diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc3613.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc3613.txt | 451 |
1 files changed, 451 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc3613.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc3613.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5cd140e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc3613.txt @@ -0,0 +1,451 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group R. Morgan +Request for Comments: 3613 Univ. of Washington +Category: Informational K. Hazelton + Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison + October 2003 + + + Definition of a Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the + Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE) + +Status of this Memo + + This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does + not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this + memo is unlimited. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. + +Abstract + + This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for + the Internet2 Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE). + This namespace is for naming persistent resources defined by MACE, + its working groups and other designated subordinates. + +1. Introduction and Community Considerations + + The Internet2 Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE) + produces many kinds of documents: specifications, working drafts, + object classes, schemas, stylesheets, etc. It also defines directory + attributes and controlled vocabularies for the values of some of + those attributes. + + MACE wishes to provide global, distributed, persistent, location- + independent names for these resources. The Uniform Resource Name + (URN) variant of URIs meets these requirements. + + MACE working groups and other MACE-affiliated groups will benefit + from the MACE URN namespace by having an easy, efficient way to + assign globally unique, persistent identifiers to resources that they + create. The nature of MACE work is that serves the needs of one or + more communities of interest. A namespace managed so as to + facilitate the creation, registration and resolution of unique, + persistent identifiers will be of great value for MACE, its + affiliates and the higher education community generally. + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + + This URN namespace specification is for a formal namespace. + +2. Specification Template + + Namespace ID: + + "mace" + + Registration Information: + + Registration Version Number 1 + + Registration Date: 2003-08-01 + + Registrant of the namespace: + + Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE) + ATTN: Lisa Hogeboom + Internet2 + 3025 Boardwalk Suite 200 + Ann Arbor, MI 48108 + + Phone: +1 734 913 4250 + + Contact: Keith Hazelton + + Affiliation: Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison + 1210 W. Dayton St. + Madison, WI 53706 + Phone: +1 608 262 0771 + + hazelton@doit.wisc.edu + + Syntactic structure: + + The Namespace Specific Strings (NSS) of all URNs assigned by MACE + will conform to the syntax defined in section 2.2 of RFC 2141, + "URN Syntax" [1]. In addition, all MACE URN NSSs will consist of + a left-to-right series of tokens delimited by colons. The left- + to-right sequence of colon-delimited tokens corresponds to + descending nodes in a tree. To the right of the lowest naming + authority node there may be zero, one or more levels of + hierarchical naming nodes terminating in a rightmost leaf node. + See the section entitled "Identifier assignment" below for more on + the semantics of NSSs. This syntax convention is captured in the + following normative ABNF rules for MACE NSSs (see RFC 2234) [2]: + + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + + MACE-NSS = 1*(subStChar) 0*(":" 1*(subStChar)) + + subStChar = trans / "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG + + trans = ALPHA / DIGIT / other / reserved + + other = "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." / + + "=" / "@" / ";" / "$" / + + "_" / "!" / "*" / "'" + + reserved = "%" / "/" / "?" / "#" + + The exclusion of the colon from the list of "other" characters + means that the colon can only occur as a delimiter between string + tokens. Note that this ABNF rule set guarantees that any valid + MACE NSS is also a valid RFC 2141 NSS. + + Relevant ancillary documentation: + + None. + + Identifier uniqueness: + + It is the responsibility of MACE directors to guarantee uniqueness + of the names of immediately subordinate naming authorities. Each + lower-level naming authority in turn inherits the responsibility + of guaranteeing uniqueness of names in their branch of the naming + tree. + + Identifier persistence: + + MACE directors bear ultimate responsibility for maintaining the + usability of MACE URNs over time. This responsibility may be + delegated to subordinate naming authorities per the discussion in + the section below on identifier assignment. That section provides + a mechanism for the delegation to be revoked in case a subordinate + naming authority ceases to function. + + Identifier assignment: + + MACE directors will create an initial series of immediately + subordinate naming authorities, and will define a process for + adding to that list of authorities. Each top-level working group + of MACE will be invited to designate a naming authority and to + suggest one or more candidate names for that authority. The + MACE-Shibboleth group, for example, might propose creating a + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + + naming authority under "urn:mace:shib," "urn:mace:shibboleth" or + some other name. + + Institutions and communities affiliated with MACE may request, + through their designated MACE liaison, that they be granted MACE- + subordinate naming authority status. They may propose candidate + names for that authority. One way for such entities to guarantee + uniqueness of their proposed name is to base it on a DNS name. + That is, if Georgetown University wished to be designated a + subordinate naming authority under MACE, the institutional MACE + liaison could propose to MACE directors that they be delegated + control over names beginning with "urn:mace:georgetown.edu". + Institutions seeking affiliation with MACE should send email to + mace-submit@internet2.edu, nominating an institutional liaison and + providing contact information for that person. + + On at least an annual basis, MACE directors will contact the + liaisons or directors of each immediately subordinate naming + authority. If there is no response, or if the respondent + indicates that they wish to relinquish naming authority, the + authority over that branch of the tree reverts to MACE. This + process will be enforced recursively by each naming authority on + its subordinates. This process guarantees that responsibility for + each branch of the tree will lapse for less than one year at worst + before being reclaimed by a superior authority. + + Lexical equivalence of two MACE namespace specific strings (NSSs) + is defined below as an exact, case-sensitive string match. MACE + will assign names of immediately subordinate naming authorities in + a case-insensitive fashion, so that there will not be two MACE- + subordinate naming authorities whose names differ only in case. + + Identifier resolution: + + MACE directors will maintain an index of all MACE and MACE + workgroup assigned URNs at the web site + http://middleware.internet2.edu/urn-mace/urn-mace.html. That + index will map URNs to resource identifiers or resource + specifications (e.g., protocol parameters). MACE-affiliated + naming authorities will specify how to resolve the URNs they + assign if they are resolvable. + + Lexical equivalence: + + Lexical equivalence of two MACE namespace specific strings (NSSs) + is defined as an exact, case-sensitive string match. + + Conformance with URN syntax: + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + + All MACE NSSs fully conform to RFC 2141 syntax rules for NSSs. + + Validation mechanism: + + As specified in the "Identifier resolution" section above, MACE + directors will maintain an index of all MACE and MACE workgroup + assigned URNs on its web site, + http://middleware.internet2.edu/urn-mace/urn-mace.html. Presence + in that index implies that a given URN is valid. MACE-affiliated + naming authorities will specify how to validate the URNs they + assign. + + Scope: + + Global. + +3. Security Considerations + + There are no additional security considerations beyond those normally + associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general. + +4. Namespace Considerations + + Registration of an NID specific to MACE is reasonable given the + following considerations: + + 1. MACE would like to assign URNs to some very fine-grained objects + (such as specific controlled vocabulary values of an attribute in + MACE-defined LDAP object classes). This does not seem to be the + primary intended use of the XMLORG namespace (RFC 3120) [3], let + alone the more tightly controlled OASIS namespace (RFC 3121) [4]. + + 2. MACE seeks naming autonomy. We understand that the XMLORG + registrants left the door open to subordinate naming authorities, + "OASIS may assign portions of its XMLORG namespace for assignment + by other parties" (RFC 3120) [3], but there is no specified + process for such assignment. That would in any case mean having a + fixed XMLORG-assigned prefix on every single object to which we + assign a URN. MACE has a number of active work groups that may + well generate a growing number of subordinate naming authorities. + Moreover, MACE is not a member of OASIS, so becoming a subordinate + naming authority under the OASIS URN space is currently not an + option. + + + + + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 5] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + + 3. MACE will want to assign URNs to non-XML objects as well. That is + another reason that XMLORG may not be an appropriate higher-level + naming authority for MACE. + + Some MACE-developed schema and namespaces may be good candidates for + inclusion in the XMLORG registry. The fact that such an object might + already have a MACE-assigned URN shouldn't be a hindrance. Work is + in progress to update RFC 2611 [5], which includes an explicit + statement that two or more URNs may point to the same resource. A + resource with a MACE-assigned namespace-specific-string would, of + course, be given an XMLORG namespace-specific-string at the time it + enters the XMLORG registry. + +5. IANA Considerations + + The IANA has formally registered URN namespace 13 to MACE, within the + IANA registry of URN NIDs. + +6. Normative References + + [1] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. + + [2] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. + + [3] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for XML.org", RFC 3120, + June 2001. + + [4] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for OASIS", RFC 3121, + June 2001. + + [5] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R. and P. Faltstrom, "URN + Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 33, RFC 2611, June 1999. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 6] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + +7. Authors' Addresses + + RL "Bob" Morgan + 4545 15th Ave. NE + Seattle, WA 98105 + U.S.A. + + EMail: rlmorgan@washington.edu + + + Keith D. Hazelton + University of Wisconsin-Madison + 1210 W. Dayton St. + Madison, WI 53706 + U.S.A. + + EMail: hazelton@doit.wisc.edu + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 7] + +RFC 3613 URN Namespace for MACE October 2003 + + +8. Full Copyright Statement + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. + + This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to + others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it + or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published + and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any + kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are + included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this + document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing + the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other + Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of + developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for + copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be + followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than + English. + + The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be + revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. + + This document and the information contained herein is provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING + TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING + BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION + HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Acknowledgement + + Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the + Internet Society. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Morgan & Hazelton Informational [Page 8] + |