From 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:54:24 +0100
Subject: doc: Add RFC documents

---
 doc/rfc/rfc552.txt | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/rfc/rfc552.txt

(limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc552.txt')

diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc552.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc552.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a91ceba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc552.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group                                           Buz Owen
+RFC # 552                                                       SDAC-TIP
+NIC # 17809                                                13 July, 1973
+
+
+                  Single access to Standard Protocols
+
+
+Isn't the idea of a single access protocol simple enough that one could
+be specified, and a socket reserved for it, before the proposed mail
+protocol becomes official?  The result would be that MP could be the
+first protocol implemented under UULP (or whatever it is to be called),
+and the other protocols could be "moved" as soon as any problems in the
+official specifications could be worked out, and at the convenience of
+implementors.
+
+The single access protocol might have the following commands:
+
+    USER
+    PASS
+    ACCT
+    MAIL
+    FTP
+    RJS
+    DRS (?)
+    HELP (?)
+    BYE
+
+following Jim White's idea of nested command and reply spaces.
+
+This doesn't address the question of "what is free", or of the
+interrelationships between the various protocols, but it doesn't make
+those problem any worse, only a little different.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+       [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with    ]
+       [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp.            10/99 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+Owen                                                            [Page 1]
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3