From 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Voss Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:54:24 +0100 Subject: doc: Add RFC documents --- doc/rfc/rfc703.txt | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/rfc/rfc703.txt (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc703.txt') diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..57e5da8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc703.txt @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + + + + +Network Working Group D.W. Dodds +RFC # 703 BBN-TENEXA +NIC # 32988 11 July, 1975 + + + July, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers + + +In the nearly five months since the last report several new server sites +have joined the network and there has been some significant progress in +New-Protocol implementation. Perhaps the New-Protocol implementation on +the TIPs scheduled for the end of the year will encourage further +progress in the near future. + +There have been numerous changes since the last list (numbers in octal): + +SRI-ARC (2) is no longer a server host; +MIT-AI (206), MIT-ML (306), LONDON (52), and OFFICE-1 (53) have added + New-Protocol servers; +LLL-RISOS (25), SDAC-44 (32), and ARPA-DMS (34) have joined the network; +SCI-TENEX (55), Rutgers-10 (56), USC-ISIC (364), and SUMEX-AIM (70) have + joined the network with New-Protocol servers. + +The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of +server-host TELNET servers. + total server hosts 43 100% + no New-Prot server 16 37% + unknown status (new host) 2 5% + total New-Prot implem. 25 58% + New-Prot on 1 and 27, + Old on socket 1 (2) 13 30% + New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 8 19% + New-Prot on 1 only (3) 4 9% + +Notes: + +* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at + various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the list. What + is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the + new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 10 July 1975. + +(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all + protocols and conventions, as I understand them. + +(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-Protocol + servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to + communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according + to what control sequences are received. + + + +Dodds [Page 1] + +RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975 + + + Tabulation of server status for all server sites: + + Host Number Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options +(Oct) (Dec) Name 1 27 Implementated (if any) + +101 65 UCLA-CCN Old X +201 129 UCLA-CCBS Old X +102 66 SRI-AI Old New I1,3,6; O3 +3 3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X +4 4 UTAH-10 Old X +305 197 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3 +106 70 MIT-DMS New New I1,3; O3 +206 134 MIT-AI New X I1,3; O3 +306 198 MIT-ML New X I1,3; O3 +7 7 RAND-RCC Old X +107 71 RAND-ISD ? ? +10 8 SDC-LAB Old X +11 9 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 +12 10 LL-67 New X None +112 74 LL-TX-2 Old X +13 11 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 +16 14 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3 +116 78 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3 +17 15 I4-TENEX Old X +217 143 I4B-TENEX Old X +20 16 AMES-67 New New None +25 21 LLL-RISOS Old Old +126 86 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3 +226 150 USC-ISIB Old New I1,3,6; O3 +27 23 USC-44 Old X +327 215 USC-ECL Old X +32 26 SDAC-44 Old X +34 28 ARPA-DMS Old X +37 31 CCA-TENEX Old X +40 32 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 +43 35 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3 +344 228 HAWAII-500 Old X +52 42 LONDON New New None +53 43 OFFICE-1 Old New I1,3,6; O3 +54 44 MIT-MULTICS New New None +55 45 SCI-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 +56 46 RUTGERS-10 New New I1,3; O3 +61 49 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 +361 241 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 +162 114 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3 +364 244 USC-ISIC Old New I1,3,6; O3 +67 55 ANL ? ? +70 56 SUMEX-AIM Old New I1,3,6; O3 + + + +Dodds [Page 2] + +RFC 703 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers July 1975 + + +Key: X No server at this socket + ? Status not ascertained-unable to connect to host + I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") + O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") + (# is option number in new Protocol, Options in tabulation: + 0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo + 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark) + +Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option +requests. + + + + + + + + + + + [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] + [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] + [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dodds [Page 3] + -- cgit v1.2.3