diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc1094.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc1094.txt | 1515 |
1 files changed, 1515 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc1094.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc1094.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cc56c4e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc1094.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1515 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group Sun Microsystems, Inc. +Request for Comments: 1094 March 1989 + + + NFS: Network File System Protocol Specification + +STATUS OF THIS MEMO + + This RFC describes a protocol that Sun Microsystems, Inc., and others + are using. A new version of the protocol is under development, but + others may benefit from the descriptions of the current protocol, and + discussion of some of the design issues. Distribution of this memo + is unlimited. + +1. INTRODUCTION + + The Sun Network Filesystem (NFS) protocol provides transparent remote + access to shared files across networks. The NFS protocol is designed + to be portable across different machines, operating systems, network + architectures, and transport protocols. This portability is achieved + through the use of Remote Procedure Call (RPC) primitives built on + top of an eXternal Data Representation (XDR). Implementations + already exist for a variety of machines, from personal computers to + supercomputers. + + The supporting mount protocol allows the server to hand out remote + access privileges to a restricted set of clients. It performs the + operating system-specific functions that allow, for example, to + attach remote directory trees to some local file system. + +1.1. Remote Procedure Call + + Sun's Remote Procedure Call specification provides a procedure- + oriented interface to remote services. Each server supplies a + "program" that is a set of procedures. NFS is one such program. The + combination of host address, program number, and procedure number + specifies one remote procedure. A goal of NFS was to not require any + specific level of reliability from its lower levels, so it could + potentially be used on many underlying transport protocols, or even + another remote procedure call implementation. For ease of + discussion, the rest of this document will assume NFS is implemented + on top of Sun RPC, described in RFC 1057, "RPC: Remote Procedure + Call Protocol Specification". + +1.2. External Data Representation + + The eXternal Data Representation (XDR) standard provides a common way + of representing a set of data types over a network. The NFS Protocol + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 1] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + Specification is written using the RPC data description language. + For more information, see RFC 1014, "XDR: External Data + Representation Standard". Although automated RPC/XDR compilers exist + to generate server and client "stubs", NFS does not require their + use. Any software that provides equivalent functionality can be + used, and if the encoding is exactly the same it can interoperate + with other implementations of NFS. + +1.3. Stateless Servers + + The NFS protocol was intended to be as stateless as possible. That + is, a server should not need to maintain any protocol state + information about any of its clients in order to function correctly. + Stateless servers have a distinct advantage over stateful servers in + the event of a failure. With stateless servers, a client need only + retry a request until the server responds; it does not even need to + know that the server has crashed, or the network temporarily went + down. The client of a stateful server, on the other hand, needs to + either detect a server failure and rebuild the server's state when it + comes back up, or cause client operations to fail. + + This may not sound like an important issue, but it affects the + protocol in some unexpected ways. We feel that it may be worth a bit + of extra complexity in the protocol to be able to write very simple + servers that do not require fancy crash recovery. Note that even if + a so-called "reliable" transport protocol such as TCP is used, the + client must still be able to handle interruptions of service by re- + opening connections when they time out. Thus, a stateless protocol + may actually simplify the implementation. + + On the other hand, NFS deals with objects such as files and + directories that inherently have state -- what good would a file be + if it did not keep its contents intact? The goal was to not + introduce any extra state in the protocol itself. Inherently + stateful operations such as file or record locking, and remote + execution, were implemented as separate services, not described in + this document. + + The basic way to simplify recovery was to make operations as + "idempotent" as possible (so that they can potentially be repeated). + Some operations in this version of the protocol did not attain this + goal; luckily most of the operations (such as Read and Write) are + idempotent. Also, most server failures occur between operations, not + between the receipt of an operation and the response. Finally, + although actual server failures may be rare, in complex networks, + failures of any network, router, or bridge may be indistinguishable + from a server failure. + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 2] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2. NFS PROTOCOL DEFINITION + + Servers change over time, and so can the protocol that they use. RPC + provides a version number with each RPC request. This RFC describes + version two of the NFS protocol. Even in the second version, there + are a few obsolete procedures and parameters, which will be removed + in later versions. An RFC for version three of the NFS protocol is + currently under preparation. + +2.1. File System Model + + NFS assumes a file system that is hierarchical, with directories as + all but the bottom level of files. Each entry in a directory (file, + directory, device, etc.) has a string name. Different operating + systems may have restrictions on the depth of the tree or the names + used, as well as using different syntax to represent the "pathname", + which is the concatenation of all the "components" (directory and + file names) in the name. A "file system" is a tree on a single + server (usually a single disk or physical partition) with a specified + "root". Some operating systems provide a "mount" operation to make + all file systems appear as a single tree, while others maintain a + "forest" of file systems. Files are unstructured streams of + uninterpreted bytes. Version 3 of NFS uses slightly more general + file system model. + + NFS looks up one component of a pathname at a time. It may not be + obvious why it does not just take the whole pathname, traipse down + the directories, and return a file handle when it is done. There are + several good reasons not to do this. First, pathnames need + separators between the directory components, and different operating + systems use different separators. We could define a Network Standard + Pathname Representation, but then every pathname would have to be + parsed and converted at each end. Other issues are discussed in + section 3, NFS Implementation Issues. + + Although files and directories are similar objects in many ways, + different procedures are used to read directories and files. This + provides a network standard format for representing directories. The + same argument as above could have been used to justify a procedure + that returns only one directory entry per call. The problem is + efficiency. Directories can contain many entries, and a remote call + to return each would be just too slow. + +2.2. Server Procedures + + The protocol definition is given as a set of procedures with + arguments and results defined using the RPC language (XDR language + extended with program, version, and procedure declarations). A brief + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 3] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + description of the function of each procedure should provide enough + information to allow implementation. Section 2.3 describes the basic + data types in more detail. + + All of the procedures in the NFS protocol are assumed to be + synchronous. When a procedure returns to the client, the client can + assume that the operation has completed and any data associated with + the request is now on stable storage. For example, a client WRITE + request may cause the server to update data blocks, filesystem + information blocks (such as indirect blocks), and file attribute + information (size and modify times). When the WRITE returns to the + client, it can assume that the write is safe, even in case of a + server crash, and it can discard the data written. This is a very + important part of the statelessness of the server. If the server + waited to flush data from remote requests, the client would have to + save those requests so that it could resend them in case of a server + crash. + + /* + * Remote file service routines + */ + program NFS_PROGRAM { + version NFS_VERSION { + void + NFSPROC_NULL(void) = 0; + + attrstat + NFSPROC_GETATTR(fhandle) = 1; + + attrstat + NFSPROC_SETATTR(sattrargs) = 2; + + void + NFSPROC_ROOT(void) = 3; + + diropres + NFSPROC_LOOKUP(diropargs) = 4; + + readlinkres + NFSPROC_READLINK(fhandle) = 5; + + readres + NFSPROC_READ(readargs) = 6; + + void + NFSPROC_WRITECACHE(void) = 7; + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 4] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + attrstat + NFSPROC_WRITE(writeargs) = 8; + + diropres + NFSPROC_CREATE(createargs) = 9; + + stat + NFSPROC_REMOVE(diropargs) = 10; + + stat + NFSPROC_RENAME(renameargs) = 11; + + stat + NFSPROC_LINK(linkargs) = 12; + + stat + NFSPROC_SYMLINK(symlinkargs) = 13; + + diropres + NFSPROC_MKDIR(createargs) = 14; + + stat + NFSPROC_RMDIR(diropargs) = 15; + + readdirres + NFSPROC_READDIR(readdirargs) = 16; + + statfsres + NFSPROC_STATFS(fhandle) = 17; + } = 2; + } = 100003; + +2.2.1. Do Nothing + + void + NFSPROC_NULL(void) = 0; + + This procedure does no work. It is made available in all RPC + services to allow server response testing and timing. + +2.2.2. Get File Attributes + + attrstat + NFSPROC_GETATTR (fhandle) = 1; + + If the reply status is NFS_OK, then the reply attributes contains the + attributes for the file given by the input fhandle. + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 5] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2.2.3. Set File Attributes + + struct sattrargs { + fhandle file; + sattr attributes; + }; + + attrstat + NFSPROC_SETATTR (sattrargs) = 2; + + The "attributes" argument contains fields which are either -1 or are + the new value for the attributes of "file". If the reply status is + NFS_OK, then the reply attributes have the attributes of the file + after the "SETATTR" operation has completed. + + Notes: The use of -1 to indicate an unused field in "attributes" is + changed in the next version of the protocol. + +2.2.4. Get Filesystem Root + + void + NFSPROC_ROOT(void) = 3; + + Obsolete. This procedure is no longer used because finding the root + file handle of a filesystem requires moving pathnames between client + and server. To do this right, we would have to define a network + standard representation of pathnames. Instead, the function of + looking up the root file handle is done by the MNTPROC_MNT procedure. + (See Appendix A, "Mount Protocol Definition", for details). + +2.2.5. Look Up File Name + + diropres + NFSPROC_LOOKUP(diropargs) = 4; + + If the reply "status" is NFS_OK, then the reply "file" and reply + "attributes" are the file handle and attributes for the file "name" + in the directory given by "dir" in the argument. + +2.2.6. Read From Symbolic Link + + union readlinkres switch (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + path data; + default: + void; + }; + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 6] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + readlinkres + NFSPROC_READLINK(fhandle) = 5; + + If "status" has the value NFS_OK, then the reply "data" is the data + in the symbolic link given by the file referred to by the fhandle + argument. + + Notes: Since NFS always parses pathnames on the client, the pathname + in a symbolic link may mean something different (or be meaningless) + on a different client or on the server if a different pathname syntax + is used. + +2.2.7. Read From File + + struct readargs { + fhandle file; + unsigned offset; + unsigned count; + unsigned totalcount; + }; + + union readres switch (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + fattr attributes; + nfsdata data; + default: + void; + }; + + readres + NFSPROC_READ(readargs) = 6; + + Returns up to "count" bytes of "data" from the file given by "file", + starting at "offset" bytes from the beginning of the file. The first + byte of the file is at offset zero. The file attributes after the + read takes place are returned in "attributes". + + Notes: The argument "totalcount" is unused, and is removed in the + next protocol revision. + +2.2.8. Write to Cache + + void + NFSPROC_WRITECACHE(void) = 7; + + To be used in the next protocol revision. + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 7] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2.2.9. Write to File + + struct writeargs { + fhandle file; + unsigned beginoffset; + unsigned offset; + unsigned totalcount; + nfsdata data; + }; + + attrstat + NFSPROC_WRITE(writeargs) = 8; + + Writes "data" beginning "offset" bytes from the beginning of "file". + The first byte of the file is at offset zero. If the reply "status" + is NFS_OK, then the reply "attributes" contains the attributes of the + file after the write has completed. The write operation is atomic. + Data from this "WRITE" will not be mixed with data from another + client's "WRITE". + + Notes: The arguments "beginoffset" and "totalcount" are ignored and + are removed in the next protocol revision. + +2.2.10. Create File + + struct createargs { + diropargs where; + sattr attributes; + }; + + diropres + NFSPROC_CREATE(createargs) = 9; + + The file "name" is created in the directory given by "dir". The + initial attributes of the new file are given by "attributes". A + reply "status" of NFS_OK indicates that the file was created, and + reply "file" and reply "attributes" are its file handle and + attributes. Any other reply "status" means that the operation failed + and no file was created. + + Notes: This routine should pass an exclusive create flag, meaning + "create the file only if it is not already there". + +2.2.11. Remove File + + stat + NFSPROC_REMOVE(diropargs) = 10; + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 8] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + The file "name" is removed from the directory given by "dir". A + reply of NFS_OK means the directory entry was removed. + + Notes: possibly non-idempotent operation. + +2.2.12. Rename File + + struct renameargs { + diropargs from; + diropargs to; + }; + + stat + NFSPROC_RENAME(renameargs) = 11; + + The existing file "from.name" in the directory given by "from.dir" is + renamed to "to.name" in the directory given by "to.dir". If the + reply is NFS_OK, the file was renamed. The RENAME operation is + atomic on the server; it cannot be interrupted in the middle. + + Notes: possibly non-idempotent operation. + +2.2.13. Create Link to File + + Procedure 12, Version 2. + + struct linkargs { + fhandle from; + diropargs to; + }; + + stat + NFSPROC_LINK(linkargs) = 12; + + Creates the file "to.name" in the directory given by "to.dir", which + is a hard link to the existing file given by "from". If the return + value is NFS_OK, a link was created. Any other return value + indicates an error, and the link was not created. + + A hard link should have the property that changes to either of the + linked files are reflected in both files. When a hard link is made + to a file, the attributes for the file should have a value for + "nlink" that is one greater than the value before the link. + + Notes: possibly non-idempotent operation. + + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 9] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2.2.14. Create Symbolic Link + + struct symlinkargs { + diropargs from; + path to; + sattr attributes; + }; + + stat + NFSPROC_SYMLINK(symlinkargs) = 13; + + Creates the file "from.name" with ftype NFLNK in the directory given + by "from.dir". The new file contains the pathname "to" and has + initial attributes given by "attributes". If the return value is + NFS_OK, a link was created. Any other return value indicates an + error, and the link was not created. + + A symbolic link is a pointer to another file. The name given in "to" + is not interpreted by the server, only stored in the newly created + file. When the client references a file that is a symbolic link, the + contents of the symbolic link are normally transparently + reinterpreted as a pathname to substitute. A READLINK operation + returns the data to the client for interpretation. + + Notes: On UNIX servers the attributes are never used, since symbolic + links always have mode 0777. + +2.2.15. Create Directory + + diropres + NFSPROC_MKDIR (createargs) = 14; + + The new directory "where.name" is created in the directory given by + "where.dir". The initial attributes of the new directory are given + by "attributes". A reply "status" of NFS_OK indicates that the new + directory was created, and reply "file" and reply "attributes" are + its file handle and attributes. Any other reply "status" means that + the operation failed and no directory was created. + + Notes: possibly non-idempotent operation. + +2.2.16. Remove Directory + + stat + NFSPROC_RMDIR(diropargs) = 15; + + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 10] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + The existing empty directory "name" in the directory given by "dir" + is removed. If the reply is NFS_OK, the directory was removed. + + Notes: possibly non-idempotent operation. + +2.2.17. Read From Directory + + struct readdirargs { + fhandle dir; + nfscookie cookie; + unsigned count; + }; + + struct entry { + unsigned fileid; + filename name; + nfscookie cookie; + entry *nextentry; + }; + + union readdirres switch (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + struct { + entry *entries; + bool eof; + } readdirok; + default: + void; + }; + + readdirres + NFSPROC_READDIR (readdirargs) = 16; + + Returns a variable number of directory entries, with a total size of + up to "count" bytes, from the directory given by "dir". If the + returned value of "status" is NFS_OK, then it is followed by a + variable number of "entry"s. Each "entry" contains a "fileid" which + consists of a unique number to identify the file within a filesystem, + the "name" of the file, and a "cookie" which is an opaque pointer to + the next entry in the directory. The cookie is used in the next + READDIR call to get more entries starting at a given point in the + directory. The special cookie zero (all bits zero) can be used to + get the entries starting at the beginning of the directory. The + "fileid" field should be the same number as the "fileid" in the the + attributes of the file. (See section "2.3.5. fattr" under "Basic + Data Types".) The "eof" flag has a value of TRUE if there are no + more entries in the directory. + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 11] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2.2.18. Get Filesystem Attributes + + union statfsres (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + struct { + unsigned tsize; + unsigned bsize; + unsigned blocks; + unsigned bfree; + unsigned bavail; + } info; + default: + void; + }; + + statfsres + NFSPROC_STATFS(fhandle) = 17; + + If the reply "status" is NFS_OK, then the reply "info" gives the + attributes for the filesystem that contains file referred to by the + input fhandle. The attribute fields contain the following values: + + tsize The optimum transfer size of the server in bytes. This is + the number of bytes the server would like to have in the + data part of READ and WRITE requests. + + bsize The block size in bytes of the filesystem. + + blocks The total number of "bsize" blocks on the filesystem. + + bfree The number of free "bsize" blocks on the filesystem. + + bavail The number of "bsize" blocks available to non-privileged + users. + + Notes: This call does not work well if a filesystem has variable + size blocks. + +2.3. Basic Data Types + + The following XDR definitions are basic structures and types used in + other structures described further on. + +2.3.1. stat + + enum stat { + NFS_OK = 0, + NFSERR_PERM=1, + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 12] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + NFSERR_NOENT=2, + NFSERR_IO=5, + NFSERR_NXIO=6, + NFSERR_ACCES=13, + NFSERR_EXIST=17, + NFSERR_NODEV=19, + NFSERR_NOTDIR=20, + NFSERR_ISDIR=21, + NFSERR_FBIG=27, + NFSERR_NOSPC=28, + NFSERR_ROFS=30, + NFSERR_NAMETOOLONG=63, + NFSERR_NOTEMPTY=66, + NFSERR_DQUOT=69, + NFSERR_STALE=70, + NFSERR_WFLUSH=99 + }; + + The "stat" type is returned with every procedure's results. A value + of NFS_OK indicates that the call completed successfully and the + results are valid. The other values indicate some kind of error + occurred on the server side during the servicing of the procedure. + The error values are derived from UNIX error numbers. + + NFSERR_PERM + Not owner. The caller does not have correct ownership to perform + the requested operation. + + NFSERR_NOENT + No such file or directory. The file or directory specified does + not exist. + + NFSERR_IO + Some sort of hard error occurred when the operation was in + progress. This could be a disk error, for example. + + NFSERR_NXIO + No such device or address. + + NFSERR_ACCES + Permission denied. The caller does not have the correct + permission to perform the requested operation. + + NFSERR_EXIST + File exists. The file specified already exists. + + NFSERR_NODEV + No such device. + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 13] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + NFSERR_NOTDIR + Not a directory. The caller specified a non-directory in a + directory operation. + + NFSERR_ISDIR + Is a directory. The caller specified a directory in a non- + directory operation. + + NFSERR_FBIG + File too large. The operation caused a file to grow beyond the + server's limit. + + NFSERR_NOSPC + No space left on device. The operation caused the server's + filesystem to reach its limit. + + NFSERR_ROFS + Read-only filesystem. Write attempted on a read-only filesystem. + + NFSERR_NAMETOOLONG + File name too long. The file name in an operation was too long. + + NFSERR_NOTEMPTY + Directory not empty. Attempted to remove a directory that was not + empty. + + NFSERR_DQUOT + Disk quota exceeded. The client's disk quota on the server has + been exceeded. + + NFSERR_STALE + The "fhandle" given in the arguments was invalid. That is, the + file referred to by that file handle no longer exists, or access + to it has been revoked. + + NFSERR_WFLUSH + The server's write cache used in the "WRITECACHE" call got flushed + to disk. + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 14] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +2.3.2. ftype + + enum ftype { + NFNON = 0, + NFREG = 1, + NFDIR = 2, + NFBLK = 3, + NFCHR = 4, + NFLNK = 5 + }; + + The enumeration "ftype" gives the type of a file. The type NFNON + indicates a non-file, NFREG is a regular file, NFDIR is a + directory, NFBLK is a block-special device, NFCHR is a character- + special device, and NFLNK is a symbolic link. + +2.3.3. fhandle + + typedef opaque fhandle[FHSIZE]; + + The "fhandle" is the file handle passed between the server and the + client. All file operations are done using file handles to refer + to a file or directory. The file handle can contain whatever + information the server needs to distinguish an individual file. + +2.3.4. timeval + + struct timeval { + unsigned int seconds; + unsigned int useconds; + }; + + The "timeval" structure is the number of seconds and microseconds + since midnight January 1, 1970, Greenwich Mean Time. It is used + to pass time and date information. + +2.3.5. fattr + + struct fattr { + ftype type; + unsigned int mode; + unsigned int nlink; + unsigned int uid; + unsigned int gid; + unsigned int size; + unsigned int blocksize; + unsigned int rdev; + unsigned int blocks; + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 15] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + unsigned int fsid; + unsigned int fileid; + timeval atime; + timeval mtime; + timeval ctime; + }; + + The "fattr" structure contains the attributes of a file; "type" is + the type of the file; "nlink" is the number of hard links to the + file (the number of different names for the same file); "uid" is + the user identification number of the owner of the file; "gid" is + the group identification number of the group of the file; "size" + is the size in bytes of the file; "blocksize" is the size in bytes + of a block of the file; "rdev" is the device number of the file if + it is type NFCHR or NFBLK; "blocks" is the number of blocks the + file takes up on disk; "fsid" is the file system identifier for + the filesystem containing the file; "fileid" is a number that + uniquely identifies the file within its filesystem; "atime" is the + time when the file was last accessed for either read or write; + "mtime" is the time when the file data was last modified + (written); and "ctime" is the time when the status of the file was + last changed. Writing to the file also changes "ctime" if the + size of the file changes. + + "Mode" is the access mode encoded as a set of bits. Notice that + the file type is specified both in the mode bits and in the file + type. This is really a bug in the protocol and will be fixed in + future versions. The descriptions given below specify the bit + positions using octal numbers. + + 0040000 This is a directory; "type" field should be NFDIR. + 0020000 This is a character special file; "type" field should + be NFCHR. + 0060000 This is a block special file; "type" field should be + NFBLK. + 0100000 This is a regular file; "type" field should be NFREG. + 0120000 This is a symbolic link file; "type" field should be + NFLNK. + 0140000 This is a named socket; "type" field should be NFNON. + 0004000 Set user id on execution. + 0002000 Set group id on execution. + 0001000 Save swapped text even after use. + 0000400 Read permission for owner. + 0000200 Write permission for owner. + 0000100 Execute and search permission for owner. + 0000040 Read permission for group. + 0000020 Write permission for group. + 0000010 Execute and search permission for group. + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 16] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + 0000004 Read permission for others. + 0000002 Write permission for others. + 0000001 Execute and search permission for others. + + Notes: The bits are the same as the mode bits returned by the + stat(2) system call in UNIX. The file type is specified both in + the mode bits and in the file type. This is fixed in future + versions. + + The "rdev" field in the attributes structure is an operating + system specific device specifier. It will be removed and + generalized in the next revision of the protocol. + +2.3.6. sattr + + struct sattr { + unsigned int mode; + unsigned int uid; + unsigned int gid; + unsigned int size; + timeval atime; + timeval mtime; + }; + + The "sattr" structure contains the file attributes which can be + set from the client. The fields are the same as for "fattr" + above. A "size" of zero means the file should be truncated. A + value of -1 indicates a field that should be ignored. + +2.3.7. filename + + typedef string filename<MAXNAMLEN>; + + The type "filename" is used for passing file names or pathname + components. + +2.3.8. path + + typedef string path<MAXPATHLEN>; + + The type "path" is a pathname. The server considers it as a + string with no internal structure, but to the client it is the + name of a node in a filesystem tree. + +2.3.9. attrstat + + union attrstat switch (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 17] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + fattr attributes; + default: + void; + }; + + The "attrstat" structure is a common procedure result. It + contains a "status" and, if the call succeeded, it also contains + the attributes of the file on which the operation was done. + +2.3.10. diropargs + + struct diropargs { + fhandle dir; + filename name; + }; + + The "diropargs" structure is used in directory operations. The + "fhandle" "dir" is the directory in which to find the file "name". + A directory operation is one in which the directory is affected. + +2.3.11. diropres + + union diropres switch (stat status) { + case NFS_OK: + struct { + fhandle file; + fattr attributes; + } diropok; + default: + void; + }; + + The results of a directory operation are returned in a "diropres" + structure. If the call succeeded, a new file handle "file" and + the "attributes" associated with that file are returned along with + the "status". + +3. NFS IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES + + The NFS protocol was designed to allow different operating systems to + share files. However, since it was designed in a UNIX environment, + many operations have semantics similar to the operations of the UNIX + file system. This section discusses some of the implementation- + specific details and semantic issues. + +3.1. Server/Client Relationship + + The NFS protocol is designed to allow servers to be as simple and + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 18] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + general as possible. Sometimes the simplicity of the server can be a + problem, if the client wants to implement complicated filesystem + semantics. + + For example, some operating systems allow removal of open files. A + process can open a file and, while it is open, remove it from the + directory. The file can be read and written as long as the process + keeps it open, even though the file has no name in the filesystem. + It is impossible for a stateless server to implement these semantics. + The client can do some tricks such as renaming the file on remove, + and only removing it on close. We believe that the server provides + enough functionality to implement most file system semantics on the + client. + + Every NFS client can also potentially be a server, and remote and + local mounted filesystems can be freely intermixed. This leads to + some interesting problems when a client travels down the directory + tree of a remote filesystem and reaches the mount point on the server + for another remote filesystem. Allowing the server to follow the + second remote mount would require loop detection, server lookup, and + user revalidation. Instead, we decided not to let clients cross a + server's mount point. When a client does a LOOKUP on a directory on + which the server has mounted a filesystem, the client sees the + underlying directory instead of the mounted directory. + + For example, if a server has a file system called "/usr" and mounts + another file system on "/usr/src", if a client mounts "/usr", it + does NOT see the mounted version of "/usr/src". A client could do + remote mounts that match the server's mount points to maintain the + server's view. In this example, the client would also have to mount + "/usr/src" in addition to "/usr", even if they are from the same + server. + +3.2. Pathname Interpretation + + There are a few complications to the rule that pathnames are always + parsed on the client. For example, symbolic links could have + different interpretations on different clients. Another common + problem for non-UNIX implementations is the special interpretation of + the pathname ".." to mean the parent of a given directory. The next + revision of the protocol uses an explicit flag to indicate the parent + instead. + +3.3. Permission Issues + + The NFS protocol, strictly speaking, does not define the permission + checking used by servers. However, it is expected that a server will + do normal operating system permission checking using AUTH_UNIX style + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 19] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + authentication as the basis of its protection mechanism. The server + gets the client's effective "uid", effective "gid", and groups on + each call and uses them to check permission. There are various + problems with this method that can been resolved in interesting ways. + + Using "uid" and "gid" implies that the client and server share the + same "uid" list. Every server and client pair must have the same + mapping from user to "uid" and from group to "gid". Since every + client can also be a server, this tends to imply that the whole + network shares the same "uid/gid" space. AUTH_DES (and the next + revision of the NFS protocol) uses string names instead of numbers, + but there are still complex problems to be solved. + + Another problem arises due to the usually stateful open operation. + Most operating systems check permission at open time, and then check + that the file is open on each read and write request. With stateless + servers, the server has no idea that the file is open and must do + permission checking on each read and write call. On a local + filesystem, a user can open a file and then change the permissions so + that no one is allowed to touch it, but will still be able to write + to the file because it is open. On a remote filesystem, by contrast, + the write would fail. To get around this problem, the server's + permission checking algorithm should allow the owner of a file to + access it regardless of the permission setting. + + A similar problem has to do with paging in from a file over the + network. The operating system usually checks for execute permission + before opening a file for demand paging, and then reads blocks from + the open file. The file may not have read permission, but after it + is opened it does not matter. An NFS server can not tell the + difference between a normal file read and a demand page-in read. To + make this work, the server allows reading of files if the "uid" given + in the call has either execute or read permission on the file. + + In most operating systems, a particular user (on UNIX, the user ID + zero) has access to all files no matter what permission and ownership + they have. This "super-user" permission may not be allowed on the + server, since anyone who can become super-user on their workstation + could gain access to all remote files. The UNIX server by default + maps user id 0 to -2 before doing its access checking. This works + except for NFS root filesystems, where super-user access cannot be + avoided. + +3.4. RPC Information + + Authentication + The NFS service uses AUTH_UNIX, AUTH_DES, or AUTH_SHORT style + authentication, except in the NULL procedure where AUTH_NONE is + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 20] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + also allowed. + + Transport Protocols + NFS is supported normally on UDP. + + Port Number + The NFS protocol currently uses the UDP port number 2049. This is + not an officially assigned port, so later versions of the protocol + use the "Portmapping" facility of RPC. + +3.5. Sizes of XDR Structures + + These are the sizes, given in decimal bytes, of various XDR + structures used in the protocol: + + /* + * The maximum number of bytes of data in a READ or WRITE + * request. + */ + const MAXDATA = 8192; + + /* The maximum number of bytes in a pathname argument. */ + const MAXPATHLEN = 1024; + + /* The maximum number of bytes in a file name argument. */ + const MAXNAMLEN = 255; + + /* The size in bytes of the opaque "cookie" passed by READDIR. */ + const COOKIESIZE = 4; + + /* The size in bytes of the opaque file handle. */ + const FHSIZE = 32; + +3.6. Setting RPC Parameters + + Various file system parameters and options should be set at mount + time. The mount protocol is described in the appendix below. For + example, "Soft" mounts as well as "Hard" mounts are usually both + provided. Soft mounted file systems return errors when RPC + operations fail (after a given number of optional retransmissions), + while hard mounted file systems continue to retransmit forever. The + maximum transfer sizes are implementation dependent. For efficient + operation over a local network, 8192 bytes of data are normally used. + This may result in lower-level fragmentation (such as at the IP + level). Since some network interfaces may not allow such packets, + for operation over slower-speed networks or hosts, or through + gateways, transfer sizes of 512 or 1024 bytes often provide better + results. + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 21] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + Clients and servers may need to keep caches of recent operations to + help avoid problems with non-idempotent operations. For example, if + the transport protocol drops the response for a Remove File + operation, upon retransmission the server may return an error code of + NFSERR_NOENT instead of NFS_OK. But if the server keeps around the + last operation requested and its result, it could return the proper + success code. Of course, the server could be crashed and rebooted + between retransmissions, but a small cache (even a single entry) + would solve most problems. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 22] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + Appendix A. MOUNT PROTOCOL DEFINITION + +A.1. Introduction + + The mount protocol is separate from, but related to, the NFS + protocol. It provides operating system specific services to get the + NFS off the ground -- looking up server path names, validating user + identity, and checking access permissions. Clients use the mount + protocol to get the first file handle, which allows them entry into a + remote filesystem. + + The mount protocol is kept separate from the NFS protocol to make it + easy to plug in new access checking and validation methods without + changing the NFS server protocol. + + Notice that the protocol definition implies stateful servers because + the server maintains a list of client's mount requests. The mount + list information is not critical for the correct functioning of + either the client or the server. It is intended for advisory use + only, for example, to warn possible clients when a server is going + down. + + Version one of the mount protocol is used with version two of the NFS + protocol. The only information communicated between these two + protocols is the "fhandle" structure. + +A.2. RPC Information + + Authentication + The mount service uses AUTH_UNIX and AUTH_NONE style + authentication only. + + Transport Protocols + The mount service is supported on both UDP and TCP. + + Port Number + Consult the server's portmapper, described in RFC 1057, "RPC: + Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification", to find the port + number on which the mount service is registered. + +A.3. Sizes of XDR Structures + + These are the sizes, given in decimal bytes, of various XDR + structures used in the protocol: + + /* The maximum number of bytes in a pathname argument. */ + const MNTPATHLEN = 1024; + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 23] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + /* The maximum number of bytes in a name argument. */ + const MNTNAMLEN = 255; + + /* The size in bytes of the opaque file handle. */ + const FHSIZE = 32; + +A.4. Basic Data Types + + This section presents the data types used by the mount protocol. In + many cases they are similar to the types used in NFS. + +A.4.1. fhandle + + typedef opaque fhandle[FHSIZE]; + + The type "fhandle" is the file handle that the server passes to the + client. All file operations are done using file handles to refer to + a file or directory. The file handle can contain whatever + information the server needs to distinguish an individual file. + + This is the same as the "fhandle" XDR definition in version 2 of the + NFS protocol; see section "2.3.3. fhandle" under "Basic Data Types". + +A.4.2. fhstatus + + union fhstatus switch (unsigned status) { + case 0: + fhandle directory; + default: + void; + } + + The type "fhstatus" is a union. If a "status" of zero is returned, + the call completed successfully, and a file handle for the + "directory" follows. A non-zero status indicates some sort of error. + In this case, the status is a UNIX error number. + +A.4.3. dirpath + + typedef string dirpath<MNTPATHLEN>; + + The type "dirpath" is a server pathname of a directory. + +A.4.4. name + + typedef string name<MNTNAMLEN>; + + The type "name" is an arbitrary string used for various names. + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 24] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + +A.5. Server Procedures + + The following sections define the RPC procedures supplied by a mount + server. + + /* + * Protocol description for the mount program + */ + program MOUNTPROG { + /* + * Version 1 of the mount protocol used with + * version 2 of the NFS protocol. + */ + version MOUNTVERS { + + void + MOUNTPROC_NULL(void) = 0; + + fhstatus + MOUNTPROC_MNT(dirpath) = 1; + + mountlist + MOUNTPROC_DUMP(void) = 2; + + void + MOUNTPROC_UMNT(dirpath) = 3; + + void + MOUNTPROC_UMNTALL(void) = 4; + + exportlist + MOUNTPROC_EXPORT(void) = 5; + } = 1; + } = 100005; + +A.5.1. Do Nothing + + void + MNTPROC_NULL(void) = 0; + + This procedure does no work. It is made available in all RPC + services to allow server response testing and timing. + +A.5.2. Add Mount Entry + + fhstatus + MNTPROC_MNT(dirpath) = 1; + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 25] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + If the reply "status" is 0, then the reply "directory" contains the + file handle for the directory "dirname". This file handle may be + used in the NFS protocol. This procedure also adds a new entry to + the mount list for this client mounting "dirname". + +A.5.3. Return Mount Entries + + struct *mountlist { + name hostname; + dirpath directory; + mountlist nextentry; + }; + + mountlist + MNTPROC_DUMP(void) = 2; + + Returns the list of remote mounted filesystems. The "mountlist" + contains one entry for each "hostname" and "directory" pair. + +A.5.4. Remove Mount Entry + + void + MNTPROC_UMNT(dirpath) = 3; + + Removes the mount list entry for the input "dirpath". + +A.5.5. Remove All Mount Entries + + void + MNTPROC_UMNTALL(void) = 4; + + Removes all of the mount list entries for this client. + +A.5.6. Return Export List + + struct *groups { + name grname; + groups grnext; + }; + + struct *exportlist { + dirpath filesys; + groups groups; + exportlist next; + }; + + exportlist + MNTPROC_EXPORT(void) = 5; + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 26] + +RFC 1094 NFS: Network File System March 1989 + + + Returns a variable number of export list entries. Each entry + contains a filesystem name and a list of groups that are allowed to + import it. The filesystem name is in "filesys", and the group name + is in the list "groups". + + Notes: The exportlist should contain more information about the + status of the filesystem, such as a read-only flag. + +Author's Address: + + Bill Nowicki + Sun Microsystems, Inc. + Mail Stop 1-40 + 2550 Garcia Avenue + Mountain View, CA 94043 + + Phone: (415) 336-7278 + + Email: nowicki@SUN.COM + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Page 27] +
\ No newline at end of file |