diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc6172.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc6172.txt | 339 |
1 files changed, 339 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc6172.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc6172.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0c8ee0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc6172.txt @@ -0,0 +1,339 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Black +Request for Comments: 6172 EMC +Updates: 4172 D. Peterson +Category: Standards Track Brocade +ISSN: 2070-1721 March 2011 + + + Deprecation of the Internet Fibre Channel Protocol (iFCP) + Address Translation Mode + +Abstract + + Changes to Fibre Channel have caused the specification of the + Internet Fibre Channel Protocol (iFCP) address translation mode to + become incorrect. Due to the absence of usage of iFCP address + translation mode, it is deprecated by this document. iFCP address + transparent mode remains correctly specified. + + iFCP address transparent mode has been implemented and is in current + use; therefore, it is not affected by this document. + + This document also records the state of Protocol Number 133, which + was allocated for a pre-standard version of the Fibre Channel + Internet Protocol (FCIP). + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6172. + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 6172 iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates March 2011 + + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction...................................................3 + 2. Conventions Used in This Document..............................3 + 3. iFCP Address Translation Mode..................................3 + 3.1. Problem Discussion........................................4 + 3.2. iFCP Address Translation Mode Deprecation.................4 + 4. FCIP and Protocol Number 133...................................5 + 5. Security Considerations........................................5 + 6. IANA Considerations............................................5 + 7. Conclusions....................................................5 + 8. References.....................................................5 + 8.1. Normative References......................................5 + 8.2. Informative References....................................6 + 9. Acknowledgments ...............................................6 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 6172 iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates March 2011 + + +1. Introduction + + See Section 3 of [RFC4172] for introductory material on Fibre Channel + concepts. + + The Internet Fibre Channel Protocol (iFCP) [RFC4172] operates in two + modes with respect to Fibre Channel N_PORT fabric addresses (24-bit + N_PORT_IDs): address transparent mode and address translation mode + (both modes are specified in [RFC4172]): + + o Address transparent mode is a pass-through mode that preserves + Fibre Channel N_PORT fabric addresses. + + o Address translation mode is a Fibre Channel analog to Network + Address Translation (NAT) in which iFCP gateways change Fibre + Channel N_PORT fabric addresses at the boundary between Fibre + Channel and the Internet. Both the source (S_ID) and destination + (D_ID) N_PORT fabric addresses may be changed by the iFCP + gateways. + + This document deprecates iFCP address translation mode because the + specification has not tracked changes in Fibre Channel and because + there are no known implementations. + + Protocol Number 133 was allocated for a pre-standard version of the + Fibre Channel Internet Protocol (FCIP) that encapsulated FC frames + directly in IP packets. That protocol number is not used by the + standard FCIP protocol [RFC3821] [FC-BB-3], but implementations of + the pre-standard protocol were deployed. Therefore, this document + makes no change to the current allocation of Protocol Number 133. + +2. Conventions Used in This Document + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. + +3. iFCP Address Translation Mode + + iFCP address translation mode has to translate addresses embedded in + transmitted data. This is analogous to NAT translation of IP + addresses embedded in IP packets. Fibre Channel restricts the + occurrence of embedded fabric addresses to control messages (frames); + N_PORTs send and receive two types of control frames that may contain + embedded fabric addresses: + + + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 6172 iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates March 2011 + + + o Extended Link Services (ELSs); and + + o FC-4 Link Services (FC-4 LSs) for the Small Computer System + Interface (SCSI) over Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP). + + The embedded fabric address translations for N_PORT control frames + are specified in Section 7.3 of [RFC4172]. These translations were + correct as specified for Fibre Channel as of approximately 2003, + based on the [FC-FS] standard for ELSs and the [FCP] standard for FCP + FC-4 LSs. + +3.1. Problem Discussion + + Significant changes have been made to FC control frames since the + iFCP specification [RFC4172] was published; the currently applicable + FC standards are [FC-LS] and [FCP-3], and additional changes are + forthcoming in the [FC-LS-2] and [FCP-4] standards projects, which + are nearing completion. These changes have caused Section 7.3 of + [RFC4172] to become incorrect. + + Actual iFCP deployment has diverged significantly from that + anticipated during the development of [RFC4172]. All deployments of + iFCP known to the authors of this document use iFCP address + transparent mode and are used only for FC inter-switch links. iFCP + address translation mode as specified in [RFC4172] cannot be used for + FC inter-switch links because the necessary embedded fabric address + translations for FC inter-switch control messages (Switch Fabric + Internal Link Services (ILSs)) have not been specified. + +3.2. iFCP Address Translation Mode Deprecation + + For the reasons described above, it is prudent to deprecate iFCP + address translation mode in preference to updating it to the current + state of Fibre Channel standards. Updating iFCP address translation + mode would create a continuing requirement to update an unused + protocol mode to match future changes to FC control frames. + + Therefore, this document deprecates iFCP address translation mode: + + o iFCP address translation mode [RFC4172] SHOULD NOT be implemented + and SHOULD NOT be used. + + o The status of [RFC4172] remains Proposed Standard RFC in order to + retain the specification of iFCP address transparent mode. + + o The [RFC4172] specification of iFCP address translation mode + should be treated as Historic [RFC2026]. + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 4] + +RFC 6172 iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates March 2011 + + +4. FCIP and Protocol Number 133 + + Protocol Number 133 was allocated for Fibre Channel (FC) [IANA-IP] + and used by a pre-standard version of the FCIP protocol that + encapsulates FC frames directly in IP packets. The standard FCIP + protocol [RFC3821] [FC-BB-3] encapsulates FC frames in TCP and hence + does not use Protocol Number 133, but implementations of the pre- + standard version of the FCIP protocol were deployed [MR]. Based on + this deployment, the protocol number needs to remain allocated. + +5. Security Considerations + + The security considerations for iFCP continue to apply; see Section + 10 of [RFC4172]. + +6. IANA Considerations + + IANA has added this document as a supplemental reference for the + allocation of Protocol Number 133 but hasn't changed that allocation. + +7. Conclusions + + For the reasons described in this document, iFCP Address Translation + mode is deprecated, and the allocation of Protocol Number 133 remains + unchanged at this time. + +8. References + +8.1. Normative References + + [FC-FS] Fibre Channel Framing and Signaling Interface (FC-FS), ANSI + INCITS 373-2003, October 2003. + + [FC-LS] Fibre Channel - Link Services (FC-LS), ANSI INCITS + 433-2007, July 2007. + + [FCP] Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP), ANSI INCITS 269-1996, April + 1996. + + [FCP-3] Fibre Channel Protocol - 3 (FCP-3), ISO/IEC 14776-223:2008, + June 2008. + + [IANA-IP] Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers, IANA Registry, + http://www.iana.org, visited October 2010. + + [RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision + 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996. + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 5] + +RFC 6172 iFCP and Protocol 133 Updates March 2011 + + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC4172] Monia, C., Mullendore, R., Travostino, F., Jeong, W., and + M. Edwards, "iFCP - A Protocol for Internet Fibre Channel + Storage Networking", RFC 4172, September 2005. + +8.2. Informative References + + [FC-BB-3] Fibre Channel Backbone - 3 (FC-BB-3), ANSI INCITS 414-2006, + July 2006. + + [FC-LS-2] Fibre Channel - Link Services - 2 (FC-LS-2), INCITS Project + 2103-D, Technical Committee T11 (www.t11.org). + + [FCP-4] Fibre Channel Protocol - 4 (FCP-4), INCITS Project 1828-D, + Technical Committee T10 (www.t10.org). + + [MR] Rajagopal, M., Private email communication, June 2009. + + [RFC3821] Rajagopal, M., Rodriguez, E., and R. Weber, "Fibre Channel + Over TCP/IP (FCIP)", RFC 3821, July 2004. + +9. Acknowledgments + + The authors would like to thank Tom Talpey, David Harrington, Joe + Touch, Paul Hoffman, and Pekka Savola for helpful comments on this + document. + +Authors' Addresses + + David L. Black + EMC Corporation + 176 South Street + Hopkinton, MA 01748 + + Phone: +1 (508) 293-7953 + EMail: david.black@emc.com + + David Peterson + Brocade Communications + 6000 Nathan Lane North + Plymouth, MN 55442 + + Phone: +1 (612) 802-3299 + EMail: david.peterson@brocade.com + + + + + +Black & Peterson Standards Track [Page 6] + |