diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc679.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc679.txt | 171 |
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc679.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc679.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..06b0812 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc679.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group D.W. Dodds +Request for Comments: 679 BBN-TENEXA +NIC: 31890 February 1975 + + + February, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers + + It has been two and a half months since our last survey, and it has + been depressing to note that "progress" toward an all-new-protocol + network has been even slower than previously. Changes since the last + list (with host numbers in octal): + + SRI-ARC (2) and OFFICE-1 (53) have added logger sockets 27, but with + Old-Protocol servers (are these forerunners of New-Protocol + servers?); + SDC-CC (110) has been removed from the list until it starts operating + on the network + LL-67 (12) now has a New-Protocol server on socket 1; + CASE-10 (15) has departed from the network; + BBN-TENEX is now host 361 (formerly 105); + ANL (ARGONNE, 67) has come on the net with Old- and New-Protocol + servers on sockets 1 and 27, respectively. + + The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of + server-host Telnet servers. + total server hosts 36 100% + no New-Prot server 17 47% + unknown status (new host) 1 3% + total New-Prot implem. 18 50% + New-Prot on socket 27, + Old on socket 1 (2) 10 28% + New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16% + New-Prot on 1 only (3) 2 6% + Notes: + + * All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run + at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data. + What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen + by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 20 Feb. 1975. + + (2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to + all protocols and conventions, as I understand them. + + (3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New- + Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt + to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs + according to what control sequences are received. + + + + +Dodds [Page 1] + +RFC 679 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers January 1975 + + + Tabulation of server status for all server sites: + + Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot. Options + No. Name 1 27 Implemented (if any) + + 101 UCLA-CCN Old X + 201 UCLA-CCBS Old X + 2 SRI-ARC Old Old + 102 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X + 4 UTAH-10 Old X + 305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 106 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 + 206 MIT-AI Old X + 306 MIT-ML Old X + 7 RAND-RCC Old X + 10 SDC-LAB Old X + 11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 + 12 LL-67 New X None + 112 LL-TX-2 Old X + 13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 + 16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 + 116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 + 17 I4-TENEX Old X + 217 KI4B-TENEX Old X + 20 AMES-67 New New None + 126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 226 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 27 USC-44 Old X + 327 USC-ECL Old X + 37 CCA-TENEX Old X + 40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 + 344 HAWAII-500 ? ? + 52 LONDON Old X + 53 OFFICE-1 Old Old + 54 MIT-MULTICS New New None + 61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 361 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 + 67 ANL Old New I1,3,6; O3 + + + + + + + + + + +Dodds [Page 2] + +RFC 679 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers January 1975 + + + Key: + + X No server at this socket + ? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host + I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") + O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") + (# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented + by anyone are: + + 0 Transmit-Binary + 1 Echo + 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead + 6 Timing-Mark ) + + Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option + requests. + + + + + + + + + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] + [ support from BBN Corp. and its successors. 7/2000 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dodds [Page 3] + |