From 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Voss Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:54:24 +0100 Subject: doc: Add RFC documents --- doc/rfc/rfc701.txt | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/rfc/rfc701.txt (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc701.txt') diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7a7d401 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc701.txt @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + AUGUST, 1974 + + AUGUST, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS + +THIS IS THE FIRST OF WHAT ARE PLANNED TO BE MONTHLY REPORTS ON +THE STATUS OF THE NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET IMPLEMENTAIONS ON THE SERVER +HOSTS ON THE ARPA NETWORK. INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ARE DATA ONLY +ON SERVER TELNETS AT THE VARIOUS SITES. ONE WOULD HOPE THAT ANY +SITE WITH AN OPERATIONAL NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER TELNET WOULD ALSO BOAST +A NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET; WE CAN CERTAINLY ASSUME THIS FOR TENEX +SITES AT WHICH TENEX 1.32 IS OPERATING. HOWEVER, NO FURTHER CLAIMS +ARE MADE FOR THE SERVER DATA CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. + +I AM SORRY TO REPORT THAT AT THIS LATE DATE, A MONTH AFTER THE RELEASE +OF TENEX 1.32, LESS THAN ONE-THIRD OF THE SERVER SITES HAVE ANY NEW- +PROTOCOL SERVER OPERATING, ACCORDING TO MY SURVEYS*, AND ONLY HALF +OF THOSE ARE USING CORRECTLY THE LOGGER SOCKET CONVENTIONS, AS I +UNDERSTAND THEM. AT THE END OF THIS REPORT IS A COMPLETE TABULATION +COMPILED FROM MY SURVEYS; THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY: + + TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 32 100% + + STATUS UNKNOWN (1) 3 9% + + NO NEW-PROT SERVER 19 59% + + TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 10 31% + + NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27, + OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 5 16% + + NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 4 13% + + NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY (3) 1 3% + + +NOTES: + +* ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM + RUN AT VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE + DATA. WHAT IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK + AS SEEN BY THE NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 15 AUG. + 1974. THERE MAY BE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE RESULTS AND THOSE + FROM SURVEYS MADE AT OTHER SITES. + +(1) NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS TO CONNECT TO THESE SITES ALL FAILED DUE TO + THE SITES' BEING DOWN TO THE NETWORK. + +(2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING + TO ALL PROTOCOLS AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM. + +(3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW- + PROTOCOL SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT + TO COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS + ACCORDING TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED. + + +TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES: + +HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT. OPTIONS + NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLEMENTATED (IF ANY) + + 1 UCLA-NMC ? ? +101 UCLA-CCN OLD X +201 UCLA-CCBC OLD X + 2 SRI-ARC OLD X +102 SRI-AI OLD X + 3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X + 4 UTAH-10 OLD X +105 BBN-TENEX OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 +205 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 +305 BBN-TENEXA OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 +106 MIT-DMS NEW NEW I1,3; 03 +206 MIT-AI OLD X +306 MIT-ML OLD X + 10 SDC-LAB ? ? + 11 HARV-10 NEW X I1,3; 03 + 12 LL-67 OLD X +112 LL-TX-2 OLD X + 13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1,3 + 15 CASE-10 OLD X + 16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1,3; 03 +116 CMU-10A NEW NEW I1,3; 03 + 17 I4-TENEX OLD X +117 I4-TENEXA ? ? + 20 AMES-67 OLD OLD(1) +126 USC-ISI OLD X + 27 USC-44 OLD X + 32 SDAC OLD X + 37 CCA-TENEX OLD X + 40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; 03 + 43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW IO(1),3; 00,3 + 53 OFFICE-1 OLD X + 54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE + +KEY: + X NO SEVER AT THIS SOCKET + ? STATUS UNKNOWN + I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER + (SERVER SAYS "WILL #") + O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER + (SERVER SAYS "DO #") + (# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS + IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE: + 0 TRANSMIT-BINARY + 1 ECHO + 3 SUPRESS-GO-AHEAD + 6 TIMING MARK ) + +NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS + TO SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION O. + + SUBMITTED 20 AUGUST 1974 + BY D. W. DODDS \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3