, this registration procedure is unnecessarily
+ restrictive, as it prevents allocation of bits to experimental
+ protocols, which in turn increases the risk of conflicts introduced
+ by use of unregistered code points (so-called "code point
+ squatting").
+
+ Accordingly, this document changes the registration procedure for the
+ registry, as described in Section 2.
+
+2. IANA Considerations
+
+ IANA has changed the registration procedure for the "IS-IS Neighbor
+ Link-Attribute Bit Values" registry to "Expert Review" [RFC8126] and
+ has listed this document as a reference for the registry. General
+ guidance for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370], and more
+ specific guidance can be found in [RFC5029].
+
+3. Security Considerations
+
+ This document does not affect the security issues discussed in
+ [RFC5029].
+
+4. References
+
+4.1. Normative References
+
+ [RFC5029] Vasseur, JP. and S. Previdi, "Definition of an IS-IS Link
+ Attribute Sub-TLV", RFC 5029, DOI 10.17487/RFC5029,
+ September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5029>.
+
+4.2. Informative References
+
+ [RFC7370] Ginsberg, L., "Updates to the IS-IS TLV Codepoints
+ Registry", RFC 7370, DOI 10.17487/RFC7370, September 2014,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7370>.
+
+ [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
+ Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
+ RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
+
+Acknowledgements
+
+ The author would like to thank John Scudder for his contributions.
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Tony Li
+ Juniper Networks
+ Email: tony.li@tony.li