summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt115
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f36cc76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc2088.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group J. Myers
+Request for Comments: 2088 Carnegie Mellon
+Cateogry: Standards Track January 1997
+
+
+ IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+1. Abstract
+
+ The Internet Message Access Protocol [IMAP4] contains the "literal"
+ syntactic construct for communicating strings. When sending a
+ literal from client to server, IMAP4 requires the client to wait for
+ the server to send a command continuation request between sending the
+ octet count and the string data. This document specifies an
+ alternate form of literal which does not require this network round
+ trip.
+
+2. Conventions Used in this Document
+
+ In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
+ server respectively.
+
+3. Specification
+
+ The non-synchronizing literal is added an alternate form of literal,
+ and may appear in communication from client to server instead of the
+ IMAP4 form of literal. The IMAP4 form of literal, used in
+ communication from client to server, is referred to as a
+ synchronizing literal.
+
+ Non-synchronizing literals may be used with any IMAP4 server
+ implementation which returns "LITERAL+" as one of the supported
+ capabilities to the CAPABILITY command. If the server does not
+ advertise the LITERAL+ capability, the client must use synchronizing
+ literals instead.
+
+ The non-synchronizing literal is distinguished from the original
+ synchronizing literal by having a plus ('+') between the octet count
+ and the closing brace ('}'). The server does not generate a command
+ continuation request in response to a non-synchronizing literal, and
+
+
+
+Myers Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2088 LITERAL January 1997
+
+
+ clients are not required to wait before sending the octets of a non-
+ synchronizing literal.
+
+ The protocol receiver of an IMAP4 server must check the end of every
+ received line for an open brace ('{') followed by an octet count, a
+ plus ('+'), and a close brace ('}') immediately preceeding the CRLF.
+ If it finds this sequence, it is the octet count of a non-
+ synchronizing literal and the server MUST treat the specified number
+ of following octets and the following line as part of the same
+ command. A server MAY still process commands and reject errors on a
+ line-by-line basis, as long as it checks for non-synchronizing
+ literals at the end of each line.
+
+ Example: C: A001 LOGIN {11+}
+ C: FRED FOOBAR {7+}
+ C: fat man
+ S: A001 OK LOGIN completed
+
+4. Formal Syntax
+
+ The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur
+ Form (BNF) notation as specified in [RFC-822] as modified by [IMAP4].
+ Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by
+ [IMAP4].
+
+ literal ::= "{" number ["+"] "}" CRLF *CHAR8
+ ;; Number represents the number of CHAR8 octets
+
+6. References
+
+ [IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4",
+ draft-crispin-imap-base-XX.txt, University of Washington, April 1996.
+
+ [RFC-822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
+ Messages", STD 11, RFC 822.
+
+7. Security Considerations
+
+ There are no known security issues with this extension.
+
+8. Author's Address
+
+ John G. Myers
+ Carnegie-Mellon University
+ 5000 Forbes Ave.
+ Pittsburgh PA, 15213-3890
+
+ Email: jgm+@cmu.edu
+
+
+
+Myers Standards Track [Page 2]
+