1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
|
Network Working Group T. Kalin
Request for Comments: 4926 M. Molina
Category: Informational DANTE
July 2007
A URN Namespace for GEANT
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Abstract
This document describes a proposed URN (Uniform Resource Name)
namespace that would be managed by DANTE, representing European
Research and academic networks, for naming persistent resources
defined by GEANT, the Consortium of European Academic and Research
Networks, its projects, activities, working groups, and other
designated subordinates.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 1]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
1. Introduction
The Consortium of European Academic and Research Networks (GEANT)
provides high-speed, high-quality network connectivity for education
institutions, universities, and research centres in Europe. The
network infrastructure is composed of several National Research and
Education Networks (NRENs) and their European-wide interconnection,
GEANT. The current network is GEANT2 [6], and is the seventh
generation of pan-European research and education network, successor
to the pan-European multi-gigabit research network GEANT. DANTE [7]
is a UK-based organization representing the members of the Consortium
and operating the GEANT2 Network. This cooperative work is mainly
done in the framework of EU-funded projects. The biggest of such
activities is currently the GN2 project [6], started in September
2004, that follows other successful ones that have evolved the
European Networks for Research and Education for almost two decades.
It is expected that these activities and the network evolution will
continue to be supported by the European Union and all European
governments in the years to come, as they view the existence of a
state-of-the-art network for research in Europe as being of top
strategic importance. We will refer to the organization involved in
these projects and those that benefit from their outcome as the
"GEANT community".
The GEANT community produces many kinds of documents: specifications,
working drafts, project reports, schemas, stylesheets, etc. The
community wishes to provide global, distributed, persistent,
location-independent names for these resources. The Uniform Resource
Name (URN) variant of URIs meets these requirements.
The GEANT community and other GEANT-affiliated groups would benefit
from the GEANT URN proposal by having an easy, efficient way to
assign globally unique, persistent identifiers to resources that they
create. The nature of GEANT work is that it serves the needs of many
communities of interest. A namespace managed so as to facilitate the
creation, registration, and resolution of unique, persistent
identifiers would be of great value for GEANT, its affiliates, and
the higher education community generally. The possibility of fitting
the naming needs under existing namespaces has been considered, but
the conclusion was that the number of activities and the size of the
developers community is such that creating a lot of (possibly
uncoordinated) dependencies from other namespaces is undesirable.
The proposed URN namespace specification is for a formal namespace.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 2]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
2. Specification Template
Namespace ID:
geant
Registration Information:
Registration Version Number 1
Registration Date: 2006-03-21
Registrant of the namespace:
DANTE
ATTN: Maurizio Molina
City House
126 - 130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 1223 371340
Contact: Tomaz Kalin
Affiliation: DANTE
City House
126 - 130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
Email: tomaz.kalin@dante.org.uk
Phone: +386 1 430 3055
Syntactic structure:
The Namespace Specific Strings (NSS) of all URNs assigned by
GEANT will conform to the syntax defined in section 2.2 of RFC
2141, "URN Syntax" [2]. In addition, all GEANT URN NSSs will
consist of a left-to-right series of tokens delimited by
colons. The left-to-right sequence of colon-delimited tokens
corresponds to descending nodes in a tree. To the right of the
lowest naming authority node, there may be zero, one, or more
levels of hierarchical naming nodes terminating in a rightmost
leaf node. See the section below entitled "Identifier
assignment" for more on the semantics of NSSs. This syntax
convention is captured in the following normative ABNF rules
for GEANT NSSs (see RFC 4234 [1]):
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 3]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
GEANT-NSS = 1*(subStChar) 0*(":" 1*(subStChar))
subStChar = trans / "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG
trans = ALPHA / DIGIT / other / reserved
other = "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." /
"=" / "@" / ";" / "$" /
"_" / "!" / "*" / "'"
reserved = "%" / "/" / "?" / "#"
The exclusion of the colon from the list of "other" characters
means that the colon can only occur as a delimiter between
string tokens. Note that this ABNF rule set guarantees that
any valid GEANT NSS is also a valid RFC 2141 NSS.
Relevant ancillary documentation:
None.
Identifier uniqueness:
It is the responsibility of DANTE to guarantee uniqueness of
the names of immediately subordinate naming authorities. Each
lower-level naming authority in turn inherits the
responsibility of guaranteeing uniqueness of names in their
branch of the naming tree.
Identifier persistence:
DANTE bears ultimate responsibility for maintaining the
usability of GEANT URNs over time. This responsibility may be
delegated to subordinate naming authorities per the discussion
in the section below on identifier assignment. That section
provides a mechanism for the delegation to be revoked in the
case a subordinate naming authority ceases to function.
Identifier assignment:
DANTE will create an initial series of immediately subordinate
naming authorities, and will define a process for adding to
that list of authorities. Each top-level working group of
GEANT will be invited to designate a naming authority and to
suggest one or more candidate names.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 4]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
Institutions and communities affiliated with GEANT may request,
through their designated GEANT liaison, that they be granted
GEANT-subordinate naming authority status. They may propose
candidate names for that authority. One way for such entities
to guarantee uniqueness of their proposed name is to base it on
a DNS name. That is, if, e.g., the German National Research
and Education Network wished to be designated a subordinate
naming authority under GEANT, the institutional GEANT liaison
could propose to DANTE to be delegated control over names
beginning with "urn:geant:dfn.de". Institutions seeking
affiliation with GEANT should send email to
geant-submit@dante.org.uk, nominating an institutional liaison
and providing contact information for that person.
On at least an annual basis, DANTE will contact the liaisons or
directors of each immediately subordinate naming authority. If
there is no response, or if the respondent indicates that they
wish to relinquish naming authority, the authority over that
branch of the tree reverts to GEANT. This process will be
enforced recursively by each naming authority on its
subordinates. This process guarantees that responsibility for
each branch of the tree will lapse for less than one year, at
worst, before being reclaimed by a superior authority.
Lexical equivalence of two GEANT namespace specific strings
(NSSs) is defined below as an exact, case-sensitive string
match. DANTE will assign names of immediately subordinate
naming authorities in lowercase only. This forestalls the
registration of two GEANT-subordinate naming authorities whose
names differ only in case.
Identifier resolution:
DANTE will maintain an index of all GEANT and GEANT workgroup
assigned URNs on its Web site,
http://www.dante.net/urn-geant/urn-geant.html. That index will
map URNs to resource identifiers, usually URLs. GEANT-
affiliated naming authorities will specify how to resolve the
URNs they assign if they are resolvable.
Lexical equivalence:
Lexical equivalence of two GEANT Namespace Specific Strings
(NSSs) is defined as an exact, case-sensitive string match.
Conformance with URN syntax:
All GEANT NSSs fully conform to RFC 2141 syntax rules for NSSs.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 5]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
Validation mechanism:
As specified in the "Identifier resolution" section above,
DANTE will maintain an index of all GEANT and GEANT workgroup
assigned URNs on its Web site,
http://www.dante.net/urn-geant/urn-geant.html Presence in that
index implies that a given URN is valid. GEANT-affiliated
naming authorities will specify how to validate the URNs they
assign.
Scope:
Global.
3. Security Considerations
There are no additional security considerations beyond those normally
associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general.
4. Namespace Considerations
Registration of an Namespace Identifier (NID) specific to GEANT is
reasonable given the following considerations:
1. GEANT would like to assign URNs to some very fine-grained
objects. This does not seem to be the primary intended use of
the XMLORG namespace (RFC 3120) [3], or the more tightly
controlled OASIS namespace (RFC 3121) [4].
2. GEANT seeks naming autonomy. GEANT is not a member of OASIS, so
becoming a subordinate naming authority under the OASIS URN space
is not an option.
3. GEANT will want to assign URNs to non-XML objects as well. That
is another reason that XMLORG may not be an appropriate higher-
level naming authority for GEANT.
Some GEANT-developed schema and namespaces may be good candidates for
inclusion in the XMLORG or possible future "EU" registry. The fact
that such an object might already have a GEANT-assigned URN shouldn't
be a hindrance. RFC 3406 [5] (which replaced RFC 2611) includes an
explicit statement that two or more URNs may point to the same
resource. A resource with a GEANT-assigned Namespace Specific String
would, of course, be given an XMLORG or EU Namespace Specific String
as it enters the XMLORG or "EU" registry.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 6]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
5. Community Considerations
The assignment and use of identifiers within the namespace are open,
and the related rule is established by DANTE. Registration agencies
(the next level naming authorities) will be the European National
Research and Education Networks and the established organizational
cross-border formations.
It is expected that the majority of the NRENs and all GEANT base
activities make use of the GEANT namespace.
After the establishment of the GEANT namespace, the consortium will,
as soon as practical, establish a resolution service (analogously to
other distributed pan-European services, like EduROAM, PerfSONAR,
etc.) for the namespace clients.
6. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the "geant" NID within the IANA registry of URN
NIDs.
7. Normative References
[1] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
8. Informative References
[2] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.
[3] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for XML.org", RFC 3120,
June 2001.
[4] Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for OASIS", RFC 3121,
June 2001.
[5] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "URN
Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October
2002.
[6] GEANT2 project's Web site, <http://www.geant2.net/>.
[7] DANTE's company Web site, <http://www.dante.net/>.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 7]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
Authors' Addresses
T. Kalin
DANTE
City House
126 - 130 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 1PQ
United Kingdom
EMail: tomaz.kalin@dante.org.uk
Maurizio Molina
DANTE
City House
126 - 130 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 1PQ
United Kingdom
EMail: maurizio.molina@dante.org.uk
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 8]
^L
RFC 4926 A URN Namespace for GEANT July 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Kalin & Molina Informational [Page 9]
^L
|