summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc4661.txt
blob: ef0b9664f8dfe077791f9b5efbf80f88e130da50 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
Network Working Group                                       H. Khartabil
Request for Comments: 4661                                         Telio
Category: Standards Track                                    E. Leppanen
                                                             M. Lonnfors
                                                        J. Costa-Requena
                                                                   Nokia
                                                          September 2006


          An Extensible Markup Language (XML)-Based Format for
                      Event Notification Filtering

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

   The SIP event notification framework describes the usage of the
   Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for subscriptions and notifications
   of changes to a state of a resource.  The document does not describe
   a mechanism whereby filtering of event notification information can
   be achieved.  Filtering is a mechanism for defining the preferred
   notification information to be delivered and for specifying triggers
   that cause that information to be delivered.  In order to enable
   this, a format is needed to enable the subscriber to describe the
   state changes of a resource that cause notifications to be sent to it
   and what those notifications are to contain.  This document presents
   a format in the form of an XML document.














Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 1]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   3.  Structure of XML-Encoded Simple-Filter . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.1.  MIME Type for Simple-Filter Document . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.2.  The <filter-set> Root Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.3.  The <ns-bindings> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       3.4.  The <filter> Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
       3.5.  The <what> Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
             3.5.1.  The <include> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
             3.5.2.  The <exclude> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
             3.5.3.  The 'type' Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
       3.6.  The <trigger> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
             3.6.1.  The <changed> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
             3.6.2.  The <added> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
             3.6.3.  The <removed> Element  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   4.  XML Schema Extensibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   5.  Syntax for Referencing XML Items and Making Logical
       Expressions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   6.  Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       6.1.  Filter Criteria Using <what> Element . . . . . . . . . . 12
       6.2.  Filter Criteria Using <trigger> Element  . . . . . . . . 13
       6.3.  Filter Criteria Using <what> and <trigger> Elements  . . 13
       6.4.  Content Filter Using Namespaces  . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
       6.5.  Content Filter Using Only <include> Elements . . . . . . 14
       6.6.  Two Content Filters as Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . 15
   7.  XML Schema for Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   8.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
   9.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
       9.1.  application/simple-filter+xml MIME TYPE  . . . . . . . . 19
       9.2.  URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
           urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       9.3.  Schema Registration  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
   10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
   11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
       11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21













Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 2]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


1.  Introduction

   The SIP event notification framework [2] describes the usage of the
   Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for subscriptions and notifications
   of changes to a state of a resource.  The document does not describe
   a mechanism whereby filtering of event notification information can
   be achieved.

   Filtering is a mechanism for defining the preferred notification
   information, referred to as content, to be delivered and for
   specifying the rules for when that information should be delivered.

   The filtering mechanism is expected to be particularly valuable and
   primarily applicable to users of mobile wireless access devices.  The
   characteristics of the devices typically include high latency, low
   bandwidth, low data processing capabilities, small display, and
   limited battery power.  Such devices can benefit from the ability to
   filter the amount of information generated at the source of the event
   notification.  However, implementers need to be aware of the
   computational burden on the source of the event notification.  This
   is discussed further in Section 8.

   The structure of the filter criteria is described using the XML
   schema.  The filter criteria is presented as an XML document.  The
   XML document contains the user's preference as to when notifications
   are to be sent to it and what they are to contain.  The scope of the
   "when" part is triggering.

   The triggering is defined as enabling a subscriber to specify
   triggering rules for notifications where the criteria are based on
   changes of the event package [2] specific state information, e.g.,
   for the presence information document [15], the change in the value
   of the <status> element.

   The functionality of the filtering regarding the SIP event
   notifications is specified in [3].

2.  Conventions

   In this document, the key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED',
   'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY',
   and 'OPTIONAL' are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1] and
   indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.

   Throughout the document, the "resulting XML document" refers to the
   final XML document that carries state information to be delivered to
   the subscriber after the filters have been applied to it.




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 3]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   "Content" refers to the XML document that appears in a notification
   reflecting the state of a resource.

3.  Structure of XML-Encoded Simple-Filter

   A simple-filter is an XML document [8] that MUST be well formed and
   MUST be valid according to schemas, including extension schemas,
   available to the validater, and applicable to the XML document.  The
   simple-filter documents MUST be based on XML 1.0 and MUST be encoded
   using UTF-8.

   The namespace identifier for elements defined by this specification
   is a URN [5], which uses the namespace identifier 'ietf' defined by
   [6] and extended by [4].  This urn is:
   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter.

   This namespace declaration indicates the namespace on which the
   filter criteria are based.

3.1.  MIME Type for Simple-Filter Document

   The MIME type for the simple-filter document is "application/
   simple-filter+xml".  Any transport protocol (SIP [12], for example)
   used to carry the filters that also carries payload type information
   MUST identify the payload as MIME type
   "application/simple-filter+xml" (for example, a Content-Type header
   field).

3.2.  The <filter-set> Root Element

   The root element of the filter criteria is <filter-set>.

   The <filter-set> element contains the namespace definition mentioned
   above.  With the optional 'package' attribute, it is possible to
   define the package to which the filter criteria is applied.  This
   might be especially useful in cases where the XML document containing
   the filter criteria is separated from the events that make use of it
   or from the protocol that usually carries it.

   The <filter-set> element may contain one <ns-bindings> element.

   The <filter-set> element contains one or more <filter> elements.

3.3.  The <ns-bindings> Element

   The <ns-bindings> element is used to bind namespaces to local
   prefixes used in expressions that select elements or attributes using




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 4]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   the syntax in Section 5.  Those prefixes apply to the <include>,
   <exclude>, <changed>, <added>, and <removed> elements.

   The <ns-bindings> element contains one or more <ns-binding> elements.
   Each <ns-binding> element has a 'prefix' attribute.  The value of the
   'prefix' attribute is a prefix used to qualify the elements pointed
   to by the expression.  The <ns-binding> element also has a 'urn'
   attribute that identifies the namespace that the prefix represents.

3.4.  The <filter> Element

   The <filter> element is used to specify the content of an individual
   filter.

   The <filter> element has an 'id' attribute.  The value of the 'id'
   attribute MUST be unique within the <filter-set> element.  The
   <filter> MAY have a 'uri' attribute.  The value of the 'uri'
   attribute is the URI of the resource to which the filter applies.
   The <filter> MAY have a 'domain' attribute.  The value of the
   'domain' attribute is the domain of the resources to which the filter
   applies.  The 'uri' attribute and the 'domain' attribute MUST NOT
   appear together in the <filter>.

   The URI of the resource is useful in cases where the 'event list'
   extension [17] is used with a package.  Since a subscription to an
   event package may be addressed to an event list, the 'uri' attribute
   allows the subscriber to define a filter specific to an individual
   resource within that list.  That resource may be another list.  The
   'uri' attribute may, of course, carry the URI of the list itself.  If
   the <filter> does not contain the 'uri' attribute, the filter applies
   to the resource identified in the subscription request.

   The 'domain' attribute carries a domain.  In this case, the filter
   applies to resources whose URI has a domain part matching that
   domain.  This can be used when a subscription is for a resource that
   is an event list with many resources from differing domains.

   URI matching is done according to the matching rules defined for a
   particular scheme.  When matching domains, the user part of the URI
   is ignored for matching purposes.

   The <filter> MAY have a 'remove' attribute that together with the
   'id' attribute indicates the existing filter to be removed.  The
   value of the 'remove' attribute is of the type "Boolean".  The
   default value is "false".






Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 5]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   The <filter> MAY have an 'enabled' attribute that indicates whether a
   filter is enabled or disabled.  The value of the 'enabled' attribute
   is of the type "Boolean".  The default value is "true".

   The <filter> element MAY contain a <what> element and MAY contain one
   or more <trigger> elements, but it MUST contain either the <what>
   element or the <trigger> element when the filter is being enabled for
   the first time.  When a filter is disabled by setting the 'enabled'
   attribute to "false", the <what> and <trigger> elements MAY be
   omitted.  Similarly, when a filter is re-enabled by setting the
   'enabled' attribute to "true", the <what> and <trigger> elements MAY
   be omitted.

   Filter contents can be changed by changing the contents in the <what>
   and <trigger> elements and maintaining the value of the filter 'id'
   attribute.

3.5.  The <what> Element

   The <what> element is used to specify the content to be delivered to
   the user.  It does not specify the exact content but the rules that
   are used to construct that information.

   The <what> element may contain one or more <include> elements and one
   or more <exclude> elements.  When more than one <include> element has
   been defined, the results are additive.  That is, each <include>
   element adds an element or attribute to the resulting XML document.
   When more than one <exclude> element has been defined, each <exclude>
   element value depletes the contents of the resulting XML document.

3.5.1.  The <include> Element

   The <include> element is used to select the content to be delivered.
   Its value can identify an XML element, an attribute, or a namespace
   of an XML document to be filtered.  This is indicated using the
   'type' attribute.

   Note that the resulting XML document MUST be valid.  Therefore, in
   addition to including the elements identified with the <include>
   element value, all other mandatory XML elements and/or attributes
   must be incorporated in the resulting XML document in order to make
   it valid.  This, in practice, means that a subscriber defining a
   filter only needs to <include> optional elements and/or attributes,
   but may <include> mandatory elements and/or attributes as well.
   There are also cases where a filter selects an attribute that belongs
   to an optional element.  In this case, the optional element needs to
   appear in the resulting XML document.




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 6]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   The syntax defined in Section 5 (see the definition of "selection")
   MUST be used.  The following example selects the <basic> element
   defined in the PIDF [13].  This results in the selection of the
   <basic> element as well as all the ancestors, i.e., <status> and
   <tuple>.

   <include type="xpath">/presence/tuple/status/basic</include>.

3.5.2.  The <exclude> Element

   The <exclude> element is used to define exceptions to the set of XML
   elements and/or attributes selected by the <include> elements.  Thus,
   XML elements (including their lower-level "child" elements) and/or
   attributes defined by the <exclude> element are not delivered.  This
   is most useful when an <include> element identifies a namespace.

   The <exclude> element has the optional 'type' attribute (see the
   definition of the 'type' in Section 3.5.3).

   Note that the resulting XML document MUST be valid.  Therefore, if
   the step in applying the <exclude> element value to an XML document
   results in an invalid document according to the schema, that step
   MUST be reversed, resulting in the elements and/or attributes being
   re-introduced into the resulting XML document with their previous
   values in order to make it valid.  This, in practice, means that a
   subscriber defining a filter only needs to <exclude> optional
   elements and/or attributes, but SHOULD NOT <exclude> mandatory
   elements and/or attributes.

   The syntax MUST follow Section 5.

3.5.3.  The 'type' Attribute

   The 'type' attribute is used to describe the value of the <include>
   and <exclude> elements.  The following values are pre-defined:
   "xpath" and "namespace".  The 'type' attribute is optional, and, if
   omitted, the default value is "xpath".

   The "xpath" value is used when the <include> or <exclude> element
   contains a value following the syntax in Section 5 that selects an
   element or an attribute.

   The "namespace" value is used when the <include> or <exclude> element
   contains a value of a namespace.  The value is the URI of the
   namespace.  The resulting XML document is comprised of the elements
   defined within the namespace.





Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 7]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


3.6.  The <trigger> Element

   The <trigger> element is used to identify the package-specific
   changes that a resource has to encounter before the content is
   delivered to the subscriber.  It can appear more than once in a
   <filter> element.  Multiple appearances of this element denote the
   "OR" operation.  This means that updates to a resource that satisfy
   any of the <trigger> elements criteria constitute the content to be
   delivered.

   The <trigger> element MAY contain the <changed>, <added>, or
   <removed> elements, but it MUST contain at least one of the three
   elements.  Any combination of the 3 elements is possible.  Multiple
   appearances of those elements within a <trigger> element denotes the
   "AND" operation.  This means that updates to a resource that satisfy
   ALL of the <changed>, <added>, and <removed> elements' criteria
   within the <trigger> element constitute the content to be delivered.

3.6.1.  The <changed> Element

   The <changed> element is used to identify the XML element or
   attribute, from the package-specific XML document, whose value MUST
   change from that of the "previous XML document", in order to activate
   the trigger and cause the content to be delivered.  Previous XML
   document" in this context refers to the raw version of the most
   recent XML document that was sent to the subscriber, before the
   filters were applied to it.  The XML element or attribute MUST be
   expressed using the syntax defined in Section 5 for the "reference"
   ABNF.

   The <changed> element MAY contain the 'from' attribute, the 'to'
   attribute, the 'by' attribute, or any combination of the three.  The
   absence of all of those attributes means a change of any sort to the
   value of the element or attribute activates the trigger.  An update
   to the element or attribute value with an identical value is not a
   change.

   Comparison of a change is done according to the element or
   attribute's lexical rules.

3.6.1.1.  The 'from' Attribute

   A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with
   the <changed> element has changed from the value indicated by this
   attribute to a different value.






Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 8]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


3.6.1.2.  The 'to' Attribute

   A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with
   the <changed> element has changed to the value indicated by this
   attribute from a different value.

3.6.1.3.  The 'by' Attribute

   A trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified with
   the <changed> element has changed by at least the amount indicated by
   this attribute from a different value.  That is, the 'by' attribute
   applies only to numerical values and indicates a delta with respect
   to the current value that an attribute or element (identified in the
   <changed> element) needs to change before it is selected.  For
   example, if the 'by' attribute is set to 2 and the current value of
   the element/attribute is 6, the element/attribute is selected when it
   reaches (or exceeds) the value 8 or when it decreases to 4 or a lower
   value.

3.6.1.4.  Combination of Attributes

   Any combination of the 'from', 'to', and 'by' attributes in the
   <changed> element is possible.  For example, if the 'from' attribute
   is combined with the 'to' attribute, it is interpreted to mean that
   the trigger is active when the XML element or attribute identified
   with the <changed> element has changed from the 'from' value to the
   'to' value.  Note that if the 'by' attribute is used in combination
   with the other attributes, the other attribute types MUST match the
   'by' type of decimal.

3.6.2.  The <added> Element

   The <added> element triggers content delivery when the XML element it
   identifies has been added to the document being filtered (that is,
   this instance of that element appears in the current document, but
   not in the previous document).  It can be used, for example, to learn
   of new services and/or capabilities subscribed to by the user, or
   services and/or capabilities that the user has now allowed the
   subscriber to see.  The XML element or attribute MUST be expressed
   using the syntax defined in Section 5 for the "reference" ABNF.

   Note that if a filter includes both the content filter (<what>) part
   and the <added> element, then the definitions of the <what> part
   SHOULD also cover the added elements.  Otherwise, the content is
   delivered without the items defined in the <added> element.






Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                     [Page 9]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


3.6.3.  The <removed> Element

   The <removed> element triggers content delivery when the XML element
   it identifies has been removed from the document being filtered (that
   is, this instance of that element appeared in the previous document,
   but not in this document).  The XML element or attribute MUST be
   expressed using the syntax defined in Section 5 for the "reference"
   ABNF.

4.  XML Schema Extensibility

   The simple-filter document is meant to be extended.  An extension
   takes place by defining a new set of elements in a new namespace,
   governed by a new schema.  Every extension MUST have an appropriate
   XML namespace assigned to it.  The XML namespace of the extension
   MUST be different from the namespaces defined in this specification.
   The extension MUST NOT change the syntax or semantics of the schemas
   defined in this document.  All XML tags and attributes that are part
   of the extension MUST be appropriately qualified so as to place them
   within that namespace and MUST be designed such that receivers can
   safely ignore such extensions.

   This specification defines explicit places where new elements or
   attributes from an extension can be placed.  These are explicitly
   indicated in the schemas by the <any> and <anyAttribute> elements.
   Extensions to this specification MUST specify where their elements
   can be placed within the document.

   As a result, a document that contains extensions will require
   multiple schemas in order to determine its validity - a schema
   defined in this document, along with those defined by extensions
   present in the document.  Because extensions occur by adding new
   elements and attributes governed by new schemas, the schemas defined
   in this document are fixed and would only be changed by a revision to
   this specification.  Such a revision, should it take place, would
   endeavor to allow documents compliant to the previous schema to
   remain compliant to the new one.  As a result, the schemas defined
   here don't provide explicit schema versions, as this is not expected
   to be needed.

5.  Syntax for Referencing XML Items and Making Logical Expressions

   The ABNF [10] is used to describe the syntax for the expressions.
   The syntax is defined to be XPATH [9] compatible but has only a
   restricted set of capabilities of the XPATH.  More information about
   the meaning of the items of the syntax can be found in [9].  The
   "abbreviated syntax" of the "node test" is used in the references
   ("reference").  The expression in the syntax relates to the



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 10]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   predicate, comparison, and logical expressions of the XPATH.  If an
   XPATH expression evaluates to more than one element at a certain
   step, the filter applies to all the elements that are evaluated.
   That is, if a filter including an element evaluates to 2 elements,
   both elements are included as a result.

   selection = reference [expression]
   expression = "[" (elem-expr / attr-expr)
                         1*[oper (elem-expr / attr-expr)] "]"
   elem-expr = (elem-path / "." / "..") compar value
   elem-path = (element / "*") 1*["/" / "*" / element] ["*" / element]
   attr-expr = [elem-path "/"] attribute compar value

   reference = elem-reference / attr-reference
   elem-reference =  "/" 1*("/" / "/*" / ("/" element))
   attr-reference = reference attribute

   oper = "and" / "or"
   compar = "=" / "<" / ">"
   element = [ns] string
   attribute = "@" [ns] string
   ns = string ":"
   string = <any sequence of data supported by XML in names of XML
   element, and/or attribute or prefixes of namespaces>
   value = <any sequence of data supported by XML as a value of the
   XML element and/or attribute>

   When identifying XML elements or attributes, the value may consist of
   two parts: the XML element/attribute selector and the condition
   (comparison and logical expressions).  The XML element selector
   appears first followed by the condition part in square brackets.  In
   the XML element selector part, the XML elements may be referenced by
   giving the full hierarchical path as: "/presence/tuple/status/basic",
   by denoting the selection to cover any hierarchical level by its name
   as: "//tuple/status/basic", or using the wildcard "*", denoting any
   value in a certain level as "/*/watcher".

   Example references are listed as follows:

   o  Selecting an element by using an XML element as a condition:
      *  //*[status/basic="open"]
      *  /presence/tuple[*/basic="open"]

   o  Selecting an element by using XML attributes as a condition:
      *  //watcher[@duration-subscribed<500]
      *  /*/watcher[@event="rejected"]





Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 11]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   o  Selecting an element by using two XML elements as a condition:
      *  //tuple[status/basic="open" and type="device"]

   o  Selecting an attribute:
      *  //watcher/@duration-subscribed

   In some cases, due to the design of the XML schema, the XPATH-like
   expression results in identification of more than one element with
   the same name (the XPATH expression may not have uniquely identified
   an element at every step).  In those cases, all elements identified
   are selected.

   When evaluating XPATH location steps, namespace expansion follows
   XPATH 1.0 [9] semantics, i.e., if the QName does not have a prefix,
   then the namespace URI in the expanded name is null.  With
   non-default namespaces, expansion is done according to the given
   <ns-bindings> definitions.  When a default namespace is used in the
   document, the <ns-binding> element SHOULD be used to define an equal
   URI with some prefix in order to have a valid XPATH evaluation in
   location steps.

6.  Examples

   The XML Schema for the XML document examples is specified in
   Section 7.

6.1.  Filter Criteria Using <what> Element

   A user wishes to get to know his friend's availability and
   willingness for messaging (SMS, IM, and MMS) in order to know whether
   the friend is able to receive a message, the address to contact, and
   the type of the message to be used.

   This example shows how to define a content filter.  The <basic>
   element as well as all parent elements are selected based on a
   condition defined by a logical expression.  The condition is <class>
   elements that have a value "MMS", "SMS", or "IM".

   The <class> element is defined in [14] as an extension to PIDF [13].

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
     <ns-bindings>
       <ns-binding prefix="pidf" urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"/>
       <ns-binding prefix="rpid"
                          urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"/>
     </ns-bindings>
     <filter id="123" uri="sip:presentity@example.com">



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 12]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


       <what>
         <include type="xpath">
           /pidf:presence/pidf:tuple[rpid:class="IM" or rpid:class="SMS"
           or rpid:class="MMS"]/pidf:status/pidf:basic
         </include>
       </what>
     </filter>
   </filter-set>

6.2.  Filter Criteria Using <trigger> Element

   A user requires to be informed when his colleague becomes available
   by some communication means.  The user gets the full presence state
   of the colleague when a certain PIDF [13] tuple <basic> status
   changes from "closed" to "open".

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
     <ns-bindings>
       <ns-binding prefix="pidf" urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"/>
     </ns-bindings>
     <filter id="123" uri="sip:presentity@example.com">
       <trigger>
         <changed from="CLOSED" to="OPEN">
           /pidf:presence/pidf:tuple/pidf:status/pidf:basic
         </changed>
   </trigger>
   </filter>
   </filter-set>

6.3.  Filter Criteria Using <what> and <trigger> Elements

   A user wishes to get information about pending and waiting
   subscriptions in order to be able to authorise watchers to see his
   presence information.

   The filter selects watcher information notifications [16] to be sent
   when a subscription status has changed to "pending" or "waiting".  In
   the notification, only the watchers that have a status of "pending"
   or "waiting" are included.

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
     <ns-bindings>
       <ns-binding prefix="wi"
                          urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo"/>
     </ns-bindings>
     <filter id="123" uri="sip:presentity@example.com">



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 13]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


       <what>
         <include>
           /wi:watcherinfo/wi:watcher-list/wi:watcher[@status="pending"
           or @status="waiting"]
         </include>
       </what>
       <trigger>
         <changed to="pending">
           /wi:watcherinfo/wi:watcher-list/wi:watcher/@status
         </changed>
       </trigger>
       <trigger>
         <changed to="waiting">
           /wi:watcherinfo/wi:watcher-list/wi:watcher/@status
         </changed>
       </trigger>
     </filter>
   </filter-set>

6.4.  Content Filter Using Namespaces

   A user turns her terminal on, and the terminal automatically fetches
   general presence status and information about communication means
   from a certain pre-defined set of her buddies.

   The filter is defined to select XML elements belonging to the PIDF
   namespace.

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
     <filter id="123" uri="sip:buddylist@example.com">
       <what>
         <include type="namespace">
           urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf
         </include>
       </what>
     </filter>
   </filter-set>

6.5.  Content Filter Using Only <include> Elements

   A user wants to know if a group of his friends is available for
   gaming.  He orders notifications about the current status and future
   changes of the game-specific presence information.

   This filter is defined to select the game-specific tuple to be
   delivered.




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 14]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter" >
     <ns-bindings>
       <ns-binding prefix="game-ext"
                          urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:game-ext"/>
     </ns-bindings>
     <filter id="123">
       <what>
         <include>
           /pidf:presence/pidf:tuple/
           pidf:status[game-ext:label="game-X"]
         </include>
       </what>
     </filter>
   </filter-set>

6.6.  Two Content Filters as Filter Criteria

   The user is interested in getting up-to-date information about the
   communication means and contact addresses of his friends.  The user
   also wants to get more information (e.g., location) about one of the
   friends in the list, named Bob.  The PIDF element <note> is filtered
   out, i.e., excluded.  The list was predefined as buddies@example.com.

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter">
     <ns-bindings>
       <ns-binding prefix="pidf" urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"/>
       <ns-binding prefix="rpid"
                          urn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"/>
     </ns-bindings>
     <filter id="8439" uri="sip:buddies@example.com">
       <what>
         <include>
           /pidf:presence/pidf:tuple[rpid:class="service"]/pidf:status/
           pidf:basic
         </include>
       </what>
       </filter>
     <filter id="999" uri="sip:bob@example.com">
       <what>
         <include type="namespace">
           urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf
         </include>
         <exclude>
           /pidf:presence/pidf:tuple/pidf:note
         </exclude>
       </what>



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 15]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


     </filter>
   </filter-set>

7.  XML Schema for Filter Criteria

   XML Schema Implementation (Normative)

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter"
          xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter"
          xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
          elementFormDefault="qualified">

     <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"
                      schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd"/>

     <xs:annotation>
       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">
         XML Schema Definition for Filter Criteria.
       </xs:documentation>
     </xs:annotation>

     <xs:element name="filter-set" type="FilterSetType"/>

       <xs:complexType name="FilterSetType">
         <xs:sequence>
           <xs:element name="ns-bindings" type="NSBindings"
                               minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
           <xs:element name="filter" type="FilterType"
                               minOccurs="1"
         maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
           </xs:sequence>
         <xs:attribute name="package" type="xs:string" use="optional"/>
         <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
       </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="NSBindings">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="ns-binding" type="NSBinding"
                             minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="NSBinding">
       <xs:attribute name="prefix" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
       <xs:attribute name="urn" type="xs:anyURI" use="required"/>
     </xs:complexType>




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 16]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


     <xs:complexType name="FilterType">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="what" type="WhatType"
                             minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
         <xs:element name="trigger" type="TriggerType"
                             minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
         <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
                       minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </xs:sequence>
       <xs:attribute name="id"  type="xs:string" use="required"/>
       <xs:attribute name="uri" type="xs:anyURI" use="optional"/>
       <xs:attribute name="domain" type="xs:string" use="optional"/>
       <xs:attribute name="remove" type="xs:boolean" use="optional"
                            default="false"/>
       <xs:attribute name="enabled" type="xs:boolean" use="optional"
                            default="true"/>
       <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
     </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="WhatType">
       <xs:sequence>
         <xs:element name="include" type="InclType"
                             minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
         <xs:element name="exclude" type="ExclType"
                             minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
         <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
                       minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="InclType">
       <xs:simpleContent>
         <xs:extension base="xs:string">
           <xs:attribute name="type" type="TypeType"
                                default="xpath" use="optional"/>
           <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
         </xs:extension>
       </xs:simpleContent>
     </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="ExclType">
       <xs:simpleContent>
         <xs:extension base="xs:string">
           <xs:attribute name="type" type="TypeType"
                                default="xpath" use="optional"/>
           <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
         </xs:extension>
       </xs:simpleContent>



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 17]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   </xs:complexType>

     <xs:simpleType name="TypeType">
       <xs:restriction base="xs:string">
         <xs:enumeration value="xpath"/>
         <xs:enumeration value="namespace"/>
       </xs:restriction>
     </xs:simpleType>

     <xs:complexType name="TriggerType">
       <xs:sequence>
       <xs:element name="changed" type="ChangedType"
                           minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       <xs:element name="added" type="xs:string"
                           minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       <xs:element name="removed" type="xs:string"
                           minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
                          minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
       </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>

     <xs:complexType name="ChangedType">
       <xs:simpleContent>
         <xs:extension base="xs:string">
           <xs:attribute name="from" type="xs:anySimpleType"
                                use="optional"/>
           <xs:attribute name="to" type="xs:anySimpleType"
                                use="optional"/>
           <xs:attribute name="by" type="xs:decimal"
                                use="optional"/>
           <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
         </xs:extension>
       </xs:simpleContent>
     </xs:complexType>

   </xs:schema>

8.  Security Considerations

   The filters in the body in a SIP message have a significant effect on
   the ways in which the request is handled at a server.  As a result,
   it is especially important that messages containing this extension be
   authenticated and authorised.  Authentication can be achieved using
   the Digest Authentication mechanism described in [12].  The
   authorisation decision is based on the permissions that the resource
   (notifier) has given to the watcher.  An example of such an
   auhorisation policy can be found in [18].



Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 18]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   Requests can reveal sensitive information about a UA's capabilities.
   If this information is sensitive, it SHOULD be encrypted using SIP
   S/MIME capabilities [11].

   All filtering-related security measures discussed in [2] MUST be
   followed along with package-specific security.

9.  IANA Considerations

   This document registers a new MIME type, "application/
   simple-filter+xml", and registers a new XML namespace.

   This specification follows the guidelines of RFC3023 [7].

9.1.  application/simple-filter+xml MIME TYPE

   MIME media type: application

   MIME subtype name: simple-filter+xml

   Mandatory parameters: none

   Optional parameters: Same as charset parameter application/xml, as
   specified in RFC 3023 [7].

   Encoding considerations: Same as encoding considerations of
   application/xml, as specified in RFC 3023 [7].

   Security considerations: See section 10 of RFC 3023 [7] and section
   Section 8 of this document.

   Interoperability considerations: none.

   Published specification: This document.

   Applications that use this media type: This document type has been
   used to support the SIP-based Event notification framework and its
   packages.

   Additional information:

   Magic number: None

   File extension: .cl or .xml

   Macintosh file type code: "TEXT"





Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 19]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   Personal and email address for further information: Hisham Khartabil
   (hisham.khartabil@telio.no)

   Intended Usage: COMMON

   Author/change controller: The IETF

9.2.  URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
      urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter

   This section registers a new XML namespace, as per guidelines in the
   IETF XML Registry [4].

   URI: The URI for this namespace is
   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter.

   Registrant Contact: IETF, SIMPLE working group, Hisham Khartabil
   (hisham.khartabil@telio.no)

9.3.  Schema Registration

   This section registers a new XML schema per the procedures in [4].

   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter

   Registrant Contact: IETF, SIMPLE working group, Hisham Khartabil
   (hisham.khartabil@telio.no).

   The XML for this schema can be found as the sole content of
   Section 7.

10.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Jonathan Rosenberg, Henning
   Schulzrinne, Tim Moran, Jari Urpalainen, Sreenivas Addagatla,
   Miguel-Angel Garcia Martin, Mary Barnes, Paul Kyzivat, Robert Sparks,
   and Elwyn Davies for their valuable input and comments.

11.  References

11.1.  Normative References

   [1]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
         Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2]   Roach, A. B., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event
         Notification", RFC 3265, June 2002.




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 20]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   [3]   Khartabil, H., Leppanen, E., Lonnfors, M., and J. Costa-
         Requena, "Functional Description of Event Notification
         Filtering", RFC 4660, September 2006.

   [4]   Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
         January 2004.

   [5]   Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

   [6]   Moats, R., "A URN Namespace for IETF Documents", RFC 2648,
         August 1999.

   [7]   Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types",
         RFC 3023, January 2001.

   [8]   Bray, T., "Exensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second
         Edition)",  W3C CR CR-xml11-20011006, October 2000.

   [9]   Clark, J., "XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0",  W3C REC
         REC-xpath-19991116, November 1999.

   [10]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
         Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.

   [11]  Ramsdell, B., "Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
         (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Message Specification", RFC 3851, July
         2004.

11.2.  Informative References

   [12]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
         Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
         Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.

   [13]  Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, W., and
         J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)", RFC
         3863, August 2004.

   [14]  Schulzrinne, H., Gurbani, V., Kyzivat, P., and J. Rosenberg,
         "RPID -- Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information
         Data Format (PIDF)", RFC 4480, July 2006.

   [15]  Rosenberg, J., "A Presence Event Package for the Session
         Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3856, August 2004.

   [16]  Rosenberg, J., "An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Based
         Format for Watcher Information", RFC 3858, August 2004.




Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 21]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


   [17]  Roach, A. B., Campbell, B., and J. Rosenberg, "A Session
         Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Notification Extension for
         Resource Lists", RFC 4663, September 2006.

   [18]  Rosenberg, J., "Presence Authorization Rules", Work in
         Progress, June 2006.













































Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 22]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


Authors' Addresses

   Hisham Khartabil
   Telio
   P.O. Box 1203 Vika
   Oslo
   Norway

   Phone: +47 2167 3544
   EMail: hisham.khartabil@telio.no


   Eva Leppanen
   Nokia
   P.O BOX 785
   Tampere
   Finland

   Phone: +358 7180 77066
   EMail: eva-maria.leppanen@nokia.com


   Mikko Lonnfors
   Nokia
   P.O BOX 321
   Helsinki
   Finland

   Phone: + 358 71800 8000
   EMail: mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com


   Jose Costa-Requena
   Nokia
   P.O. Box 321
   FIN-00045 NOKIA GROUP
   FINLAND

   Phone: +358 71800 8000
   EMail: jose.costa-requena@nokia.com











Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 23]
^L
RFC 4661             XML Based Format for Filtering       September 2006


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).







Khartabil, et al.           Standards Track                    [Page 24]
^L