path: root/doc/rfc/rfc2523.txt

Network Working Group                                            P. Karn
Request for Comments: 2523                                      Qualcomm
Category: Experimental                                        W. Simpson
                                                              DayDreamer
                                                              March 1999


               Photuris: Extended Schemes and Attributes


Status of this Memo

   This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
   Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  Copyright (C) Philip Karn
   and William Allen Simpson (1994-1999).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   Photuris is a session-key management protocol.  Extensible Exchange-
   Schemes are provided to enable future implementation changes without
   affecting the basic protocol.

   Additional authentication attributes are included for use with the IP
   Authentication Header (AH) or the IP Encapsulating Security Protocol
   (ESP).

   Additional confidentiality attributes are included for use with ESP.


















Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page i]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


Table of Contents


     1.     Additional Exchange-Schemes ...........................    1

     2.     Additional Key-Generation-Function ....................    5
        2.1       SHA1 Hash .......................................    5

     3.     Additional Privacy-Methods ............................    5
        3.1       DES-CBC over Mask ...............................    5
        3.2       DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask ..........................    6

     4.     Additional Validity-Method ............................    6
        4.1       SHA1-IPMAC Check ................................    6

     5.     Additional Attributes .................................    7
        5.1       SHA1-IPMAC ......................................    7
           5.1.1  Symmetric Identification ........................    8
           5.1.2  Authentication ..................................    9
        5.2       RIPEMD-160-IPMAC ................................    9
           5.2.1  Symmetric Identification ........................   10
           5.2.2  Authentication ..................................   11
        5.3       DES-CBC .........................................   11
        5.4       Invert (Decryption/Encryption) ..................   12
        5.5       XOR Whitening ...................................   13

     APPENDICES ...................................................   15

     A.     Exchange-Scheme Selection .............................   15
        A.1       Responder .......................................   15
        A.2       Initiator .......................................   15

     SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ......................................   16

     ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................   16

     REFERENCES ...................................................   17

     CONTACTS .....................................................   18

     COPYRIGHT ....................................................   19










Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page ii]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


1.  Additional Exchange-Schemes

   The packet format and basic facilities are already defined for
   Photuris [RFC-2522].

   These optional Exchange-Schemes are specified separately, and no
   single implementation is expected to support all of them.

   This document defines the following values:

   (3)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 3.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         An Exchange-Scheme Size of zero is invalid.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "Simple Masking"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (4)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 2.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Scheme #2.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (5)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 5.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         An Exchange-Scheme Size of zero is invalid.





Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 1]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999



         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "Simple Masking"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (6)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 3.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Scheme #3.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (7)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a variable
         generator (g).  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero, the
         pair [g,p] is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.  Each is encoded in a separate
         Variable Precision Integer (VPI).  The generator VPI is
         followed by (concatenated to) the modulus VPI, and the result
         is nested inside the Exchange-Scheme Value field.

         An Exchange-Scheme Size of zero is invalid.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "Simple Masking"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

         When more than one modulus is specified for a given kind of
         Scheme, the Size of the modulus MUST be unique, independent of
         the Size of the generator.

   (8)   Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 2.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 2]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Schemes #2 and #4.

         Key-Generation-Function     "SHA1 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "SHA1-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         112-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (10)  Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 5.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Scheme #5.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (12)  Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 3.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Schemes #3 and #6.

         Key-Generation-Function     "SHA1 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "SHA1-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         112-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (14)  Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a variable
         generator (g).  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero, the
         pair [g,p] is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 3]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


         the list of Offered-Schemes.  Each is encoded in a separate
         Variable Precision Integer (VPI).  The generator VPI is
         followed by (concatenated to) the modulus VPI, and the result
         is nested inside the Exchange-Scheme Value field.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Scheme #7.

         Key-Generation-Function     "MD5 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "MD5-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         64-bits of cryptographic strength.

         When more than one modulus is specified for a given kind of
         Scheme, the Size of the modulus MUST be unique, independent of
         the Size of the generator.

   (20)  Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a recommended
         generator (g) of 5.  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero,
         the modulus is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Schemes #5 and #10.

         Key-Generation-Function     "SHA1 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "SHA1-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         112-bits of cryptographic strength.

   (28)  Implementation Optional.  Any modulus (p) with a variable
         generator (g).  When the Exchange-Scheme Size is non-zero, the
         pair [g,p] is contained in the Exchange-Scheme Value field in
         the list of Offered-Schemes.  Each is encoded in a separate
         Variable Precision Integer (VPI).  The generator VPI is
         followed by (concatenated to) the modulus VPI, and the result
         is nested inside the Exchange-Scheme Value field.

         When the Exchange-Scheme Size field is zero, includes by
         reference all of the moduli specified in the list of Offered-
         Schemes for Schemes #7 and #14.




Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 4]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999



         Key-Generation-Function     "SHA1 Hash"
         Privacy-Method              "DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask"
         Validity-Method             "SHA1-IPMAC Check"

         This combination of features requires a modulus with at least
         112-bits of cryptographic strength.

         When more than one modulus is specified for a given kind of
         Scheme, the Size of the modulus MUST be unique, independent of
         the Size of the generator.



2.  Additional Key-Generation-Function
2.1.  SHA1 Hash

   SHA1 [FIPS-180-1] is used as a pseudo-random-function for generating
   the key(s).  The key(s) begin with the most significant bits of the
   hash.  SHA1 is iterated as needed to generate the requisite length of
   key material.

   When an individual key does not use all 160-bits of the last hash,
   any remaining unused (least significant) bits of the last hash are
   discarded.  When combined with other uses of key generation for the
   same purpose, the next key will begin with a new hash iteration.


3.  Additional Privacy-Methods
3.1.  DES-CBC over Mask

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Privacy-Key Computation", sufficient
   privacy-key material is generated to match the message length,
   beginning with the next field after the SPI, and including the
   Padding.  The message is masked by XOR with the privacy-key.

   Then, the Key-Generation-Function is iterated to generate a DES key.
   The most significant 64-bits (8 bytes) of the generated hash are used
   for the privacy-key, and the remainder are discarded.  Although
   extremely rare, the 64 weak, semi-weak, and possibly weak keys
   [Schneier95, pages 280-282] are discarded.  The Key-Generation-
   Function is iterated until a valid key is obtained.

   The least significant bit of each key byte is ignored (or set to
   parity when the implementation requires).

   The 64-bit CBC IV is zero.  Message encryption begins with the next
   field after the SPI, and continues to the end of the data indicated



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 5]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


   by the UDP Length.


3.2.  DES-EDE3-CBC over Mask

   This is "Triple DES" outer-CBC EDE encryption (and DED decryption)
   with three 56-bit keys [KR96].

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Privacy-Key Computation", sufficient
   privacy-key material is generated to match the message length,
   beginning with the next field after the SPI, and including the
   Padding.  The message is masked by XOR with the privacy-key.

   Then, the Key-Generation-Function is iterated (at least) three times
   to generate the three DES keys.  The most significant 64-bits (8
   bytes) of each generated hash are used for each successive privacy-
   key, and the remainder are discarded.  Each key is examined
   sequentially, in the order used for encryption.  A key that is
   identical to a previous key MUST be discarded.  Although extremely
   rare, the 64 weak, semi-weak, and possibly weak keys [Schneier95,
   pages 280-282] MUST be discarded.  The Key-Generation-Function is
   iterated until a valid key is obtained before generating the next
   key.

   In all three keys, the least significant bit of each key byte is
   ignored (or set to parity when the implementation requires).

   The 64-bit CBC IV is zero.  Message encryption begins with the next
   field after the SPI, and continues to the end of the data indicated
   by the UDP Length.


4.  Additional Validity-Method
4.1.  SHA1-IPMAC Check

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Validity Verification", the Verification
   field value is the SHA1 [FIPS-180-1] hash over the concatenation of

      SHA1( key, keyfill, data, datafill, key, mdfill )

   where the key is the computed verification-key.

   The keyfill and datafill use the same pad-with-length technique
   defined for mdfill.  This padding and length is implicit, and does
   not appear in the datagram.

   The resulting Verification field is a 160-bit Variable Precision
   Integer (22 bytes including Size).  When used in calculations, the



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 6]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


   Verification data includes both the Size and Value fields.


5.  Additional Attributes

   The attribute format and basic facilities are already defined for
   Photuris [RFC-2522].

   These optional attributes are specified separately, and no single
   implementation is expected to support all of them.

   This document defines the following values:

     Use    Type
     AEI      6  SHA1-IPMAC
     AEI      7  RIPEMD-160-IPMAC
      E       8  DES-CBC
      E       9  Invert (Decryption/Encryption)
      E      10  XOR

     A      AH Attribute-Choice
      E     ESP Attribute-Choice
       I    Identity-Choice
        X   dependent on list location



5.1.  SHA1-IPMAC

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Attribute   |    Length     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Attribute        6

   Length           0














Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 7]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


5.1.1.  Symmetric Identification

   When selected as an Identity-Choice, the immediately following
   Identification field contains an unstructured Variable Precision
   Integer.  Valid Identifications and symmetric secret-keys are
   preconfigured by the parties.

   There is no required format or content for the Identification value.
   The value may be a number or string of any kind.  See [RFC-2522] "Use
   of Identification and Secrets" for details.

   The symmetric secret-key (as specified) is selected based on the
   contents of the Identification field.  All implementations MUST
   support at least 62 bytes.  The selected symmetric secret-key SHOULD
   provide at least 80-bits of cryptographic strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Identity Verification", the Verification
   field value is the SHA1 [FIPS-180-1] hash over the concatenation of:

      SHA1( key, keyfill, data, datafill, key, mdfill )

   where the key is the computed verification-key.

   The keyfill and datafill use the same pad-with-length technique
   defined for mdfill.  This padding and length is implicit, and does
   not appear in the datagram.

   The resulting Verification field is a 160-bit Variable Precision
   Integer (22 bytes including Size).  When used in calculations, the
   Verification data includes both the Size and Value fields.

   For both [RFC-2522] "Identity Verification" and "Validity
   Verification", the verification-key is the SHA1 [FIPS-180-1] hash of
   the following concatenated values:

    + the symmetric secret-key,
    + the computed shared-secret.

   For [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the symmetric secret-key is
   used directly as the generation-key.

   The symmetric secret-key is used in calculations in the same fashion
   as [RFC-2522] "MD5-IPMAC Symmetric Identification".








Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 8]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


5.1.2.  Authentication

   May be selected as an AH or ESP Attribute-Choice, pursuant to [RFC-
   1852] et sequitur.  The selected Exchange-Scheme SHOULD provide at
   least 80-bits of cryptographic strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the most
   significant 384-bits (48 bytes) of the Key-Generation-Function
   iterations are used for the key.

   Profile:

      When negotiated with Photuris, the transform differs slightly from
      [RFC-1852].

      The form of the authenticated message is:

         SHA1( key, keyfill, datagram, datafill, key, mdfill )

      where the key is the SPI session-key.

      The additional datafill protects against the attack described in
      [PO96].  The keyfill and datafill use the same pad-with-length
      technique defined for mdfill.  This padding and length is
      implicit, and does not appear in the datagram.


5.2.  RIPEMD-160-IPMAC

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Attribute   |    Length     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Attribute        7

   Length           0














Karn & Simpson                Experimental                      [Page 9]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


5.2.1.  Symmetric Identification

   When selected as an Identity-Choice, the immediately following
   Identification field contains an unstructured Variable Precision
   Integer.  Valid Identifications and symmetric secret-keys are
   preconfigured by the parties.

   There is no required format or content for the Identification value.
   The value may be a number or string of any kind.  See [RFC-2522] "Use
   of Identification and Secrets" for details.

   The symmetric secret-key (as specified) is selected based on the
   contents of the Identification field.  All implementations MUST
   support at least 62 bytes.  The selected symmetric secret-key SHOULD
   provide at least 80-bits of cryptographic strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Identity Verification", the Verification
   field value is the RIPEMD-160 [DBP96] hash over the concatenation of:

      RIPEMD160( key, keyfill, data, datafill, key, mdfill )

   where the key is the computed verification-key.

   The keyfill and datafill use the same pad-with-length technique
   defined for mdfill.  This padding and length is implicit, and does
   not appear in the datagram.

   The resulting Verification field is a 160-bit Variable Precision
   Integer (22 bytes including Size).  When used in calculations, the
   Verification data includes both the Size and Value fields.

   For both [RFC-2522] "Identity Verification" and "Validity
   Verification", the verification-key is the RIPEMD-160 [DBP96] hash of
   the following concatenated values:

    + the symmetric secret-key,
    + the computed shared-secret.

   For [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the symmetric secret-key is
   used directly as the generation-key.

   The symmetric secret-key is used in calculations in the same fashion
   as [RFC-2522] "MD5-IPMAC Symmetric Identification".








Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 10]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


5.2.2.  Authentication

   May be selected as an AH or ESP Attribute-Choice.  The selected
   Exchange-Scheme SHOULD provide at least 80-bits of cryptographic
   strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the most
   significant 384-bits (48 bytes) of the Key-Generation-Function
   iterations are used for the key.

   Profile:

      When negotiated with Photuris, the form of the authenticated
      message is:

         RIPEMD160( key, keyfill, datagram, datafill, key, mdfill )

      where the key is the SPI session-key.

      The additional datafill protects against the attack described in
      [PO96].  The keyfill and datafill use the same pad-with-length
      technique defined for mdfill.  This padding and length is
      implicit, and does not appear in the datagram.


5.3.  DES-CBC

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Attribute   |    Length     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Attribute        8

   Length           0

   May be selected as an ESP Attribute-Choice, pursuant to [RFC-1829] et
   sequitur.  The selected Exchange-Scheme SHOULD provide at least 56-
   bits of cryptographic strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the most
   significant 64-bits (8 bytes) of the Key-Generation iteration are
   used for the key, and the remainder are discarded.  Although
   extremely rare, the 64 weak, semi-weak, and possibly weak keys
   [Schneier95, pages 280-282] MUST be discarded.  The Key-Generation-
   Function is iterated until a valid key is obtained.

   The least significant bit of each key byte is ignored (or set to



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 11]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


   parity when the implementation requires).

   Profile:

      When negotiated with Photuris, the transform differs slightly from
      [RFC-1829].

      The 32-bit Security Parameters Index (SPI) field is followed by a
      32-bit Sequence Number (SN).

      The 64-bit CBC IV is generated from the 32-bit Security Parameters
      Index (SPI) field followed by (concatenated with) the 32-bit
      Sequence Number (SN) field.  Then, the bit-wise complement of the
      32-bit Sequence Number (SN) value is XOR'd with the first 32-bits
      (SPI):

         (SPI ^ -SN) || SN

      The Padding values begin with the value 1, and count up to the
      number of padding bytes.  For example, if the plaintext length is
      41, the padding values are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, plus any
      additional obscuring padding.

      The PadLength and PayloadType are not appended.  Instead, the
      PayloadType is indicated by the SPI, as specified by the ESP-
      Attributes attribute (#2).

      After decryption, if the padding bytes are not the correct
      sequential values, then the payload is discarded, and a
      "Decryption Failed" error is indicated, as described in [RFC-
      2521].


5.4.  Invert (Decryption/Encryption)

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Attribute   |    Length     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Attribute        9

   Length           0

   May be selected as an ESP Attribute-Choice, immediately preceding an
   encryption choice.  This indicates that the following attribute is
   inverted from encryption to decryption (or decryption to encryption)
   as the attributes are processed.



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 12]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


   For example, the combination

      "DES-CBC",
      "Invert",
      "DES-CBC",
      "DES-CBC",

   indicates "Triple DES" outer-CBC EDE encryption (and DED decryption)
   with three keys [KR96] pursuant to [RFC-1851] et sequitur.  The
   selected Exchange-Scheme SHOULD provide at least 112-bits of
   cryptographic strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the Key-
   Generation-Function is iterated (at least) three times to generate
   the three independent keys, in the order used for encryption.  The
   most significant 64-bits (8 bytes) of each iteration are used for
   each successive key, and the remainder are discarded.

   Each key is examined sequentially, in the order used for encryption.
   A key that is identical to any previous key MUST be discarded.  Any
   weak keys indicated for the algorithm MUST be discarded.  The Key-
   Generation-Function is iterated until a valid key is obtained before
   generating the next key.

   Profile:

      When negotiated with Photuris, the "DES-EDE3-CBC" transform
      differs slightly from [RFC-1851], in the same fashion as "DES-CBC"
      (described earlier).


5.5.  XOR Whitening

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Attribute   |    Length     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Attribute        10

   Length           0

   May be selected as an ESP Attribute-Choice, pursuant to [XEX3] et
   sequitur.  The combination

      "XOR",
      "DES-CBC",
      "XOR",



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 13]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


   indicates "DESX" encryption with three keys [KR96].  The selected
   Exchange-Scheme SHOULD provide at least 104-bits of cryptographic
   strength.

   As described in [RFC-2522] "Session-Key Computation", the Key-
   Generation-Function is iterated (at least) three times to generate
   the three independent keys, in the order used for encryption.  The
   most significant bytes of each iteration are used for each successive
   key, and the remainder are discarded.

   Note that this attribute may appear multiple times in the same ESP
   attribute list, both before and after an encryption transform.  For
   example,

      "XOR",
      "DES-CBC",
      "XOR",
      "Invert",
      "DES-CBC",
      "XOR",
      "DES-CBC",
      "XOR",

   would be one possible combination with Triple DES.



























Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 14]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


A.  Exchange-Scheme Selection

   At first glance, there appear to be a large number of exchange-
   schemes.  In practice, the selection is simple to automate.

   Each scheme indicates a needed strength.  This strength is based upon
   the functions used in protecting the Photuris Exchanges themselves.

   Each keyed attribute also indicates a needed strength.  This strength
   is based upon its cryptographic functions.

   Because the usage of these functions is orthogonal, the same strength
   value can select an appropriate scheme that meets the needs of both
   features.


A.1.  Responder

   The attributes to be offered to the particular Initiator are
   examined.  For each level of strength specified, a scheme that meets
   or exceeds the requirements is offered.

   For example, a Responder offering MD5-IPMAC and SHA1-IPMAC might
   offer scheme #2 with a 512-bit modulus and a 1024-bit modulus, and
   scheme #4 with a zero Size (indicating moduli of #2).


A.2.  Initiator

   The strength indicated by the application for the Security
   Association, together with the party privacy policy of the system
   operator, is used to select from the offered schemes.  The strength
   indicates the minimal level to be chosen, while the party privacy
   policy indicates whether to choose the minimal or maximal level of
   available protection.

   For example, an application might indicate that it desires 80-bits of
   strength.  In that case, only the 1024-bit modulus would be
   appropriate.  The party privacy policy of the system operator would
   indicate whether to choose scheme #2 with "Simple Masking" or scheme
   #4 with "DES-CBC over Mask".

   Alternatively, an application might indicate that it desires 64-bits
   of strength.  The party privacy policy of the system operator would
   indicate whether to choose scheme #2 with the 512-bit modulus, or
   scheme #4 with the 1024-bit modulus.





Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 15]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


Security Considerations

   Provision for multiple generators does not enhance the security of
   the Photuris protocol exchange itself.  Rather, it provides an
   opportunity for novelty of moduli, by allowing more forms of moduli
   to be used.  An abundance of moduli inhibits a determined attacker
   from pre-calculating moduli exchange values, and discourages
   dedication of resources for analysis of any particular modulus.  That
   is, this protects the community of Photuris users.

   In addition to preventing various attacks by protecting verification
   fields, the masking of the message plaintext before encryption is
   intended to obscure the relation of the number of parties and SPIs
   active between two IP nodes.  The privacy mask dependency on the SPI
   and SPILT generates a different initial encrypted block for every SPI
   creation message.

   This obscurement would be less effective when the SPI and SPILT are
   invariant or are not created for a particular exchange direction.
   The number of parties could be revealed by the number of exchanges
   with differences in the initial encrypted blocks.


Acknowledgements

   Phil Karn was principally responsible for the design of party privacy
   protection, and provided much of the design rationale text (now
   removed to a separate document).

   William Simpson was responsible for the packet formats, and
   additional Exchange-Schemes, editing and formatting.  All such
   mistakes are his responsibity.

   Use of encryption for privacy protection is also found in the
   Station-To-Station authentication protocol [DOW92].

   Bart Preneel and Paul C van Oorschot in [PO96] recommended padding
   between the data and trailing key when hashing for authentication.

   Niels Provos developed the first implementation with multiple schemes
   and multiple moduli per scheme (circa July 1997).

   Special thanks to the Center for Information Technology Integration
   (CITI) for providing computing resources.







Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 16]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


References

   [DBP96]     Dobbertin, H., Bosselaers, A., and Preneel, B., "RIPEMD-
               160: a strengthened version of RIPEMD", Fast Software
               Encryption, Third International Workshop, Lecture Notes
               in Computer Science 1039 (1996), Springer-Verlag, pages
               71-82.

               See also corrections at
               ftp://ftp.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/COSIC/bosselae/ripemd/.

   [DOW92]     Whitfield Diffie, Paul C van Oorshot, and Michael J
               Wiener, "Authentication and Authenticated Key Exchanges",
               Designs, Codes and Cryptography, v 2 pp 107-125, Kluwer
               Academic Publishers, 1992.

   [FIPS-180-1]
               "Secure Hash Standard", National Institute of Standards
               and Technology, U.S. Department Of Commerce, April 1995.

               Also known as: 59 Fed Reg 35317 (1994).

   [KR96]      Kaliski, B., and Robshaw, M., "Multiple Encryption:
               Weighing Security and Performance", Dr. Dobbs Journal,
               January 1996.

   [PO96]      Bart Preneel, and Paul C van Oorshot, "On the security of
               two MAC algorithms", Advances in Cryptology -- Eurocrypt
               '96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1070 (May 1996),
               Springer-Verlag, pages 19-32.

   [RFC-1829]  Karn, P., Metzger, P., Simpson, W., "The ESP DES-CBC
               Transform", July 1995.

   [RFC-1850]  Karn, P., Metzger, P., Simpson, W., "The ESP Triple DES
               Transform", September 1995.

   [RFC-1851]  Metzger, P., Simpson, W., "IP Authentication using Keyed
               SHA", September 1995.

   [RFC-2521]  Karn, P., and Simpson, W., "ICMP Security Failures
               Messages", March 1999.

   [RFC-2522]  Karn, P., and Simpson, W., "Photuris: Session-Key
               Management Protocol", March 1999.

   [XEX3]      Simpson, W., Baldwin, R., "The ESP DES-XEX3-CBC
               Transform", Work In Progress, June 1997.



Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 17]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


Contacts

   Comments about this document should be discussed on the
   photuris@adk.gr mailing list.

   Questions about this document can also be directed to:

      Phil Karn
      Qualcomm, Inc.
      6455 Lusk Blvd.
      San Diego, California  92121-2779

          karn@qualcomm.com
          karn@unix.ka9q.ampr.org (preferred)


      William Allen Simpson
      DayDreamer
      Computer Systems Consulting Services
      1384 Fontaine
      Madison Heights, Michigan  48071

          wsimpson@UMich.edu
          wsimpson@GreenDragon.com (preferred)



























Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 18]
^L
RFC 2523                 Schemes and Attributes               March 1999


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  Copyright (C) Philip Karn
   and William Allen Simpson (1994-1999).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards (in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed), or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.























Karn & Simpson                Experimental                     [Page 19]
^L