path: root/doc/rfc/rfc3318.txt

Network Working Group                                     R. Sahita, Ed.
Request for Comments: 3318                                       S. Hahn
Category: Informational                                       Intel Labs
                                                                 K. Chan
                                                         Nortel Networks
                                                           K. McCloghrie
                                                           Cisco Systems
                                                              March 2003


                   Framework Policy Information Base

Status of this Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This document defines a set of PRovisioning Classes (PRCs) and
   textual conventions that are common to all clients that provision
   policy using Common Open Policy Service (COPS) protocol for
   Provisioning.

   Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI) describes a
   structure for specifying policy information that can then be
   transmitted to a network device for the purpose of configuring policy
   at that device.  The model underlying this structure is one of well-
   defined (PRCs) and instances of these classes (PRIs) residing in a
   virtual information store called the Policy Information Base (PIB).

   One way to provision policy is by means of the (COPS) protocol with
   the extensions for provisioning.  This protocol supports multiple
   clients, each of which may provision policy for a specific policy
   domain such as QoS, virtual private networks, or security.

   As described in COPS usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR), each
   client supports a non-overlapping and independent set of PIB modules.
   However, some PRovisioning Classes are common to all subject-
   categories (client-types) and need to be present in each.






Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 1]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


Table of Contents

   Conventions used in this document.................................2
   1. Glossary.......................................................2
   2. General PIB Concepts...........................................3
     2.1. Roles......................................................3
       2.1.1. An Example.............................................5
     2.2. Management of Role-Combinations from the PDP...............6
     2.3. Updating a Request State...................................7
       2.3.1 Full Request State......................................8
       2.3.2 Installing PRIs in a Request............................8
       2.3.3 Updating PRIs in a Request..............................8
       2.3.4 Removing PRIs from a Request............................9
       2.3.5 Removing EXTENDED, AUGMENTED PRIs.......................9
       2.3.6 Error Handling in Request updates.......................9
     2.4. Multiple PIB Instances....................................10
     2.5. Reporting and Configuring of Device Capabilities..........11
     2.6. Reporting of Device Limitations...........................12
   3. The Framework TC PIB module...................................12
   4. Summary of the Framework PIB..................................17
     4.1. Base PIB classes Group....................................17
     4.2. Device Capabilities group.................................19
     4.3. Classifier group..........................................20
     4.4. Marker group..............................................20
   5. The Framework PIB Module......................................21
   6. Security Considerations.......................................66
   7. IANA Considerations...........................................67
   8. References....................................................67
     8.1 Normative References.......................................67
     8.2 Informative References.....................................68
   9. Acknowledgments...............................................68
   10. Authors' Addresses...........................................69
   11. Full Copyright Statement.....................................70

Conventions used in this document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

1. Glossary

   PRC    PRovisioning Class.  A type of policy data.  See [POLTERM].
   PRI    PRovisioning Instance.  An instance of a PRC.  See [POLTERM].
   PIB    Policy Information Base.  The database of policy information.
          See [POLTERM]
   PDP    Policy Decision Point.  See [RAP-FRAMEWORK].
   PEP    Policy Enforcement Point.  See [RAP-FRAMEWORK].



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 2]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003



2. General PIB Concepts

2.1. Roles

   The policy to apply to an interface may depend on many factors, such
   as immutable characteristics of the interface (e.g., Ethernet or
   frame relay), the status of the interface (e.g., half or full
   duplex), or user configuration (e.g., branch office or headquarters
   interface).  Rather than specifying policies explicitly for each
   interface of all devices in the network, policies are specified in
   terms of interface functionality.

   To describe these functionalities of an interface, we use the concept
   of "Roles".  A Role is simply a string that is associated with an
   interface.  A given interface may have any number of roles
   simultaneously.  Provisioning classes have an attribute called a
   "RoleCombination" which is a lexicographically ordered set of roles.
   Instances of a given PRovisioning Class are applied to an interface
   if and only if the set of roles in the role combination matches the
   set of the roles of the interface.

   Thus, roles provide a way to bind policy to interfaces without having
   to explicitly identify interfaces in a consistent manner across all
   network devices.  That is, roles provide a level of indirection to
   the application of a set of policies to specific interfaces.  This
   separates the policy definition from device implementation specific
   interface identification.  Furthermore, if the same policy is being
   applied to several interfaces, that policy needs to be pushed to the
   device only once, rather than once per interface, as long as the
   interfaces are configured with the same role combination.

   We point out that, in the event that the administrator needs to have
   a unique policy for each interface, the administrator can configure
   each interface with a unique role.

   The PEP sends all its Capability Set Names, Role Combinations, Policy
   Controlled Interfaces, and their relationships to the PDP in the
   first COPS request (REQ) message for a handle, and whenever any
   updates or deletes occur.  The PDP can install new instances or
   change existing instances of these PRIs.  This operation can also
   occur in subsequent request messages generated in response to COPS
   state synchronization (SSQ) requests and local configuration changes.

   The comparing of roles (or role combinations) is case sensitive.






Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 3]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   By convention, when formatting the role-combination for exchange
   within a protocol message, within a PIB object's value, or as a
   printed value, the set is formatted in lexicographical order of the
   role's ASCII values; that is, the role that is first is formatted
   first.  For example, "a+b" and "b+a" are NOT different role-
   combinations; rather, they are different formatting of the same
   role-combination, and hence for this example:

   - "a+b" is the valid formatting of that role-combination,
   - "b+a" is an invalid formatting of that role-combination.

   The role-combination of interfaces to which no roles have been
   assigned is known as the "null" role-combination.  (Note the
   deliberate use of lower-case letters for "null" so that it avoids
   confusion with the ASCII NULL character that has a value of zero but
   a length of one.)

   In an "install" or an "install-notify" class, the wildcard role-
   combination "*" can be used.  In addition to providing for
   interface-specific roles, it also allows for other optimizations in
   reducing the number of role-combinations for which a policy has to be
   specified.  For example:

   Suppose we have three interfaces:

      Roles A, B and R1 are assigned to interface I1
      Roles A, B and R2 are assigned to interface I2
      Roles A, B and R3 are assigned to interface I3

   Then, a PRI of a fictional IfDscpAssignTable that has the following
   values for its attributes:

      ifDscpAssignPrid    = 1
      ifDscpAssignRoles   = "*+A+B"
      ifDscpAssignName    = "4queues"
      ifDscpAssignDscpMap = 1

   will apply to all three interfaces, because "*" matches with R1, R2
   and R3.  The policies can be assigned to an interface due to more
   than one wild-carded role combo matching a given interface's role
   combo string.  The PDP should attempt to resolve conflicts between
   policies before sending policies to the PEP.  In the situation where
   the PDP sends multiple policies to a PEP and they do conflict, either
   because of an error by the PDP or because of a device specific
   conflict, the PEP MUST reject the installation of the conflicting
   policies and return an error.





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 4]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   Formally,
   - The wildcard Role is denoted by "*",
   - The "*" Role is not allowed to be defined as part of the role-
     combination of an interface as notified by the PEP to the PDP; it
     is only allowed in policies installed/deleted via COPS-PR from the
     PDP to the PEP.
   - For a policy to apply to an interface when the policy's role-
     combination is "*+a+b", the interface's role-combination:
      - Must include "a" and "b", and
      - Can include zero or more other roles.
   - The wildcard character "*" is listed before the other roles as "*"
     is lexicographically before "a"; however, the wildcard matches any
     zero or more roles, irrespective of lexicographical order.  For
     example: "*+b+e+g" would match "a+b+c+e+f+g".

     Note that the characters "+" and "*" MUST not be used in an
     interface Role.  The Framework Role PIB module in section 4 of this
     document contains the Role and RoleCombination Textual Conventions.

2.1.1. An Example

   The functioning of roles might be best understood by an example.
   Suppose I have a device with three interfaces, with roles as follows:

         IF1: "finance"
         IF2: "finance"
         IF3: "manager"

   Suppose, I also have a PDP with two policies:

         P1: Packets from finance department (role "finance") get DSCP 5
         P2: Packets from managers (role "manager") get DSCP 6

   To obtain policy, the PEP reports to the PDP that it has some
   interfaces with role combination "finance" and some with role
   combination "manager".  In response, the PDP downloads policy P1
   associated with role combination "finance" and downloads a second
   policy P2 associated with role combination "manager".

   Now suppose the finance person attached to IF2 is promoted to manager
   and so the system administrator adds the role "manager" to IF2.  The
   PEP now reports to the PDP that it has three role combinations: some
   interfaces with role combination "finance", some with role
   combination "manager" and some with role combination
   "finance+manager".  In response, the PDP downloads an additional
   third policy associated with the new role combination
   "finance+manager".




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 5]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   How the PDP determines the policy for this new role combination is
   entirely the responsibility of the PDP.  It could do so
   algorithmically or by rule.  For example, there might be a rule that
   specifies that manager policy takes preference over department
   policy.  Or there might be a third policy installed in the PDP as
   follows:

         P3: Packets from finance managers (role "finance" and role
             "manager") get DSCP 7

   The point here is that the PDP is required to determine what policy
   applies to this new role combination and to download a third policy
   to the PEP for the role combination "finance+manager", even if that
   policy is the same as one already downloaded.  The PEP is not
   required (or allowed) to construct policy for new role combinations
   from existing policy.

2.2. Management of Role-Combinations from the PDP

   The PEP notifies the PDP of the Role-Combination assigned to each
   interface and capability set name in a COPS configuration request
   (instances of the frwkIfRoleComboTable).  The first request sent to
   the PDP must be a 'full state' request.  A 'full state' request for a
   PEP includes notify and install-notify table PRIs for the PEP which
   must be interpreted as the complete state of the PEP and must not be
   interpreted as updates to any previous set of PRIs sent in a previous
   message.  Any previous PRIs from the PEP should be discarded when a
   'full state' request is received for the particular request handle.
   A request is specified as a 'full state' request by setting the
   frwkPibIncarnationFullState attribute in the frwkPibIncarnation PRI
   sent in the request.

   All existing frwkIfRoleCombo instances must be sent to the PDP in the
   first configuration request for a request handle.  If the Role-
   Combinations are not assigned specific values, default ('null')
   Role-Combinations must be sent to the PDP for all ifIndices active on
   the PEP and updates must be sent every time the IfIndices are
   updated.  The PEP may notify the PDP of the Capability sets (if any)
   via the frwkCapabilitySetTable.  If the PEP does not need to notify
   the PDP of capability sets, it must set the capability set name in
   the frwkIfRoleComboTable instances to a zero length string.

   In response to this configuration request, if applicable, the PDP may
   send policies for the PEP in a solicited decision or must send a null
   decision.  The PEP must then send a solicited report message for the
   decision.





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 6]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   At any later time, the PDP can update the Role-Combinations assigned
   to a specific interface, identified by IfIndex, or for an aggregate,
   identified by the capability set name, via an unsolicited decision to
   the PEP on any open request handle.  The PDP does this by sending
   updated PRIs for the frwkIfRoleComboTable.

   When the Interface Role Combination associations are updated by the
   PDP, the PEP SHOULD send updated 'full state' requests for all open
   contexts.  A context is an instantiation of the PIB module(s)
   namespace identified by a unique COPS handle for a particular COPS
   client type.  This is true even if the PEP's request state changes
   due to an internal event or if the state is changed by the PDP.  If
   the role-combination updates were sent by the PDP, the PEP SHOULD
   send these updated requests only if it can process the unsolicited
   decision containing the frwkIfRoleCombo PRIs successfully, and it
   MUST do so after sending the success report for the unsolicited
   decision.  If the PEP failed to process the decision (i.e., the
   frwkIfRoleCombo PRIs), it MUST only send a failure report to the PDP.

   On the other hand, the PDP must not expect to receive the updated
   requests with the revised role-combination information until after it
   receives a success report for these updates from the PEP.  If the PDP
   does not receive updated requests on some request handles, the PEP
   must not be sent decision updates for that frwkIfRoleCombo updates,
   i.e., the PDP must have the previous request state that it maintained
   for that request handle.

   Note that, any unsolicited decisions received by the PEP in the time
   period after it receives updates to its Role-Combination associations
   and before receiving solicited decisions for the updated requests it
   sent for all context handles, could possibly contain outdated
   policies corresponding to the old Role-Combination associations as
   notified by this PEP in a previous request state.

   The PDP must respond to the updated requests by solicited decisions,
   sending policies if applicable or null decisions.  The PEP must
   respond to these solicited decisions with solicited reports to
   complete the transaction.

2.3. Updating a Request State

   This section describes the messages exchanged between the PEP and PDP
   when the PEP is updating a previously sent request for a particular
   COPS handle.  Note that a PEP can incrementally update a request only
   if the frwkPibIncarnationFullState attribute is shown to be supported
   via the supported PRC table.  If this attribute is not supported, the
   PDP must treat all PEP requests as the full request state.




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 7]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


2.3.1 Full Request State

   When the PEP wants to send the entire request state to the PDP (for
   example, in response to a Synchronize State Request from the PDP),
   the PEP MUST send the incarnation instance with the
   frwkPibIncarnationFullState attribute set to 'true'.

   A PDP that receives an incarnation instance in the request message
   with this attribute set to 'true', must clear the request information
   it maintains for this request handle and re-install the information
   received.

   If this attribute is set to 'false' or if the incarnation instance is
   missing in the request message, the request must be interpreted as an
   incremental update to the previous request message.

2.3.2 Installing PRIs in a Request

   If the PEP wants to install additional PRIs for a request handle, the
   PEP MUST ensure that the frwkPibIncarnationFullState attribute is set
   to 'false', and the PEP MUST use new (unused in this context)
   InstanceIds [SPPI] for these PRIs.

   When a PDP receives instances with new InstanceIds for a request with
   the frwkPibIncarnationFullState in the incarnation instance set to
   'false', or if the request has no incarnation information, it must
   interpret these PRIs as an incremental update to the request state
   and add them to the request state it maintains for this handle.

2.3.3 Updating PRIs in a Request

   If the PEP wants to update previously installed PRIs for a request
   handle, the PEP MUST ensure that the frwkPibIncarnationFullState
   attribute is set to 'false' for these PRIs.  Note that the PEP must
   send the same InstanceIds for the PRIs being updated.  If the PEP
   uses new InstanceIds, the PDP must interpret them as Install's for
   this request state.

   When a PDP receives a request with instances having InstanceIds that
   exist in its state for that handle with the
   frwkPibIncarnationFullState in the incarnation instance set to
   'false' or if the request has no incarnation information, it must
   interpret these PRIs as an update to the PRIs in the request state it
   maintains for this handle.







Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 8]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


2.3.4 Removing PRIs from a Request

   If the PEP wants to remove previously installed PRIs for a request
   handle, the PEP MUST ensure that the frwkPibIncarnationFullState
   attribute is set to 'false', and MUST send the PRI bindings with the
   PRID set to the InstanceId of the PRI to be removed, and the length
   field in the EPD object header set to the header length only,
   effectively setting the data length to zero.

   Note that the PEP must send the same InstanceIds for the PRIs being
   removed.  If the PEP sends new InstanceIds and the length field in
   the EPD object header is set to the header length only (implying the
   data length is zero), the PEP is attempting to remove an
   unknown/non-existent PRI.  This SHOULD result in the PDP sending
   error PRIs in the solicited decision (see section 2.3.6 for a
   description of the frwkErrorTable).

   If the PEP sends new InstanceIds, and the length field in the EPD
   object header is greater than the header length only (implying the
   EPD object has some attributes encoded in it), the PDP will interpret
   this as an install of the PRI if it can decode the EPD successfully.

   When a PDP receives a request with instances having InstanceIds that
   exist in its state for that handle with the
   frwkPibIncarnationFullState in the incarnation instance set to
   'false', or if the request has no incarnation information, and the
   length field in the EPD object header is set to the header length
   only (implying the data length is zero), it must remove these PRIs
   from the request state it maintains for this handle.

2.3.5 Removing EXTENDED, AUGMENTED PRIs

   The PEP should remove the extended/augmented PRIs when it removes the
   base PRIs in the same COPS message.  See [SPPI] for a description of
   EXTENDED/AUGMENTED PRCs.  A PDP that receives removes for a base PRI
   must implicitly remove the extensions.

2.3.6 Error Handling in Request updates

   If the PDP cannot process all the request installs/updates/removes in
   the COPS request message successfully, it MUST rollback to its
   previous request state and it MUST send a solicited decision to the
   PEP that contains frwkErrorTable instances.  These instances contain
   an error code and a sub-code as defined in the [COPS-PR] CPERR
   object.  For example, if the PEP tries to remove an instance that
   does not exist, the 'priInstanceInvalid' error code must be sent to
   the PEP in a frwkError PRI.  The frwkError PRIs also contain the PRC
   and the InstanceId of the error-causing PRI.  The PEP may then



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                      [Page 9]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   examine these error PRIs and resend the modified request.  Note that,
   until the PEP resends the request updates/removes, it will have
   configuration information for the last successful request state it
   sent to the PDP.

2.4. Multiple PIB Instances

   [COPS-PR] supports multiple, disjoint, independent instances of the
   PIB to represent multiple instances of configured policy.  The intent
   is to allow for the pre-provisioning of policy that can then be made
   active by a single, short decision from the PDP.

   A COPS context can be defined as an independent COPS request state
   for a particular subject category (client-type).  A context may be an
   outsourcing context or a configuration context.  A configuration
   context is an instance of the PIB triggered and controlled by the
   PDP, which contains device setup information.  This device
   configuration information dictates the device behavior as specified
   by the PDP.  An outsourcing context on the other hand, is a PIB
   instance that is triggered from the PEP side and is a request to the
   PDP for action.  The action requested will be interpreted in the
   domain of the client-type.  Configuration contexts belong to a set of
   configuration contexts for a specific client type - out of which one
   configuration context may be active.  However, multiple outsourcing
   contexts can be active simultaneously.

   With the [COPS-PR] protocol, each of these states is identified by a
   unique client handle.  The creation and deletion of these PIB
   instances can be controlled by the PDP as described in [COPS-PR] or
   can be triggered by an event by the PEP.  A PEP must open at least
   one "request-state" for configuration for a given subject-category
   (client type).  Additional "request-states" at the PEP may be
   initiated by the PDP or asynchronously generated by the PEP for
   outsourcing due to local events, which will be fully specified by the
   PRID/EPD data carried in the request.

   The frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet flag defines a set of contexts out of
   which only one context can be active at any given time.  This set is
   called the 'configuration contexts' set.  At most, one context may be
   active from this 'configuration context' set at any given time.
   Contexts that have the frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet attribute set to
   'true' belong to this set.  Contexts that do not belong to this set
   have the frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet set to 'false' and belong to the
   set of 'outsourcing contexts'.  Note that a PEP can have these two
   sets of contexts only if the frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet attribute is
   shown to be supported via the supported PRC table.  If the





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 10]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet is not supported, a PEP must treat all
   contexts as belonging to the set of 'configuration contexts' i.e., at
   the most one context can be active at any given time.

   Note that in the event that a PEP has a capability change such as a
   card hot swap or any other change in its notify information that may
   warrant a policy refresh, a subsequent complete or incremental
   request must be issued to the PDP containing the new/updated
   capabilities for all the configuration contexts.  A request for re-
   configuration is issued for all request state configuration contexts,
   both for the active configuration context as well as any inactive
   configuration contexts.  This is to ensure that when an inactive
   configuration context is activated, it has been pre-configured with
   policies compatible with the PEP's current capabilities.

   Although many PIB instances may be configured on a device (the
   maximum number of these instances being determined by the device
   itself), only one of the contexts from the 'configuration contexts'
   set can be active at any given time; the active one being selected by
   the PDP.  The Framework PIB supports the attribute
   frwkPibIncarnationActive in the frwkPibIncarnationTable to allow the
   PDP to denote the PIB instance as being active in a COPS decision
   message, and similarly, to report the active state (active or not) of
   the PIB instance to the PDP in a COPS request message.

   When the PEP installs an attribute frwkPibIncarnationActive that is
   'true' in one PIB instance which belongs to the 'configuration
   contexts' set, the PEP must ensure, re-setting the attribute if
   necessary, that the frwkPibIncarnationActive attribute is 'false' in
   all other installed contexts that belong to this set.  To switch
   contexts, the PDP should set the frwkPibIncarnationActive attribute
   to 'true' in the context it wants to make the active context.  The
   PDP should set this attribute in a context to 'false' only if it
   wants to send an inactive context to the PEP or deactivate the active
   context on the PEP.  If an active context is made inactive without
   activating another context, the PEP must not have any policies
   enforced from any configuration contexts installed.

2.5. Reporting and Configuring of Device Capabilities

   Each network device providing policy-based services has its own
   inherent capabilities.  These capabilities can be hardware specific,
   e.g., an Ethernet interface supporting input classification, or can
   be statically configured, e.g., supported queuing disciplines.  These
   capabilities are organized into Capability Sets, with each Capability
   Set given a unique name (frwkCapabilitySetName) and associated with a
   set of Role Combinations.  In that way, each Role Combination may be
   associated with a set of interfaces.  These capabilities are



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 11]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   communicated to the PDP when policy is requested by the PEP.  Knowing
   device capabilities, the PDP can send the PRIs relevant to the
   specific device, rather than sending the entire PIB.

   Specific capability PRCs may be defined in other PIBs.  These
   capability instances are grouped via the frwkCapabilitySetTable.  If
   the PEP wishes to send capability information to the PDP, the PIB
   must indicate which capabilities the PEP may send to the PDP by means
   of the 'notify' PIB-ACCESS clause as described in [SPPI].  If a PIB
   does not have any capabilities to communicate to the PDP, it must not
   send any instances for the frwkCapabilitySetTable.  If in this case
   the frwkIfRoleCombo table is used to communicate role combinations
   assigned to interfaces (via IfIndex), the frwkRoleComboCapSetName
   attribute in the frwkIfRoleComboTable instances must be set to a zero
   length string.

2.6. Reporting of Device Limitations

   To facilitate efficient policy installation, it is important to
   understand a device's limitations in relation to the advertised
   device capabilities.  Limitations may be class-based, e.g., an
   "install" class is supported as a "notify" or only a limited number
   of class instances may be created, or attribute-based.  Attribute
   limitations, such as supporting a restricted set of enumerations or
   requiring related attributes to have certain values, detail
   implementation limitations at a fine level of granularity.

   A PDP can avoid certain installation issues in a proactive fashion by
   taking into account a device's limitations prior to policy
   installation rather than in a reactive mode during installation.  As
   with device capabilities, device limitations are communicated to the
   PDP when policy is requested.

   Reported device limitations may be accompanied by guidance values
   that can be used by a PDP to determine acceptable values for the
   identified attributes.

3. The Framework TC PIB module

FRAMEWORK-TC-PIB  PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS  MODULE-IDENTITY, TEXTUAL-CONVENTION,
         Unsigned32, pib FROM COPS-PR-SPPI;

frwkTcPib  MODULE-IDENTITY
    SUBJECT-CATEGORIES   { all }
    LAST-UPDATED "200302130000Z"  -- 13 Feb 2003
    ORGANIZATION "IETF RAP WG"



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 12]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    CONTACT-INFO "Keith McCloghrie
                  Cisco Systems, Inc.
                  170 West Tasman Drive,
                  San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA
                  Phone: +1 408 526 5260
                  Email: kzm@cisco.com

                  John Seligson
                  Nortel Networks, Inc.
                  4401 Great America Parkway
                  Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
                  Phone: +1 408 495 2992
                  Email: jseligso@nortelnetworks.com

                  Ravi Sahita
                  Intel Labs.
                  2111 NE 25th Ave.
                  Hillsboro, OR 97124 USA
                  Phone: +1 503 712 1554
                  Email: ravi.sahita@intel.com

                  RAP WG Mailing list: rap@ops.ietf.org "
    DESCRIPTION
         "The PIB module containing the Role and RoleCombination
         Textual Conventions and other generic TCs.

         Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). This version of
         this PIB module is part of RFC 3318; see the RFC itself for
         full legal notices."

    REVISION     "200302130000Z"  -- 13 Feb 2003
    DESCRIPTION  "Initial version, published in RFC 3318."
      ::= { pib 3 }

Role ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A role represents a functionality characteristic or
        capability of a resource to which policies are applied.
        Examples of roles include Backbone_interface,
        Frame_Relay_interface, BGP-capable-router, web-server,
        firewall, etc.
        The only valid character set is US-ASCII. Valid characters
        are a-z, A-Z, 0-9, period, hyphen and underscore. A role
        must always start with a letter (a-z or A-Z). A role must
        not contain the US-ASCII characters '*' or '+' since they
        have special meaning associated with them, explained in the
        RoleCombination TEXTUAL CONVENTION."



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 13]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..31))

RoleCombination ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An octet string containing concatenated Roles. For the
        format specification of roles, refer to the 'Role' TEXTUAL-
        CONVENTION. A valid Role Combination must be formed by a set
        of valid Roles, concatenated by the US-ASCII character '+',
        where the roles are in lexicographic order from minimum to
        maximum. For example, 'a+b' and 'b+a' are NOT different
        role-combinations; rather, they are different formatting of
        the same (one) role-combination.

        Notice the roles within a role-combination are in
        Lexicographic order from minimum to maximum, hence, we
        declare:
        'a+b' is the valid formatting of the role-combination,
        'b+a' is an invalid formatting of the role-combination.

        Notice the need of zero-length role-combination as the role-
        combination of interfaces to which no roles have been
        assigned. This role-combination is also known as the 'null'
        role-combination. (Note the deliberate use of lower case
        letters to avoid confusion with the US-ASCII NULL character
        which has a value of zero but length of one.)

        The US-ASCII character '*' is used to specify a wild carded
        Role Combination. '*' must not be used to wildcard Roles.
        Hence, we declare:
        '*+a+b' is a valid wild carded Role Combination.
        'eth*+a+b' is not a valid wild carded Role Combination.
        Note that since Roles are lexicographically listed in a Role
        Combination, the following is an invalid role combination,
        since '*' is lexicographically before 'a': 'a+b+*'."
    SYNTAX OCTET STRING  (SIZE (0..255))

PrcIdentifierOid ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An OID that identifies a PRC. The value MUST be an OID
        assigned to a PRC's entry definition. The Entry definition
        of a PRC has an OID value XxxTable.1 where XxxTable is the
        OID assigned to the PRC table object.

        An attribute with this syntax MUST specify a PRC, which is
        defined in the PIB module(s) registered in the context of
        the client-type used.



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 14]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003



        An attribute with this syntax cannot have the value 0.0
        (zeroDotZero). If the attribute using this syntax can be set
        to 0.0 use the PrcIdentifierOidOrZero TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
        which makes such use explicit."
    SYNTAX    OBJECT IDENTIFIER

PrcIdentifierOidOrZero ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An OID that identifies a PRC or zeroDotZero (0.0). The
        value MUST be an OID assigned to a PRC's entry definition or
        0.0  (zeroDotZero). The Entry definition of a PRC has an OID
        value XxxTable.1 where XxxTable is the OID assigned to the
        PRC table object.

        An attribute with this syntax can have the value 0.0
        (zeroDotZero) to indicate that it currently does not
        identify a PRC."
    SYNTAX    OBJECT IDENTIFIER

AttrIdentifier ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A Unsigned32 value that identifies an attribute in a PRC by
        its sub-id. The sub-id is the OID assigned to this attribute
        in the PRC definition.

        A AttrIdentifier value is always interpreted within the
        context of an attribute of type PrcIdentifierOid or
        PrcIdentifierOidOrZero. The PrcIdentifierOid (or
           PrcIdentifierOidOrZero) object which defines the context
        must be registered immediately before the object which uses
        the AttrIdentifier textual convention. If the context
        defining attribute is of type PrcIdentifierOidOrZero and has
        the value 0.0, then in that case this attribute value has no
        meaning.

        An attribute with this syntax MUST specify a sub-id which
        MUST be defined in the PRC identified (if any) in the
        PrcIdentifierOid (or PrcIdentifierOidOrZero) attribute. The
        PrcIdentifierOid (orZero) and the AttrIdentifier attributes
        together identify a particular attribute in a particular
        PRC.







Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 15]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


        An attribute with this syntax cannot have the value 0
        (zero). If the attribute using this syntax can be set
        to 0 use the AttrIdentifierOrZero TEXTUAL-CONVENTION which
        makes that explicit."
    SYNTAX    Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)

AttrIdentifierOrZero ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A Unsigned32 value that identifies an attribute in a PRC by
        its sub-id or has the value 0 (zero). The sub-id if non-
        zero, is the OID assigned to this attribute in the PRC
        definition.

        An AttrIdentifierOrZero value is always interpreted within
        the context of an attribute of type PrcIdentifierOid or
        PrcIdentifierOidOrZero. The PrcIdentifierOid (or
        PrcIdentifierOidOrZero) object that defines the context must
        be registered immediately before the object which uses the
        AttrIdentifierOrZero textual convention. If the context
        defining attribute is of type PrcIdentifierOidOrZero and has
        the value 0.0, then in that case this attribute value has no
        meaning.

        An attribute with this syntax can have the value 0 (zero) to
        indicate that it currently does not identify a PRC
        attribute. If it has a non-zero value, the
        PrcIdentifierOid (orZero) and the AttrIdentifierOrZero
        attributes together identify a particular attribute in a
        particular PRC."
    SYNTAX    Unsigned32

AttrIdentifierOid ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An OID that identifies an attribute in a PRC. The value
        MUST be an OID assigned to a PRC's attribute definition. The
        last sub-id is the sub-id of the attribute as it is
        defined in the PRC entry definition. The prefix OID (after
        dropping the last sub-id) is the OID assigned to the Entry
        object of a defined PRC. The Entry definition of a PRC has
        an OID value XxxTable.1 where XxxTable is the OID assigned
        to the PRC Table object.

        An attribute with this syntax MUST not have the value 0.0
        (zeroDotZero). If 0.0 is a valid value, the TEXTUAL
        CONVENTION AttrIdentifierOidOrZero must be used which makes
        such use explicit."



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 16]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    SYNTAX    OBJECT IDENTIFIER

AttrIdentifierOidOrZero ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An OID that identifies an attribute in a PRC or has a value
         0.0 (zeroDotZero). The value MUST be an OID assigned to a
         PRC's attribute definition or the value 0.0.

         If not 0.0, the last sub-id MUST be the sub-id of the
         attribute as it is defined in the PRC Entry object
         definition. The prefix OID (after dropping the last sub-id)
         is the OID assigned to the Entry object of a defined PRC.
         The Entry definition of a PRC has an OID value XxxTable.1
         Where, XxxTable is the OID assigned to the PRC Table
         object.

         An attribute with this syntax can have the value 0.0
         (zeroDotZero) to indicate that it currently does not
         identify a PRC's attribute."
    SYNTAX    OBJECT IDENTIFIER

ClientType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An Unsigned32 value that identifies a COPS Client-type. An
        attribute with this syntax must be set to zero if it does
        not specify a COPS client-type for the PRI."
    REFERENCE
        "The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) Protocol, RFC 2748."
    SYNTAX    Unsigned32 (0..65535)

ClientHandle ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An octet string that identifies a COPS Client handle. A
        zero length value implies the attribute does not specify a
        valid client handle."
    REFERENCE
        "The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) Protocol, RFC 2748."
    SYNTAX    OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..65535))

END








Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 17]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


4. Summary of the Framework PIB

   The Framework PIB defines four groups of PRCs:

4.1. Base PIB classes Group

   This contains PRCs intended to describe the PRCs supported by the
   PEP, PRC and/or attribute limitations and its current configuration.

      PRC Support Table

         As the technology evolves, we expect devices to be enhanced
         with new PIBs, existing PIBs to add new PRCs and existing PRCs
         to be augmented or extended with new attributes.  Also, it is
         likely that some existing PRCs or individual attributes of PRCs
         will be deprecated.  The PRC Support Table describes the PRCs
         that the device supports as well as the individual attributes
         of each PRC.  Using this information the PDP can potentially
         tailor the policy to more closely match the capabilities of the
         device.  The PRC Support Table instances are specific to the
         particular Subject Category (Client-Type).  That is, the PRC
         Support Table for Subject Category 'A' will not include
         instances for classes supported by the Subject Category 'B'.
         Note that the COPS client-type [COPS] used for Framework PIB
         PRIs sent/received over COPS-PR MUST be the unique SUBJECT-
         CATEGORY number assigned for the area of policy being managed
         (e.g., QoS, Security etc). The PEP MUST ignore the attributes
         that it reports as not Supported in the decision from the PDP.
         The PEP SHOULD not send duplicate PRC support instances in a
         COPS Request and the PDP MUST ignore duplicate instances and
         MUST use the first instance received for a supported PRC in a
         COPS Request.

      PIB Incarnation Table

         This PRC contains exactly one row (corresponding to one PRI)
         per context.  It identifies the PDP that was the last to
         download policy into the device and also contains an identifier
         to identify the version of the policy currently downloaded.
         This identifier, both its syntax and value, is meaningful only
         to the PDPs.  It is intended to be a mechanism whereby a PDP,
         when accepting a connection from a PEP, can easily identify a
         known incarnation of policy.  This PRC defines a flag via which
         the installed contexts are divided into a set of contexts
         ('configuration contexts') out of which only one context is
         active and a the remaining contexts form a set of 'outsourcing
         contexts' which are all active.  The incarnation PRC also
         defines an attribute to indicate which configuration context is



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 18]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


         the active one at the present time in the 'configuration
         contexts' set.  The incarnation instance is specific to the
         particular Subject Category (Client-Type).

      Component Limitations Table

         Some devices may not be able to implement the full range of
         values for all attributes.  In principle, each PRC supports a
         set of errors that the PEP can report to the PDP in the event
         that the specified policy is not implementable.  It may be
         preferable for the PDP to be informed of the device limitations
         before actually attempting to install policy, and while the
         error can indicate that a particular attribute value is
         unacceptable to the PEP, this does not help the PDP ascertain
         which values would be acceptable.  To alleviate these
         limitations, the PEP can report some limitations of attribute
         values and/or classes and possibly guidance values for the
         attribute in the Component Limitations Table

      Device Identification Table

         This PRC contains a single PRI that contains device-specific
         information that is used to facilitate efficient policy
         installation by a PDP.  The instance of this PRC is reported to
         the PDP in a COPS request message so that the PDP can take into
         account certain device characteristics during policy
         installation.

4.2. Device Capabilities group

   This group contains the PRCs that describe the characteristics of
   interfaces of the device and the Role Combinations assigned to them.

      Capabilities Set Table

         The capabilities the PEP supports are described by rows in this
         PRC (frwkCapabilitySetTable).  Each row, or instance of this
         class, associates a unique capability name with a set of
         capabilities that an entity on the PEP may support.  The unique
         name is used to form a set of capabilities that the name
         represents.  The capability references can specify instances in
         relevant capability tables in any PIB.  The PEP notifies the
         PDP of these capability sets and then the PDP configures the
         interfaces, per role combination.  The unique name
         (frwkCapabilitySetName) is not to be confused with the IfType
         object in the Interfaces Group MIB [RFC2863].





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 19]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      Interface and Role Combination Table

         The Capabilities Set Table (explained above) describes the
         entities on the PEP (for example, interfaces) by their
         capabilities, by assigning the capability sets a unique name
         (frwkCapabilitySetName).  It is possible to tailor the behavior
         of interfaces by assigning specific role-combinations to the
         capability sets.  This allows interfaces with the same
         capability sets to be assigned different policies, based on the
         current roles assigned to them.  At the PDP, configuration is
         done in terms of these interface capability set names and the
         role-combinations assigned to them.  Thus, each row of this
         class is a <Interface Index, interface capability set name,
         Role Combo> tuple, that indicates the roles that have been
         assigned to a particular capability set (as identified by
         frwkRoleComboCapSetName) and to a particular interface.  Note
         that the uniqueness criteria for this PRC has all the
         attributes, thus a frwkRoleComboCapSetName may have multiple
         role-combinations that it is associated with.  Via the IfIndex,
         this PRC answers the questions of 'which interfaces have a
         specific role combination?' and 'what role combination a
         specific interface is a part of?'.

4.3. Classifier group

   This group contains the IP, IEEE 802 and Internal Label Classifier
   elements.  The set of tables consist of a Base Filter table that
   contains the Index InstanceId and the Negation flag for the filter.
   This frwkBaseFilterTable is extended to form the IP Filter table, the
   802 Filter table [802] and the Internal Label table.  Filters may
   also be defined outside this document and used to extend the Base
   Filter table.

   The Extended classes do not have a separate Index value. Instances of
   the extended classes have the same indices as their base class
   instance.  Inheritance is achieved using the EXTENDS keyword as
   defined in [SPPI].

4.4. Marker group

   This group contains the 802 marker and internal label marker PRCs.
   The 802 marker may be applied to mark 802 packets with the required
   VLAN Id and/or priority value.  The Internal Label marker is applied
   to traffic in order to label it with a network device specific label.
   Such a label is used to assist the differentiation of an input flow
   after it has been aggregated with other flows.  The label is





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 20]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   implementation specific and may be used for other policy related
   functions like flow accounting purposes and/or other data path
   treatments.

5. The Framework PIB Module

  FRAMEWORK-PIB PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

  IMPORTS
      Unsigned32, Integer32, MODULE-IDENTITY,
      MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-TYPE, OBJECT-GROUP, pib
              FROM COPS-PR-SPPI
      InstanceId, Prid
              FROM COPS-PR-SPPI-TC
      RoleCombination, PrcIdentifierOid, AttrIdentifierOrZero,
      ClientType, ClientHandle
              FROM FRAMEWORK-TC-PIB
      InetAddress, InetAddressType,
      InetAddressPrefixLength, InetPortNumber
              FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB
      InterfaceIndex
              FROM IF-MIB
      DscpOrAny
              FROM DIFFSERV-DSCP-TC
      TruthValue, PhysAddress
              FROM SNMPv2-TC
      SnmpAdminString
              FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB;

  frameworkPib  MODULE-IDENTITY
      SUBJECT-CATEGORIES { all }
      LAST-UPDATED "200302130000Z"  -- 13 Feb 2003
      ORGANIZATION "IETF RAP WG"
      CONTACT-INFO "
                    Keith McCloghrie
                    Cisco Systems, Inc.
                    170 West Tasman Drive,
                    San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA
                    Phone: +1 408 526 5260
                    Email: kzm@cisco.com

                    John Seligson
                    Nortel Networks, Inc.
                    4401 Great America Parkway
                    Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
                    Phone: +1 408 495 2992
                    Email: jseligso@nortelnetworks.com




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 21]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


                    Ravi Sahita
                    Intel Labs.
                    2111 NE 25th Ave.

                    Hillsboro, OR 97124 USA
                    Phone: +1 503 712 1554
                    Email: ravi.sahita@intel.com

                    RAP WG Mailing list: rap@ops.ietf.org"

      DESCRIPTION
           "A PIB module containing the base set of PRCs that
           provide support for management of multiple PIB contexts,
           association of roles to device capabilities and other
           reusable PRCs. PEPs are required for to implement this
           PIB if the above features are desired. This PIB defines
           PRCs applicable to 'all' subject-categories.

           Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). This version
           of this PIB module is part of RFC 3318; see the RFC
           itself for full legal notices."
      REVISION     "200302130000Z"  -- 13 Feb 2003
      DESCRIPTION
           "Initial version, published in RFC 3318."

      ::= { pib 2 }

  --
  -- The root OID for PRCs in the Framework PIB
  --

  frwkBasePibClasses
               OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frameworkPib 1 }

  --
  -- PRC Support Table
  --














Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 22]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkPrcSupportTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkPrcSupportEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Each instance of this PRC specifies a PRC that the device
          supports and a bit string to indicate the attributes of the
          class that are supported.  These PRIs are sent to the PDP to
          indicate to the PDP which PRCs, and which attributes of
          these PRCs, the device supports.

          All install and install-notify PRCs supported by the device
          must be represented in this PRC. Notify PRCs may be
          represented for informational purposes."

      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 1 }

  frwkPrcSupportEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkPrcSupportEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkPrcSupport class that identifies a
          specific PRC and associated attributes as supported
          by the device."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkPrcSupportPrid }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc }

      ::= { frwkPrcSupportTable 1 }

  FrwkPrcSupportEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkPrcSupportPrid           InstanceId,
          frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc   PrcIdentifierOid,
          frwkPrcSupportSupportedAttrs OCTET STRING
  }

  frwkPrcSupportPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies an
          instance of the frwkPrcSupport class."

      ::= { frwkPrcSupportEntry 1 }







Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 23]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PrcIdentifierOid
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The object identifier of a supported PRC. The value is the
           OID of the Entry object of the PRC definition. The Entry
           Object definition of a PRC has an OID with value XxxTable.1
           Where, XxxTable is the OID assigned to the PRC Table
           Object definition. There may not be more than one instance
           of the frwkPrcSupport class with the same value of
           frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc."

      ::= { frwkPrcSupportEntry 2 }

  frwkPrcSupportSupportedAttrs OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         OCTET STRING
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "A bit string representing the supported attributes of the
          class that is identified by the frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc
          object.

          Each bit of this bit string corresponds to a class
          attribute, with the most significant bit of the i-th octet
          of this octet string corresponding to the (8*i - 7)-th
          attribute, and the least significant bit of the i-th octet
          corresponding to the (8*i)-th class attribute. Each bit
          specifies whether or not the corresponding class attribute
          is currently supported, with a '1' indicating support and a
          '0' indicating no support.

          If the value of this bit string is N bits long and there are
          more than N class attributes then the bit string is
          logically extended with 0's to the required length.
          On the other hand, If the PDP receives a bit string of
          length N and there are less that N class attributes then the
          PDP should ignore the extra bits in the bit string, i.e.,
          assume those attributes are unsupported."
        REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning.  RFC 3084, section
          2.2.1."

      ::= { frwkPrcSupportEntry 3 }

  --
  -- PIB Incarnation Table
  --




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 24]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkPibIncarnationTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkPibIncarnationEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install-notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This PRC contains a single PRovisioning Instance per
          installed context that identifies the current incarnation
          of the PIB and the PDP or network manager that installed
          this incarnation.  The instance of this PRC is reported to
          the PDP in the REQ message so that the PDP can (attempt to)
          ascertain the current state of the PIB. A network manager
          may use the instance to determine the state of the device."

      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 2 }

  frwkPibIncarnationEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkPibIncarnationEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkPibIncarnation class. Only
          one instance of this PRC is ever instantiated per context"

      PIB-INDEX { frwkPibIncarnationPrid }

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationTable 1 }

  FrwkPibIncarnationEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkPibIncarnationPrid                InstanceId,
          frwkPibIncarnationName                SnmpAdminString,
          frwkPibIncarnationId                  OCTET STRING,
          frwkPibIncarnationLongevity           INTEGER,
          frwkPibIncarnationTtl                 Unsigned32,
          frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet           TruthValue,
          frwkPibIncarnationActive              TruthValue,
          frwkPibIncarnationFullState           TruthValue
  }

  frwkPibIncarnationPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An index to uniquely identify an instance of this PRC."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 1 }







Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 25]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkPibIncarnationName OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..255))
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The name of the PDP that installed the current incarnation
          of the PIB into the device.  A zero-length string value for
          this type implies the PDP has not assigned this type any
          value. By default, it is the zero length string."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 2 }

  frwkPibIncarnationId OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An ID to identify the current incarnation.  It has meaning
          to the PDP/manager that installed the PIB and perhaps its
          standby PDPs/managers. A zero-length string value for
          this type implies the PDP has not assigned this type any
          value. By default, it is the zero-length string."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 3 }

  frwkPibIncarnationLongevity OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         INTEGER {
                          expireNever(1),
                          expireImmediate(2),
                          expireOnTimeout(3)
                     }
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This attribute controls what the PEP does with the
          downloaded policy on a Client Close message or a loss of
          connection to the PDP.

          If set to expireNever, the PEP continues to operate with the
          installed policy indefinitely.  If set to expireImmediate,
          the PEP immediately expires the policy obtained from the PDP
          and installs policy from local configuration.  If set to
          expireOnTimeout, the PEP continues to operate with the
          policy installed by the PDP for a period of time specified
          by frwkPibIncarnationTtl.  After this time (and it has not
          reconnected to the original or new PDP) the PEP expires this
          policy and reverts to local configuration.

          For all cases, it is the responsibility of the PDP to check
          the incarnation and download new policy, if necessary, on a
          reconnect. On receiving a Remove-State for the active



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 26]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          context, this attribute value MUST be ignored and the PEP
          should expire the policy in that active context immediately.
          Policy enforcement timing only applies to policies that have
          been installed dynamically (e.g., by a PDP via COPS)."
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning. RFC 3084."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 4 }

  frwkPibIncarnationTtl OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Unsigned32
      UNITS          "seconds"
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The number of seconds after a Client Close or TCP timeout
          for which the PEP continues to enforce the policy in the
          PIB. After this interval, the PIB is considered expired and
          the device no longer enforces the policy installed in the
          PIB.

          This attribute is only meaningful if
          frwkPibIncarnationLongevity is set to expireOnTimeout."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 5 }

  frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX        TruthValue
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "When the PDP installs a PRI with this flag set to 'true' it
          implies this context belongs to the set of contexts out of
          which at the most one context can be active at a given time.
          If this attribute is set to 'false' this context is one of
          the outsourcing (simultaneous active) contexts on the PEP.

          This attribute is 'true' for all contexts belong to the set
          of configuration contexts. Within the configuration context
          set, one context can be active identified by the
          frwkPibIncarnationActive attribute."
      REFERENCE
          "TruthValue Textual Convention, defined in RFC 2579."
      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 6 }









Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 27]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkPibIncarnationActive OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         TruthValue
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "When the PDP installs a PRI on the PEP with this attribute
          set to 'true' and if this context belongs to the
          'configuration contexts' set, i.e., the
          frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet is set to 'true', then the PIB
          instance to which this PRI belongs must become the active
          PIB instance. In this case, the previous active instance
          from this set MUST become inactive and the
          frwkPibIncarnationActive attribute in that PIB instance MUST
          be set to 'false'.

          When the PDP installs an attribute frwkPibIncarnationActive
          on the PEP  that is 'true' in one PIB instance and if the
          context belongs to the 'configuration contexts' set, the PEP
          must ensure, re-setting the attribute if necessary, that the
          frwkPibIncarnationActive attribute is  'false' in all other
          contexts which belong to the 'configuration contexts' set."

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 7 }

  frwkPibIncarnationFullState OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         TruthValue
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This attribute is interpreted only when sent in a COPS
          request message from the PEP to the PDP. It does not have
          any meaning when sent from the PDP to the PEP.

          If this attribute is set to 'true' by the PEP, then the
          request that the PEP sends to the PDP must be interpreted as
          the complete configuration request for the PEP. The PDP must
          in this case refresh the request information for the
          handle that the request containing this PRI was received on.
          If this attribute is set to 'false', then the
             request PRIs sent in the request must be interpreted as
          updates to the previous request PRIs sent using that handle.
          See section 3.3 for details on updating request state
          information."
      REFERENCE
          "RFC 3318 Section 2.3"

      ::= { frwkPibIncarnationEntry 8 }

  --
  -- Device Identification Table



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 28]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  --

  frwkDeviceIdTable OBJECT-TYPE

      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkDeviceIdEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This PRC contains a single PRovisioning Instance that
          contains general purpose device-specific information that is
          used to facilitate efficient policy communication by a PDP.
          The  instance of this PRC is reported to the PDP in a COPS
          request message so that the PDP can take into account
          certain device characteristics during policy installation."

      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 3 }

  frwkDeviceIdEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkDeviceIdEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkDeviceId class. Only one instance of
          this PRC is ever instantiated."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkDeviceIdPrid }

      ::= { frwkDeviceIdTable 1 }

  FrwkDeviceIdEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkDeviceIdPrid        InstanceId,
          frwkDeviceIdDescr       SnmpAdminString,
          frwkDeviceIdMaxMsg      Unsigned32,
          frwkDeviceIdMaxContexts Unsigned32
  }

  frwkDeviceIdPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An index to uniquely identify an instance of this PRC."

      ::= { frwkDeviceIdEntry 1 }









Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 29]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkDeviceIdDescr OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SnmpAdminString (SIZE (1..255))
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "A textual description of the PEP. This value should include
          the name and version identification of the PEP's hardware
          and software."

      ::= { frwkDeviceIdEntry 2 }

  frwkDeviceIdMaxMsg OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (64..4294967295)
      UNITS          "octets"
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The maximum COPS-PR message size, in octets, that the
          device is capable of processing. Received messages with a
          size in excess of this value must cause the PEP to return an
          error to the PDP containing the global error code
          'maxMsgSizeExceeded'. This is an additional error-avoidance
          mechanism to allow the administrator to know the maximum
          message size supported so that they have the ability to
          control the message size of messages sent to the device.
          This attribute must have a non-zero value. The device should
          send the MAX value for Unsigned32 for this attribute if it
          not defined."
      DEFVAL { 4294967295 }

      ::= { frwkDeviceIdEntry 3 }

  frwkDeviceIdMaxContexts OBJECT-TYPE
     SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
     UNITS          "contexts"
     STATUS         current
     DESCRIPTION
         "The maximum number of unique contexts supported by
          the device. This is an additional error-avoidance mechanism
          to allow the administrators to have the ability to know the
          maximum number of contexts supported so that they can
          control the number of configuration contexts they install on
          the device. This attribute must have a non-zero value. The
          device should send the MAX value for Unsigned32 for this
          attribute if it not defined."
      DEFVAL { 4294967295 }

     ::= { frwkDeviceIdEntry 4 }

  --



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 30]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  -- Component Limitations Table
  --

  frwkCompLimitsTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkCompLimitsEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This PRC supports the ability to export information
          detailing PRC/attribute implementation limitations to the
          policy management system. Instances of this PRC apply only
          for PRCs with access type 'install' or 'install-notify'.

          Each instance of this PRC identifies a PRovisioning Class
          or attribute and a limitation related to the implementation
          of the class/attribute in the device. Additional information
          providing guidance related to the limitation may also be
          present. These PRIs are sent to the PDP to indicate which
          PRCs or PRC attributes the device supports in a restricted
          manner."

      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 4 }

  frwkCompLimitsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkCompLimitsEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkCompLimits class that identifies
          a PRC or PRC attribute and a limitation related to the PRC
          or PRC attribute implementation supported by the device.
          COPS-PR lists the error codes that MUST be returned (if
          applicable)for policy installation that don't abide by the
          restrictions indicated by the limitations exported. [SPPI]
          defines an INSTALL-ERRORS clause that allows PIB designers
          to define PRC specific error codes that can be returned for
          policy installation. This allows efficient debugging of PIB
          implementations."
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning. RFC 3084."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkCompLimitsPrid }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkCompLimitsComponent,
                   frwkCompLimitsAttrPos,
                   frwkCompLimitsNegation,
                   frwkCompLimitsType,
                   frwkCompLimitsSubType,
                   frwkCompLimitsGuidance }




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 31]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      ::= { frwkCompLimitsTable 1 }

  FrwkCompLimitsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkCompLimitsPrid           InstanceId,
          frwkCompLimitsComponent      PrcIdentifierOid,
          frwkCompLimitsAttrPos        AttrIdentifierOrZero,
          frwkCompLimitsNegation       TruthValue,
          frwkCompLimitsType           INTEGER,
          frwkCompLimitsSubType        INTEGER,
          frwkCompLimitsGuidance       OCTET STRING
  }

  frwkCompLimitsPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies an
          instance of the frwkCompLimits class."

      ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 1 }

  frwkCompLimitsComponent OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PrcIdentifierOid
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The value is the OID of a PRC (the table entry) which is
          supported in some limited fashion or contains an attribute
          that is supported in some limited fashion with regard to
          it's definition in the associated PIB module. The same OID
          may appear in the table several times, once for each
          implementation limitation acknowledged by the device."

      ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 2 }

  frwkCompLimitsAttrPos OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         AttrIdentifierOrZero
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The relative position of the attribute within the PRC
          specified by the frwkCompLimitsComponent. A value of 1 would
          represent the first columnar object in the PRC and a value
          of N would represent the Nth columnar object in the PRC. A
          value of zero (0) indicates that the limit applies to the
          PRC itself and not to a specific attribute."

      ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 3 }





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 32]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkCompLimitsNegation OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX        TruthValue
      STATUS        current
      DESCRIPTION
           "A boolean value ,if 'true', negates the component limit
           exported."

      ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 4 }

  frwkCompLimitsType OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX    INTEGER {
                           priSpaceLimited(1),
                           attrValueSupLimited(2),
                           attrEnumSupLimited(3),
                           attrLengthLimited(4),
                           prcLimitedNotify(5)
                        }
      STATUS   current
      DESCRIPTION
          "A value describing an implementation limitation for the
          device related to the PRC or PRC attribute identified by
          the frwkCompLimitsComponent and the frwkCompLimitsAttrPos
          attributes.

          Values for this object are one of the following:

          priSpaceLimited(1) - No more instances than that specified
          by the guidance value may be installed in the given class.
          The component identified MUST be a valid PRC. The SubType
          used MUST be valueOnly(9).

          attrValueSupLimited(2) - Limited values are acceptable for
          the identified component. The component identified MUST be a
          valid PRC attribute. The guidance OCTET STRING will be
          decoded according to the attribute type.

          attrEnumSupLimited(3) - Limited enumeration values are legal
          for the identified component. The attribute identified MUST
          be a valid enum type.

          attrLengthLimited(4) - The length of the specified
          value for the identified component is limited. The component
          identified MUST be a valid PRC attribute of base-type OCTET
          STRING.

          prcLimitedNotify (5) - The component is currently limited
          for use by request or report messages prohibiting decision
          installation. The component identified must be a valid PRC."



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 33]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 5 }

     frwkCompLimitsSubType OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         INTEGER {
                                  none(1),
                                  lengthMin(2),
                                  lengthMax(3),
                                  rangeMin(4),
                                  rangeMax(5),
                                  enumMin(6),
                                  enumMax(7),
                                  enumOnly(8),
                                  valueOnly(9),
                                  bitMask(10)
                              }
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This object indicates the type of guidance related
          to the noted limitation (as indicated by the
          frwkCompLimitsType attribute) that is provided
          in the frwkCompLimitsGuidance attribute.

          A value of 'none(1)' means that no additional
          guidance is provided for the noted limitation type.

          A value of 'lengthMin(2)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the minimum
          acceptable length for the value of the identified
          component. A corresponding class instance
          specifying the 'lengthMax(3)' value is required
          in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'lengthMax(3)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the maximum
          acceptable length for the value of the identified
          component. A corresponding class instance
          specifying the 'lengthMin(2)' value is required
          in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'rangeMin(4)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the lower bound
          of the range for the value of the identified
          component. A corresponding class instance
          specifying the 'rangeMax(5)' value is required
          in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'rangeMax(5)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the upper bound



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 34]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          of the range for the value of the identified
          component. A corresponding class instance
          specifying the 'rangeMin(4)' value is required
          in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'enumMin(6)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the lowest
          enumeration acceptable for the value of the
          identified component. A corresponding
          class instance specifying the 'enumMax(7)'
          value is required in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'enumMax(7)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to the largest
          enumeration acceptable for the value of the
          identified component. A corresponding
          class instance specifying the 'enumMin(6)'
          value is required in conjunction with this sub-type.

          A value of 'enumOnly(8)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to a single
          enumeration acceptable for the value of the
          identified component.

          A value of 'valueOnly(9)' means that the guidance
          attribute provides data related to a single
          value that is acceptable for the identified
          component.

          A value of 'bitMask(10)' means that the guidance
          attribute is a bit mask such that all the combinations of
          bits set in the bitmask are acceptable values for the
          identified component which should be an attribute of type

          'BITS'.

          For example, an implementation of the frwkIpFilter class may
          be limited in several ways, such as address mask, protocol
          and Layer 4 port options. These limitations could be
          exported using this PRC with the following instances:

          Component        Type                 Sub-Type   Guidance
          ------------------------------------------------------------
          DstPrefixLength  attrValueSupLimited  valueOnly   24
          SrcPrefixLength  attrValueSupLimited  valueOnly   24
          Protocol         attrValueSupLimited  rangeMin    10
          Protocol         attrValueSupLimited  rangeMax    20




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 35]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          The above entries describe a number of limitations that
          may be in effect for the frwkIpFilter class on a given
          device. The limitations include restrictions on acceptable
          values for certain attributes.

          Also, an implementation of a PRC may be limited in the ways
          it can be accessed. For instance, for a fictitious PRC
          dscpMapEntry, which has a PIB-ACCESS of 'install-notify':

          Component    Type              SubType  Guidance
          ------------------------------------------------------------
          dscpMapEntry prcLimitedNotify  none     zero-length string."

         ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 6 }

   frwkCompLimitsGuidance OBJECT-TYPE
         SYNTAX         OCTET STRING
         STATUS         current
         DESCRIPTION
             "A value used to convey additional information related
             to the implementation limitation. Note that a guidance
             value will not necessarily be provided for all exported
             limitations. If a guidance value is not provided, the
             value must be a zero-length string.

             The format of the guidance value, if one is present as
             indicated by the frwkCompLimitsSubType attribute,
             is described by the following table. Note that the
             format of guidance value is dictated by the base-type of
             the component whose limitation is being exported,
             interpreted in the context of the frwkCompLimitsType and
             frwkCompLimitsSubType values. Any other restrictions
             (such as size/range/enumerated value) on the guidance
             value MUST be complied with according to the definition
             of the component for which guidance is being specified.

             Note that numbers are encoded in network byte order.

             Base Type                      Value
             ---------                      -----
             Unsigned32/Integer32/INTEGER   32-bit value.
             Unsigned64/Integer64        64-bit Value.
             OCTET STRING                octets of data.
             OID                         32-bit OID components.
             BITS                        Binary octets of length
                                         same as Component specified."

         ::= { frwkCompLimitsEntry 7 }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 36]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  --
  -- Complete Reference specification table
  --

  frwkReferenceTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkReferenceEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install-notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Each instance of this PRC specifies a reference to a PRI
          in a specific PIB context (handle) for a specific client-
          type. This table gives the PDP the ability to set up
          policies that span installed contexts and the PEP the
          ability to reference instances in another, perhaps
          configured context. The PEP must send a
          'attrReferenceUnknown' COPS-PR error to the PDP if it
          encounters an invalid reference. "
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning. RFC 3084, error
          codes section 4.5."

      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 5 }

  frwkReferenceEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkReferenceEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Entry specification for the frwkReferenceTable."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkReferencePrid }
      UNIQUENESS { }

      ::= { frwkReferenceTable 1 }

  FrwkReferenceEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkReferencePrid           InstanceId,
          frwkReferenceClientType     ClientType,
          frwkReferenceClientHandle   ClientHandle,
          frwkReferenceInstance       Prid
  }

  frwkReferencePrid  OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies an
          instance of the frwkReference class."




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 37]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      ::= { frwkReferenceEntry 1 }

  frwkReferenceClientType OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         ClientType
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Is unused if set to zero else specifies a client-type for
           which the reference is to be interpreted. This non-zero
           client-type must be activated explicitly via a separate
           COPS client-open else this attribute is not valid."

      ::= { frwkReferenceEntry 2 }

  frwkReferenceClientHandle OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         ClientHandle
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Must be set to specify a valid client-handle in the scope
          of the client-type specified."

      ::= { frwkReferenceEntry 3 }

  frwkReferenceInstance OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Prid
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "References a PRI in the context identified by
           frwkReferenceClientHandle for client-type identified by
           frwkReferenceClientType."

      ::= { frwkReferenceEntry 4 }

  --
  -- Error specification table
  --

  frwkErrorTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkErrorEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Each instance of this PRC specifies a class specific
          error object. Instances of this PRC are transient, i.e.,
          instances received in a COPS decision message must not be
          maintained by the PEP in its copy of the PIB instances. This
          PRC allows a PDP to send error information to the PEP if the
          PDP cannot process updates to a Request successfully."




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 38]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      ::= { frwkBasePibClasses 6 }

  frwkErrorEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkErrorEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Entry specification for the frwkErrorTable."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkErrorPrid }
      UNIQUENESS {
                   frwkErrorCode,
                   frwkErrorSubCode,
                   frwkErrorPrc,
                   frwkErrorInstance
                 }

      ::= { frwkErrorTable 1 }

  FrwkErrorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkErrorPrid        InstanceId,
          frwkErrorCode        Unsigned32,
          frwkErrorSubCode     Unsigned32,
          frwkErrorPrc         PrcIdentifierOid,
          frwkErrorInstance    InstanceId
  }

  frwkErrorPrid  OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies an
          instance of the frwkError class."

      ::= { frwkErrorEntry 1 }

  frwkErrorCode OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (0..65535)
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Error code defined in COPS-PR CPERR object."
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning. RFC 3084."

      ::= { frwkErrorEntry 2 }

  frwkErrorSubCode OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (0..65535)
      STATUS         current



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 39]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      DESCRIPTION
          "The class-specific error object is used to communicate
          errors relating to specific PRCs."

      ::= { frwkErrorEntry 3 }

  frwkErrorPrc OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PrcIdentifierOid
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The PRC due to which the error specified by codes
          (frwkErrorCode , frwkErrorSubCode) occurred."

      ::= { frwkErrorEntry 4 }

  frwkErrorInstance OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The PRI of the identified PRC (frwkErrorPrc) due to which
          the error specified by codes (frwkErrorCode ,
          frwkErrorSubCode) occurred. Must be set to zero if unused."

      ::= { frwkErrorEntry 5 }

  --
  -- The device capabilities and role combo classes group
  --

  frwkDeviceCapClasses
              OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frameworkPib 2 }
  --
  -- Capability Set Table
  --

  frwkCapabilitySetTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkCapabilitySetEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION

          "This PRC describes the capability sets that exist on the
          interfaces on the device. The capability set is given a
          unique name that identifies a set. These capability set
          names are used by the PDP to determine policy information to
          be associated with interfaces that possess similar sets of
          capabilities."




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 40]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      ::= { frwkDeviceCapClasses 1 }

  frwkCapabilitySetEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkCapabilitySetEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of this PRC describes a particular set of
          capabilities and associates a unique name with the set."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkCapabilitySetPrid }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkCapabilitySetName,
                   frwkCapabilitySetCapability }

      ::= { frwkCapabilitySetTable 1 }

  FrwkCapabilitySetEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkCapabilitySetPrid           InstanceId,
          frwkCapabilitySetName           SnmpAdminString,
          frwkCapabilitySetCapability     Prid
  }

  frwkCapabilitySetPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies a
          instance of the class."

      ::= { frwkCapabilitySetEntry 1 }

  frwkCapabilitySetName OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SnmpAdminString (SIZE (1..255))
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The name for the capability set.  This name  is the unique
          identifier of a set of capabilities. This attribute must not
          be assigned a zero-length string."

      ::= { frwkCapabilitySetEntry 2 }

  frwkCapabilitySetCapability OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Prid
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION

          "The complete PRC OID and instance identifier specifying the
          capability PRC instance for the interface. This attribute
          references a specific instance of a capability table. The



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 41]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          capability table whose instance is referenced must be
          defined in the client type specific PIB that this PIB is
          used with. The referenced capability instance becomes a part
          of the set of capabilities associated with the specified
          frwkCapabilitySetName."

      ::= { frwkCapabilitySetEntry 3 }

  --
  -- Interface and Role Combination Tables
  --

  frwkRoleComboTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkRoleComboEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install-notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This is an abstract PRC that may be extended or referenced
          to enumerate the role combinations, capability set names
          assigned to any interface on a PEP. The identification of
          the interface is to be defined by its extensions or
          referencing PRCs."

      ::= { frwkDeviceCapClasses 2 }

  frwkRoleComboEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkRoleComboEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of this PRC describes one association of an
          interface to a role-combination and capability set name .
          Note that an interface can have multiple associations. This
          constraint is controlled by the extending or referencing
          PRC's uniqueness clause."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkRoleComboPrid }
      UNIQUENESS { }

      ::= { frwkRoleComboTable 1 }

  FrwkRoleComboEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkRoleComboPrid         InstanceId,
          frwkRoleComboRoles        RoleCombination,
          frwkRoleComboCapSetName   SnmpAdminString
  }

  frwkRoleComboPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 42]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An arbitrary integer index that uniquely identifies an
          instance of the class."

      ::= { frwkRoleComboEntry 1 }

  frwkRoleComboRoles OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         RoleCombination
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The role combination assigned to a specific interface."

      ::= { frwkRoleComboEntry 2 }

  frwkRoleComboCapSetName OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..255))
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The name of the capability set associated with
          the Role Combination specified in frwkRoleComboRoles. If
          this is a zero length string it implies the PEP is not
          exporting any capability set information for this
          RoleCombination. The PDP must then use the RoleCombinations
          provided as the only means of assigning policies
          If a non-zero length string is specified, the name must
          exist in frwkCapabilitySetTable."

      ::= { frwkRoleComboEntry 3 }

  --
  -- Interface, Role Combination association via IfIndex
  --

  frwkIfRoleComboTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkIfRoleComboEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install-notify
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This PRC enumerates the interface to role combination and
          frwkRoleComboCapSetName mapping for all policy managed
          interfaces of a device. Policy for an interface depends not
          only on the capability set of an interface but also on its
          roles. This  table specifies all the <interface index,
          interface capability set name, role combination> tuples
          currently on the device"

      ::= { frwkDeviceCapClasses 3 }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 43]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkIfRoleComboEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkIfRoleComboEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of this PRC describes the association of
          a interface to an capability set name and a role
          combination.
          Note that a capability set name can have multiple role
          combinations assigned to it, but an IfIndex can have only
          one role combination associated."

      EXTENDS { frwkRoleComboEntry }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex,
                   frwkRoleComboCapSetName   }

      ::= { frwkIfRoleComboTable 1 }

  FrwkIfRoleComboEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex      InterfaceIndex
  }

  frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InterfaceIndex
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The value of this attribute is the ifIndex which is
          associated with the specified RoleCombination and interface
          capability set name."

      ::= { frwkIfRoleComboEntry 1 }

  --
  -- The Classification classes group
  --

  frwkClassifierClasses
             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frameworkPib 3 }
  --
  -- The Base Filter Table
  --

  frwkBaseFilterTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkBaseFilterEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install
      STATUS         current






Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 44]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      DESCRIPTION
          "The Base Filter class.  A packet has to match all
          fields in an Filter.  Wildcards may be specified for those
          fields that are not relevant."

      ::= { frwkClassifierClasses 1 }

  frwkBaseFilterEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkBaseFilterEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkBaseFilter class."

      PIB-INDEX { frwkBaseFilterPrid }

      ::= { frwkBaseFilterTable 1 }

  FrwkBaseFilterEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkBaseFilterPrid         InstanceId,
          frwkBaseFilterNegation     TruthValue
  }

  frwkBaseFilterPrid OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InstanceId
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An integer index to uniquely identify this Filter among all
          the Filters."

      ::= { frwkBaseFilterEntry 1 }

  frwkBaseFilterNegation OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         TruthValue
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This attribute behaves like a logical NOT for the filter.
          If the packet matches this filter and the value of this
          attribute is 'true', the action associated with this filter
          is not applied to the packet.  If the value of this
          attribute is 'false', then the action is applied to the
          packet."

      ::= { frwkBaseFilterEntry 2 }

  --
  -- The IP Filter Table
  --




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 45]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkIpFilterTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkIpFilterEntry
      PIB-ACCESS     install
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "Filter definitions.  A packet has to match all fields in a
          filter.  Wildcards may be specified for those fields that
          are not relevant."

      INSTALL-ERRORS {
          invalidDstL4PortData(1),
          invalidSrcL4PortData(2)
          }
      ::= { frwkClassifierClasses 2 }

  frwkIpFilterEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         FrwkIpFilterEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "An instance of the frwkIpFilter class."

      EXTENDS { frwkBaseFilterEntry }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkBaseFilterNegation,
                   frwkIpFilterAddrType,
                   frwkIpFilterDstAddr,
                   frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength,
                   frwkIpFilterSrcAddr,
                   frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength,
                   frwkIpFilterDscp,
                   frwkIpFilterFlowId,
                   frwkIpFilterProtocol,
                   frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin,
                   frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax,
                   frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin,
                   frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterTable 1 }

  FrwkIpFilterEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwkIpFilterAddrType         InetAddressType,
          frwkIpFilterDstAddr          InetAddress,
          frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength  InetAddressPrefixLength,
          frwkIpFilterSrcAddr          InetAddress,
          frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength  InetAddressPrefixLength,
          frwkIpFilterDscp             DscpOrAny,
          frwkIpFilterFlowId           Integer32,
          frwkIpFilterProtocol         Unsigned32,
          frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin     InetPortNumber,



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 46]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax     InetPortNumber,
          frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin     InetPortNumber,
          frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax     InetPortNumber
  }

  frwkIpFilterAddrType OBJECT-TYPE

      SYNTAX         InetAddressType
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The address type enumeration value to specify the type of
          the packet's IP address.

          While other types of addresses are defined in the
          InetAddressType textual convention, an IP filter can only
          use IPv4 and IPv6 addresses directly to classify traffic.
          All other InetAddressTypes require mapping to the
          corresponding Ipv4 or IPv6 address before being used to
          classify traffic. Therefore, this object as such is not
          limited to IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, i.e., it can be assigned
          any of the valid values defined in the InetAddressType TC,
          but the mapping of the address values to IPv4 or IPv6
          addresses for the address attributes (frwkIpFilterDstAddr
          and frwkIpFilterSrcAddr) must be done by the PEP. For
          example when dns (16) is used, the PEP must resolve
          the address to IPv4 or IPv6 at install time."
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses.
          RFC 3291."

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 1 }

  frwkIpFilterDstAddr OBJECT-TYPE

      SYNTAX         InetAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The IP address to match against the packet's
           destination IP address. If the address type is 'ipv4',
           'ipv6', 'ipv4z' or 'ipv6z' then, the attribute
           frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength indicates the number of bits
           that are relevant. "
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses.
          RFC 3291."

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 2 }




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 47]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetAddressPrefixLength
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The length of a mask for the matching of the destination
           IP address. This attribute is interpreted only if the
           InetAddressType is 'ipv4', 'ipv4z', 'ipv6' or 'ipv6z'.
           Masks are constructed by setting bits in sequence from the
           most-significant bit downwards for
           frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength bits length. All other bits in
           the mask, up to the  number needed to fill the length of
           the address frwkIpFilterDstAddr are cleared to zero. A zero
           bit in the mask then means that the corresponding bit in
           the address always matches.

           In IPv4 addresses, a length of 0 indicates a match of any
           address; a length of 32 indicates a match of a single host
           address, and a length between 0 and 32 indicates the use of
           a CIDR Prefix. IPv6 is similar, except that prefix lengths
           range from 0..128."
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses.
          RFC 3291."
      DEFVAL { 0 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 3 }

  frwkIpFilterSrcAddr OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The IP address to match against the packet's source IP
          address. If the address type is 'ipv4', 'ipv6', 'ipv4z' or
          'ipv6z' then, the attribute frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength
          indicates the number of bits that are relevant."
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses.
          RFC 3291."

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 4 }

  frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetAddressPrefixLength
      UNITS          "bits"
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The length of a mask for the matching of the source IP
           address. This attribute is interpreted only if the



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 48]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


           InetAddressType is 'ipv4', 'ipv4z', 'ipv6' or 'ipv6z'.
           Masks are constructed by setting bits in sequence from the
           most-significant bit downwards for
           frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength bits length. All other bits in
           the mask, up to the  number needed to fill the length of
           the address frwkIpFilterSrcAddr are cleared to zero.  A
           zero bit in the mask then means that the corresponding bit
           in the address always matches.

           In IPv4 addresses, a length of 0 indicates a match of any
           address; a length of 32 indicates a match of a single host
           address, and a length between 0 and 32 indicates the use of
           a CIDR Prefix. IPv6 is similar, except that prefix lengths
           range from 0..128."
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses.
          RFC 3291."
      DEFVAL { 0 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 5 }

  frwkIpFilterDscp OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         DscpOrAny
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The value that the DSCP in the packet can have and
           match this filter. A value of -1 indicates that a specific
           DSCP value has not been defined and thus all DSCP values
           are considered a match."
      REFERENCE
          "Management Information Base for the Differentiated Services
           Architecture. RFC 3289."
      DEFVAL { -1 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 6 }

  frwkIpFilterFlowId OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX        Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575)
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The flow label or flow identifier in an IPv6 header
           that may be used to discriminate traffic flows.
           The value of -1 for this attribute MUST imply that
           any flow label value in the IPv6 header will match,
           resulting in the flow label field of the IPv6 header
           being ignored for matching this filter entry."

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 7 }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 49]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003



  frwkIpFilterProtocol OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (0..255)
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The layer-4 protocol Id to match against the IPv4 protocol
          number or the IPv6 Next-Header number in the packet. A value
          of 255 means match all. Note the protocol number of 255 is
          reserved by IANA, and Next-Header number of 0 is used in
          IPv6."
      DEFVAL { 255 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 8 }

  frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetPortNumber
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The minimum value that the packet's layer 4 destination
          port number can have and match this filter. This value must
          be equal to or lesser that the value specified for this
          filter in frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax.

          COPS-PR error code 'attrValueInvalid' must be returned if
          the frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin is greater than
          frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax"
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning.  RFC 3084, error
          codes section 4.5."
      DEFVAL { 0 }

     ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 9 }

  frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetPortNumber
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The maximum value that the packet's layer 4 destination
          port number can have and match this filter. This value must
          be equal to or greater that the value specified for this
          filter in frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin.

          COPS-PR error code 'attrValueInvalid' must be returned if
          the frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax is less than
          frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin"
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning.  RFC 3084, error
          codes section 4.5."



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 50]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      DEFVAL { 65535 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 10 }

  frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetPortNumber
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The minimum value that the packet's layer 4 source port
          number can have and match this filter. This value must
          be equal to or lesser that the value specified for this
          filter in frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax.

          COPS-PR error code 'attrValueInvalid' must be returned if
          the frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin is greated than
          frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax"
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning.  RFC 3084, error
          codes section 4.5."
      DEFVAL { 0 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 11 }

  frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         InetPortNumber
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The maximum value that the packet's layer 4 source port
          number can have and match this filter.  This value must be
          equal to or greater that the value specified for this filter
          in frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin.

          COPS-PR error code 'attrValueInvalid' must be returned if
          the frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax is less than
          frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin"
      REFERENCE
          "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning.  RFC error codes
          section 4.5."
      DEFVAL { 65535 }

      ::= { frwkIpFilterEntry 12 }

  --
  -- The IEEE 802 Filter Table
  --

  frwk802FilterTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF Frwk802FilterEntry



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 51]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


      PIB-ACCESS     install
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "IEEE 802-based filter definitions. A class that contains
          attributes of IEEE 802 (e.g., 802.3) traffic that form
          filters that are used to perform traffic classification."
      REFERENCE
          "IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks.
          Overview and Architecture, ANSI/IEEE Std 802, 1990."
      ::= { frwkClassifierClasses 3 }

  frwk802FilterEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Frwk802FilterEntry
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "IEEE 802-based filter definitions.  An entry specifies
          (potentially) several distinct matching components. Each
          component is tested against the data in a frame
          individually. An overall match occurs when all of the
          individual components match the data they are compared
          against in the frame being processed. A failure of any
          one test causes the overall match to fail.

          Wildcards may be specified for those fields that are not
          relevant."

      EXTENDS { frwkBaseFilterEntry }
      UNIQUENESS { frwkBaseFilterNegation,
                   frwk802FilterDstAddr,
                   frwk802FilterDstAddrMask,
                   frwk802FilterSrcAddr,
                   frwk802FilterSrcAddrMask,
                   frwk802FilterVlanId,
                   frwk802FilterVlanTagRequired,
                   frwk802FilterEtherType,
                   frwk802FilterUserPriority }

      ::= { frwk802FilterTable 1 }

  Frwk802FilterEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
          frwk802FilterDstAddr         PhysAddress,
          frwk802FilterDstAddrMask     PhysAddress,
          frwk802FilterSrcAddr         PhysAddress,
          frwk802FilterSrcAddrMask     PhysAddress,
          frwk802FilterVlanId          Integer32,
          frwk802FilterVlanTagRequired INTEGER,
          frwk802FilterEtherType       Integer32,
          frwk802FilterUserPriority    BITS



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 52]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  }

  frwk802FilterDstAddr OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PhysAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The 802 address against which the 802 DA of incoming
          traffic streams will be compared. Frames whose 802 DA
          matches the physical address specified by this object,
          taking into account address wildcarding as specified by the
          frwk802FilterDstAddrMask object, are potentially subject to
          the processing guidelines that are associated with this
          entry through the related action class."
      REFERENCE
          "Textual Conventions for SMIv2, RFC 2579."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 1 }

  frwk802FilterDstAddrMask OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PhysAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This object specifies the bits in a 802 destination address
          that should be considered when performing a 802 DA
          comparison against the address specified in the
          frwk802FilterDstAddr object.

          The value of this object represents a mask that is logically
          and'ed with the 802 DA in received frames to derive the
          value to be compared against the frwk802FilterDstAddr
          address. A zero bit in the mask thus means that the
          corresponding bit in the address always matches. The
          frwk802FilterDstAddr value must also be masked using this
          value prior to any comparisons.

          The length of this object in octets must equal the length in
          octets of the frwk802FilterDstAddr. Note that a mask with no
          bits set (i.e., all zeroes) effectively wildcards the
          frwk802FilterDstAddr object."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 2 }

  frwk802FilterSrcAddr OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PhysAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The 802 MAC address against which the 802 MAC SA of
          incoming traffic streams will be compared. Frames whose 802



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 53]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          MAC SA matches the physical address specified by this
          object, taking into account address wildcarding as specified
          by the frwk802FilterSrcAddrMask object, are potentially
          subject to the processing guidelines that are associated
          with this entry through the related action class."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 3 }

  frwk802FilterSrcAddrMask OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         PhysAddress
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This object specifies the bits in a 802 MAC source address
          that should be considered when performing a 802 MAC SA
          comparison against the address specified in the
          frwk802FilterSrcAddr object.

          The value of this object represents a mask that is logically
          and'ed with the 802 MAC SA in received frames to derive the
          value to be compared against the frwk802FilterSrcAddr
          address. A zero bit in the mask thus means that the
          corresponding bit in the address always matches. The
          frwk802FilterSrcAddr value must also be masked using this
          value prior to any comparisons.

          The length of this object in octets must equal the length in
          octets of the frwk802FilterSrcAddr. Note that a mask with no
          bits set (i.e., all zeroes) effectively wildcards the
          frwk802FilterSrcAddr object."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 4 }

  frwk802FilterVlanId OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Integer32 (-1 | 1..4094)
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "The VLAN ID (VID) that uniquely identifies a VLAN
          within the device. This VLAN may be known or unknown
          (i.e., traffic associated with this VID has not yet
          been seen by the device) at the time this entry
          is instantiated.

          Setting the frwk802FilterVlanId object to -1 indicates that
          VLAN data should not be considered during traffic
          classification."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 5 }




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 54]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


  frwk802FilterVlanTagRequired OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         INTEGER {
                         taggedOnly(1),
                         priorityTaggedPlus(2),
                         untaggedOnly(3),
                         ignoreTag(4)
                     }
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This object indicates whether the presence of an
          IEEE 802.1Q VLAN tag in data link layer frames must
          be considered when determining if a given frame
          matches this 802 filter entry.

          A value of 'taggedOnly(1)' means that only frames
          containing a VLAN tag with a non-Null VID (i.e., a
          VID in the range 1..4094) will be considered a match.

          A value of 'priorityTaggedPlus(2)' means that only
          frames containing a VLAN tag, regardless of the value
          of the VID, will be considered a match.

          A value of 'untaggedOnly(3)' indicates that only
          untagged frames will match this filter component.

          The presence of a VLAN tag is not taken into
          consideration in terms of a match if the value is
          'ignoreTag(4)'."

      ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 6 }

  frwk802FilterEtherType OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX         Integer32 (-1 | 0..'ffff'h)
      STATUS         current
      DESCRIPTION
          "This object specifies the value that will be compared
          against the value contained in the EtherType field of an
          IEEE 802 frame. Example settings would include 'IP'
          (0x0800), 'ARP' (0x0806) and 'IPX' (0x8137).

          Setting the frwk802FilterEtherTypeMin object to -1 indicates
          that EtherType data should not be considered during traffic
          classification.

          Note that the position of the EtherType field depends on
          the underlying frame format. For Ethernet-II encapsulation,
          the EtherType field follows the 802 MAC source address. For
          802.2 LLC/SNAP encapsulation, the EtherType value follows



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 55]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


          the Organization Code field in the 802.2 SNAP header. The
        value that is tested with regard to this filter component
        therefore depends on the data link layer frame format being
        used. If this 802 filter component is active when there is
        no EtherType field in a frame (e.g., 802.2 LLC), a match is
        implied."

    ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 7 }

frwk802FilterUserPriority OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         BITS {
                        matchPriority0(0),
                        matchPriority1(1),
                        matchPriority2(2),
                        matchPriority3(3),
                        matchPriority4(4),
                        matchPriority5(5),
                        matchPriority6(6),
                        matchPriority7(7)
                   }
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The set of values, representing the potential range
        of user priority values, against which the value contained
        in the user priority field of a tagged 802.1 frame is
        compared. A test for equality is performed when determining
        if a match exists between the data in a data link layer
        frame and the value of this 802 filter component. Multiple
        values may be set at one time such that potentially several
        different user priority values may match this 802 filter
        component.

        Setting all of the bits that are associated with this
        object causes all user priority values to match this
        attribute. This essentially makes any comparisons
        with regard to user priority values unnecessary. Untagged
        frames are treated as an implicit match."

    ::= { frwk802FilterEntry 8 }

--
-- The Internal label filter extension
--

frwkILabelFilterTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkILabelFilterEntry
    PIB-ACCESS     install
    STATUS         current



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 56]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    DESCRIPTION
        "Internal label filter Table. This PRC is used to achieve
         classification based on the internal flow label set by the
         PEP possibly after ingress classification to avoid
         re-classification at the egress interface on the same PEP."

    ::= { frwkClassifierClasses 4 }

frwkILabelFilterEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         FrwkILabelFilterEntry
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Internal label filter entry definition."

    EXTENDS { frwkBaseFilterEntry }
    UNIQUENESS { frwkBaseFilterNegation,
                 frwkILabelFilterILabel }

    ::= { frwkILabelFilterTable 1 }

FrwkILabelFilterEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
   frwkILabelFilterILabel      OCTET STRING
}

frwkILabelFilterILabel      OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
       "The Label that this flow uses for differentiating traffic
        flows.  The flow labeling is meant for network device
       internal usage. A value of zero length string matches all
       internal labels."
    ::= { frwkILabelFilterEntry 1 }

--
-- The Marker classes group
--

frwkMarkerClasses
           OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frameworkPib 4 }
--
-- The 802 Marker Table
--

frwk802MarkerTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF Frwk802MarkerEntry
    PIB-ACCESS     install
    STATUS         current



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 57]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    DESCRIPTION
        "The 802 Marker class. An 802 packet can be marked with the
         specified VLAN id, priority level."

    ::= { frwkMarkerClasses 1 }

frwk802MarkerEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         Frwk802MarkerEntry
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "frwk802Marker entry definition."

    PIB-INDEX { frwk802MarkerPrid }
    UNIQUENESS { frwk802MarkerVlanId,
                 frwk802MarkerPriority }

    ::= { frwk802MarkerTable 1 }

Frwk802MarkerEntry::= SEQUENCE {
        frwk802MarkerPrid          InstanceId,
        frwk802MarkerVlanId        Unsigned32,
        frwk802MarkerPriority      Unsigned32
}

frwk802MarkerPrid  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         InstanceId
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An integer index to uniquely identify this 802 Marker."

    ::= { frwk802MarkerEntry 1 }

frwk802MarkerVlanId  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (1..4094)
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The VLAN ID (VID) that uniquely identifies a VLAN within
         the device."

    ::= { frwk802MarkerEntry 2 }

frwk802MarkerPriority  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         Unsigned32 (0..7)
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The user priority field of a tagged 802.1 frame."

    ::= { frwk802MarkerEntry 3 }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 58]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003



--
-- The Internal Label Marker Table
--

frwkILabelMarkerTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         SEQUENCE OF FrwkILabelMarkerEntry
    PIB-ACCESS     install
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The Internal Label Marker class. A flow in a PEP can be
        marked with an internal label using this PRC."

    ::= { frwkMarkerClasses 2 }

frwkILabelMarkerEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         FrwkILabelMarkerEntry
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "frwkILabelkMarker entry definition."

    PIB-INDEX { frwkILabelMarkerPrid }
    UNIQUENESS { frwkILabelMarkerILabel }

    ::= { frwkILabelMarkerTable 1 }

FrwkILabelMarkerEntry::= SEQUENCE {
        frwkILabelMarkerPrid          InstanceId,
        frwkILabelMarkerILabel        OCTET STRING
}

frwkILabelMarkerPrid  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         InstanceId
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "An integer index to uniquely identify this Label Marker."

    ::= { frwkILabelMarkerEntry 1 }

frwkILabelMarkerILabel  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX         OCTET STRING
    STATUS         current
    DESCRIPTION
        "This internal label is implementation specific and may be
         used for other policy related functions like flow
         accounting purposes and/or other data path treatments."

    ::= { frwkILabelMarkerEntry 2 }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 59]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003



--
-- Conformance Section
--

frwkBasePibConformance
                OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frameworkPib 5 }

frwkBasePibCompliances
                OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frwkBasePibConformance 1 }

frwkBasePibGroups
                OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frwkBasePibConformance 2 }

frwkBasePibCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Describes the requirements for conformance to the
            Framework PIB."

    MODULE  -- this module
        MANDATORY-GROUPS { frwkPrcSupportGroup,
                           frwkPibIncarnationGroup,
                           frwkDeviceIdGroup,
                           frwkCompLimitsGroup,
                           frwkCapabilitySetGroup,
                           frwkRoleComboGroup,
                           frwkIfRoleComboGroup }

        OBJECT          frwkPibIncarnationLongevity
        PIB-MIN-ACCESS  notify
        DESCRIPTION
           "Install support is required if policy expiration is to
           be supported."

        OBJECT          frwkPibIncarnationTtl
        PIB-MIN-ACCESS  notify
        DESCRIPTION
           "Install support is required if policy expiration is to
           be supported."

        OBJECT          frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet
        PIB-MIN-ACCESS  notify
        DESCRIPTION
           "Install support is required if configuration contexts
           and outsourcing contexts are both to be supported."

        OBJECT          frwkPibIncarnationFullState



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 60]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


        PIB-MIN-ACCESS  notify
        DESCRIPTION
            "Install support is required if incremental updates to
            request states is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwkReferenceGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkReferenceGroup is mandatory if referencing
            across PIB contexts for specific client-types is to be
            supported."

    GROUP   frwkErrorGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkErrorGroup is mandatory sending errors in
             decisions is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwkBaseFilterGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkBaseFilterGroup is mandatory if filtering
             based on traffic components is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwkIpFilterGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkIpFilterGroup is mandatory if filtering
             based on IP traffic components is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwk802FilterGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwk802FilterGroup is mandatory if filtering
            based on 802 traffic criteria is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwkILabelFilterGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkILabelFilterGroup is mandatory if filtering
            based on PEP internal label is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwk802MarkerGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwk802MarkerGroup is mandatory if marking a packet
            with 802 traffic criteria is to be supported."

    GROUP   frwkILabelMarkerGroup
        DESCRIPTION
            "The frwkILabelMarkerGroup is mandatory if marking a
            flow with internal labels is to be supported."

    ::= { frwkBasePibCompliances 1 }




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 61]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


frwkPrcSupportGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkPrcSupportPrid,
             frwkPrcSupportSupportedPrc,
             frwkPrcSupportSupportedAttrs }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkPrcSupportTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 1 }

frwkPibIncarnationGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkPibIncarnationPrid,
             frwkPibIncarnationName,
             frwkPibIncarnationId,
             frwkPibIncarnationLongevity,
             frwkPibIncarnationTtl,
             frwkPibIncarnationInCtxtSet,
             frwkPibIncarnationActive,
             frwkPibIncarnationFullState
            }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkDevicePibIncarnationTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 2 }

frwkDeviceIdGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkDeviceIdPrid,
             frwkDeviceIdDescr,
             frwkDeviceIdMaxMsg,
             frwkDeviceIdMaxContexts }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkDeviceIdTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 3 }

frwkCompLimitsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkCompLimitsPrid,
             frwkCompLimitsComponent,
             frwkCompLimitsAttrPos,
             frwkCompLimitsNegation,
             frwkCompLimitsType,
             frwkCompLimitsSubType,



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 62]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


             frwkCompLimitsGuidance }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkCompLimitsTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 4 }

frwkReferenceGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkReferencePrid,
             frwkReferenceClientType,
             frwkReferenceClientHandle,
             frwkReferenceInstance }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkReferenceTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 5 }

frwkErrorGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkErrorPrid,
             frwkErrorCode,
             frwkErrorSubCode,
             frwkErrorPrc,
             frwkErrorInstance }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkErrorTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 6 }

frwkCapabilitySetGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkCapabilitySetPrid,
             frwkCapabilitySetName,
             frwkCapabilitySetCapability }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkCapabilitySetTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 7 }

frwkRoleComboGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkRoleComboPrid,
             frwkRoleComboRoles,
             frwkRoleComboCapSetName }



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 63]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkRoleComboTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 8 }

frwkIfRoleComboGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS { frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkIfRoleComboTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 9 }

frwkBaseFilterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkBaseFilterPrid,
             frwkBaseFilterNegation }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkBaseFilterTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 10 }

frwkIpFilterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkIpFilterAddrType,
             frwkIpFilterDstAddr,
             frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength,
             frwkIpFilterSrcAddr,
             frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength,
             frwkIpFilterDscp,
             frwkIpFilterFlowId,
             frwkIpFilterProtocol,
             frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMin,
             frwkIpFilterDstL4PortMax,
             frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMin,
             frwkIpFilterSrcL4PortMax }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkIpFilterTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 11 }

frwk802FilterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwk802FilterDstAddr,
             frwk802FilterDstAddrMask,



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 64]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


             frwk802FilterSrcAddr,
             frwk802FilterSrcAddrMask,
             frwk802FilterVlanId,
             frwk802FilterVlanTagRequired,
             frwk802FilterEtherType,
             frwk802FilterUserPriority }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwk802FilterTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 12 }

frwkILabelFilterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS { frwkILabelFilterILabel }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkILabelFilterTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 13 }

frwk802MarkerGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwk802MarkerPrid,
             frwk802MarkerVlanId,
             frwk802MarkerPriority }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwk802MarkerTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 14 }

frwkILabelMarkerGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
             frwkILabelMarkerPrid,
             frwkILabelMarkerILabel }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
            "Objects from the frwkILabelMarkerTable."

    ::= { frwkBasePibGroups 15 }

END









Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 65]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


6. Security Considerations

   It is clear that this PIB is used for configuration using [COPS-PR],
   and anything that can be configured can be misconfigured, with a
   potentially disastrous effect.  At this writing, no security holes
   have been identified beyond those that the COPS base protocol
   security is itself intended to address.  These relate primarily to
   controlled access to sensitive information and the ability to
   configure a device - or which might result from operator error, which
   is beyond the scope of any security architecture.

   There are a number of PRovisioning Classes defined in this PIB that
   have a PIB-ACCESS clause of install and install-notify (read-create).
   These are:

   frwkPibIncarnationTable: Malicious access of this PRC can cause the
   PEP to use an incorrect context of policies.

   frwkReferenceTable: Malicious access of this PRC can cause the PEP to
   interpret the installed policy in an incorrect manner.

   frwkErrorTable: Malicious access of this PRC can cause the PEP to
   incorrectly assume that the PDP could not process its messages.

   FrwkCapabilitySetTable, frwkRoleComboTable and frwkIfRoleComboTable:
   Malicious access of these PRCs can cause the PEP to apply policies to
   the wrong interfaces.

   FrwkBaseFilterTable, frwkIpFilterTable, frwk802FilterTable and
   frwkILabelFilterTable: Malicious access of these PRCs can cause
   unintended classification of traffic on the PEP potentially leading
   to incorrect policies being applied.

   frwk802MarkerTable, frwkILabelMarkerTable: Malicious access of these
   PRCs can cause unintended marking of traffic on the PEP potentially
   leading to incorrect policies being applied.

   Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some
   network environments.  The support for "Install" or "Install-Notify"
   decisions sent over [COPS-PR] in a non-secure environment without
   proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations.
   There are a number of PRovisioning Classes in this PIB that may
   contain information that may be sensitive from a business
   perspective, in that they may represent a customer's service contract
   or the filters that the service provider chooses to apply to a
   customer's ingress or egress traffic.  There are no PRCs that are
   sensitive in their own right, such as passwords or monetary amounts.
   It may be important to control even "Notify"(read-only) access to



Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 66]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   these PRCs and possibly to even encrypt the values of these PRIs when
   sending them over the network via COPS-PR.  The use of IPSEC between
   the PDP and the PEP, as described in [COPS], provides the necessary
   protection against security threats.  However, even if the network
   itself is secure, there is no control as to who on the secure network
   is allowed to "Install/Notify" (read/change/create/delete) the PRIs
   in this PIB.

   It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the PEP/PDP
   giving access to an instance of this PIB, is properly configured to
   give access to only the PRIs and principals (users) that have
   legitimate rights to indeed "Install" or "Notify" (change/create/
   delete) them.

7. IANA Considerations

   This document describes the frameworkPib and frwkTcPib Policy
   Information Base (PIB) modules for registration under the "pib"
   branch registered with IANA.  The IANA has assigned PIB numbers 2 and
   3, respectively.

   Both these PIBs use "all" in the SUBJECT-CATEGORIES clause, i.e.,
   they apply to all COPS client types.  No new COPS client type is to
   be registered for these two PIB modules.

8. References

8.1 Normative References

   [COPS]           Boyle, J., Cohen, R., Durham, D., Herzog, S., Rajan,
                    R. and A. Sastry, "The COPS (Common Open Policy
                    Service) Protocol", RFC 2748, January 2000.

   [COPS-PR]        Chan, K., Durham, D., Gai, S., Herzog, S.,
                    McCloghrie, K., Reichmeyer, Seligson, J., Smith, A.
                    and R. Yavatkar, "COPS Usage for Policy
                    Provisioning", RFC 3084, March 2001.

   [SPPI]           McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K.,
                    Hahn, S., Sahita, R., Smith, A. and F. Reichmeyer,
                    "Structure of Policy Provisioning Information", RFC
                    3159, August 2001.

   [SNMP-SMI]       McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J.,
                    Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of
                    Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,
                    RFC 2578, April 1999.




Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 67]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   [INETADDR]       Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S. and J.
                    Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet
                    Network Addresses", RFC 3291, May 2002.

   [802]            IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area
                    Networks: Overview and Architecture, ANSI/IEEE Std
                    802, 1990.

   [SNMPFRWK]       Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An
                    Architecture for Describing Simple Network
                    Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks",
                    STD 62, RFC 3411, December 2002.

   [RFC2863]        McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces
                    Group MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.

   [DS-MIB]         Baker, F., Chan, K. and  A. Smith, "Management
                    Information Base for the Differentiated Services
                    Architecture", RFC 3289, May 2002.

   [SNMPv2TC]       McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
                    "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579,
                    April 1999.

   [RFC2279]        Yergeau, F. "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
                    10646", RFC 2279, January 1998.

   [RFC2119]        Bradner, S., "Key words to use in the RFCs", BCP 14,
                    RFC 2119, March 1997.

8.2 Informative References

   [RAP-FRAMEWORK]  Yavatkar, R and D. Pendarakis, "A Framework for
                    Policy-based Admission Control", RFC 2753, January
                    2000.

   [POLTERM]        Westerinen, A., Schnizlein, J., Strassner, J.,
                    Scherling, M., Quinn, B., Herzog, S., Huynh, A.,
                    Carlson, M., Perry, J. and S. Waldbusser,
                    "Terminology for Policy-Based Management", RFC 3198,
                    November 2001.

9. Acknowledgments

   Early versions of this specification were also co-authored by Michael
   Fine, Francis Reichmeyer, John Seligson and Andrew Smith.





Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 68]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


   Special thanks to Carol Bell, David Durham and Bert Wijnen for their
   many significant comments.

   Additional useful comments have been made by Diana Rawlins, Martin
   Bokaemper, Tina Iliff, Pedro Da Silva, Juergen Schoenwaelder,
   Noisette Yoann and Man Li.

10. Authors' Addresses

   Ravi Sahita
   Intel Labs.
   2111 NE 25th Avenue
   Hillsboro, OR 97124 USA

   Phone: +1 503 712 1554
   EMail: ravi.sahita@intel.com


   Scott Hahn
   Intel Corp.
   2111 NE 25th Avenue
   Hillsboro, OR 97124 USA

   Phone: +1 503 264 8231
   EMail: scott.hahn@intel.com


   Kwok Ho Chan
   Nortel Networks, Inc.
   600 Technology Park Drive
   Billerica, MA 01821 USA

   Phone: +1 978 288 8175
   EMail: khchan@nortelnetworks.com


   Keith McCloghrie
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA  95134-1706 USA

   Phone: +1 408 526 5260
   EMail: kzm@cisco.com








Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 69]
^L
RFC 3318           Framework Policy Information Base          March 2003


11.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.



















Sahita, et. al.              Informational                     [Page 70]
^L