summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt339
1 files changed, 339 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1808be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc4735.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group T. Taylor
+Request for Comments: 4735 Nortel
+Category: Standards Track October 2006
+
+
+ Example Media Types for Use in Documentation
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+ Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+ improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+ Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+ and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+Abstract
+
+ This document is registration for the 'example' media type and
+ 'example' subtypes within the standards tree. The 'example/*' and
+ '*/example' media types are defined for documentation purposes only.
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ From time to time, documents created by the IETF or by other
+ standards bodies show examples involving the use of media types,
+ where the actual media type is not relevant. It would be useful in
+ such cases to be able to show a media type whose illustrative role in
+ the example is clear. In the worst case, this can be useful to debug
+ implementations where the designer mistook the example for a
+ requirement of the protocol concerned.
+
+ To meet this need, this document registers the following media types:
+
+ o the 'example' media type;
+
+ o the 'application/example', 'audio/example', 'image/example',
+ 'message/example', 'model/example', 'multipart/example',
+ 'text/example', and 'video/example' media subtypes.
+
+ It is suggested that compilers of illustrative examples involving
+ media types in trees other than the standards tree might also
+ incorporate the string "example" into their hypothetical media types.
+
+
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006
+
+
+2. Terminology
+
+ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
+ "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
+ document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
+
+3. Registration of the 'example' Media Type
+
+ This section registers the 'example' media type in accordance with
+ the requirements of RFC 4288.
+
+ Type name: example.
+
+ Subtype name: any subtype may be used with the 'example' type.
+ However, IANA MUST NOT register any subtypes for the 'example' media
+ type.
+
+
+ Required parameters: as invented by the user.
+
+ Optional parameters: as invented by the user.
+
+ Encoding considerations: as invented by the user.
+
+ Security considerations: The 'example' media type is defined for use
+ in documentation only. It MUST NOT be implemented. Its appearance
+ in real code could lead to unpredictable results and therefore open
+ up security holes.
+
+ Interoperability considerations: Any attempt to negotiate or send the
+ 'example' media type is bound to lead to interoperability problems.
+
+ Published specification: this document.
+
+ Applications that use this media type: as invented by the user.
+
+ Additional information:
+ Magic number(s): not applicable.
+ File extension(s): not applicable.
+ Macintosh file type code(s): not applicable.
+
+ Person & email address to contact for further information:
+ ietf-types@iana.org.
+
+ Intended usage: LIMITED USE.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006
+
+
+ Restrictions on usage: This type is intended only for use in
+ documents providing examples involving specification of some media
+ type, where the actual media type used is irrelevant.
+
+ Author: Internet Engineering Task Force
+
+ Change controller: Internet Engineering Task Force
+
+4. Registration of the 'application/example', 'audio/example',
+ 'image/example', 'message/example', 'model/example',
+ 'multipart/example', 'text/example', and 'video/example' Subtypes
+
+ This section registers 'example' media subtypes in accordance with
+ the requirements of RFC 4288.
+
+ Type name: 'application', 'audio', 'image', 'message', 'model',
+ 'multipart', 'text', and 'video'.
+
+ Subtype name: 'example'.
+
+ Required parameters: those required by the type and any others as
+ invented by the user.
+
+ Optional parameters: those offered by the type and any others as
+ invented by the user.
+
+ Encoding considerations: as invented by the user.
+
+ Security considerations: The 'example' media subtypes are defined
+ for use in documentation only. They MUST NOT be implemented. Their
+ appearance in real code could lead to unpredictable results and
+ therefore open up security holes.
+
+ Interoperability considerations: Any attempt to negotiate or send
+ one of these 'example' media subtypes is bound to lead to
+ interoperability problems.
+
+ Published specification: this document.
+
+ Applications that use this media type: as invented by the user.
+
+ Additional information:
+ Magic number(s): not applicable.
+ File extension(s): not applicable.
+ Macintosh file type code(s): not applicable.
+
+ Person & email address to contact for further information:
+ ietf-types@iana.org.
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 3]
+
+RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006
+
+
+ Intended usage: LIMITED USE.
+
+ Restrictions on usage: These subtypes are intended only for use in
+ documents providing examples involving specification of some subtype
+ of the given media type, where the actual subtype used is irrelevant.
+
+ Author: Internet Engineering Task Force
+
+ Change controller: Internet Engineering Task Force
+
+5. Security Considerations
+
+ The 'example' media type and subtypes are defined for use in
+ documentation only. They MUST NOT be implemented. Any attempt to
+ implement them in real code could lead to unpredictable results and
+ thus potentially open up security holes.
+
+6. IANA Considerations
+
+ This document specifies and registers the 'example' media type and
+ the 'application/example', 'audio/example', 'image/example',
+ 'message/example', 'model/example', 'multipart/example',
+ 'text/example', and 'video/example' subtypes.
+
+7. Acknowledgements
+
+ This document sprang from Magnus Westerland's expression of need and
+ Rod Walsh's support and suggestions for generalization. Warnings
+ against implementation in the Security Considerations and
+ Interoperability Considerations sections and the 'multipart/example'
+ subtype were added at John Klensin's suggestion. Some editing
+ touchups and strengthening of the language in the Security
+ Considerations section were done in response to the Gen-ART reviewer,
+ Sharon Chisholm.
+
+8. Normative References
+
+ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+ Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
+
+ [RFC4288] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
+ Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 4]
+
+RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006
+
+
+Author's Address
+
+ Tom Taylor
+ Nortel
+ 1852 Lorraine Ave
+ Ottawa, Ontario K1H 6Z8
+ Canada
+
+ EMail: taylor@nortel.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 5]
+
+RFC 4735 Example Media Types October 2006
+
+
+Full Copyright Statement
+
+ Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
+
+ This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
+ contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
+ retain all their rights.
+
+ This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
+ "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
+ OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
+ ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
+ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
+ INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
+ WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Intellectual Property
+
+ The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
+ Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
+ pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
+ this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
+ might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
+ made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
+ on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
+ found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
+
+ Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
+ assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
+ attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
+ such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
+ specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
+ http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
+
+ The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
+ copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
+ rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
+ this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
+ ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
+
+Acknowledgement
+
+ Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
+ Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Taylor Standards Track [Page 6]
+