summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc703.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc703.txt171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..57e5da8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
+RFC # 703 BBN-TENEXA
+NIC # 32988 11 July, 1975
+
+
+ July, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers
+
+
+In the nearly five months since the last report several new server sites
+have joined the network and there has been some significant progress in
+New-Protocol implementation. Perhaps the New-Protocol implementation on
+the TIPs scheduled for the end of the year will encourage further
+progress in the near future.
+
+There have been numerous changes since the last list (numbers in octal):
+
+SRI-ARC (2) is no longer a server host;
+MIT-AI (206), MIT-ML (306), LONDON (52), and OFFICE-1 (53) have added
+ New-Protocol servers;
+LLL-RISOS (25), SDAC-44 (32), and ARPA-DMS (34) have joined the network;
+SCI-TENEX (55), Rutgers-10 (56), USC-ISIC (364), and SUMEX-AIM (70) have
+ joined the network with New-Protocol servers.
+
+The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of
+server-host TELNET servers.
+ total server hosts 43 100%
+ no New-Prot server 16 37%
+ unknown status (new host) 2 5%
+ total New-Prot implem. 25 58%
+ New-Prot on 1 and 27,
+ Old on socket 1 (2) 13 30%
+ New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 8 19%
+ New-Prot on 1 only (3) 4 9%
+
+Notes:
+
+* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at
+ various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the list. What
+ is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the
+ new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 10 July 1975.
+
+(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all
+ protocols and conventions, as I understand them.
+
+(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-Protocol
+ servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to
+ communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according
+ to what control sequences are received.
+
+
+
+Dodds [Page 1]
+
+RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975
+
+
+ Tabulation of server status for all server sites:
+
+ Host Number Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options
+(Oct) (Dec) Name 1 27 Implementated (if any)
+
+101 65 UCLA-CCN Old X
+201 129 UCLA-CCBS Old X
+102 66 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3
+3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X
+4 4 UTAH-10 Old X
+305 197 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3
+106 70 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3
+206 134 MIT-AI New X I1,3; O3
+306 198 MIT-ML New X I1,3; O3
+7 7 RAND-RCC Old X
+107 71 RAND-ISD ? ?
+10 8 SDC-LAB Old X
+11 9 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3
+12 10 LL-67 New X None
+112 74 LL-TX-2 Old X
+13 11 SU-AI New* New* I1,3
+16 14 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3
+116 78 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3
+17 15 I4-TENEX Old X
+217 143 I4B-TENEX Old X
+20 16 AMES-67 New New None
+25 21 LLL-RISOS Old Old
+126 86 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3
+226 150 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3
+27 23 USC-44 Old X
+327 215 USC-ECL Old X
+32 26 SDAC-44 Old X
+34 28 ARPA-DMS Old X
+37 31 CCA-TENEX Old X
+40 32 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3
+43 35 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3
+344 228 HAWAII-500 Old X
+52 42 LONDON New New None
+53 43 OFFICE-1 Old New I1,3,6; O3
+54 44 MIT-MULTICS New New None
+55 45 SCI-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3
+56 46 RUTGERS-10 New New I1,3; O3
+61 49 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3
+361 241 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3
+162 114 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3
+364 244 USC-ISIC Old New I1,3,6; O3
+67 55 ANL ? ?
+70 56 SUMEX-AIM Old New I1,3,6; O3
+
+
+
+Dodds [Page 2]
+
+RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975
+
+
+Key: X No server at this socket
+ ? Status not ascertained-unable to connect to host
+ I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #")
+ O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #")
+ (# is option number in new Protocol, Options in tabulation:
+ 0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo
+ 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark)
+
+Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option
+requests.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+ [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
+ [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dodds [Page 3]
+