summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc396.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc396.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc396.txt59
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc396.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc396.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..013b753
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc396.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+NIC#: 11796
+RFC#: 396
+Date: 11/13/73
+Title: Network Graphics Working Group Meeting - Second Iteration
+Author: Steve Bunch ILL-ANTS
+Distrib: Network Graphics Group
+Updates: RFC 474
+
+ I have obtained some feedback concerning my suggestion in RFC
+474 that the Working Group meeting be held here on May 11, 1973. The
+comments generally fell into three groups:
+
+ (1) The meeting should be held at the end of April/ start of May to
+ coincide with the ANTS meeting being held here then.
+ (2) The meeting should be held in mid to late summer (majority said
+ this).
+ (3) The meeting should not be held yet, as there is nothing to meet
+ about.
+
+(1) That's simply too soon. Admittedly it would be convenient, but
+some people have other commitments on their time and that probably
+wouldn't allow enough time for preparation.
+(3) is not true, even considering my meager present and future planned
+needs. I hope there is a large group that shares this opinion.
+(2) seems to be the best idea, since everyone who contacted me
+objected strongly to the 11th of May.
+
+ Bearing this in mind, I propose July 16, 1973 as the new meeting
+date. This should give everyone ample time to peruse James Michener's
+(at the moment) forthcoming RFC. If you have specific questions about
+past meetings, committees, etc., this should give you time to get an
+answer, also.
+
+ The meeting will be chaired by James Michener, Network Graphics
+Group chairman. A recording secretary will (if my understanding of
+past meeting protocol is correct) be volunteered at the meeting. My
+role has been, and will probably remain, clerical. My phone number,
+by the way, is (217) 333-9354. It was shown incorrectly in RFC 474. My
+apologies to those people who got the Publications Office. I can also
+be reached via network mail as user BUNCH at site USC-ISI (restated in
+a vague, obfuscatory, and hubistic metalanguage, English, by popular
+request).
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ]
+ [ direction of Alex McKenzie. 1/97 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+ [Page 1]
+