diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc669.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc669.txt | 171 |
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc669.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc669.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..93dab0e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc669.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group D.W. Dodds +Request for Comments: 669 BBN-TENEXA +NIC: 31435 December 4, 1974 + + + November, 1974, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers + + + Two months have elapsed since our last survey, and the appearance of + additional New-Protocol servers has progressed at the usual snail's + pace. The changes in this list are (with host numbers in octal): + + SRI-AI (102) now has a New-Protocol server; + SDC-LAB (10) is back on the net and the list; + SDC-CC (110) is coming on the net but status is as yet unknown; + USC-ISI (126) and USC-ISIB (226) (formerly ISI-DEVTENEX) now have + New-Protocol servers; + SDAC-44 (32) has been removed -- no longer classed as a server host; + HAWAII-500 (344) is coming on the net, status presently unknown; + LONDON (52) has been added; + BBN-TENEXD is now host 162 (formerly 205). + + What follows is an update of the summary and tabulation that appeared + in RFC #702.* Is there light at the end of the tunnel? + + total server hosts 37 100% + no New-Prot server 19 51% + unknown status (new host) 2 6% + total New-Prot implem. 16 43% + New-Prot on socket 27, + Old on socket 1 (2) 9 24% + New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16% + New-Prot on 1 only (3) 1 3% + + Notes: + + * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run + at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data. + What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen + by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 4 Dec. 1974. + + (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to + all protocols and conventions, as I understand them. + + (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New- + Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt + to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs + according to what control sequences are received. + + + +Dodds [Page 1] + +RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974 + + + Tabulation of server status for all server sites: + +Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options + No. Name 1 27 Implementation (if any) + +101 UCLA-CCN Old X +201 UCLA-CCBS Old X + 2 SRI-ARC Old X +102 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X + 4 UTAH-10 Old X +105 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 +305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 +106 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 +206 MIT-AI Old X +306 MIT-ML Old X + 7 RAND-RCC Old X + 10 SDC-LAB Old X +110 SDC-CC ? ? + 11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 + 12 LL-67 Old* X +112 LL-TX-2 Old X + 13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 + 15 CASE-10 Old X + 16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 +116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 + 17 I4-TENEX Old X +217 KI4B-TENEX Old X + 20 AMES-67 New New None +126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 +226 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 27 USC-44 Old X +327 USC-ECL Old X + 37 CCA-TENEX Old X + 40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 +344 HAWAII-500 ? ? + 52 LONDON Old* X + 53 OFFICE-1 Old X + 54 MIT-MULTICS New New None + 61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 +162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 + + + + + + + + + +Dodds [Page 2] + +RFC 669 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974 + + +Key: X No server at this socket + ? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host + I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") + O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") + (# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented + by anyone are: + 0 Transmit-Binary + 1 Echo + 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead + 6 Timing-Mark ) + + Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option + requests. + + + + + + + + + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] + [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 2/2000 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dodds [Page 3] + |