From 4bfd864f10b68b71482b35c818559068ef8d5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Voss <mail@thomasvoss.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:54:24 +0100
Subject: doc: Add RFC documents

---
 doc/rfc/rfc73.txt | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/rfc/rfc73.txt

(limited to 'doc/rfc/rfc73.txt')

diff --git a/doc/rfc/rfc73.txt b/doc/rfc/rfc73.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ee3c8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc/rfc73.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group                                   S. Crocker
+Request for Comments #73                                UCLA
+                                                        25 Sept. 70
+
+                        Response to NWM/RFC #67
+
+Bill's suggestion is a good one; however, my current policy is to
+encourage the most rapid implementation of the protocol in document
+#1, and his suggested modification should be delayed.  It seems to me
+most important to gain experience using the network before making
+changes to the protocol which are not dictated by necessity.  (I
+polled several sites regarding Bill's suggestion.  Sites with NCP
+implementations under way tended to agree with this policy, while
+sites further behind tended to desire Bill's suggested change.)
+
+With respect to changes, in general, I believe that changes are
+necessary to improve the efficiency, provide greater flexibility, and
+guarantee reliability.  Many of us can suggest changes now, but I
+suspect that clearer ideas will emerge from usage.
+
+       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
+         [ into the online RFC archives by Josh Elliott 1/98 ]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+                                                                [Page 1]
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3