blob: 2a4cab84ee29cca96c984d6132f5c71e6585cf72 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
NETWORK WORKING GROUP Jim White
Request for Comments #132 UCSB
NIC #6708 April 28, 1971
TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107
______________________________
On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V.
Flow Control', the partial sentence:
Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number
of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned
if it is in the range zero to 128...
should read:
...if it is the range of zero to 127,...
---
That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and
only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding
fraction is 1.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ]
[Page 1]
^L
|
