summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0800c43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc8602.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Arkko
+Request for Comments: 8602 Ericsson
+Updates: 3219 T. Hardie
+Category: Standards Track July 2019
+ISSN: 2070-1721
+
+
+ Update to the Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) IANA Registry Rules
+ regarding Postal Addresses
+
+Abstract
+
+ This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing
+ over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses
+ be included in contact information.
+
+ This memo updates RFC 3219.
+
+Status of This Memo
+
+ This is an Internet Standards Track document.
+
+ This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
+ (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
+ received public review and has been approved for publication by the
+ Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
+ Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
+
+ Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
+ and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
+ https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8602.
+
+Copyright Notice
+
+ Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
+ document authors. All rights reserved.
+
+ This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
+ (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
+ publication of this document. Please review these documents
+ carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
+ to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
+ include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
+ the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
+ described in the Simplified BSD License.
+
+
+
+
+
+Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 1]
+
+RFC 8602 TRIP Registry Update July 2019
+
+
+Table of Contents
+
+ 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
+ 2. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
+ 3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
+ 4. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
+ Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+ Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
+
+1. Introduction
+
+ This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing
+ over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses
+ be included in contact information. No use for the addresses is
+ identified, and omitting this information provides a privacy benefit.
+
+ This memo updates RFC 3219.
+
+2. IANA Considerations
+
+ This memo updates the registration rules [RFC8126] for TRIP
+ Attributes ([RFC3219], Section 13.2) and TRIP IP Telephony
+ Administrative Domain (ITAD) Numbers ([RFC3219], Section 13.5) as
+ follows.
+
+ The IETF no longer requires IANA to collect postal address
+ information when adding TRIP registry entries. Additionally, IANA
+ has removed previously collected postal addresses from the
+ registries.
+
+3. Security Considerations
+
+ No security impacts of this change have been identified.
+
+4. Normative References
+
+ [RFC3219] Rosenberg, J., Salama, H., and M. Squire, "Telephony
+ Routing over IP (TRIP)", RFC 3219, DOI 10.17487/RFC3219,
+ January 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3219>.
+
+ [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
+ Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
+ RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
+ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 2]
+
+RFC 8602 TRIP Registry Update July 2019
+
+
+Acknowledgements
+
+ The authors would like to thank Michelle Cotton, Alissa Cooper, and
+ Jonathan Rosenberg for interesting discussions in this problem space.
+ The authors would also like to thank Carlos Pignataro, Russ Housley,
+ Abdussalam Baryun, and Paul Wouters for feedback.
+
+Authors' Addresses
+
+ Jari Arkko
+ Ericsson
+ Kauniainen 02700
+ Finland
+
+ Email: jari.arkko@piuha.net
+
+
+ Ted Hardie
+
+ Email: ted.ietf@gmail.com
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Arkko & Hardie Standards Track [Page 3]
+