summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/rfc/rfc5263.txt
blob: db6eece1b985785ab265c0b4b48a29ea079dbcd5 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
Network Working Group                                        M. Lonnfors
Request for Comments: 5263                              J. Costa-Requena
Category: Standards Track                                    E. Leppanen
                                                                   Nokia
                                                            H. Khartabil
                                                                Ericsson
                                                          September 2008


            Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for
              Partial Notification of Presence Information

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   By default, presence delivered using the presence event package for
   the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is represented in the Presence
   Information Data Format (PIDF).  A PIDF document contains a set of
   elements, each representing a different aspect of the presence being
   reported.  When any subset of the elements change, even just a single
   element, a new document containing the full set of elements is
   delivered.  This memo defines an extension allowing delivery of only
   the presence data that has actually changed.





















Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 1]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
   2.  Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   3.  Introduction to the Partial Notification Mechanism . . . . . .  3
     3.1.  Basic Presence Agent Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     3.2.  Operation with Partial Notification  . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   4.  Client and Server Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     4.1.  Content-Type for Partial Notifications . . . . . . . . . .  4
     4.2.  Watcher Generation of SUBSCRIBE Requests . . . . . . . . .  4
     4.3.  Presence Agent Processing of SUBSCRIBE Requests  . . . . .  4
     4.4.  Presence Agent Generation of Partial Notifications . . . .  5
     4.5.  Watcher Processing of NOTIFY Requests  . . . . . . . . . .  6
   5.  Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
   7.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
   8.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     8.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
     8.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

1.  Introduction

   A presence event package for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [3]
   allows users ('watchers') to subscribe to other users'
   ('presentities') presence information.  The presence information is
   composed of multiple pieces of data that are delivered to the
   watcher.  The size of the presence information document can be large
   (i.e., the presence document can contain an arbitrary number of
   elements called presence tuples that convey data).  As specified in
   RFC 2778 [9] and the presence event package for SIP [3], a Presence
   Agent (PA) always delivers in presence notifications all the presence
   data that has been authorized for a certain watcher.  This is done
   regardless of what presence data has changed compared to last
   notification.  It may not be reasonable to send the complete presence
   information over low bandwidth and high latency links when only part
   of the presence information has actually changed.  This may end up
   degrading the presence service and causing bad perception at the
   watcher side.

   This document defines a partial notification approach where the
   presence server delivers to the watchers only those parts of the
   presence information that have changed compared to the presence
   information sent in the previous notifications.  This reduces the
   amount of data that is transported over the network.

   This mechanism utilizes the presence event package for SIP [3] and a
   new MIME type for carrying partial Presence Information Data Format
   documents [2].



Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 2]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


2.  Conventions

   In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
   "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
   and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1] and
   indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.

   This document makes use of the vocabulary defined in RFC 2778 [9],
   RFC 3265 [6], the presence event package for SIP [3], and the PIDF
   extension for Partial Presence [2].

3.  Introduction to the Partial Notification Mechanism

   This chapter briefly introduces the regular functionality of the
   presence service, and gives an overview of the partial notification
   solution.  This section is informational in nature.  It does not
   contain any normative statements.

3.1.  Basic Presence Agent Operation

   The presence service normally operates so that a watcher sends a SIP
   SUBSCRIBE request targeted to the presentity.  The request is routed
   to the presence agent where the presentity's presence information is
   stored.  The SUBSCRIBE request can include an Accept header field
   that indicates the supported content types.

   The presence agent receives the SUBSCRIBE request and if there is no
   Accept header indicating the supported content types or the Accept
   header contains the default PIDF content type, the PA will generate
   presence notifications using the default PIDF format [5].  The PIDF
   document can contain one or multiple XML elements.  The PIDF document
   includes a set of elements defined in RFC 2778 [9], and its
   extensions for representing the presence information.  This PIDF
   document will be carried in the body of a NOTIFY request constructed
   as per RFC 3265 [6].  During basic operation, the presence document
   always contains the full state corresponding to the presence status
   of the presentity, as determined by the PA local policy and
   authorization rules.

3.2.  Operation with Partial Notification

   The partial notification mechanism allows a watcher to request that,
   whenever possible, notifications contain only presence information
   that has actually changed.  A watcher that wants to receive partial
   notifications according to this document, creates a SIP SUBSCRIBE
   request similar to that of a regular presence subscription.  However,
   the SIP SUBSCRIBE request contains an Accept header field whose value




Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 3]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


   contains the "application/pidf-diff+xml" tag as well as the
   "application/pidf+xml" tag.

   When the presence agent receives the subscription, it examines the
   Accept header field value and if the "application/pidf-diff+xml"
   value is present, it can decide to use the partial notifications
   mechanism specified in this memo.  The presence agent builds NOTIFY
   requests that contain the Content-Type header field set to
   "application/pidf-diff+xml".  The first NOTIFY request that contains
   presence information will contain a full presence document.
   Subsequent NOTIFY requests can contain partial presence documents.
   This behavior is described in detail in Section 4.

4.  Client and Server Operations

   Unless otherwise specified in this document, the regular watcher and
   presence agent behavior is applied as defined in the SIP presence
   event package [3].

4.1.  Content-Type for Partial Notifications

   Entities supporting the partial notification extension described in
   this document MUST support the 'application/pidf-diff+xml' content
   type specified in the PIDF extension for partial presence [2].

4.2.  Watcher Generation of SUBSCRIBE Requests

   A SUBSCRIBE request can be used to negotiate the preferred content
   type to be used in the notifications.  The Accept header field is
   used for this purpose as specified in RFC 3261 [4].  When a watcher
   wants to allow the presence agent to send partial notifications the
   watcher MUST include an Accept header field in its SUBSCRIBE request.
   The value of the Accept header field MUST contain 'application/
   pidf-diff+xml' (in addition to 'application/pidf+xml' required by the
   SIP presence event package [3]).  The watcher MAY include a "q"
   parameter with each Accept value to indicate the relative preference
   of that value.

4.3.  Presence Agent Processing of SUBSCRIBE Requests

   The presence agent receives subscriptions from watchers and generates
   notifications according to the SIP presence event package [3].  If
   the watcher has indicated the supported content types in the Accept
   header field of the SUBSCRIBE request, the presence agent compares
   the values included in the Accept header field with the supported
   ones, and decides which one to use.  If the watcher has indicated
   preferred accept values by means of "q" parameters, the presence




Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 4]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


   agent SHOULD base the decision on those preferences, unless otherwise
   indicated by the presence agent local policy.

4.4.  Presence Agent Generation of Partial Notifications

   Once a subscription is accepted and installed, the PA MUST deliver
   the full state of the presence information in the first partial
   notification that contains a presence document having <pidf-full>
   root element.  If the presence agent decides to send notifications
   that include a presence document according to this specification, the
   presence agent MUST build a presence document according to the PIDF
   extension for Partial Presence [2] and MUST set the Content-Type
   header field to the value 'application/pidf-diff+xml'.

   When using the 'application/pidf-diff+xml' MIME type, the PA MUST
   include a "version" attribute; for the first partial notification
   (within a given subscription), the PA MUST initialize version to
   value one (1).  This version counter is scoped to the subscription,
   and is incremented by one within each partial notification.  The
   version value is only reset when the given subscription is
   terminated.  It is not reset when the subscription is refreshed.

   When the PA generates a partial presence document, the PA SHOULD
   include only that presence information that has changed compared to
   the previous notifications.  It is up to the PA's local policy to
   determine what is considered as a change to the previous state.

   The PA MUST construct the partial presence document according to the
   following logic:

   o  The PA MUST construct the presence information according to the
      PIDF extension for Partial Presence [2].  All the information that
      has been added to the presence document is listed inside <add>
      elements.  All information that has been removed from the presence
      document is listed inside <remove> elements, and all information
      that has been changed is listed under <replace> elements.

   o  The PA MUST include a "version" attribute in the presence
      document.  The PA MUST increment the version number by one
      compared to the earlier successfully sent presence document in the
      PIDF extension for Partial Presence [2] format to the watcher
      associated with a certain subscription.

   The PA MUST NOT send a new NOTIFY request that contains a partial
   notification for the same Request-URI until it has received a final
   response from the watcher for the previous one or the previous NOTIFY
   request has timed out.




Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 5]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


   When the PA receives a SUBSCRIBE request (refresh or termination)
   within the associated subscription, it SHOULD send a NOTIFY request
   containing the full presence document.

   If the PA has used other than the 'application/pidf-diff+xml' content
   type in notifications within the existing subscription, and changes
   to deliver partial notifications, the PA MUST deliver the full state
   of the presence information containing a presence document having
   <pidf-full> root element as the first partial notification.

4.5.  Watcher Processing of NOTIFY Requests

   Watcher processes all NOTIFY requests that contain 'application/
   pidf+xml' content type as specified in RFC 3856 [3].

   When the watcher receives the first notification containing the
   'application/pidf-diff+xml' MIME body the watcher MUST initialize an
   internal version counter, related to this subscription, to the value
   of the "version" included in the presence document.  This version
   counter is scoped to the subscription.  The watcher MUST also store
   the received full presence document as its local copy.

   When the watcher receives a subsequent 'application/pidf-diff+xml'
   encoded presence document the watcher MUST compare the received
   "version" attribute with the local version counter.  If the watcher
   receives a presence document with the "version" attribute value equal
   or lower than the locally stored version number, it is considered a
   PA failure, and the watcher SHOULD discard the document without
   further processing.  Otherwise, the watcher MUST modify its locally
   stored information according to the following logic:

   o  If the root element of the presence document is <pidf-full>, the
      watcher must replace its local copy of the presence document with
      the presence document received in the 'application/pidf-diff+xml'
      body and set the internal version value to the value of the
      "version" attribute included in the presence document.

   o  If the root element of the presence document is <pidf-diff> and
      the received version number is incremented by one compared with
      the local version counter, the watcher MUST apply the changes to
      its local copy of the full presence document indicated in the
      received 'application/pidf-diff+xml' document as specified in PIDF
      extension for Partial Presence [2].  The watcher MUST increment
      the local version counter by one.







Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 6]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


   o  If the root element of the presence document is <pidf-diff> and
      the received "version" value is higher by more than one compared
      with the locally stored value, the watcher assumes that one or
      more NOTIFYs were lost.  The watcher SHOULD either refresh the
      subscription in order to receive a full presence document or
      terminate the subscription.

   If the watcher encounters a processing error while processing the
   received 'application/pidf-diff+xml' encoded presence document, look
   at Section 5.1 of [8].  In this case, the watcher SHOULD renew the
   subscription.  The watcher MAY also fall back to normal presence
   operations by not inserting 'application/pidf-diff+xml' in a new
   SUBSCRIBE request.  It is hardly reasonable to signal this error to
   the notifier even if the error exists in the notifier process.

   If the PA changes the content type used in notifications within the
   existing subscription, the watcher MUST discard all the previously
   received presence information (except local version counter) from
   that particular presentity and process the new content as specified
   for that content type.  The local version counter MUST NOT be
   discarded because if the PA changes back to 'application/
   pidf-diff+xml', the MIME type version counter will continue to
   increase from the last version value.

5.  Examples

   The following message flow shows an example applying the partial
   notifications mechanism.

   A watcher sends a SUBSCRIBE request declaring support for the default
   presence format ('application/pidf+xml) and for the partial
   notification format ('application/pidf-diff+xml') in the Accept
   header field value.  The watcher uses the "q" parameter to set the
   preference for receiving partial notifications.  The PA accepts the
   subscription and, based on the "q" parameter value, selects to send
   partial notifications in NOTIFY requests.  The first NOTIFY request
   includes the full state of presence information.  The following
   notifications only include information about delta of the presence
   information from the previous NOTIFY requests.












Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 7]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


       Watcher                   Presence Agent                  PUA
            | F1 SUBSCRIBE              |                         |
            |-------------------------->|                         |
            | F2 200 OK                 |                         |
            |<--------------------------|                         |
            | F3 NOTIFY                 |                         |
            |<--------------------------|                         |
            | F4 200 OK                 |                         |
            |-------------------------->|                         |
            |                           |                         |
            |                           |   Update presence       |
            |                           |<----------------------- |
            |                           |                         |
            | F5 NOTIFY                 |                         |
            |<--------------------------|                         |
            | F6 200 OK                 |                         |
            |-------------------------->|                         |

         Message Details

      F1 SUBSCRIBE   watcher->example.com server

            SUBSCRIBE sip:resource@example.com SIP/2.0
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP watcherhost.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
            To: <sip:resource@example.com>
            From: <sip:watcher@example.com> ;tag=xfg9
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            CSeq: 17766 SUBSCRIBE
            Max-Forwards: 70
            Event: presence
            Accept: application/pidf+xml;q=0.3,
              application/pidf-diff+xml;q=1
            Contact: <sip:user@watcherhost.example.com>
            Expires: 3600
            Content-Length: 0















Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 8]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


      The PA accepts the subscription and generates a 200 OK response
      to the SUBSCRIBE request

         F2 200 OK   example.com server ->watcher

            SIP/2.0 200 OK
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP watcherhost.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
              ;received=192.0.2.1
            To: <sip:resource@example.com>;tag=ffd2
            From: <sip:watcher@example.com>;tag=xfg9
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            CSeq: 17766 SUBSCRIBE
            Event: presence
            Expires: 3600
            Contact: <sip:server.example.com>
            Content-Length: 0

      The PA, based on the "q" parameter value in the Accept header
      of the SUBSCRIBE request (F1), decides to use partial
      notifications.  The PA creates the first NOTIFY request that
      includes the full presence document.

         F3 NOTIFY  example.com server -> watcher

            NOTIFY sip:user@watcherhost.example.com SIP/2.0
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP server.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKna998sk
            To: <sip:watcher@example.com>;tag=xfg9
            From: <sip:resource@example.com>;tag=ffd2
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            Event: presence
            Subscription-State: active;expires=3599
            Max-Forwards: 70
            CSeq: 8775 NOTIFY
            Contact: <sip:server.example.com>
            Content-Type: application/pidf-diff+xml
            Content-Length: ...

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <p:pidf-full xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
             xmlns:p="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf-diff"
             xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"
             xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:caps"
             xmlns:cp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"
             xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
             entity="sip:resource@example.com"
             version="1">



Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                     [Page 9]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


       <tuple id="sg89ae">
        <status>
         <basic>open</basic>
        </status>
        <c:servcaps>
         <c:audio>true</c:audio>
         <c:video>false</c:video>
         <c:message>true</c:message>
        </c:servcaps>
         <r:relationship><r:assistant/></r:relationship>
        <contact priority="0.8">tel:09012345678</contact>
       </tuple>

       <tuple id="cg231jcr">
        <status>
         <basic>open</basic>
        </status>
        <contact priority="1.0">im:res@example.com</contact>
       </tuple>

       <tuple id="r1230d">
        <status>
         <basic>closed</basic>
        </status>
        <cp:homepage>http://example.com/~res/</cp:homepage>
        <cp:icon>http://example.com/~res/icon.gif</cp:icon>
        <cp:card>http://example.com/~res/card.vcd</cp:card>
        <contact priority="0.9">sip:resource@example.com</contact>
       </tuple>

       <note xml:lang="en">Full state presence document</note>

       <dm:person id="fdkfj">
         <r:activities>
          <r:on-the-phone/>
          <r:busy/>
         </r:activities>
       </dm:person>













Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 10]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


       <dm:device id="u00b40c7">
         <c:devcaps>
          <c:mobility>
           <c:supported>
            <c:mobile/>
           </c:supported>
          </c:mobility>
         </c:devcaps>
         <dm:deviceID>mac:xxx</dm:deviceID>
       </dm:device>

      </p:pidf-full>

         F4 200 OK watcher -> example.com server

            SIP/2.0 200 OK
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP server.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKna998sk
              ;received=192.0.2.2
            To: <sip:watcher@example.com>;tag=xfg9
            From: <sip:resource@example.com>;tag=ffd2
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            CSeq: 8775 NOTIFY
            Content-Length: 0

            At a later time, the presentity's presence information
            changes.  The PA generates a NOTIFY request
            that includes information about the changes.

      F5 NOTIFY example.com server -> watcher

            NOTIFY sip:user@watcherhost.example.com SIP/2.0
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP server.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKna998sl
            To: <sip:watcher@example.com>;tag=xfg9
            From: <sip:resource@example.com>;tag=ffd2
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            CSeq: 8776 NOTIFY
            Event: presence
            Subscription-State: active;expires=3543
            Max-Forwards: 70
            Contact: <sip:server.example.com>
            Content-Type: application/pidf-diff+xml
            Content-Length: ...







Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 11]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <p:pidf-diff xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
                   xmlns:p="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf-diff"
                   xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"
                   xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
                entity="sip:resource@example.com"
                version="2">

       <p:add sel="presence/note" pos="before"><tuple id="ert4773">
        <status>
         <basic>open</basic>
        </status>
        <contact priority="0.4">mailto:res@example.com</contact>
        <note xml:lang="en">This is a new tuple inserted
              between the last tuple and note element</note>
       </tuple>

       </p:add>

       <p:replace sel="*/tuple[@id='r1230d']/status/basic/text()"
        >open</p:replace>

       <p:remove sel="*/dm:person/r:activities/r:busy"/>

       <p:replace sel="*/tuple[@id='cg231jcr']/contact/@priority"
        >0.7</p:replace>

      </p:pidf-diff>

      F6 200 OK watcher-> example.com server

            SIP/2.0 200 OK
            Via: SIP/2.0/TCP server.example.com;
              branch=z9hG4bKna998sl
             ;received=192.0.2.2
            To: <sip:watcher@example.com>;tag=xfg9
            From: <sip:resource@example.com>;tag=ffd2
            Call-ID: 2010@watcherhost.example.com
            CSeq: 8776 NOTIFY
            Content-Length: 0











Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 12]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


6.  Security Considerations

   This specification relies on the presence event package for SIP [3].
   Partial notifications can reveal information about what has changed
   compared to the previous notification.  This can make it easier for
   an eavesdropper to know what kind of changes are happening in the
   presentity's presence information.  However, the same information can
   be found if the presence event package is used with baseline PIDF
   [5].

   A third party can inject a NOTIFY request with partial state that
   will cause the watcher to think it has missed a partial notification
   and to request a new full presence document.  This is no worse than
   what we have without this extension since a party that could perform
   such action could also send a NOTIFY with Subscription-State:
   terminated and achieve the same effect without knowing about the
   extension.  Partial Notification does not make the situation any
   worse, and the protection mechanisms from the existing system apply
   to preventing this attack against the partial notification mechanism.

   Presence-related security considerations are extensively discussed in
   the presence event package for SIP [3] and all those identified
   security considerations apply to this document as well.  Issues
   described in the presence event package for SIP [3], including
   confidentiality, message integrity and authenticity, outbound
   authentication, replay prevention, Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks
   against thirst parties and DoS attacks against servers all apply here
   without any change.

   It is RECOMMENDED that TLS [7] be used between elements to provide
   hop-by-hop confidentially protection.  Furthermore, S/MIME MAY be
   used for integrity and authenticity of SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests.
   This is described in Section 23 of RFC 3261.

7.  Acknowledgments

   The authors would like to thank Jari Urpalainen, Jyrki Aarnos,
   Jonathan Rosenberg, Dean Willis, Kriztian Kiss, Juha Kalliokulju,
   Miguel Garcia, Anders Kristensen, Yannis Pavlidis, Ben Cambell,
   Robert Sparks, and Tim Moran for their valuable comments.











Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 13]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2]  Lonnfors, M., Khartabil, H., Leppanen, E., and J. Urpalainen,
        "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) Extension for Partial
        Presence", RFC 5262, August 008.

   [3]  Rosenberg, J., "A Presence Event Package for the Session
        Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3856, August 2004.

   [4]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
        Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
        Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.

   [5]  Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, W., and
        J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)",
        RFC 3863, August 2004.

   [6]  Roach, A., "SIP-Specific Event Notification", RFC 3265,
        June 2002.

   [7]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.1",
        RFC 4346, April 2006.

   [8]  Urpalainen, J., "An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch
        Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath)
        Selectors", RFC 5261, September 2008.

8.2.  Informative References

   [9]  Day, M., Rosenberg, J., and H. Sugano, "A Model for Presence and
        Instant Messaging", RFC 2778, February 2000.















Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 14]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


Authors' Addresses

   Mikko Lonnfors
   Nokia
   P.O. Box 321
   Helsinki
   Finland

   Phone: +358 71 8008000
   EMail: mikko.lonnfors@nokia.com


   Jose Costa-Requena
   Nokia
   P.O. Box 321
   Helsinki
   Finland

   Phone: +358 71 8008000
   EMail: jose.costa-requena@nokia.com


   Eva Leppanen
   Nokia
   Lempaala
   Finland

   EMail: eva.leppanen@saunalahti.fi


   Hisham Khartabil
   Ericsson
   Melbourne
   Australia

   Phone: +61 416 108 890
   EMail: hisham.khartabil@gmail.com














Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 15]
^L
RFC 5263                  Partial Notification            September 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.












Lonnfors, et al.            Standards Track                    [Page 16]
^L