diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc7818.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/rfc/rfc7818.txt | 283 |
1 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc7818.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc7818.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..77e059d --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc7818.txt @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Jethanandani +Request for Comments: 7818 Cisco Systems, Inc +Category: Informational March 2016 +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + URN Namespace for MEF Documents + +Abstract + + This document describes the Namespace Identifier (NID) "mef" for + Uniform Resource Names (URNs) used to identify resources published by + MEF Forum (https://www.mef.net). MEF specifies and manages resources + that utilize this URN identification model. Management activities + for these and other resources types are handled by the manager of the + MEF Assigned Names and Numbers (MANN) registry. + +Status of This Memo + + This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is + published for informational purposes. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents + approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet + Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7818. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + + + + +Jethanandani Informational [Page 1] + +RFC 7818 Namespace for MEF March 2016 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 2. URN Specification for MEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + +1. Introduction + + The MEF Forum (MEF) is a nonprofit international industry standards + organization dedicated to the worldwide adoption of Carrier Ethernet + (CE) networks and services. The forum creates specifications in the + areas of Services, Architecture, and Operations and Management. + + As part of these specifications efforts, there is a need to identify + identifiers in a managed namespace that are unique and persistent. + To ensure that this namespace's uniqueness is absolute, a + registration of a specific URN Syntax [RFC2141] Namespace Identifier + (NID) for use by MEF is being specified in this document. + +1.1. Terminology + + +---------+--------------------------------+ + | Acronym | Meaning | + +---------+--------------------------------+ + | CE | Carrier Ethernet | + | | | + | MANN | MEF Assigned Names and Numbers | + | | | + | MEF | MEF Forum | + | | | + | NID | Namespace Identifier | + | | | + | NSS | Namespace-Specific String | + | | | + | RDS | Resolution Discovery System | + | | | + | URN | Uniform Resource Name | + +---------+--------------------------------+ + + + + + + + + +Jethanandani Informational [Page 2] + +RFC 7818 Namespace for MEF March 2016 + + +2. URN Specification for MEF + + Namespace ID: + + mef + + Registration information: + + registration version number: 1 + + registration date: 2016-02-08 + + Declared registrant of the namespace: + + Registering organization + + Name: MEF Forum + + Address: 6033 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 1107 + Los Angeles, CA 90045 + United States + + Designated contact: + + Role: Manager, MEF Namespace + + Email: namespace@mef.net + + Declaration of syntactic structure: + + The syntax of namespace-specific strings for the "mef" namespace + is <NSS> in RFC 2141. + + Relevant ancillary documentation: + + MEF publishes information regarding the registered resources in + the MEF Assigned Names and Numbers (MANN) registry + (https://www.mef.net/MANN). + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Jethanandani Informational [Page 3] + +RFC 7818 Namespace for MEF March 2016 + + + Identifier uniqueness considerations: + + MEF will manage resource classes using the "mef" NID and will be + the authority for managing resources and associated subsequent + strings. MEF is expected to guarantee the uniqueness of the + strings themselves, or it may permit secondary responsibility for + certain defined resources. + + MEF could allow for use of experimental type values for testing + purposes only. Note that using experimental types may create + collisions as multiple users may use the same values for different + resources and specific strings. + + Identifier persistence considerations: + + MEF will update the MEF Assigned Names and Numbers (MANN) registry + to document the registered resources that will use the "mef" NID. + + Process of identifier assignment: + + Assignment of a URN from the MEF namespace will be documented as + part of the MEF Assigned Names and Numbers (MANN) registry. + + Process of identifier resolution: + + The namespace is not listed with a Resolution Discovery System + (RDS). Therefore, this process is not relevant. + + Rules for Lexical Equivalence: + + The entire URN is case-insensitive. + + Conformance with URN Syntax: + + No special considerations + + Validation mechanism: + + None specified. URN assignment will be handled by procedures + implemented in support of MEF activities. + + Scope: + + Global + + + + + + + +Jethanandani Informational [Page 4] + +RFC 7818 Namespace for MEF March 2016 + + +3. Examples + + The following are examples of URNs that MEF is looking to assign: + + urn:mef:yang:mef-services + + urn:mef:yang:mef-interfaces + +4. Security Considerations + + There are no security considerations other than those normally + associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general, which are + described in "Function Requirements for Uniform Resource Names" + [RFC1737] and "URN Syntax" [RFC2141]. + +5. IANA Considerations + + Per this document, IANA has added a new entry ("mef") in the "Uniform + Resource Names (URN) Namespaces" registry available from the IANA + site (https://www.iana.org). + +6. Normative References + + [RFC1737] Sollins, K. and L. Masinter, "Functional Requirements for + Uniform Resource Names", RFC 1737, DOI 10.17487/RFC1737, + December 1994, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1737>. + + [RFC2141] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, DOI 10.17487/RFC2141, + May 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2141>. + +Author's Address + + Mahesh Jethanandani + Cisco Systems, Inc + 170 W. Tasman Drive + San Jose, CA 95134 + United States + + Phone: +1 408.526.8763 + Email: mjethanandani@gmail.com + + + + + + + + + + + +Jethanandani Informational [Page 5] + |