blob: 6f215f435d173e09f534909e7b7e53b118d43fe2 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
Network Working Group University of California Los Angeles
Request for Comments: 18 Vint Cerf
Category: September 1969
It is suggested that link 1 be used for the HOST-HOST control link
and link 0 be used for IMP-IMP control.
This will facilitate communication between Hosts and reduce delays
due to interference with IMP-IMP communications.
[This RFC has been restored to on-line status by Elmar K. Bins]
[Page 1]
^L
|
