From 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Voss Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:54:24 +0100 Subject: doc: Add RFC documents --- doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 227 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt (limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt') diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..02cb30e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/rfc/rfc7163.txt @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + + + + +Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) C. Holmberg +Request for Comments: 7163 I. Sedlacek +Updates: 5031 Ericsson +Category: Standards Track March 2014 +ISSN: 2070-1721 + + + URN for Country-Specific Emergency Services + +Abstract + + This document updates the registration guidance provided in Section + 4.2 of RFC 5031, which allows the registration of service URNs with + the 'sos' service type only for emergency services "that are offered + widely and in different countries". This document updates those + instructions to allow such registrations when, at the time of + registration, those services are offered in only one country. + +Status of This Memo + + This is an Internet Standards Track document. + + This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force + (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has + received public review and has been approved for publication by the + Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on + Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. + + Information about the current status of this document, any errata, + and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at + http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7163. + +Copyright Notice + + Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the + document authors. All rights reserved. + + This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal + Provisions Relating to IETF Documents + (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of + publication of this document. Please review these documents + carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect + to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must + include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of + the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as + described in the Simplified BSD License. + + + + + +Holmberg & Sedlacek Standards Track [Page 1] + +RFC 7163 Country-Specific Emergency Services March 2014 + + +Table of Contents + + 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3. Update to RFC 5031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3.1. General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 3.2. New Text Replacing the Text of the 2nd Paragraph of + Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6.2. Informative Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + +1. Introduction + + The advice to experts for registering sub-services of the service URN + with the 'sos' service type is provided in Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 + [RFC5031] as follows: + + The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an + immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the + government or other public institutions. Additional sub-services + can be added after expert review and must be of general public + interest and have a similar emergency nature. The expert is + designated by the ECRIT working group, its successor, or, in their + absence, the IESG. The expert review should only approve + emergency services that are offered widely and in different + countries, with approximately the same caller expectation in terms + of services rendered. The 'sos' service is not meant to invoke + general government, public information, counseling, or social + services. + + Some existing emergency services are, at least initially, offered in + only one country. Examples are the "Reporting spies" emergency + service offered in South Korea and the "GAULA (anti-kidnapping)" + emergency service offered in Colombia according to [WIKIPEDIA]. + Future emergency service might also initially be introduced in only + one country. + + The advice to experts of sub-services of the service URN with the + 'sos' service type provided in RFC 5031 [RFC5031] prevents the + registration of a sub-service of the service URN with the 'sos' + service type for a service that, at the time of registration, is + offered in one country only. + + + + + + +Holmberg & Sedlacek Standards Track [Page 2] + +RFC 7163 Country-Specific Emergency Services March 2014 + + + This document updates the 2nd paragraph of Section 4.2 of RFC 5031 + [RFC5031], in order to allow the registration of service URNs with + the 'sos' service type for emergency services that, at the time of + registration, are offered in one country only. + +2. Conventions + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 + [RFC2119]. + +3. Update to RFC 5031 + +3.1. General + + Section 3.2 of this document replaces the text of the 2nd paragraph + of Section 4.2 (Sub-Services for the 'sos' Service) of RFC 5031 + [RFC5031]. + +3.2. New Text Replacing the Text of the 2nd Paragraph of Section 4.2 of + RFC 5031 + + The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an + immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the + government or other public institutions. Additional sub-services can + be added after expert review. The expert is designated by the ECRIT + working group, its successor, or, in their absence, the IESG. The + designated expert should only approve services that are to be used + for emergency purposes, that are offered in at least one country, + that do not match the description of any existing service URN with + the 'sos' service type, and where the service description and the URN + are defined as broadly as possible to encourage reuse. The 'sos' + service is not meant to invoke general government, public + information, counseling, or social services. + +4. IANA Considerations + + This document updates the advice to the expert of the "'sos' Sub- + Services" registry. IANA has updated the reference for that registry + to point to + this document (instead of RFC 5031 [RFC5031]). + +5. Security Considerations + + This document does not update the Security Considerations of RFC + 5031. + + + + +Holmberg & Sedlacek Standards Track [Page 3] + +RFC 7163 Country-Specific Emergency Services March 2014 + + +6. References + +6.1. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. + + [RFC5031] Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for + Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031, + January 2008. + +6.2. Informative Reference + + [WIKIPEDIA] Wikipedia, "Emergency telephone number", March 2014, + . + +Authors' Addresses + + Christer Holmberg + Ericsson + Hirsalantie 11 + Jorvas 02420 + Finland + + EMail: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com + + + Ivo Sedlacek + Ericsson + Sokolovska 79 + Praha 18600 + Czech Republic + + EMail: ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Holmberg & Sedlacek Standards Track [Page 4] + -- cgit v1.2.3