1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
|
Network Working Group R. Mahy
Request for Comments: 5028 Plantronics
Category: Standards Track October 2007
A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for
Instant Messaging (IM) Services
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document registers a Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) service for
Instant Messaging (IM). Specifically, this document focuses on
provisioning 'im:' URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers) in ENUM.
1. Introduction
ENUM (E.164 Number Mapping, RFC 3761 [1]) is a system that uses DNS
(Domain Name Service, RFC 1034 [2]) to translate telephone numbers,
such as '+12025550100', into URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers, RFC
3986 [3]), such as 'im:user@example.com'. ENUM exists primarily to
facilitate the interconnection of systems that rely on telephone
numbers with those that use URIs to identify resources.
Instant Messaging (IM) is a service defined in RFC 2778 [6] that
allows users to send and receive typically short, often textual
messages in near real-time. The IETF has defined a generic URI used
to identify an IM service for a particular resource: the 'im:' URI
scheme (defined in RFC 3861 [4]). RFC 3861 [4] also defines rules
for discovering service running specific protocols, such as SIP (the
Session Initiation Protocol, RFC 3261 [8]) and XMPP (the eXtensible
Messaging and Presence Protocol, RFC 3921 [9]) from a specific 'im:'
URI.
RFC 3953 [10] already defines an enumservice for presence services,
which returns 'pres:' URIs (also defined in RFC 3861 [4]). This
document registers an enumservice for advertising IM information
associated with an E.164 number.
Mahy Standards Track [Page 1]
^L
RFC 5028 IM Enumservice October 2007
2. ENUM Service Registration - im
As defined in RFC 3761 [1], the following is a template covering
information needed for the registration of the enumservice specified
in this document:
Enumservice Name:
"im"
Enumservice Type:
"im"
Enumservice Subtypes:
N/A
URI scheme(s):
"im:"
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified is an
'im:' URI. The 'im:' URI scheme does not identify any particular
protocol that will be used to handle instant messaging receipt or
delivery, rather the mechanism in RFC 3861 [4] is used to discover
whether an IM protocol supported by the party querying ENUM is
also supported by the target resource.
Security considerations:
See section 3.
Intended usage:
COMMON
Author:
Rohan Mahy (rohan@ekabal.com)
3. Security Considerations
The Domain Name System (DNS) does not make policy decisions about
which records it provides to a DNS resolver. All DNS records must be
assumed to be available to all inquirers at all times. The
information provided within an ENUM record set must therefore be
considered open to the public -- which is a cause for some privacy
considerations.
Revealing an 'im:' URI by itself is unlikely to introduce many
privacy concerns, although, depending on the structure of the URI, it
might reveal the full name or employer of the target. The use of
anonymous URIs mitigates this risk.
As ENUM uses DNS, which in its current form is an insecure protocol,
there is no mechanism for ensuring that the answer returned to a
query is authentic. An analysis of threats specific to the
dependence of ENUM on the DNS is provided in RFC 3761, and a thorough
analysis of threats to the DNS itself is covered in RFC 3833 [11].
Many of these problems are prevented when the resolver verifies the
Mahy Standards Track [Page 2]
^L
RFC 5028 IM Enumservice October 2007
authenticity of answers to its ENUM queries via DNSSEC [5] in zones
where it is available.
More serious security concerns are associated with potential attacks
against an underlying Instant Messaging system (for example, message
forgery and tampering). For this reason, IM protocols have a number
of security requirements (detailed in RFC 2779 [7]) that call for
authentication, integrity and confidentiality properties, and similar
measures to prevent such attacks. Any instant messaging protocol
used in conjunction with the 'im:' URI scheme is required to meet
these requirements.
Unlike a traditional telephone number, the resource identified by an
'im:' URI may require that callers provide cryptographic credentials
for authentication and authorization before instant messages are
exchanged. In concert with instant messaging protocols, ENUM can
actually provide far greater protection from unwanted callers than
does the existing PSTN, despite the public availability of ENUM
records.
4. IANA Considerations
This document requests registration of the "im" Enumservice according
to the definitions in this document and RFC 3761 [1].
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[1] Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform Resource
Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.
[2] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD
13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
[3] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986,
January 2005.
[4] Peterson, J., "Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and
Presence", RFC 3861, August 2004.
[5] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose,
"Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions", RFC
4035, March 2005.
Mahy Standards Track [Page 3]
^L
RFC 5028 IM Enumservice October 2007
5.2. Informative References
[6] Day, M., Rosenberg, J., and H. Sugano, "A Model for Presence
and Instant Messaging", RFC 2778, February 2000.
[7] Day, M., Aggarwal, S., Mohr, G., and J. Vincent, "Instant
Messaging / Presence Protocol Requirements", RFC 2779, February
2000.
[8] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.
[9] Saint-Andre, P., Ed., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC 3921,
October 2004.
[10] Peterson, J., "Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
Registration for Presence Services", RFC 3953, January 2005.
[11] Atkins, D. and R. Austein, "Threat Analysis of the Domain Name
System (DNS)", RFC 3833, August 2004.
Author's Address
Rohan Mahy
Plantronics
EMail: rohan@ekabal.com
Mahy Standards Track [Page 4]
^L
RFC 5028 IM Enumservice October 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Mahy Standards Track [Page 5]
^L
|
