summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt2131
1 files changed, 2131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4181c5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3382.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2131 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group R. deBry
+Request for Comments: 3382 Utah Valley State College
+Updates: 2910, 2911 R. Herriot
+Category: Standards Track Consultant
+ T. Hastings
+ K. Ocke
+ P. Zehler
+ Xerox Corporation
+ September 2002
+
+
+ Internet Printing Protocol (IPP):
+ The 'collection' attribute syntax
+
+Status of this Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document specifies an OPTIONAL attribute syntax called
+ 'collection' for use with the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP/1.0 and
+ IPP/1.1). A 'collection' is a container holding one or more named
+ values, which are called "member" attributes. A collection allows
+ data to be grouped like a PostScript dictionary or a Java Map. This
+ document also specifies the conformance requirements for a definition
+ document that defines a collection attribute. Finally, this document
+ gives some illustrative example collection attribute definitions that
+ are not intended as actual attribute specifications.
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1 Introduction.....................................................3
+ 1.1 Problem Statement..............................................3
+ 1.2 Solution.......................................................3
+ 2 Terminology......................................................4
+ 2.1 Conformance Terminology........................................4
+ 2.2 Other terminology..............................................5
+ 3 Definition of a Collection Attribute.............................5
+ 3.1 Information to Include.........................................5
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ 3.2 Nested Collections.............................................9
+ 4 Collection Attributes as Attributes in Operations................9
+ 4.1 General Rules..................................................9
+ 4.2 Unsupported Values.............................................9
+ 5 Example definition of a collection attribute.....................9
+ 5.1 media-col (collection)........................................10
+ 5.1.1 media-color (type3 keyword | name(MAX)......................10
+ 5.1.2 media-size (collection).....................................11
+ 5.2 media-col-default (collection)................................11
+ 5.3 media-col-ready (1setOf collection)...........................12
+ 5.4 media-col-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)....................12
+ 6 A Second Example Definition Of A Collection Attribute...........12
+ 7 Encoding........................................................13
+ 7.1 Additional tags defined for representing a collection
+ attribute value...............................................13
+ 7.2 Example encoding: "media-col" (collection)....................14
+ 8 Legacy issues...................................................20
+ 9 IANA Considerations.............................................20
+ 10 Internationalization Considerations............................20
+ 11 Security Considerations........................................21
+ 12 References.....................................................21
+ Appendix A: Encoding Example of a Simple Collection (Informative).22
+ Appendix B: Encoding Example of 1setOf Collection (Informative)...25
+ Appendix C: Encoding Example of Collection containing 1setOf XXX
+ attribute (Informative)...............................31
+ Appendix D: Description of the Base IPP Documents (Informative)...35
+ Authors' Addresses................................................36
+ Full Copyright Statement..........................................38
+
+Table of Tables
+
+ Table 1 - "media-col" member attributes...........................10
+ Table 2 - "media-size" collection member attributes...............11
+ Table 3 - Tags defined for encoding the 'collection' attribute
+ syntax .................................................13
+ Table 4 - Overview Encoding of "media-col" collection.............15
+ Table 5 - Example Encoding of "media-col" collection..............16
+ Table 6 - Overview Encoding of simple collection..................22
+ Table 7 - Example Encoding of simple collection...................22
+ Table 8 - Overview Encoding of 1setOf collection..................25
+ Table 9 - Example Encoding of 1setOf collection...................26
+ Table 10 - Overview Encoding of collection with 1setOf value......31
+ Table 11 - Example Encoding of collection with 1setOf value.......32
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+1 Introduction
+
+ This document is an OPTIONAL extension to IPP/1.0 [RFC2565, RFC2566]
+ and IPP/1.1 [RFC2911, RFC2910]. For a description of the base IPP
+ documents see Appendix D.
+
+1.1 Problem Statement
+
+ The IPP Model and Semantics [RFC2911] supports most of the common
+ data structures that are available in programming languages. It
+ lacks a mechanism for grouping several attributes of different types.
+ The Java language uses the Map to solve this problem and PostScript
+ has a dictionary. The new mechanism for grouping attributes together
+ (called 'collection' mechanism) must allow for optional members and
+ the subsequent addition of new members.
+
+ The 'collection' mechanism must be encoded in a manner consistent
+ with existing 1.0 and 1.1 parsing rules (see [RFC2910]). Current 1.0
+ and 1.1 parsers that don't support the 'collection' mechanism must
+ not confuse collections or parts of a collection they receive with
+ other attributes.
+
+1.2 Solution
+
+ The new mechanism is a new IPP attribute syntax called a
+ 'collection'. As such, each collection value is a value of an
+ attribute whose attribute syntax type is defined to be a
+ 'collection'. Such an attribute is called a collection attribute.
+ The name of the collection attribute serves to identify the
+ collection value in an operation request or response, as with any
+ attribute value.
+
+ The 'collection' attribute syntax is a container holding one or more
+ named values (i.e., attributes), which are called member attributes.
+ Each collection attribute definition document lists the mandatory and
+ optional member attributes of each collection value. A collection
+ value is similar to an IPP attribute group in a request or a
+ response, such as the operation attributes group. They both consist
+ of a set of attributes.
+
+ As with any attribute syntax, the document that defines a collection
+ attribute specifies whether the attribute is single-valued
+ (collection) or multi-valued (1setOf collection). If the attribute
+ is multi-valued (1setOf collection), each collection value MUST be a
+ separate instance of a single definition of a collection, i.e., it
+ MUST have the same member attributes except for OPTIONAL member
+ attributes. If we view each collection definition as a separate
+ syntax type, this rule continues the IPP/1.1 notion that each
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ attribute has a single type or pattern (e.g., "keyword | name" is a
+ pattern). Without this rule, the supported values would be more
+ difficult to describe and the mechanism defined in item 4 of section
+ 3.1 would not be sufficient.
+
+ The name of each member attribute MUST be unique for a collection
+ attribute, but MAY be the same as the name of a member attribute in
+ another collection attribute and/or MAY be the same as the name of an
+ attribute that is not a member of a collection. The rules for naming
+ member attributes are given in section 3.1.
+
+ Each member attribute can have any attribute syntax type, including
+ 'collection', and can be either single-valued or multi-valued. The
+ length of a collection value is not limited. However, the length of
+ each member attribute MUST NOT exceed the limit of its attribute
+ syntax.
+
+ The member attributes in a collection MAY be in any order in a
+ request or response. When a client sends a collection attribute to
+ the Printer, the order that the Printer stores the member attributes
+ of the collection value and the order returned in a response MAY be
+ different from the order sent by the client.
+
+ A collection value MUST NOT contain two or more member attributes
+ with the same attribute name. Such a collection is mal-formed.
+ Clients MUST NOT submit such malformed requests and Printers MUST NOT
+ return such malformed responses. If such a malformed request is
+ submitted to a Printer, the Printer MUST (depending on
+ implementation) either (1) reject the request with the 'client-
+ error-bad-request' status code (see [RFC2911] section 13.1.4.1), or
+ (2) accept the request and use only one of each duplicate member
+ attributes.
+
+2 Terminology
+
+ This section defines terminology used throughout this document.
+
+2.1 Conformance Terminology
+
+ Capitalized terms, such as MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD
+ NOT, MAY, NEED NOT, and OPTIONAL, have special meaning relating to
+ conformance as defined in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [RFC2119] and [RFC2911],
+ section 12.1. If an implementation supports the extension defined in
+ this document, then these terms apply; otherwise, they do not. These
+ terms define conformance to this document only; they do not affect
+ conformance to other documents, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+2.2 Other terminology
+
+ This document uses terms such as Job object (or Job), IPP Printer
+ object (or Printer), "operation", "request", response", "attributes",
+ "keywords", and "support". These terms have special meaning and are
+ defined in the model terminology [RFC2911] section 12.2. The
+ following additional terms are introduced in this document:
+
+ collection: an attribute syntax in which each attribute value is a
+ set of attributes, called member attributes.
+
+ member attribute: an attribute that is defined to be used as one
+ of the attributes in a collection.
+
+ collection attribute: an attribute whose definition specifies the
+ 'collection' attribute syntax and each of the member attributes
+ that MAY occur in a collection attribute value.
+
+3 Definition of a Collection Attribute
+
+ This section describes the requirements for any collection attribute
+ definition.
+
+3.1 Information to Include
+
+ When a specification document defines an "xxx" collection attribute,
+ i.e., an attribute whose attribute syntax type is 'collection' or
+ '1setOf collection'; the definition document MUST include the
+ following aspects of the attribute semantics. Suppose the "xxx"
+ collection attribute contains N member attributes named "aaa1",
+ "aaa2", ..., "aaaN" ("aaaI" represents any one of these N member
+ attributes).
+
+ 1. The name of the collection attribute MUST be specified (e.g.,
+ "xxx"). The selection of the name "xxx" MUST follow the same
+ rules for uniqueness as for attributes of any other syntax type,
+ (as defined by IPP/1.1) unless "xxx" is a member attribute of
+ another collection. Then the selection of the name "xxx" MUST
+ follow the rules for uniqueness defined in item 5a) of this list.
+
+ 2. The collection attribute syntax MUST be of type 'collection' or
+ '1setOf collection'.
+
+ 3. The context of the collection attribute MUST be specified, i.e.,
+ whether the attribute is an operation attribute, a Job Template
+ attribute, a Job Description attribute, a Printer Description
+ attribute, a member attribute of a particular collection
+ attribute, etc.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ 4. An "xxx-supported" attribute MUST be specified and it has one of
+ the following two forms:
+
+ a) "xxx-supported" is a "1setOf collection", which enumerates all
+ of the supported collection values of "xxx". If a collection
+ of this form contains a nested collection, it MUST be of the
+ same form.
+
+ For example, "media-size-supported" might have the values {{x-
+ dimension:210, y-dimension:297},{x-dimension:297, y-
+ dimension:420}} to show that it supports two values of "media
+ size": A4 (210x297) and A3 (297x420). It does not support
+ other combinations of "x-dimension" and "y-dimension" member
+ attributes, such as 210x420 or 297x297, and it does not support
+ non-enumerated values, such as 420x595.
+
+ b) "xxx-supported" is a "1setOf type2 keyword", which enumerates
+ the names of all of the member attributes of "xxx": "aaa1",
+ "aaa2", ..., "aaaN". If a collection of this form contains a
+ nested collection, it MAY be of either form. See item 5f)
+ below for details on supported values of member attributes.
+
+ For example, "media-col-supported" might have the keyword
+ values: "media-size" and "media-color".
+
+ 5. The member attributes MUST be defined. For each member attribute,
+ the definition document MUST provide the following information:
+
+ a) The member attribute's name (e.g., "aaa") MUST be unique within
+ the collection being defined and MUST either:
+
+ i) reuse the attribute name of another attribute (that is
+ unique across the entire IPP attribute name space) and
+ have the same syntax and semantics as the reused attribute
+ (if the condition of item 4b) above is met). For example,
+ a member attribute definition could reuse the IPP/1.1
+ "media" attribute.
+
+ ii) potentially occur elsewhere in the entire IPP attribute
+ name space. (if the condition of item 4a) above is met).
+ For example, a member attribute could be "x-dimension",
+ which could potentially occur in another collection or as
+ an attribute outside of a collection.
+
+ iii) be unique across the entire IPP attribute name space (if
+ the condition of item 4b) above is met). For example, a
+ member attribute could be "media-color" which must be
+ unique across the entire IPP attribute name space.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ b) Whether the member attribute is REQUIRED or OPTIONAL for the
+ Printer to support.
+
+ c) Whether the member attribute is REQUIRED or OPTIONAL for the
+ client to supply in a request.
+
+ d) The member attribute's syntax type, which can be any attribute
+ syntax, including '1setOf X', 'collection', and '1setOf
+ collection'. If this attribute name reuses the name of another
+ attribute (case of item a1 above), it MUST have the same
+ attribute syntax, including cardinality (whether or not
+ 1setOf).
+
+ e) The semantics of the "aaa" member attribute. The semantic
+ definition MUST include a description of any constraint or
+ boundary conditions the member attribute places on the
+ associated attribute, especially if the attribute reuses the
+ name of another attribute (case of item a1 above).
+
+ f) The supported values for each "aaaI" member attribute (of the
+ member attributes "aaa1", "aaa2", ..., "aaaN") is specified by
+ one of two mechanisms.
+
+ i) If "xxx-supported" is a "1setOf collection" (see item 4a)
+ above), the value for each "aaaI" is specified in each
+ collection value of "xxx-supported", in the context of
+ other member attributes. That is, "xxx-supported"
+ enumerates all supported values of "xxx".
+
+ ii) If the value of "xxx-supported" is a "1setOf type2
+ keyword" (see item 4b) above), the supported values of
+ "aaaI" are the values specified by either i) the "aaaI-
+ supported" attribute or ii) the definition of the member
+ attribute "aaaI" within the document defining the "xxx"
+ attribute. The values of each member attribute "aaaI" are
+ specified independently of other member attributes, though
+ a Printer is not required to support all combinations of
+ supported values.
+
+ For example, "media-col-supported" might have the keyword
+ values: "media-size" and "media-color". Using the first
+ method for defining supported values (an "aaaI-supported"
+ attribute), the collection values of "media-col" are
+ combinations of values of "media-size-supported" and
+ "media-color-supported". If "media-size-supported" has
+ the values of '210x297' and '297x420' and "media-color-
+ supported" has the values of 'white' and 'pink', the
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Printer might support only the combinations 'white-
+ 210x297', 'pink-210x297' and 'white-297x420', and not
+ 'pink-297x420'.
+
+ If a collection contains a member "aaaI", whose syntax
+ type is "text", the supported values would probably be
+ defined by the definition of "xxx" rather than by the
+ attribute "aaaI-supported".
+
+ g) the default value of each "aaaI" member attribute if it is
+ OPTIONAL for a client to supply the "aaa" member attribute in a
+ request. The default value is specified by the attribute's
+ definition within a document and MUST be one of the following:
+
+ i) a fixed default
+
+ ii) a mechanism by which the Printer determines default
+
+ iii) an indefinite default that is left to the implementation.
+
+ iv) an attribute that the Printer uses to determine the
+ default
+
+ 6. The default value of "xxx", if a client does not supply it. The
+ default value is specified by the attribute's definition within a
+ document and MUST be one of the following:
+
+ a) a fixed default
+
+ b) a mechanism by which the Printer determines default
+
+ c) an indefinite default that is left to the implementation
+
+ d) a Printer attribute "xxx-default" which is a collection with
+ the same member attributes as "xxx". If optional member
+ attributes are absent, the Printer uses the defaulting rules of
+ item 5g) above.
+
+ 7. The "xxx-ready (1setOf collection)" attribute, if human
+ intervention is required to make many of the supported values
+ available. For example, "media-col" is an attribute which has a
+ "ready" attribute. Most attributes do not have a "ready"
+ attribute.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 8]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+3.2 Nested Collections
+
+ A member attribute may have a syntax type of 'collection' or '1setOf
+ collection', in which case it is called a nested collection
+ attribute. The rules for a nested collection attribute are the same
+ as for a collection attribute as specified in section 3.1.
+
+4 Collection Attributes as Attributes in Operations
+
+4.1 General Rules
+
+ A collection value is like any other IPP/1.1 value, except that it is
+ structured. The rules for attributes with collection values are the
+ same as for attributes of any other syntax type (see IPP/1.1), be
+ they in any group of a request of a response.
+
+4.2 Unsupported Values
+
+ The rules for returning an unsupported collection attribute are an
+ extension to the current rules:
+
+ 1. If the entire collection attribute is unsupported, then the
+ Printer returns just the collection attribute name with the
+ 'unsupported' out-of-band value (see the beginning of [RFC2911]
+ section 4.1) in the Unsupported Attributes Group.
+
+ 2. If a collection contains unrecognized, unsupported member
+ attributes and/or conflicting values, the attribute returned in
+ the Unsupported Group is a collection containing the unrecognized,
+ unsupported member attributes, and/or conflicting values. The
+ unrecognized member attributes have an out-of-band value of
+ 'unsupported' (see the beginning of [RFC2911] section 4.1). The
+ unsupported member attributes and conflicting values have their
+ unsupported or conflicting values.
+
+5 Example definition of a collection attribute
+
+ In some printing environments, it is desirable to allow the client to
+ select the media by its properties, e.g., weight, color, size, etc.,
+ instead of by name. In IPP/1.1 (see [RFC2911]), the "media (type3
+ keyword | name) Job Template attribute allows selection by name. It
+ is tempting to extend the "media" attribute syntax to include
+ "collection", but then existing clients could not understand default
+ or supported media values that use the collection value. To preserve
+ interoperability, a new attribute MUST BE added, e.g., "media-col
+ (collection)". The following subsections contain a sample definition
+ of a simplified "media-col" attribute. The definition follows the
+ rules in section 3.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ All of the example attribute definitions in this document are
+ illustrative examples, rather than actual definitions. These
+ examples are intended to illustrate how to define collection
+ attributes. Other documents MUST define collection attributes for
+ use in actual interchange. Such definitions may be very similar to
+ the examples in this document, since we attempted to pick useful
+ examples.
+
+ Note: we picked the name "media-col" because the name "media" is
+ already in use. Ordinarily the collection attribute would have a
+ name like any other attribute and would not end in "col".
+
+ The member attributes of "media-col" attribute ("media-color (type 3
+ keyword)" and "media-size (collection)") both follow the naming rules
+ of item 4a3 of section 3, i.e., the names are unique across the
+ entire IPP attribute name space. The member attributes of the
+ "media-size (collection)" member attribute ("x-dimension
+ (integer(0:MAX))" and "y-dimension (integer(0:MAX))") both follow the
+ naming rules of item 4a2 of section 3, i.e., they potentially occur
+ elsewhere in the IPP attribute name space.
+
+5.1 media-col (collection)
+
+ The "media-col" (collection) attribute augments the IPP/1.1 [RFC2911]
+ "media" attribute. This collection attribute enables a client end
+ user to submit a list of media characteristics to the Printer. When
+ the client specifies media using the "media-col" collection
+ attribute, the Printer object MUST match the requested media exactly.
+ The 'collection' consists of the following member attributes:
+
+ Table 1 - "media-col" member attributes
+
+ Attribute name attribute syntax request Printer
+ Support
+
+ media-color type3 keyword | name (MAX) MAY MUST
+
+ media-size collection MUST MUST
+
+ The definitions for the member attributes is given in the following
+ sub-sections:
+
+5.1.1 media-color (type3 keyword | name(MAX)
+
+ This member attribute identifies the color of the media. Valid
+ values are 'red', 'white' and 'blue'.
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 10]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ The "media-color-supported" (1setOf (type3 keyword | name(MAX)))
+ Printer attribute identifies the values of this "media-color" member
+ attribute that the Printer supports, i.e., the colors supported.
+
+ If the client omits this member attribute, the Printer determines the
+ value in an implementation dependent manner.
+
+5.1.2 media-size (collection)
+
+ This member attribute identifies the size of the media. The
+ 'collection' consists of the member attributes shown in Table 2:
+
+ Table 2 - "media-size" collection member attributes
+
+ Attribute name attribute syntax request Printer
+ Support
+
+ x-dimension integer (0:MAX) MUST MUST
+
+ y-dimension integer (0:MAX) MUST MUST
+
+ The definitions for the member attributes are given in the following
+ sub-sections:
+
+5.1.2.1 x-dimension (integer(0:MAX))
+
+ This attribute identifies the width of the media in inch units along
+ the X axis.
+
+5.1.2.2 y-dimension (integer(0:MAX))
+
+ This attribute identifies the height of the media in inch units along
+ the Y axis.
+
+ The "media-size-supported" (1setOf collection) Printer attribute
+ identifies the values of this "media-size" member attribute that the
+ Printer supports, i.e., the size combinations supported. The names
+ of the member attributes are the same as the member attributes of the
+ "media-size" collection attribute, namely "x-dimension", and "y-
+ dimension", since they have the same attribute syntax and the same
+ semantics.
+
+5.2 media-col-default (collection)
+
+ The "media-col-default" Printer attribute specifies the media that
+ the Printer uses, if any, if the client omits the "media-col" and
+ "media". Job Template attributes in the Job Creation operation and
+ the PDL do not include a media specification. The member attributes
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 11]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ are defined in Table 1. A Printer MUST support the same member
+ attributes for this default collection attribute as it supports for
+ the corresponding "media-col" Job Template attribute.
+
+5.3 media-col-ready (1setOf collection)
+
+ The "media-col-ready" Printer attribute identifies the media that are
+ available for use without human intervention, i.e., the media that
+ are ready to be used without human intervention. The collection
+ value MUST have all of the member attributes that are supported in
+ Table 1.
+
+5.4 media-col-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)
+
+ The "media-col-supported" Printer attribute identifies the keyword
+ names of the member attributes supported in the "media-col"
+ collection Job Template attribute, i.e., the keyword names of the
+ member attributes in Table 1 that the Printer supports.
+
+6 A Second Example Definition Of A Collection Attribute
+
+ All of the example attribute definitions in this document are
+ illustrative examples, rather than actual definitions. These
+ examples are intended to illustrate how to define collection
+ attributes. Other documents MUST define collection attributes for
+ use in actual interchange. Such definitions may be very similar to
+ the examples in this document, since we attempted to pick useful
+ examples.
+
+ In some printing environments, it is desirable to allow the client to
+ select the media for the job start sheet. The reason for not adding
+ the 'collection' attribute syntax to the existing "job-sheets" Job
+ Template attribute is the same as for "media". Instead, a new Job
+ Template attribute is introduced, e.g., "job-sheet-col (collection)".
+
+ The member attributes of "job-sheet-col" attribute ("job-sheets (type
+ 3 keyword)" and "media (type3 keyword | name)") both follow the
+ naming rules of item 4a1 of section 3, i.e., they reuse existing IPP
+ attributes. According to the rules, their supported values come from
+ the existing IPP attributes: "job-sheets-supported" and "media-
+ supported". However, their default values do not come from "job-
+ sheets-default" and "media-default", respectively. Rather, the
+ definition of "job-sheet-col" says that "job-sheets (type 3 keyword)"
+ is required and if "media (type3 keyword | name)" is absent, the
+ Printer uses the same media as the rest of the job uses.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 12]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ If "job-sheet-col" attribute was defined to contain the member
+ attribute "job-sheet-media (type3 keyword | name)" instead of "media
+ (type3 keyword | name)", then the definition would also have to
+ specify a "job-sheet-media-supported (1setOf (type3 keyword | name))"
+ whose values would be independent of "media-supported (1setOf (type3
+ keyword | name))" and would be set separately by a System
+ Administrator.
+
+ The actual text for the definition of the attribute is left as an
+ exercise for the reader.
+
+7 Encoding
+
+ This section defines the additional encoding tags used according to
+ [RFC2910] and gives an example of their use. The encoding tags
+ defined in this document MUST be used by all collection attributes
+ defined in other documents. However, the example of their use is
+ illustrative only.
+
+7.1 Additional tags defined for representing a collection attribute
+ value
+
+ The 'collection' attribute syntax uses the tags defined in Table 3.
+
+ Table 3 - Tags defined for encoding the 'collection' attribute syntax
+
+ Tag name Tag
+ value Meaning
+
+ begCollection 0x34 Begin the collection attribute value.
+
+ endCollection 0x37 End the collection attribute value.
+
+ memberAttrName 0x4A The value is the name of the
+ collection member attribute
+
+ When encoding a collection attribute "xxx" that contains an attribute
+ "aaa" and is not inside another collection, the encoding follows
+ these rules:
+
+ 1. The beginning of the collection is indicated with a value tag that
+ MUST be syntax type 'begCollection' (0x34) with a name length and
+ Name field that represent the name of the collection attribute
+ ("xxx") as with any attribute, followed by a value. The Printer
+ MAY ignore the value and its length MAY be 0. In the future,
+ however, this field MAY contain useful information, such as the
+ collection name (cf. the name of a C struct).
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 13]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ 2. Each member attribute is encoded as a sequence of two or more
+ values that appear to be part of a single multi-valued attribute,
+ i.e., 1setOf. The first value after the 'begCollection' value has
+ the attribute syntax, 'memberAttrName' (0x4A), and its value holds
+ the name of the first member attribute (e.g., "aaa"). The second
+ value holds the first member's attribute value, which can be of
+ any attribute syntax, except 'memberAttrName' or 'endCollection'.
+ If the first member's attribute value is multi-valued, the third
+ value holds the second value of the first member's value.
+ Otherwise, the third value holds the name of second member
+ attribute (e.g., "bbb"), and its attribute syntax is
+ 'memberAttrName'. In this case, the fourth member's value is the
+ value of "bbb".
+
+ Note that the technique of encoding a 'collection' as a '1setOf'
+ makes it easy for a Printer that doesn't support a particular
+ collection attribute (or the collection attribute syntax at all)
+ to simply skip over the entire collection value.
+
+ 3. The end of the collection is indicated with a value tag that MUST
+ be syntax type 'endCollection' (e.g., 0x37) and MAY have a zero
+ name length and a zero value length. In the future, this field
+ MAY contain useful information, such as the collection name that
+ matches the one in the 'begCollection' .
+
+ 4. It is valid to have a member attribute that is itself, a
+ collection attribute, i.e., collections can be nested within
+ collections. This is represented by the occurrence of a member
+ attribute that is of attribute syntax type 'begCollection'. Such
+ a collection is terminated by a matching 'endCollection'. The
+ name of such a member attribute is in the immediately preceding
+ value, whose syntax type is 'memberAttrName'.
+
+ 5. It is valid for a collection attribute to be multi-valued, i.e.,
+ have more than one collection value. If the next attribute
+ immediately following the 'endCollection' has a zero name length
+ and a tag of 'begCollection', then the collection attribute is a
+ multi-valued collection, as with any attribute. This statement
+ applies to collections within collections and collections that are
+ not in collections.
+
+7.2 Example encoding: "media-col" (collection)
+
+ The collection specified in section 5 is used for the encoding
+ example shown in Table 5. The example also shows nested collections,
+ since the "media-size" member attribute is a 'collection. The
+ encoding example represents a blue 4x6-index card and takes 216
+ octets. The Appendices contain more complex examples.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 14]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Additional examples have been included in the appendices.
+
+ The overall structure of the two collection values can be pictorially
+ represented as:
+
+ "media-col" =
+ { "media-color" = 'blue';
+ "media-size" =
+ { "x-dimension" = 6;
+ "y-dimension" = 4
+ }
+ },
+
+ The full encoding is in table 5. A simplified view of the encoding
+ looks like this:
+
+ Table 4 - Overview Encoding of "media-col" collection
+
+ Tag Value Name Value
+
+ begCollection media-col ""
+
+ memberAttrName "" media-color
+
+ keyword "" blue
+
+ memberAttrName "" media-size
+
+ begCollection "" ""
+
+ memberAttrName "" x-dimension
+
+ integer "" 6
+
+ memberAttrName "" y-dimension
+
+ integer "" 4
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 15]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Table 5 - Example Encoding of "media-col" collection
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag beginning of the "media-
+ col" collection attribute
+
+ 0x0009 name- length of (collection)
+ length attribute name
+
+ media-col media-col name name of (collection)
+ attribute
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "media-color"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of "media-color"
+ length keyword
+
+ media-color media-color value value is name of 1st
+ member attribute
+
+
+ 0x44 keyword type value-tag keyword type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 16]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0004 value-
+ length
+
+ blue blue value value of 1st member
+ attribute
+
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "media-size"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000A value- length of "media-size"
+ length keyword
+
+ media-size media-size value Name of 2nd member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag Beginning of the "media-
+ size" collection attribute
+ which is a sub-collection
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- collection attribute names
+ length have no value
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "x-dimension"
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 17]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of "x-dimension"
+ length keyword
+
+ x-dimension x-dimension value name of 1st sub-
+ collection member
+ attribute
+
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0006 value value of 1st sub-
+ collection member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "y-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of the "y-
+ length dimension" keyword
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 18]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ y-dimension y-dimension value name of 2nd sub-
+ collection member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0004 value value of 2nd sub-
+ collection member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the sub-collection
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the 1st collection
+ value in 1setOf
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 19]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+8 Legacy issues
+
+ IPP 1.x Printers and Clients will gracefully ignore collections and
+ its member attributes if it does not understand the collection. The
+ begCollection and endCollection elements each look like an attribute
+ with an attribute syntax that the recipient doesn't support and so
+ should ignore the entire attribute. The individual member attributes
+ and their values will look like a 1setOf values of the collection
+ attribute, so that the Printer simply ignores the entire attribute
+ and all of its values. Returning unsupported attributes is also
+ simple, since only the name of the collection attribute is returned
+ with the 'unsupported' out-of-band value (see section 4.2).
+
+9 IANA Considerations
+
+ The following table provides registration for the 'collection'
+ attribute syntax defined in this document. This is to be registered
+ according to the procedures in RFC 2911 [RFC2911] section 6.3.
+
+ Tag value: Attribute Syntaxes: Ref. Section:
+ collection RFC 3382 3
+ 0x34 begCollection RFC 3382 7.1
+ 0x37 endCollection RFC 3382 7.1
+ 0x4A memberAttrName RFC 3382 7.1
+
+ The resulting attribute syntax registration will be published in the
+ http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registrations registry.
+
+10 Internationalization Considerations
+
+ This attribute syntax by itself has no impact on
+ internationalization. However, the member attributes that are
+ subsequently defined for use in a collection may have
+ internationalization considerations, as may any attribute, according
+ to [RFC2911].
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 20]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+11 Security Considerations
+
+ This attribute syntax causes no more security concerns than any other
+ attribute syntax. It is only the attributes that are subsequently
+ defined, to use this or any other attribute syntax, that may have
+ security concerns, depending on the semantics of the attribute,
+ according to [RFC2911].
+
+12 References
+
+12.1 Normative References
+
+ [RFC2910] Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P. and R. Turner, "Internet
+ Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport", RFC 2910,
+ September 2000.
+
+ [RFC2911] Isaacson, S., deBry, R., Hastings, T., Herriot, R. and P.
+ Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and
+ Semantics", RFC 2911, September 2000.
+
+12.2 Informative References
+
+ [RFC2565] Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P. and R. Tuner, "Internet
+ Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport", RFC 2565,
+ April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2566] deBry, R., Hastings, T., Herriot, R., Isaacson, S. and P.
+ Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and
+ Semantics", RFC 2566, April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2567] Wright, D., "Design Goals for an Internet Printing
+ Protocol", RFC 2567, April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2568] Zilles, S., "Rationale for the Structure and Model and
+ Protocol for the Internet Printing Protocol", RFC 2568,
+ April 1999.
+
+ [RFC2569] Herriot, R., Hastings, T., Jacobs, N. and J. Martin,
+ "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols", RFC 2569, April
+ 1999.
+
+ [RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter,
+ L., Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer
+ Protocol - HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
+
+ [RFC3196] Hastings, T., Manros, C., Zehler, P., Kugler, C. and H.
+ Holst, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementor's
+ Guide", RFC 3196, November 2001.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 21]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+Appendix A: Encoding Example of a Simple Collection (Informative)
+
+ The overall structure of the collection value can be pictorially
+ represented as:
+
+ "media-size" =
+ { "x-dimension" = 6;
+ "y-dimension" = 4
+ }
+
+ A simplified view of the encoding would look like this:
+
+ Table 6 - Overview Encoding of simple collection
+
+ Tag Value Name Value
+
+ begCollection media-size ""
+
+ memberAttrName "" x-dimension
+
+ integer "" 6
+
+ memberAttrName "" y-dimension
+
+ integer "" 4
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+ Note: "" represents a name or value whose length is 0.
+
+ Table 7 - Example Encoding of simple collection
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag beginning of the "media-
+ size" collection attribute
+
+ 0x000A name- length of (collection)
+ length attribute name
+
+ media-size media-size name name of (collection)
+ attribute
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 22]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts member attribute:
+ "x-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of "x-dimension"
+ length keyword
+
+ x-dimension x-dimension value name of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0006 value value of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "y-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 23]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x000B value- length of the "y-
+ length dimension" keyword
+
+ y-dimension y-dimension value name of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf for
+ length media-size
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0004 value value of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the collection
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 24]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+Appendix B: Encoding Example of 1setOf Collection (Informative)
+
+ The overall structure of the collection value can be pictorially
+ represented as:
+
+ "media-size-supported" =
+ { "x-dimension" = 6;
+ "y-dimension" = 4
+ },
+ { "x-dimension" = 3;
+ "y-dimension" = 5
+ };
+
+ A simplified view of the encoding would look like this:
+
+ Table 8 - Overview Encoding of 1setOf collection
+
+ Tag Value Name Value
+
+ begCollection media-size- ""
+ supported
+
+ memberAttrName "" x-dimension
+
+ integer "" 6
+
+ memberAttrName "" y-dimension
+
+ integer "" 4
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+ begCollection "" ""
+
+ memberAttrName "" x-dimension
+
+ integer "" 3
+
+ memberAttrName "" y-dimension
+
+ integer "" 5
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 25]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Table 9 - Example Encoding of 1setOf collection
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag beginning of the "media-
+ size-supported (1setOf
+ collection" attribute
+
+ 0x00014 name- length of (collection)
+ length attribute name
+
+ media-size- media-size- name name of (collection)
+ supported supported attribute
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts member attribute:
+ "x-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of "x-dimension"
+ length keyword
+
+ x-dimension x-dimension value name of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 26]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0006 value value of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts member attribute:
+ "y-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of the "y-
+ length dimension" keyword
+
+ y-dimension y-dimension value name of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0004 value value of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the collection
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 27]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag beginning of the 2nd
+ member of the 1setOf
+ "sizes-avail " collection
+ attribute
+
+ 0x0000 name- Zero length name indicates
+ length this is member of previous
+ attribute
+
+ name no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts member attribute:
+ "x-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of "x-dimension"
+ length keyword
+
+ x-dimension x-dimension value name of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 28]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0003 value value of 1st collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts member attribute:
+ "y-dimension"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x000B value- length of the "y-
+ length dimension" keyword
+
+ y-dimension y-dimension value name of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0005 value value of 2nd collection
+ member attribute
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 29]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the 1setOf
+ collection value
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 30]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+Appendix C: Encoding Example of Collection containing 1setOf XXX
+ attribute (Informative)
+
+ The overall structure of the collection value can be pictorially
+ represented as:
+
+ "wagons" =
+ { "colors" = red, blue;
+ "sizes" = 4, 6, 8
+ }
+
+ A simplified view of the encoding would look like this:
+
+ Table 10 - Overview Encoding of collection with 1setOf value
+
+ Tag Value Name Value
+
+ begCollection wagons ""
+
+ memberAttrName "" colors
+
+ keyword "" red
+
+ keyword "" blue
+
+ memberAttrName "" sizes
+
+ integer "" 4
+
+ integer "" 6
+
+ integer "" 8
+
+ endCollection "" ""
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 31]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Table 11 - Example Encoding of collection with 1setOf value
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x34 begCollection value-tag beginning of the "wagons"
+ collection attribute
+
+ 0x0005 name- length of (collection)
+ length attribute name
+
+ wagons wagons name name of (collection)
+ attribute
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "colors"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0006 value- length of "colors" keyword
+ length
+
+ colors colors value value is name of 1st
+ member attribute
+
+ 0x44 keyword type value-tag keyword type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf wagons
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value-
+ length
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 32]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ blue blue value value of 1st member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x44 keyword type value-tag keyword type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf wagons
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0003 value-
+ length
+
+ red red value value of 1st member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x4A memberAttrName value-tag starts a new member
+ attribute: "sizes"
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0005 value- length of "length-avail"
+ length keyword
+
+ sizes sizes value Name of 2nd member
+ attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf wagons
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 33]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ 0x0004 value 1st value for 1setOf
+ integer attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value-
+ length length of an integer = 4
+
+ 0x0006 value 2nd value for 1setOf
+ integer attribute
+
+ 0x21 integer type value-tag attribute type
+
+ 0x0000 name- 0 indicates 1setOf
+ length
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0004 value- length of an integer = 4
+ length
+
+ 0x0008 value 3rd value for 1setOf
+ integer attribute
+
+ 0x37 endCollection value-tag end of the collection
+
+ 0x0000 name- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type, so part of 1setOf
+
+ no name (since name-length
+ was 0)
+
+ 0x0000 value- defined to be 0 for this
+ length type
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 34]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Octets Symbolic Value Protocol comments
+ field
+
+ no value (since value-
+ length was 0)
+
+Appendix D: Description of the Base IPP Documents (Informative)
+
+ The base set of IPP documents includes:
+
+ Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2567]
+ Rationale for the Structure and Model and Protocol for the
+ Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2568]
+ Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics [RFC2911]
+ Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport [RFC2910]
+ Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementer's Guide [RFC3196]
+ Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols [RFC2569]
+
+ The "Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol" document takes a
+ broad look at distributed printing functionality, and it enumerates
+ real-life scenarios that help to clarify the features that need to be
+ included in a printing protocol for the Internet. It identifies
+ requirements for three types of users: end users, operators, and
+ administrators. It calls out a subset of end user requirements that
+ are satisfied in IPP/1.0 [RFC2566, RFC2565]. A few OPTIONAL operator
+ operations have been added to IPP/1.1 [RFC2911, RFC2910].
+
+ The "Rationale for the Structure and Model and Protocol for the
+ Internet Printing Protocol" document describes IPP from a high level
+ view, defines a roadmap for the various documents that form the suite
+ of IPP specification documents, and gives background and rationale
+ for the IETF IPP working group's major decisions.
+
+ The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics" document
+ describes a simplified model with abstract objects, their attributes,
+ and their operations. The model introduces a Printer and a Job. The
+ Job supports multiple documents per Job. The model document also
+ addresses how security, internationalization, and directory issues
+ are addressed.
+
+ The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport" document
+ is a formal mapping of the abstract operations and attributes defined
+ in the model document onto HTTP/1.1 [RFC2616]. It also defines the
+ encoding rules for a new Internet MIME media type called
+ "application/ipp". This document also defines the rules for
+ transporting over HTTP a message body whose Content-Type is
+ "application/ipp". This document defines the 'ipp' scheme for
+ identifying IPP printers and jobs.
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 35]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ The "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Implementer's Guide" document
+ gives insight and advice to implementers of IPP clients and IPP
+ objects. It is intended to help them understand IPP/1.1 and some of
+ the considerations that may assist them in the design of their client
+ and/or IPP object implementations. For example, a typical order of
+ processing requests is given, including error checking. Motivation
+ for some of the specification decisions is also included.
+
+ The "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols" document gives some
+ advice to implementers of gateways between IPP and LPD (Line Printer
+ Daemon) implementations.
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Roger deBry
+ Utah Valley State College
+ Orem, UT 84058
+
+ Phone: (801) 222-8000
+ EMail: debryro@uvsc.edu
+
+
+ Tom Hastings
+ Xerox Corporation
+ 737 Hawaii St. ESAE 231
+ El Segundo, CA 90245
+
+ Phone: 310-333-6413
+ Fax: 310-333-5514
+ EMail: hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com
+
+
+ Robert Herriot
+ Consultant
+ 706 Colorado Ave
+ Palo Alto, CA 94303
+
+ Phone: 650-327-4466
+ Fax: 650-327-4466
+ EMail: bob@herriot.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 36]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+ Kirk Ocke
+ Xerox Corp.
+ 800 Phillips Rd
+ M/S 128-30E
+ Webster, NY 14580
+
+ Phone: (585) 442-4832
+ EMail: KOcke@crt.xerox.com
+
+
+ Peter Zehler
+ Xerox Corp.
+ 800 Phillips Rd
+ M/S 128-30E
+ Webster, NY 14580
+
+ Phone: (585) 265-8755
+ EMail: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
+
+ IPP Web Page: http://www.pwg.org/ipp/
+ IPP Mailing List: ipp@pwg.org
+
+ To subscribe to the ipp mailing list, send the following email:
+
+ 1) send it to majordomo@pwg.org
+ 2) leave the subject line blank
+ 3) put the following two lines in the message body:
+ subscribe ipp
+ end
+
+ Implementers of this specification document are encouraged to join
+ the IPP Mailing List in order to participate in any discussions of
+ clarification issues and review of registration proposals for
+ additional attributes and values. In order to reduce spam the
+ mailing list rejects mail from non-subscribers, so you must subscribe
+ to the mailing list in order to send a question or comment to the
+ mailing list.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 37]
+
+RFC 3382 IPP: The 'collection' attribute syntax September 2002
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
+
+ This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
+ others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
+ or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
+ and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
+ kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
+ included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
+ document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
+ the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
+ Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
+ developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
+ copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
+ followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
+ English.
+
+ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
+ revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
+ TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
+ BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
+ HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
+ Internet Society.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+deBry, et. al. Standards Track [Page 38]
+