1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
|
Network Working Group G. Malkin
Request for Comments: 1783 Xylogics, Inc.
Updates: 1350 A. Harkin
Category: Standards Track Hewlett Packard Co.
March 1995
TFTP Blocksize Option
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The Trivial File Transfer Protocol [1] is a simple, lock-step, file
transfer protocol which allows a client to get or put a file onto a
remote host. One of its primary uses is the booting of diskless
nodes on a Local Area Network. TFTP is used because it is very
simple to implement in a small node's limited ROM space. However,
the choice of a 512-byte blocksize is not the most efficient for use
on a LAN whose MTU may 1500 bytes or greater.
This document describes a TFTP option which allows the client and
server to negotiate a blocksize more applicable to the network
medium. The TFTP Option Extension mechanism is described in [2].
Blocksize Option Specification
The TFTP Read Request or Write Request packet is modified to include
the blocksize option as follows:
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
| opc |filename| 0 | mode | 0 | blksize| 0 | #octets| 0 |
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
opc
The opcode field contains either a 1, for Read Requests, or 2,
for Write Requests, as defined in [1].
filename
The name of the file to be read or written, as defined in [1].
This is a NULL-terminated field.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 1]
^L
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
mode
The mode of the file transfer: "netascii", "octet", or "mail",
as defined in [1]. This is a NULL-terminated field.
blksize
The Blocksize option, "blksize" (case insensitive). This is a
NULL-terminated field.
#octets
The number of octets in a block, specified in ASCII. Valid
values range between "8" and "65464" octets, inclusive. This
is a NULL-terminated field.
For example:
+-------+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+
| 1 | foobar | 0 | binary | 0 | blksize| 0 | 1432 | 0 |
+-------+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+
is a Read Request, for the file named "foobar", in binary transfer
mode, with a block size of 1432 bytes (Ethernet MTU, less the UDP and
IP header lengths).
If the server is willing to accept the blocksize option, it sends an
Option Acknowledgment (OACK) to the client. The specified value must
be less than or equal to the value specified by the client. The
client must then either use the size specified in the OACK, or send
an ERROR packet, with error code 8, to terminate the transfer.
The rules for determining the final packet are unchanged from [1].
The reception of a data packet with a data length less than the
negotiated blocksize is the final packet. If the blocksize is
greater than the size of the packet, the first packet is the final
packet. If amount of data to be transfered is an integral multiple
of the blocksize, an extra data packet containing no data is sent to
end the transfer.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 2]
^L
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
Proof of Concept
Performance tests were run on the prototype implementation using a
variety of block sizes. The tests were run on a lightly loaded
Ethernet, between two HP-UX 9000, in "octet" mode, on 2.25MB files.
The average (5x) transfer times for paths with (g-time) and without
(n-time) a intermediate gateway are graphed as follows:
|
37 + g
|
35 +
|
33 +
|
31 +
|
29 +
|
27 +
| g blocksize n-time g-time
25 + --------- ------ ------
s | n 512 23.85 37.05
e 23 + g 1024 16.15 25.65
c | 1432 13.70 23.10
o 21 + 2048 10.90 16.90
n | 4096 6.85 9.65
d 19 + 8192 4.90 6.15
s |
17 + g
| n
15 +
| n
13 +
|
11 + n
| g
9 +
|
7 + n
| g
5 + n
"
0 +------+------+--+---+------+------+---
512 1K | 2K 4K 8K
1432
blocksize (bytes)
Malkin & Harkin [Page 3]
^L
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
The comparisons between transfer times (without a gateway) between
the standard 512-byte blocksize and the negotiated blocksizes are:
1024 2x -32%
1432 2.8x -42%
2048 4x -54%
4096 8x -71%
8192 16x -80%
As was anticipated, the transfer time decreases with an increase in
blocksize. The reason for the reduction in time is the reduction in
the number of packets sent. For example, by increasing the blocksize
from 512 bytes to 1024 bytes, not only are the number of data packets
halved, but the number of acknowledgement packets is also halved
(along with the number of times the data transmitter must wait for an
ACK). A secondary effect is the efficiency gained by reducing the
per-packet framing and processing overhead.
Of course, if the blocksize exceeds the path MTU, IP fragmentation
and reassembly will begin to add more overhead. This will be more
noticable the greater the number of gateways in the path.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
References
[1] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", STD 33, RFC 1350,
MIT, July 1992.
[2] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, "TFTP Option Extension", RFC 1782,
Xylogics, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., March 1995.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 4]
^L
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
Authors' Addresses
Gary Scott Malkin
Xylogics, Inc.
53 Third Avenue
Burlington, MA 01803
Phone: (617) 272-8140
EMail: gmalkin@xylogics.com
Art Harkin
Internet Services Project
Information Networks Division
19420 Homestead Road MS 43LN
Cupertino, CA 95014
Phone: (408) 447-3755
EMail: ash@cup.hp.com
Malkin & Harkin [Page 5]
^L
|
